From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Cc: Claire Chang <tientzu@chromium.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
mpe@ellerman.id.au, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, jgross@suse.com,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org,
"list@263.net:IOMMU DRIVERS" <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
sstabellini@kernel.org, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
grant.likely@arm.com, xypron.glpk@gmx.de,
Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>,
mingo@kernel.org, bauerman@linux.ibm.com, peterz@infradead.org,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
linux-devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>,
Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com>,
tfiga@chromium.org, bskeggs@redhat.com, bhelgaas@google.com,
chris@chris-wilson.co.uk, daniel@ffwll.ch, airlied@linux.ie,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
jani.nikula@linux.intel.com, jxgao@google.com,
joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, matthew.auld@intel.com,
rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 01/15] swiotlb: Refactor swiotlb init functions
Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 09:41:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bab261b4-f801-05af-8fd9-c440ed219591@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210527130211.GA24344@lst.de>
On 5/27/21 8:02 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 11:50:07AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> You convert this call site with swiotlb_init_io_tlb_mem() which did not
>> do the set_memory_decrypted()+memset(). Is this okay or should
>> swiotlb_init_io_tlb_mem() add an additional argument to do this
>> conditionally?
>
> The zeroing is useful and was missing before. I think having a clean
> state here is the right thing.
>
> Not sure about the set_memory_decrypted, swiotlb_update_mem_attributes
> kinda suggests it is too early to set the memory decrupted.
>
> Adding Tom who should now about all this.
The reason for adding swiotlb_update_mem_attributes() was because having
the call to set_memory_decrypted() in swiotlb_init_with_tbl() triggered a
BUG_ON() related to interrupts not being enabled yet during boot. So that
call had to be delayed until interrupts were enabled.
Thanks,
Tom
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Cc: heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com,
thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com, peterz@infradead.org,
joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
chris@chris-wilson.co.uk, grant.likely@arm.com, paulus@samba.org,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
mingo@kernel.org, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
sstabellini@kernel.org, Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
xypron.glpk@gmx.de, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
bskeggs@redhat.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, matthew.auld@intel.com,
linux-devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
jxgao@google.com, daniel@ffwll.ch, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, airlied@linux.ie,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, jani.nikula@linux.intel.com,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, bhelgaas@google.com,
Claire Chang <tientzu@chromium.org>,
boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
jgross@suse.com, Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
tfiga@chromium.org,
"list@263.net:IOMMU DRIVERS" <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
bauerman@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 01/15] swiotlb: Refactor swiotlb init functions
Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 09:41:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bab261b4-f801-05af-8fd9-c440ed219591@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210527130211.GA24344@lst.de>
On 5/27/21 8:02 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 11:50:07AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> You convert this call site with swiotlb_init_io_tlb_mem() which did not
>> do the set_memory_decrypted()+memset(). Is this okay or should
>> swiotlb_init_io_tlb_mem() add an additional argument to do this
>> conditionally?
>
> The zeroing is useful and was missing before. I think having a clean
> state here is the right thing.
>
> Not sure about the set_memory_decrypted, swiotlb_update_mem_attributes
> kinda suggests it is too early to set the memory decrupted.
>
> Adding Tom who should now about all this.
The reason for adding swiotlb_update_mem_attributes() was because having
the call to set_memory_decrypted() in swiotlb_init_with_tbl() triggered a
BUG_ON() related to interrupts not being enabled yet during boot. So that
call had to be delayed until interrupts were enabled.
Thanks,
Tom
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Cc: heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com,
thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com, peterz@infradead.org,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, chris@chris-wilson.co.uk,
grant.likely@arm.com, paulus@samba.org,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
mingo@kernel.org, sstabellini@kernel.org,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
xypron.glpk@gmx.de,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
bskeggs@redhat.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, matthew.auld@intel.com,
linux-devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
jxgao@google.com, daniel@ffwll.ch, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, airlied@linux.ie,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, jani.nikula@linux.intel.com,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, bhelgaas@google.com,
Claire Chang <tientzu@chromium.org>,
boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
jgross@suse.com, Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"list@263.net:IOMMU DRIVERS" <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com>,
mpe@ellerman.id.au, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
bauerman@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 01/15] swiotlb: Refactor swiotlb init functions
Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 09:41:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bab261b4-f801-05af-8fd9-c440ed219591@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210527130211.GA24344@lst.de>
On 5/27/21 8:02 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 11:50:07AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> You convert this call site with swiotlb_init_io_tlb_mem() which did not
>> do the set_memory_decrypted()+memset(). Is this okay or should
>> swiotlb_init_io_tlb_mem() add an additional argument to do this
>> conditionally?
>
> The zeroing is useful and was missing before. I think having a clean
> state here is the right thing.
>
> Not sure about the set_memory_decrypted, swiotlb_update_mem_attributes
> kinda suggests it is too early to set the memory decrupted.
>
> Adding Tom who should now about all this.
The reason for adding swiotlb_update_mem_attributes() was because having
the call to set_memory_decrypted() in swiotlb_init_with_tbl() triggered a
BUG_ON() related to interrupts not being enabled yet during boot. So that
call had to be delayed until interrupts were enabled.
