From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Claire Chang <tientzu@chromium.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
mpe@ellerman.id.au, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, jgross@suse.com,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org,
"list@263.net:IOMMU DRIVERS" <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
sstabellini@kernel.org, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
grant.likely@arm.com, xypron.glpk@gmx.de,
Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>,
mingo@kernel.org, bauerman@linux.ibm.com, peterz@infradead.org,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
linux-devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>,
Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com>,
Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>,
bskeggs@redhat.com, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
chris@chris-wilson.co.uk, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
airlied@linux.ie, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, jani.nikula@linux.intel.com,
Jianxiong Gao <jxgao@google.com>,
joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, matthew.auld@intel.com,
rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 05/15] swiotlb: Add a new get_io_tlb_mem getter
Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 11:51:15 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YKvLc9onyqdsINP7@0xbeefdead.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALiNf28ke3c91Y7xaHUgvJePKXqYA7UmsYJV9yaeZc3-4Lzs8Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 02:51:52PM +0800, Claire Chang wrote:
> Still keep this function because directly using dev->dma_io_tlb_mem
> will cause issues for memory allocation for existing devices. The pool
> can't support atomic coherent allocation so we need to distinguish the
> per device pool and the default pool in swiotlb_alloc.
This above should really be rolled in the commit. You can prefix it by
"The reason it was done this way was because directly using .."
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Claire Chang <tientzu@chromium.org>
Cc: heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com,
thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com, peterz@infradead.org,
joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
chris@chris-wilson.co.uk, grant.likely@arm.com, paulus@samba.org,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
mingo@kernel.org, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
sstabellini@kernel.org, Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
bskeggs@redhat.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, matthew.auld@intel.com,
linux-devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
Jianxiong Gao <jxgao@google.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, airlied@linux.ie,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, jani.nikula@linux.intel.com,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
jgross@suse.com, Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>,
"list@263.net:IOMMU DRIVERS" <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com>,
xypron.glpk@gmx.de, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
bauerman@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 05/15] swiotlb: Add a new get_io_tlb_mem getter
Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 11:51:15 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YKvLc9onyqdsINP7@0xbeefdead.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALiNf28ke3c91Y7xaHUgvJePKXqYA7UmsYJV9yaeZc3-4Lzs8Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 02:51:52PM +0800, Claire Chang wrote:
> Still keep this function because directly using dev->dma_io_tlb_mem
> will cause issues for memory allocation for existing devices. The pool
> can't support atomic coherent allocation so we need to distinguish the
> per device pool and the default pool in swiotlb_alloc.
This above should really be rolled in the commit. You can prefix it by
"The reason it was done this way was because directly using .."
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Claire Chang <tientzu@chromium.org>
Cc: heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com,
thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com, peterz@infradead.org,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, chris@chris-wilson.co.uk,
grant.likely@arm.com, paulus@samba.org,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
mingo@kernel.org, sstabellini@kernel.org,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
mpe@ellerman.id.au,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
bskeggs@redhat.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, matthew.auld@intel.com,
linux-devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
Jianxiong Gao <jxgao@google.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, airlied@linux.ie,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, jani.nikula@linux.intel.com,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
jgross@suse.com, Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"list@263.net:IOMMU DRIVERS" <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com>,
xypron.glpk@gmx.de, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
bauerman@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 05/15] swiotlb: Add a new get_io_tlb_mem getter
Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 11:51:15 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YKvLc9onyqdsINP7@0xbeefdead.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALiNf28ke3c91Y7xaHUgvJePKXqYA7UmsYJV9yaeZc3-4Lzs8Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 02:51:52PM +0800, Claire Chang wrote:
> Still keep this function because directly using dev->dma_io_tlb_mem
> will cause issues for memory allocation for existing devices. The pool
> can't support atomic coherent allocation so we need to distinguish the
> per device pool and the default pool in swiotlb_alloc.
This above should really be rolled in the commit. You can prefix it by
"The reason it was done this way was because directly using .."
