All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: james.morse@arm.com, alexandru.elisei@arm.com,
	suzuki.poulose@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	ardb@kernel.org, qwandor@google.com, tabba@google.com,
	dbrazdil@google.com, kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/14] KVM: arm64: Don't overwrite ignored bits with owner id
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 14:39:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YPWAeTJMWJ+A7W2c@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87im16jwe6.wl-maz@kernel.org>

On Monday 19 Jul 2021 at 13:55:29 (+0100), Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Jul 2021 11:47:26 +0100,
> Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com> wrote:
> > 
> > The nVHE protected mode uses invalid mappings in the host stage-2
> > page-table to track the owner of each page in the system. In order to
> > allow the usage of ignored bits (a.k.a. software bits) in these
> > mappings, move the owner encoding away from the top bits.
> 
> But that's exactly what the current situation is allowing: the use of
> the SW bits. I am guessing that what you really mean is that you want
> to *preserve* the SW bits from an existing mapping and use other bits
> when the mapping is invalid?

Yes, this is really just forward looking, but I think it might be useful
to allow annotating invalid mappings with both an owner id _and_
additional flags for e.g. shared pages and such. And using bits [58-55]
to store those flags just like we do for valid mappings should make
things easier, but no big deal.

I see how this is going to conflict with kvm_pgtable_stage2_annotate()
from your series though, so maybe I should just drop this patch and
leave the encoding 'issue' to the caller -- the rest of the series
doesn't depend on this anyway, this was just small cleanup.

Thanks,
Quentin

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: kernel-team@android.com, qwandor@google.com, will@kernel.org,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/14] KVM: arm64: Don't overwrite ignored bits with owner id
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 14:39:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YPWAeTJMWJ+A7W2c@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87im16jwe6.wl-maz@kernel.org>

On Monday 19 Jul 2021 at 13:55:29 (+0100), Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Jul 2021 11:47:26 +0100,
> Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com> wrote:
> > 
> > The nVHE protected mode uses invalid mappings in the host stage-2
> > page-table to track the owner of each page in the system. In order to
> > allow the usage of ignored bits (a.k.a. software bits) in these
> > mappings, move the owner encoding away from the top bits.
> 
> But that's exactly what the current situation is allowing: the use of
> the SW bits. I am guessing that what you really mean is that you want
> to *preserve* the SW bits from an existing mapping and use other bits
> when the mapping is invalid?

Yes, this is really just forward looking, but I think it might be useful
to allow annotating invalid mappings with both an owner id _and_
additional flags for e.g. shared pages and such. And using bits [58-55]
to store those flags just like we do for valid mappings should make
things easier, but no big deal.

I see how this is going to conflict with kvm_pgtable_stage2_annotate()
from your series though, so maybe I should just drop this patch and
leave the encoding 'issue' to the caller -- the rest of the series
doesn't depend on this anyway, this was just small cleanup.

Thanks,
Quentin
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: james.morse@arm.com, alexandru.elisei@arm.com,
	suzuki.poulose@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	ardb@kernel.org, qwandor@google.com, tabba@google.com,
	dbrazdil@google.com, kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/14] KVM: arm64: Don't overwrite ignored bits with owner id
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 14:39:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YPWAeTJMWJ+A7W2c@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87im16jwe6.wl-maz@kernel.org>

On Monday 19 Jul 2021 at 13:55:29 (+0100), Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Jul 2021 11:47:26 +0100,
> Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com> wrote:
> > 
> > The nVHE protected mode uses invalid mappings in the host stage-2
> > page-table to track the owner of each page in the system. In order to
> > allow the usage of ignored bits (a.k.a. software bits) in these
> > mappings, move the owner encoding away from the top bits.
> 
> But that's exactly what the current situation is allowing: the use of
> the SW bits. I am guessing that what you really mean is that you want
> to *preserve* the SW bits from an existing mapping and use other bits
> when the mapping is invalid?

Yes, this is really just forward looking, but I think it might be useful
to allow annotating invalid mappings with both an owner id _and_
additional flags for e.g. shared pages and such. And using bits [58-55]
to store those flags just like we do for valid mappings should make
things easier, but no big deal.

I see how this is going to conflict with kvm_pgtable_stage2_annotate()
from your series though, so maybe I should just drop this patch and
leave the encoding 'issue' to the caller -- the rest of the series
doesn't depend on this anyway, this was just small cleanup.