Thanks,
Tom
>
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Cc: heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com,
thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com, peterz@infradead.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, chris@chris-wilson.co.uk,
grant.likely@arm.com, paulus@samba.org,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
mingo@kernel.org, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
sstabellini@kernel.org, Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
xypron.glpk@gmx.de, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
bskeggs@redhat.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, matthew.auld@intel.com,
linux-devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
jxgao@google.com, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
airlied@linux.ie, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, bhelgaas@google.com,
Claire Chang <tientzu@chromium.org>,
boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
jgross@suse.com, Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
tfiga@chromium.org,
"list@263.net:IOMMU DRIVERS" <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com>,
mpe@ellerman.id.au, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
bauerman@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 01/15] swiotlb: Refactor swiotlb init functions
Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 09:41:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bab261b4-f801-05af-8fd9-c440ed219591@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210527130211.GA24344@lst.de>
On 5/27/21 8:02 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 11:50:07AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> You convert this call site with swiotlb_init_io_tlb_mem() which did not
>> do the set_memory_decrypted()+memset(). Is this okay or should
>> swiotlb_init_io_tlb_mem() add an additional argument to do this
>> conditionally?
>
> The zeroing is useful and was missing before. I think having a clean
> state here is the right thing.
>
> Not sure about the set_memory_decrypted, swiotlb_update_mem_attributes
> kinda suggests it is too early to set the memory decrupted.
>
> Adding Tom who should now about all this.
The reason for adding swiotlb_update_mem_attributes() was because having
the call to set_memory_decrypted() in swiotlb_init_with_tbl() triggered a
BUG_ON() related to interrupts not being enabled yet during boot. So that
call had to be delayed until interrupts were enabled.
Thanks,
Tom
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Cc: heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com,
thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com, peterz@infradead.org,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
chris@chris-wilson.co.uk, grant.likely@arm.com, paulus@samba.org,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
mingo@kernel.org, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
sstabellini@kernel.org, Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
xypron.glpk@gmx.de, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
bskeggs@redhat.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, matthew.auld@intel.com,
linux-devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
jxgao@google.com, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
airlied@linux.ie, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
bhelgaas@google.com, Claire Chang <tientzu@chromium.org>,
boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
jgross@suse.com, Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
tfiga@chromium.org,
"list@263.net:IOMMU DRIVERS" <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com>,
mpe@ellerman.id.au, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
bauerman@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 01/15] swiotlb: Refactor swiotlb init functions
Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 09:41:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bab261b4-f801-05af-8fd9-c440ed219591@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210527130211.GA24344@lst.de>
On 5/27/21 8:02 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 11:50:07AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> You convert this call site with swiotlb_init_io_tlb_mem() which did not
>> do the set_memory_decrypted()+memset(). Is this okay or should
>> swiotlb_init_io_tlb_mem() add an additional argument to do this
>> conditionally?
>
> The zeroing is useful and was missing before. I think having a clean
> state here is the right thing.
>
> Not sure about the set_memory_decrypted, swiotlb_update_mem_attributes
> kinda suggests it is too early to set the memory decrupted.
>
> Adding Tom who should now about all this.
The reason for adding swiotlb_update_mem_attributes() was because having
the call to set_memory_decrypted() in swiotlb_init_with_tbl() triggered a
BUG_ON() related to interrupts not being enabled yet during boot. So that
call had to be delayed until interrupts were enabled.
Thanks,
Tom
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-27 14:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 265+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-18 6:42 [PATCH v7 00/15] Restricted DMA Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [PATCH v7 01/15] swiotlb: Refactor swiotlb init functions Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-19 18:50 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 18:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 18:50 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 18:50 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 18:50 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-20 6:40 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-20 6:40 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-20 6:40 ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-05-20 6:40 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-20 6:40 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-20 6:40 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-24 15:53 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2021-05-24 15:53 ` [Intel-gfx] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2021-05-24 15:53 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2021-05-24 15:53 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2021-05-24 15:53 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2021-05-25 3:08 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-25 3:08 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-25 3:08 ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-05-25 3:08 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-25 3:08 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-25 3:08 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-27 13:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-27 13:02 ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-27 13:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-27 13:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-27 14:41 ` Tom Lendacky [this message]
2021-05-27 14:41 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tom Lendacky
2021-05-27 14:41 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-05-27 14:41 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-05-27 14:41 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-05-27 16:32 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-05-27 16:32 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tom Lendacky
2021-05-27 16:32 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-05-27 16:32 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-05-27 16:32 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-05-31 15:00 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-31 15:00 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-31 15:00 ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-05-31 15:00 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-31 15:00 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-31 15:00 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [PATCH v7 02/15] swiotlb: Refactor swiotlb_create_debugfs Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-19 19:24 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 19:24 ` [Intel-gfx] " Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 19:24 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 19:24 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 19:24 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-27 13:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-27 13:24 ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-27 13:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-27 13:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [PATCH v7 03/15] swiotlb: Add DMA_RESTRICTED_POOL Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-19 19:00 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 19:00 ` [Intel-gfx] " Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 19:00 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 19:00 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 19:00 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-27 13:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-27 13:25 ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-27 13:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-27 13:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [PATCH v7 04/15] swiotlb: Add restricted DMA pool initialization Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:48 