From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> To: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Marian Csontos <mcsontos@redhat.com>, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk-settings: make sure that max_sectors is aligned on "logical_block_size" boundary. (fwd) Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 15:37:46 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <YDSwyrLeiP/fKgZH@T590> (raw) In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.2102221312070.5407@file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com> On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 01:15:32PM -0500, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 15:36:51 -0500 (EST) > From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com> > To: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> > Cc: heinzm@redhat.com, Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@redhat.com>, > Marian Csontos <mcsontos@redhat.com>, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, > dm-devel@redhat.com > Subject: [PATCH] blk-settings: make sure that max_sectors is aligned on > "logical_block_size" boundary. > > We get these I/O errors when we run md-raid1 on the top of dm-integrity on > the top of ramdisk: > device-mapper: integrity: Bio not aligned on 8 sectors: 0xff00, 0xff > device-mapper: integrity: Bio not aligned on 8 sectors: 0xff00, 0xff > device-mapper: integrity: Bio not aligned on 8 sectors: 0xffff, 0x1 > device-mapper: integrity: Bio not aligned on 8 sectors: 0xffff, 0x1 > device-mapper: integrity: Bio not aligned on 8 sectors: 0x8048, 0xff > device-mapper: integrity: Bio not aligned on 8 sectors: 0x8147, 0xff > device-mapper: integrity: Bio not aligned on 8 sectors: 0x8246, 0xff > device-mapper: integrity: Bio not aligned on 8 sectors: 0x8345, 0xbb > > The ramdisk device has logical_block_size 512 and max_sectors 255. The > dm-integrity device uses logical_block_size 4096 and it doesn't affect the > "max_sectors" value - thus, it inherits 255 from the ramdisk. So, we have > a device with max_sectors not aligned on logical_block_size. > > The md-raid device sees that the underlying leg has max_sectors 255 and it > will split the bios on 255-sector boundary, making the bios unaligned on > logical_block_size. > > In order to fix the bug, we round down max_sectors to logical_block_size. > > Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > > --- > block/blk-settings.c | 10 ++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > > Index: linux-2.6/block/blk-settings.c > =================================================================== > --- linux-2.6.orig/block/blk-settings.c 2020-10-29 12:20:46.000000000 +0100 > +++ linux-2.6/block/blk-settings.c 2020-11-19 21:20:18.000000000 +0100 > @@ -591,6 +591,16 @@ int blk_stack_limits(struct queue_limits > ret = -1; > } > > + t->max_sectors = round_down(t->max_sectors, t->logical_block_size / 512); > + if (t->max_sectors < PAGE_SIZE / 512) > + t->max_sectors = PAGE_SIZE / 512; > + t->max_hw_sectors = round_down(t->max_hw_sectors, t->logical_block_size / 512); > + if (t->max_sectors < PAGE_SIZE / 512) if (t->max_hw_sectors < PAGE_SIZE / 512) > + t->max_hw_sectors = PAGE_SIZE / 512; > + t->max_dev_sectors = round_down(t->max_dev_sectors, t->logical_block_size / 512); > + if (t->max_sectors < PAGE_SIZE / 512) if (t->max_dev_sectors < PAGE_SIZE / 512) > + t->max_dev_sectors = PAGE_SIZE / 512; I'd suggest to add a helper(such as, blk_round_down_sectors()) to round_down each one. -- Ming
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> To: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, Marian Csontos <mcsontos@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] blk-settings: make sure that max_sectors is aligned on "logical_block_size" boundary. (fwd) Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 15:37:46 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <YDSwyrLeiP/fKgZH@T590> (raw) In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.2102221312070.5407@file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com> On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 01:15:32PM -0500, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 15:36:51 -0500 (EST) > From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com> > To: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> > Cc: heinzm@redhat.com, Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@redhat.com>, > Marian Csontos <mcsontos@redhat.com>, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, > dm-devel@redhat.com > Subject: [PATCH] blk-settings: make sure that max_sectors is aligned on > "logical_block_size" boundary. > > We get these I/O errors when we run md-raid1 on the top of dm-integrity on > the top of ramdisk: > device-mapper: integrity: Bio not aligned on 8 sectors: 0xff00, 0xff > device-mapper: integrity: Bio not aligned on 8 sectors: 0xff00, 0xff > device-mapper: integrity: Bio not aligned on 8 sectors: 0xffff, 0x1 > device-mapper: integrity: Bio not aligned on 8 sectors: 0xffff, 0x1 > device-mapper: integrity: Bio not aligned on 8 sectors: 0x8048, 0xff > device-mapper: integrity: Bio not aligned on 8 sectors: 0x8147, 0xff > device-mapper: integrity: Bio not aligned on 8 sectors: 0x8246, 0xff > device-mapper: integrity: Bio not aligned on 8 sectors: 0x8345, 0xbb > > The ramdisk device has logical_block_size 512 and max_sectors 255. The > dm-integrity device uses logical_block_size 4096 and it doesn't affect the > "max_sectors" value - thus, it inherits 255 from the ramdisk. So, we have > a device with max_sectors not aligned on logical_block_size. > > The md-raid device sees that the underlying leg has max_sectors 255 and it > will split the bios on 255-sector boundary, making the bios unaligned on > logical_block_size. > > In order to fix the bug, we round down max_sectors to logical_block_size. > > Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > > --- > block/blk-settings.c | 10 ++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > > Index: linux-2.6/block/blk-settings.c > =================================================================== > --- linux-2.6.orig/block/blk-settings.c 2020-10-29 12:20:46.000000000 +0100 > +++ linux-2.6/block/blk-settings.c 2020-11-19 21:20:18.000000000 +0100 > @@ -591,6 +591,16 @@ int blk_stack_limits(struct queue_limits > ret = -1; > } > > + t->max_sectors = round_down(t->max_sectors, t->logical_block_size / 512); > + if (t->max_sectors < PAGE_SIZE / 512) > + t->max_sectors = PAGE_SIZE / 512; > + t->max_hw_sectors = round_down(t->max_hw_sectors, t->logical_block_size / 512); > + if (t->max_sectors < PAGE_SIZE / 512) if (t->max_hw_sectors < PAGE_SIZE / 512) > + t->max_hw_sectors = PAGE_SIZE / 512; > + t->max_dev_sectors = round_down(t->max_dev_sectors, t->logical_block_size / 512); > + if (t->max_sectors < PAGE_SIZE / 512) if (t->max_dev_sectors < PAGE_SIZE / 512) > + t->max_dev_sectors = PAGE_SIZE / 512; I'd suggest to add a helper(such as, blk_round_down_sectors()) to round_down each one. -- Ming -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-23 7:40 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-02-22 18:15 [PATCH] blk-settings: make sure that max_sectors is aligned on "logical_block_size" boundary. (fwd) Mikulas Patocka 2021-02-22 18:15 ` [dm-devel] " Mikulas Patocka 2021-02-23 7:37 ` Ming Lei [this message] 2021-02-23 7:37 ` Ming Lei 2021-02-23 16:28 ` [PATCH v2] blk-settings: make sure that max_sectors is aligned on "logical_block_size" boundary Mikulas Patocka 2021-02-23 16:28 ` [dm-devel] " Mikulas Patocka 2021-02-24 0:39 ` Ming Lei 2021-02-24 0:39 ` [dm-devel] " Ming Lei 2021-02-24 2:26 ` Jens Axboe 2021-02-24 2:26 ` [dm-devel] " Jens Axboe
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=YDSwyrLeiP/fKgZH@T590 \ --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \ --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \ --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \ --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mcsontos@redhat.com \ --cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.