All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@intel.com>
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, jmattson@google.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, like.xu.linux@gmail.com,
	kan.liang@linux.intel.com, wei.w.wang@intel.com,
	Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/15] KVM: x86/vmx: Check Arch LBR config when return perf capabilities
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 22:04:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y9RKaEzZ9tSKW1ZB@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221125040604.5051-11-weijiang.yang@intel.com>

On Thu, Nov 24, 2022, Yang Weijiang wrote:
>  	return vmcs_config.cpu_based_2nd_exec_ctrl &
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> index b28be793de29..59bdd9873fb5 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> @@ -2360,6 +2360,10 @@ static void prepare_vmcs02_early(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, struct loaded_vmcs *vmcs0
>  		if (guest_efer != host_efer)
>  			exec_control |= VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_EFER;
>  	}
> +
> +	if (cpu_has_vmx_arch_lbr())
> +		exec_control &= ~VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_LBR_CTL;
> +
>  	vm_entry_controls_set(vmx, exec_control);
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -2374,6 +2378,10 @@ static void prepare_vmcs02_early(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, struct loaded_vmcs *vmcs0
>  		exec_control |= VM_EXIT_LOAD_IA32_EFER;
>  	else
>  		exec_control &= ~VM_EXIT_LOAD_IA32_EFER;
> +
> +	if (cpu_has_vmx_arch_lbr())
> +		exec_control &= ~VM_EXIT_CLEAR_IA32_LBR_CTL;

This is wrong.  If KVM doesn't enumerate suport to L1, then L1's value needs to
be preserved on entry/exit to/from L1<->L2.  I.e. just delete these lines.

>  	vm_exit_controls_set(vmx, exec_control);
>  
>  	/*
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> index 2ab4c33b5008..359da38a19a1 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> @@ -2599,6 +2599,7 @@ static __init int setup_vmcs_config(struct vmcs_config *vmcs_conf,
>  		{ VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_EFER,		VM_EXIT_LOAD_IA32_EFER },
>  		{ VM_ENTRY_LOAD_BNDCFGS,		VM_EXIT_CLEAR_BNDCFGS },
>  		{ VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_RTIT_CTL,		VM_EXIT_CLEAR_IA32_RTIT_CTL },
> +		{ VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_LBR_CTL, 		VM_EXIT_CLEAR_IA32_LBR_CTL },
>  	};
>  
>  	memset(vmcs_conf, 0, sizeof(*vmcs_conf));
> @@ -4794,6 +4795,9 @@ static void vmx_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool init_event)
>  	vpid_sync_context(vmx->vpid);
>  
>  	vmx_update_fb_clear_dis(vcpu, vmx);
> +
> +	if (!init_event && cpu_has_vmx_arch_lbr())
> +		vmcs_write64(GUEST_IA32_LBR_CTL, 0);

This belongs in init_vmcs().

>  }
>  
>  static void vmx_enable_irq_window(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> @@ -6191,6 +6195,10 @@ void dump_vmcs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	    vmentry_ctl & VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL)
>  		pr_err("PerfGlobCtl = 0x%016llx\n",
>  		       vmcs_read64(GUEST_IA32_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL));
> +	if (kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR) &&

Follow every other field and check the VMCS support, not the cap.

> +	    vmentry_ctl & VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_LBR_CTL)
> +		pr_err("ArchLBRCtl = 0x%016llx\n",
> +		       vmcs_read64(GUEST_IA32_LBR_CTL));
>  	if (vmentry_ctl & VM_ENTRY_LOAD_BNDCFGS)
>  		pr_err("BndCfgS = 0x%016llx\n", vmcs_read64(GUEST_BNDCFGS));
>  	pr_err("Interruptibility = %08x  ActivityState = %08x\n",

...

> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
> index a3da84f4ea45..f68c8a53a248 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
> @@ -493,7 +493,8 @@ static inline u8 vmx_get_rvi(void)
>  	 VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_EFER |					\
>  	 VM_ENTRY_LOAD_BNDCFGS |					\
>  	 VM_ENTRY_PT_CONCEAL_PIP |					\
> -	 VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_RTIT_CTL)
> +	 VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_RTIT_CTL |					\
> +	 VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_LBR_CTL)
>  
>  #define __KVM_REQUIRED_VMX_VM_EXIT_CONTROLS				\
>  	(VM_EXIT_SAVE_DEBUG_CONTROLS |					\
> @@ -515,7 +516,8 @@ static inline u8 vmx_get_rvi(void)
>  	       VM_EXIT_LOAD_IA32_EFER |					\
>  	       VM_EXIT_CLEAR_BNDCFGS |					\
>  	       VM_EXIT_PT_CONCEAL_PIP |					\
> -	       VM_EXIT_CLEAR_IA32_RTIT_CTL)
> +	       VM_EXIT_CLEAR_IA32_RTIT_CTL |				\
> +	       VM_EXIT_CLEAR_IA32_LBR_CTL)