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:48 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:48 ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:48 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:48 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:48 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-24 15:49 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2021-05-24 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2021-05-24 15:49 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2021-05-24 15:49 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2021-05-24 15:49 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2021-05-25 3:08 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-25 3:08 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-25 3:08 ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-05-25 3:08 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-25 3:08 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-25 3:08 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-27 13:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-27 13:27 ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-27 13:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-27 13:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-19 18:54 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 18:54 ` [Intel-gfx] " Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 18:54 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 18:54 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 18:54 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-20 6:39 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-20 6:39 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-20 6:39 ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-05-20 6:39 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-20 6:39 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-20 6:39 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-27 13:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-27 13:27 ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-27 13:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-27 13:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [PATCH v7 05/15] swiotlb: Add a new get_io_tlb_mem getter Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:51 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:51 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:51 ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:51 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:51 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:51 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-24 15:51 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2021-05-24 15:51 ` [Intel-gfx] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2021-05-24 15:51 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2021-05-24 15:51 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2021-05-24 15:51 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2021-05-25 3:08 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-25 3:08 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-25 3:08 ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-05-25 3:08 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-25 3:08 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-25 3:08 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-19 19:18 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 19:18 ` [Intel-gfx] " Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 19:18 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 19:18 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 19:18 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [PATCH v7 06/15] swiotlb: Update is_swiotlb_buffer to add a struct device argument Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-19 19:19 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 19:19 ` [Intel-gfx] " Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 19:19 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 19:19 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 19:19 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [PATCH v7 07/15] swiotlb: Update is_swiotlb_active " Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-19 19:20 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 19:20 ` [Intel-gfx] " Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 19:20 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 19:20 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 19:20 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-27 13:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-27 13:28 ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-27 13:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-27 13:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [PATCH v7 08/15] swiotlb: Bounce data from/to restricted DMA pool if available Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [PATCH v7 09/15] swiotlb: Move alloc_size to find_slots Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [PATCH v7 10/15] swiotlb: Refactor swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [PATCH v7 11/15] dma-direct: Add a new wrapper __dma_direct_free_pages() Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-19 18:59 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 18:59 ` [Intel-gfx] " Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 18:59 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 18:59 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-19 18:59 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [PATCH v7 12/15] swiotlb: Add restricted DMA alloc/free support Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [PATCH v7 13/15] dma-direct: Allocate memory from restricted DMA pool if available Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-27 13:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-27 13:30 ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-27 13:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-27 13:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [PATCH v7 14/15] dt-bindings: of: Add restricted DMA pool Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-26 12:13 ` Will Deacon
2021-05-26 12:13 ` [Intel-gfx] " Will Deacon
2021-05-26 12:13 ` Will Deacon
2021-05-26 12:13 ` Will Deacon
2021-05-26 12:13 ` Will Deacon
2021-05-26 15:53 ` Will Deacon
2021-05-26 15:53 ` [Intel-gfx] " Will Deacon
2021-05-26 15:53 ` Will Deacon
2021-05-26 15:53 ` Will Deacon
2021-05-26 15:53 ` Will Deacon
2021-05-27 11:29 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-27 11:29 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-27 11:29 ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-05-27 11:29 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-27 11:29 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-27 11:29 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-27 11:34 ` Will Deacon
2021-05-27 11:34 ` [Intel-gfx] " Will Deacon
2021-05-27 11:34 ` Will Deacon
2021-05-27 11:34 ` Will Deacon
2021-05-27 11:34 ` Will Deacon
2021-05-27 12:48 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-27 12:48 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-27 12:48 ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-05-27 12:48 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-27 12:48 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-27 12:48 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-27 12:53 ` Will Deacon
2021-05-27 12:53 ` [Intel-gfx] " Will Deacon
2021-05-27 12:53 ` Will Deacon
2021-05-27 12:53 ` Will Deacon
2021-05-27 12:53 ` Will Deacon
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [PATCH v7 15/15] of: Add plumbing for " Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:42 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-18 6:53 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Restricted DMA (rev3) Patchwork
2021-05-18 6:56 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-05-18 7:29 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-05-18 9:10 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-05-27 13:00 ` [PATCH v7 00/15] Restricted DMA Claire Chang
2021-05-27 13:00 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-27 13:00 ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-05-27 13:00 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-27 13:00 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-27 13:00 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-27 13:54 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for Restricted DMA (rev4) Patchwork
2021-06-01 19:42 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for Restricted DMA (rev5) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bab261b4-f801-05af-8fd9-c440ed219591@amd.com \
--to=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bauerman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=bskeggs@redhat.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=drinkcat@chromium.org \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=grant.likely@arm.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=james.quinlan@broadcom.com \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=jxgao@google.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=tfiga@chromium.org \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tientzu@chromium.org \
--cc=treding@nvidia.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
--cc=xypron.glpk@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.