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Claire Chang <tientzu@chromium.org>
Cc: heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com,
thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com, peterz@infradead.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, chris@chris-wilson.co.uk,
grant.likely@arm.com, paulus@samba.org,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
mingo@kernel.org, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
sstabellini@kernel.org, Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
mpe@ellerman.id.au, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
bskeggs@redhat.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, matthew.auld@intel.com,
linux-devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
Jianxiong Gao <jxgao@google.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
airlied@linux.ie, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
jgross@suse.com, Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>,
"list@263.net:IOMMU DRIVERS" <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com>,
xypron.glpk@gmx.de, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
bauerman@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 05/15] swiotlb: Add a new get_io_tlb_mem getter
Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 11:51:15 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YKvLc9onyqdsINP7@0xbeefdead.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALiNf28ke3c91Y7xaHUgvJePKXqYA7UmsYJV9yaeZc3-4Lzs8Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 02:51:52PM +0800, Claire Chang wrote:
> Still keep this function because directly using dev->dma_io_tlb_mem
> will cause issues for memory allocation for existing devices. The pool
> can't support atomic coherent allocation so we need to distinguish the
> per device pool and the default pool in swiotlb_alloc.
This above should really be rolled in the commit. You can prefix it by
"The reason it was done this way was because directly using .."
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Claire Chang <tientzu@chromium.org>
Cc: heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com,
thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com, peterz@infradead.org,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
chris@chris-wilson.co.uk, grant.likely@arm.com, paulus@samba.org,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
mingo@kernel.org, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
sstabellini@kernel.org, Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
mpe@ellerman.id.au, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
bskeggs@redhat.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, matthew.auld@intel.com,
linux-devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
Jianxiong Gao <jxgao@google.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
airlied@linux.ie, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
jgross@suse.com, Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>,
"list@263.net:IOMMU DRIVERS" <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com>,
xypron.glpk@gmx.de, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
bauerman@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 05/15] swiotlb: Add a new get_io_tlb_mem getter
Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 11:51:15 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YKvLc9onyqdsINP7@0xbeefdead.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALiNf28ke3c91Y7xaHUgvJePKXqYA7UmsYJV9yaeZc3-4Lzs8Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 02:51:52PM +0800, Claire Chang wrote:
> Still keep this function because directly using dev->dma_io_tlb_mem
> will cause issues for memory allocation for existing devices. The pool
> can't support atomic coherent allocation so we need to distinguish the
> per device pool and the default pool in swiotlb_alloc.
This above should really be rolled in the commit. You can prefix it by
"The reason it was done this way was because directly using .."
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-24 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 265+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-18 6:42 [PATCH v7 00/15] Restricted DMA Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [PATCH v7 01/15] swiotlb: Refactor swiotlb init functions Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-19 18:50 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 18:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 18:50 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 18:50 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 18:50 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-20 6:40 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-20 6:40 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-20 6:40 ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-05-20 6:40 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-20 6:40 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-20 6:40 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-24 15:53 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2021-05-24 15:53 ` [Intel-gfx] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2021-05-24 15:53 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2021-05-24 15:53 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2021-05-24 15:53 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2021-05-25 3:08 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-25 3:08 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-25 3:08 ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-05-25 3:08 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-25 3:08 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-25 3:08 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-27 13:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-27 13:02 ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-27 13:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-27 13:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-27 14:41 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-05-27 14:41 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tom Lendacky
2021-05-27 14:41 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-05-27 14:41 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-05-27 14:41 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-05-27 16:32 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-05-27 16:32 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tom Lendacky
2021-05-27 16:32 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-05-27 16:32 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-05-27 16:32 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-05-31 15:00 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-31 15:00 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-31 15:00 ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-05-31 15:00 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-31 15:00 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-31 15:00 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [PATCH v7 02/15] swiotlb: Refactor swiotlb_create_debugfs Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-19 19:24 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 19:24 ` [Intel-gfx] " Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 19:24 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 19:24 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 19:24 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-27 13:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-27 13:24 ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-27 13:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-27 13:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [PATCH v7 03/15] swiotlb: Add DMA_RESTRICTED_POOL Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-19 19:00 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 19:00 ` [Intel-gfx] " Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 19:00 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 19:00 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 19:00 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-27 13:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-27 13:25 ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-27 13:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-27 13:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [PATCH v7 04/15] swiotlb: Add restricted DMA pool initialization Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:48 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:48 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:48 ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:48 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:48 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:48 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-24 15:49 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2021-05-24 