All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Marian Csontos <mcsontos@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH] blk-settings: make sure that max_sectors is aligned on "logical_block_size" boundary. (fwd)
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 13:15:32 -0500 (EST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.2102221312070.5407@file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com> (raw)



---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 15:36:51 -0500 (EST)
From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
To: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: heinzm@redhat.com, Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@redhat.com>,
    Marian Csontos <mcsontos@redhat.com>, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
    dm-devel@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH] blk-settings: make sure that max_sectors is aligned on
    "logical_block_size" boundary.

We get these I/O errors when we run md-raid1 on the top of dm-integrity on 
the top of ramdisk:
device-mapper: integrity: Bio not aligned on 8 sectors: 0xff00, 0xff
device-mapper: integrity: Bio not aligned on 8 sectors: 0xff00, 0xff
device-mapper: integrity: Bio not aligned on 8 sectors: 0xffff, 0x1
device-mapper: integrity: Bio not aligned on 8 sectors: 0xffff, 0x1
device-mapper: integrity: Bio not aligned on 8 sectors: 0x8048, 0xff
device-mapper: integrity: Bio not aligned on 8 sectors: 0x8147, 0xff
device-mapper: integrity: Bio not aligned on 8 sectors: 0x8246, 0xff
device-mapper: integrity: Bio not aligned on 8 sectors: 0x8345, 0xbb

The ramdisk device has logical_block_size 512 and max_sectors 255. The 
dm-integrity device uses logical_block_size 4096 and it doesn't affect the 
"max_sectors" value - thus, it inherits 255 from the ramdisk. So, we have 
a device with max_sectors not aligned on logical_block_size.

The md-raid device sees that the underlying leg has max_sectors 255 and it
will split the bios on 255-sector boundary, making the bios unaligned on
logical_block_size.

In order to fix the bug, we round down max_sectors to logical_block_size.

Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

---
 block/blk-settings.c |   10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

Index: linux-2.6/block/blk-settings.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/block/blk-settings.c	2020-10-29 12:20:46.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6/block/blk-settings.c	2020-11-19 21:20:18.000000000 +0100
@@ -591,6 +591,16 @@ int blk_stack_limits(struct queue_limits
 		ret = -1;
 	}
 
+	t->max_sectors = round_down(t->max_sectors, t->logical_block_size / 512);
+	if (t->max_sectors < PAGE_SIZE / 512)
+		t->max_sectors = PAGE_SIZE / 512;
+	t->max_hw_sectors = round_down(t->max_hw_sectors, t->logical_block_size / 512);
+	if (t->max_sectors < PAGE_SIZE / 512)
+		t->max_hw_sectors = PAGE_SIZE / 512;
+	t->max_dev_sectors = round_down(t->max_dev_sectors, t->logical_block_size / 512);
+	if (t->max_sectors < PAGE_SIZE / 512)
+		t->max_dev_sectors = PAGE_SIZE / 512;
+
 	/* Discard alignment and granularity */
 	if (b->discard_granularity) {
 		alignment = queue_limit_discard_alignment(b, start);


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Marian Csontos <mcsontos@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com
Subject: [dm-devel] [PATCH] blk-settings: make sure that max_sectors is aligned on "logical_block_size" boundary. (fwd)
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 13:15:32 -0500 (EST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.2102221312070.5407@file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com> (raw)



---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 15:36:51 -0500 (EST)
From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
To: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: heinzm@redhat.com, Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@redhat.com>,
    Marian Csontos <mcsontos@redhat.com>, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
    dm-devel@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH] blk-settings: make sure that max_sectors is aligned on
    "logical_block_size" boundary.

We get these I/O errors when we run md-raid1 on the top of dm-integrity on 
the top of ramdisk:
device-mapper: integrity: Bio not aligned on 8 sectors: 0xff00, 0xff
device-mapper: integrity: Bio not aligned on 8 sectors: 0xff00, 0xff
device-mapper: integrity: Bio not aligned on 8 sectors: 0xffff, 0x1
device-mapper: integrity: Bio not aligned on 8 sectors: 0xffff, 0x1
device-mapper: integrity: Bio not aligned on 8 sectors: 0x8048, 0xff
device-mapper: integrity: Bio not aligned on 8 sectors: 0x8147, 0xff
device-mapper: integrity: Bio not aligned on 8 sectors: 0x8246, 0xff
device-mapper: integrity: Bio not aligned on 8 sectors: 0x8345, 0xbb

The ramdisk device has logical_block_size 512 and max_sectors 255. The 
dm-integrity device uses logical_block_size 4096 and it doesn't affect the 
"max_sectors" value - thus, it inherits 255 from the ramdisk. So, we have 
a device with max_sectors not aligned on logical_block_size.

The md-raid device sees that the underlying leg has max_sectors 255 and it
will split the bios on 255-sector boundary, making the bios unaligned on
logical_block_size.

In order to fix the bug, we round down max_sectors to logical_block_size.

Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

---
 block/blk-settings.c |   10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

Index: linux-2.6/block/blk-settings.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/block/blk-settings.c	2020-10-29 12:20:46.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6/block/blk-settings.c	2020-11-19 21:20:18.000000000 +0100
@@ -591,6 +591,16 @@ int blk_stack_limits(struct queue_limits
 		ret = -1;
 	}
 
+	t->max_sectors = round_down(t->max_sectors, t->logical_block_size / 512);
+	if (t->max_sectors < PAGE_SIZE / 512)
+		t->max_sectors = PAGE_SIZE / 512;
+	t->max_hw_sectors = round_down(t->max_hw_sectors, t->logical_block_size / 512);
+	if (t->max_sectors < PAGE_SIZE / 512)
+		t->max_hw_sectors = PAGE_SIZE / 512;
+	t->max_dev_sectors = round_down(t->max_dev_sectors, t->logical_block_size / 512);
+	if (t->max_sectors < PAGE_SIZE / 512)
+		t->max_dev_sectors = PAGE_SIZE / 512;
+
 	/* Discard alignment and granularity */
 	if (b->discard_granularity) {
 		alignment = queue_limit_discard_alignment(b, start);

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel


             reply	other threads:[~2021-02-22 18:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-22 18:15 Mikulas Patocka [this message]
2021-02-22 18:15 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH] blk-settings: make sure that max_sectors is aligned on "logical_block_size" boundary. (fwd) Mikulas Patocka
2021-02-23  7:37 ` Ming Lei
2021-02-23  7:37   ` [dm-devel] " Ming Lei
2021-02-23 16:28   ` [PATCH v2] blk-settings: make sure that max_sectors is aligned on "logical_block_size" boundary Mikulas Patocka
2021-02-23 16:28     ` [dm-devel] " Mikulas Patocka
2021-02-24  0:39     ` Ming Lei
2021-02-24  0:39       ` [dm-devel] " Ming Lei
2021-02-24  2:26     ` Jens Axboe
2021-02-24  2:26       ` [dm-devel] " Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LRH.2.02.2102221312070.5407@file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com \
    --to=mpatocka@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mcsontos@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.