From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>, llvm@lists.linux.dev, kbuild-all@lists.01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_sysfs.c:413:1: error: static_assert expression is not an integral constant expression Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 11:53:25 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <YT+eJY4JoobVsKWu@archlinux-ax161> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210913183813.GY2505917@nvidia.com> On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 03:38:13PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 10:00:02AM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > > > > This macro would like to know that the passed in member name has a u64 > > > type, all the things I've come up with fail on clang - but many work > > > fine on gcc. Frankly I think this case is a clang bug myself.. > > > > Perhaps, though this assertion looks a bit like offsetof() to me. I > > wonder if that can help here? > > The assertion would logically like to be this: > > static_assert(typecheck(((struct qib_port *)0)->N, u64)) This works for me with both GCC and clang, if that is acceptable to you? It fails if you change one of the variables to 'u32'. Cheers, Nathan diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_sysfs.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_sysfs.c index 452e2355d24e..0a3b28142c05 100644 --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_sysfs.c +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_sysfs.c @@ -403,7 +403,7 @@ static ssize_t diagc_attr_store(struct ib_device *ibdev, u32 port_num, } #define QIB_DIAGC_ATTR(N) \ - static_assert(&((struct qib_ibport *)0)->rvp.n_##N != (u64 *)NULL); \ + static_assert(__same_type(((struct qib_ibport *)0)->rvp.n_##N, u64)); \ static struct qib_diagc_attr qib_diagc_attr_##N = { \ .attr = __ATTR(N, 0664, diagc_attr_show, diagc_attr_store), \ .counter = \
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> To: kbuild-all@lists.01.org Subject: Re: drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_sysfs.c:413:1: error: static_assert expression is not an integral constant expression Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 11:53:25 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <YT+eJY4JoobVsKWu@archlinux-ax161> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210913183813.GY2505917@nvidia.com> [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1525 bytes --] On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 03:38:13PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 10:00:02AM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > > > > This macro would like to know that the passed in member name has a u64 > > > type, all the things I've come up with fail on clang - but many work > > > fine on gcc. Frankly I think this case is a clang bug myself.. > > > > Perhaps, though this assertion looks a bit like offsetof() to me. I > > wonder if that can help here? > > The assertion would logically like to be this: > > static_assert(typecheck(((struct qib_port *)0)->N, u64)) This works for me with both GCC and clang, if that is acceptable to you? It fails if you change one of the variables to 'u32'. Cheers, Nathan diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_sysfs.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_sysfs.c index 452e2355d24e..0a3b28142c05 100644 --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_sysfs.c +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_sysfs.c @@ -403,7 +403,7 @@ static ssize_t diagc_attr_store(struct ib_device *ibdev, u32 port_num, } #define QIB_DIAGC_ATTR(N) \ - static_assert(&((struct qib_ibport *)0)->rvp.n_##N != (u64 *)NULL); \ + static_assert(__same_type(((struct qib_ibport *)0)->rvp.n_##N, u64)); \ static struct qib_diagc_attr qib_diagc_attr_##N = { \ .attr = __ATTR(N, 0664, diagc_attr_show, diagc_attr_store), \ .counter = \
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-13 18:53 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-09-11 12:17 drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_sysfs.c:413:1: error: static_assert expression is not an integral constant expression kernel test robot 2021-09-11 12:17 ` kernel test robot 2021-09-13 16:53 ` Jason Gunthorpe 2021-09-13 16:53 ` Jason Gunthorpe 2021-09-13 17:00 ` Nick Desaulniers 2021-09-13 17:00 ` Nick Desaulniers 2021-09-13 17:00 ` Nick Desaulniers 2021-09-13 18:38 ` Jason Gunthorpe 2021-09-13 18:38 ` Jason Gunthorpe 2021-09-13 18:53 ` Nathan Chancellor [this message] 2021-09-13 18:53 ` Nathan Chancellor 2021-09-13 19:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe 2021-09-13 19:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe 2021-09-13 19:13 ` Nathan Chancellor 2021-09-13 19:13 ` Nathan Chancellor 2021-09-13 19:16 ` Jason Gunthorpe 2021-09-13 19:16 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=YT+eJY4JoobVsKWu@archlinux-ax161 \ --to=nathan@kernel.org \ --cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \ --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \ --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=lkp@intel.com \ --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \ --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.