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2021-05-24 15:49 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2021-05-24 15:49 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2021-05-24 15:49 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2021-05-25 3:08 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-25 3:08 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-25 3:08 ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-05-25 3:08 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-25 3:08 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-25 3:08 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-27 13:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-27 13:27 ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-27 13:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-27 13:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-19 18:54 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 18:54 ` [Intel-gfx] " Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 18:54 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 18:54 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 18:54 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-20 6:39 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-20 6:39 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-20 6:39 ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-05-20 6:39 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-20 6:39 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-20 6:39 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-27 13:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-27 13:27 ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-27 13:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-27 13:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [PATCH v7 05/15] swiotlb: Add a new get_io_tlb_mem getter Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:51 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:51 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:51 ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:51 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:51 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:51 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-24 15:51 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2021-05-24 15:51 ` [Intel-gfx] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2021-05-24 15:51 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2021-05-24 15:51 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2021-05-24 15:51 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2021-05-25 3:08 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-25 3:08 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-25 3:08 ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-05-25 3:08 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-25 3:08 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-25 3:08 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-19 19:18 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 19:18 ` [Intel-gfx] " Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 19:18 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 19:18 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 19:18 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [PATCH v7 06/15] swiotlb: Update is_swiotlb_buffer to add a struct device argument Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-19 19:19 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 19:19 ` [Intel-gfx] " Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 19:19 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 19:19 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 19:19 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [PATCH v7 07/15] swiotlb: Update is_swiotlb_active " Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-19 19:20 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 19:20 ` [Intel-gfx] " Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 19:20 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 19:20 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 19:20 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-27 13:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-27 13:28 ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-27 13:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-27 13:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [PATCH v7 08/15] swiotlb: Bounce data from/to restricted DMA pool if available Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [PATCH v7 09/15] swiotlb: Move alloc_size to find_slots Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [PATCH v7 10/15] swiotlb: Refactor swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [PATCH v7 11/15] dma-direct: Add a new wrapper __dma_direct_free_pages() Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-19 18:59 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 18:59 ` [Intel-gfx] " Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 18:59 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 18:59 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 18:59 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [PATCH v7 12/15] swiotlb: Add restricted DMA alloc/free support Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [PATCH v7 13/15] dma-direct: Allocate memory from restricted DMA pool if available Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-27 13:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-27 13:30 ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-27 13:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-27 13:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [PATCH v7 14/15] dt-bindings: of: Add restricted DMA pool Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-26 12:13 ` Will Deacon
2021-05-26 12:13 ` [Intel-gfx] " Will Deacon
2021-05-26 12:13 ` Will Deacon
2021-05-26 12:13 ` Will Deacon
2021-05-26 12:13 ` Will Deacon
2021-05-26 15:53 ` Will Deacon
2021-05-26 15:53 ` [Intel-gfx] " Will Deacon
2021-05-26 15:53 ` Will Deacon
2021-05-26 15:53 ` Will Deacon
2021-05-26 15:53 ` Will Deacon
2021-05-27 11:29 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-27 11:29 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-27 11:29 ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-05-27 11:29 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-27 11:29 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-27 11:29 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-27 11:34 ` Will Deacon
2021-05-27 11:34 ` [Intel-gfx] " Will Deacon
2021-05-27 11:34 ` Will Deacon
2021-05-27 11:34 ` Will Deacon
2021-05-27 11:34 ` Will Deacon
2021-05-27 12:48 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-27 12:48 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-27 12:48 ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-05-27 12:48 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-27 12:48 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-27 12:48 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-27 12:53 ` Will Deacon
2021-05-27 12:53 ` [Intel-gfx] " Will Deacon
2021-05-27 12:53 ` Will Deacon
2021-05-27 12:53 ` Will Deacon
2021-05-27 12:53 ` Will Deacon
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [PATCH v7 15/15] of: Add plumbing for " Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:53 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Restricted DMA (rev3) Patchwork
2021-05-18 6:56 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-05-18 7:29 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-05-18 9:10 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-05-27 13:00 ` [PATCH v7 00/15] Restricted DMA Claire Chang
2021-05-27 13:00 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-27 13:00 ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-05-27 13:00 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-27 13:00 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-27 13:00 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-27 13:54 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for Restricted DMA (rev4) Patchwork
2021-06-01 19:42 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for Restricted DMA (rev5) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YKvLc9onyqdsINP7@0xbeefdead.lan \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bauerman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=bskeggs@redhat.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=drinkcat@chromium.org \
--cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=grant.likely@arm.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=james.quinlan@broadcom.com \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=jxgao@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=tfiga@chromium.org \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tientzu@chromium.org \
--cc=treding@nvidia.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
--cc=xypron.glpk@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.