Enabling these flags by default is wrong.  KVM will clear LBR_CTL on VM-Exit when
arch LBRs are supported, and AFAICT, never restore the host's values.  And that
will happen regardless of whether or not the guest is using arch LBRs.  I assume
the correct approach is to toggle these fields, but I'll be damned if I can figure
out what the intended behavior of the existing LBR suport is.  I'll follow up in
the cover letter.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-01-27 22:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-25  4:05 [PATCH v2 00/15] Introduce Architectural LBR for vPMU Yang Weijiang
2022-11-25  4:05 ` [PATCH v2 01/15] perf/x86/lbr: Simplify the exposure check for the LBR_INFO registers Yang Weijiang
2022-12-22 10:57   ` Like Xu
2022-12-22 13:29     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-12-22 17:41     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-12-23  2:12       ` Like Xu
2022-12-27 11:58   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Like Xu
2022-11-25  4:05 ` [PATCH v2 02/15] KVM: x86: Report XSS as an MSR to be saved if there are supported features Yang Weijiang
2022-11-25  4:05 ` [PATCH v2 03/15] KVM: x86: Refresh CPUID on writes to MSR_IA32_XSS Yang Weijiang
2023-01-26 19:50   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-30  6:33     ` Yang, Weijiang
2022-11-25  4:05 ` [PATCH v2 04/15] KVM: PMU: disable LBR handling if architectural LBR is available Yang Weijiang
2023-01-27 20:10   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-30  8:10     ` Yang, Weijiang
2022-11-25  4:05 ` [PATCH v2 05/15] KVM: vmx/pmu: Emulate MSR_ARCH_LBR_DEPTH for guest Arch LBR Yang Weijiang
2022-12-22 11:00   ` Like Xu
2022-12-25  4:30     ` Yang, Weijiang
2022-12-22 11:15   ` Like Xu
2023-01-27 20:25   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-30 11:46     ` Yang, Weijiang
2022-11-25  4:05 ` [PATCH v2 06/15] KVM: vmx/pmu: Emulate MSR_ARCH_LBR_CTL " Yang Weijiang
2022-12-22 11:09   ` Like Xu
2022-12-25  4:27     ` Yang, Weijiang
2022-12-22 11:19   ` Like Xu
2022-12-25  4:16     ` Yang, Weijiang
2022-12-22 11:24   ` Like Xu
2022-12-25  4:08     ` Yang, Weijiang
2023-01-27 21:42   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-11-25  4:05 ` [PATCH v2 07/15] KVM: VMX: Support passthrough of architectural LBRs Yang Weijiang
2022-11-25  4:05 ` [PATCH v2 08/15] KVM: x86: Add Arch LBR MSRs to msrs_to_save_all list Yang Weijiang
2023-01-27 21:43   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-30 12:27     ` Yang, Weijiang
2022-11-25  4:05 ` [PATCH v2 09/15] KVM: x86: Refine the matching and clearing logic for supported_xss Yang Weijiang
2023-01-27 21:46   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-30 12:37     ` Yang, Weijiang
2022-11-25  4:05 ` [PATCH v2 10/15] KVM: x86/vmx: Check Arch LBR config when return perf capabilities Yang Weijiang
2022-12-22 11:06   ` Like Xu
2022-12-25  4:28     ` Yang, Weijiang
2023-01-27 22:04   ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2022-11-25  4:06 ` [PATCH v2 11/15] KVM: x86: Add XSAVE Support for Architectural LBR Yang Weijiang
2023-01-27 22:07   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-30 13:13     ` Yang, Weijiang
2022-11-25  4:06 ` [PATCH v2 12/15] KVM: x86/vmx: Disable Arch LBREn bit in #DB and warm reset Yang Weijiang
2022-12-22 11:22   ` Like Xu
2022-12-25  4:12     ` Yang, Weijiang
2023-01-27 22:09   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-30 13:09     ` Yang, Weijiang
2022-11-25  4:06 ` [PATCH v2 13/15] KVM: x86/vmx: Save/Restore guest Arch LBR Ctrl msr at SMM entry/exit Yang Weijiang
2023-01-27 22:11   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-30 12:50     ` Yang, Weijiang
2022-11-25  4:06 ` [PATCH v2 14/15] KVM: x86: Add Arch LBR data MSR access interface Yang Weijiang
2023-01-27 22:13   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-30 12:46     ` Yang, Weijiang
2023-01-30 17:30       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-31 13:14         ` Yang, Weijiang
2023-01-31 16:05           ` Sean Christopherson
2022-11-25  4:06 ` [PATCH v2 15/15] KVM: x86/cpuid: Advertise Arch LBR feature in CPUID Yang Weijiang
2022-12-22 11:03   ` Like Xu
2022-12-25  4:31     ` Yang, Weijiang
2023-01-27 22:15   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-12  1:57 ` [PATCH v2 00/15] Introduce Architectural LBR for vPMU Yang, Weijiang
2023-01-27 22:46 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-30 13:38   ` Yang, Weijiang
2023-06-05  9:50   ` Like Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y9RKaEzZ9tSKW1ZB@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=like.xu.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=like.xu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=weijiang.yang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.