Thanks,
Quentin

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-19 13:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 126+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-19 10:47 [PATCH 00/14] Track shared pages at EL2 in protected mode Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 10:47 ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 10:47 ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 10:47 ` [PATCH 01/14] KVM: arm64: Provide the host_stage2_try() helper macro Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 10:47   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 10:47   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 13:57   ` Fuad Tabba
2021-07-20 13:57     ` Fuad Tabba
2021-07-20 13:57     ` Fuad Tabba
2021-07-19 10:47 ` [PATCH 02/14] KVM: arm64: Optimize kvm_pgtable_stage2_find_range() Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 10:47   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 10:47   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 10:47 ` [PATCH 03/14] KVM: arm64: Continue stage-2 map when re-creating mappings Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 10:47   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 10:47   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 12:14   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-19 12:14     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-19 12:14     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-19 13:32     ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 13:32       ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 13:32       ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20  8:26       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-20  8:26         ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-20  8:26         ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-20 11:56         ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 11:56           ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 11:56           ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 10:47 ` [PATCH 04/14] KVM: arm64: Rename KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_S2_IGNORED Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 10:47   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 10:47   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 10:47 ` [PATCH 05/14] KVM: arm64: Don't overwrite ignored bits with owner id Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 10:47   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 10:47   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 12:55   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-19 12:55     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-19 12:55     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-19 13:39     ` Quentin Perret [this message]
2021-07-19 13:39       ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 13:39       ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20  8:46       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-20  8:46         ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-20  8:46         ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-19 10:47 ` [PATCH 06/14] KVM: arm64: Tolerate re-creating hyp mappings to set ignored bits Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 10:47   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 10:47   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 10:17   ` Fuad Tabba
2021-07-20 10:17     ` Fuad Tabba
2021-07-20 10:17     ` Fuad Tabba
2021-07-20 10:30     ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 10:30       ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 10:30       ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 10:59       ` Fuad Tabba
2021-07-20 10:59         ` Fuad Tabba
2021-07-20 10:59         ` Fuad Tabba
2021-07-20 11:14         ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 11:14           ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 11:14           ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 10:47 ` [PATCH 07/14] KVM: arm64: Enable forcing page-level stage-2 mappings Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 10:47   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 10:47   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 14:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-19 14:24     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-19 14:24     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-19 15:36     ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 15:36       ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 15:36       ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 10:47 ` [PATCH 08/14] KVM: arm64: Add support for tagging shared pages in page-table Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 10:47   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 10:47   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 14:43   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-19 14:43     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-19 14:43     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-19 15:49     ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 15:49       ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 15:49       ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 10:13       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-20 10:13         ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-20 10:13         ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-20 11:48         ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 11:48           ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 11:48           ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 13:48   ` Fuad Tabba
2021-07-20 13:48     ` Fuad Tabba
2021-07-20 13:48     ` Fuad Tabba
2021-07-20 14:06     ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 14:06       ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 14:06       ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-21  7:34       ` Fuad Tabba
2021-07-21  7:34         ` Fuad Tabba
2021-07-21  7:34         ` Fuad Tabba
2021-07-19 10:47 ` [PATCH 09/14] KVM: arm64: Mark host bss and rodata section as shared Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 10:47   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 10:47   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 15:01   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-19 15:01     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-19 15:01     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-19 15:56     ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 15:56       ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 15:56       ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 10:47 ` [PATCH 10/14] KVM: arm64: Enable retrieving protections attributes of PTEs Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 10:47   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 10:47   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 10:47 ` [PATCH 11/14] KVM: arm64: Expose kvm_pte_valid() helper Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 10:47   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 10:47   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-21  8:20   ` Fuad Tabba
2021-07-21  8:20     ` Fuad Tabba
2021-07-21  8:20     ` Fuad Tabba
2021-07-19 10:47 ` [PATCH 12/14] KVM: arm64: Refactor pkvm_pgtable locking Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 10:47   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 10:47   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-21  8:37   ` Fuad Tabba
2021-07-21  8:37     ` Fuad Tabba
2021-07-21  8:37     ` Fuad Tabba
2021-07-19 10:47 ` [PATCH 13/14] KVM: arm64: Restrict hyp stage-1 manipulation in protected mode Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 10:47   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 10:47   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-21 10:45   ` Fuad Tabba
2021-07-21 10:45     ` Fuad Tabba
2021-07-21 10:45     ` Fuad Tabba
2021-07-21 13:35     ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-21 13:35       ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-21 13:35       ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 10:47 ` [PATCH 14/14] KVM: arm64: Prevent late calls to __pkvm_create_private_mapping() Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 10:47   ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 10:47   ` Quentin Perret

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YPWAeTJMWJ+A7W2c@google.com \
    --to=qperret@google.com \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dbrazdil@google.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=qwandor@google.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=tabba@google.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.