All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan  <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
	Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>, Deep Shah <sdeep@vmware.com>,
	VMware Inc <pv-drivers@vmware.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Peter H Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <knsathya@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/11] Add TDX Guest Support (Initial support)
Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2021 09:38:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YWFG7+QqVGZ5ZdG9@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211009053747.1694419-1-sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>

On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 10:37:36PM -0700, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote:
> Hi All,

Now let's see: you sent this particular patchset on Monday, 4th. The
usual process is that you wait at least a week for review comments,
incorporate them into your next revision and then you send it. We were
still reviewing v8...

But I see already a v9 in my mbox from yesterday and *also* a v10. v9
you probably didn't build-test enough so you had to hastily do a v10. 4
days later!

And because that's not enough, there are a bunch of other TDX patchsets
from you flying in constantly.

Now, please explain to me how you imagine this whole review thing is
supposed to work?

You hammer people with patchsets until they go in? Forget proper review?

Or people should drop the other things they have to do for their jobs
and deal only with your patchsets?

How about we trade places: you review and try to get sh*t to work and I
hammer you with patchsets every 3-4 days?

For chrissakes, please calm down with that constant hammering and try to
put yourself in the maintainer's shoes for once. Also, try to realize
that hammering people with patchsets will get you the *opposite* of what
you're trying to achieve - you will get ignored.

Geez.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-10-09  7:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-09  5:37 [PATCH v10 00/11] Add TDX Guest Support (Initial support) Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2021-10-09  5:37 ` [PATCH v10 01/11] x86/paravirt: Move halt paravirt calls under CONFIG_PARAVIRT Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2021-10-15 16:59   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-10-09  5:37 ` [PATCH v10 02/11] x86/tdx: Introduce INTEL_TDX_GUEST config option Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2021-10-11 18:19   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-10-11 18:38     ` Andi Kleen
2021-10-11 18:47       ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-10-09  5:37 ` [PATCH v10 03/11] x86/cpufeatures: Add TDX Guest CPU feature Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2021-10-13  8:18   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-10-13 13:32     ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2021-10-13 19:42     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-10-13 23:19       ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-10-14  0:25         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-10-14  7:57           ` Borislav Petkov
     [not found]       ` <1a6220a5-3abd-dea1-4b2f-2acade311236@linux.intel.com>
2021-10-18 21:59         ` Borislav Petkov
2021-10-18 22:04           ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2021-10-13 20:44   ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-10-13 21:05     ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2021-10-13 21:35       ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-10-13 21:07     ` Borislav Petkov
2021-10-13 21:25       ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-10-13 21:37         ` Borislav Petkov
2021-10-13 22:28           ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2021-10-13 23:02             ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-10-14 17:28               ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2021-10-09  5:37 ` [PATCH v10 04/11] x86/tdx: Add TDX support to intel_cc_platform_has() Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2021-10-13 15:57   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-10-14  7:12   ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-10-14 17:31     ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2021-10-09  5:37 ` [PATCH v10 05/11] x86/tdx: Add __tdx_module_call() and __tdx_hypercall() helper functions Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2021-10-14  7:28   ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-10-15  0:19     ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2021-10-09  5:37 ` [PATCH v10 06/11] x86/traps: Add #VE support for TDX guest Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2021-10-14  8:30   ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-10-17  2:45     ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2021-10-17  3:18       ` Dave Hansen
2021-10-17  3:49         ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2021-10-09  5:37 ` [PATCH v10 07/11] x86/tdx: Add HLT " Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2021-10-14  9:30   ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-10-15  1:33     ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2021-10-15 15:03       ` Sean Christopherson
2021-10-09  5:37 ` [PATCH v10 08/11] x86/tdx: Wire up KVM hypercalls Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2021-10-14 10:21   ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-10-15  3:03     ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2021-10-09  5:37 ` [PATCH v10 09/11] x86/tdx: Add MSR support for TDX guest Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2021-10-09  5:37 ` [PATCH v10 10/11] x86/tdx: Don't write CSTAR MSR on Intel Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2021-10-14 10:47   ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-10-14 13:47     ` Andi Kleen
2021-10-14 14:27       ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-10-09  5:37 ` [PATCH v10 11/11] x86/tdx: Handle CPUID via #VE Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2021-10-14 12:01   ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-10-14 13:25     ` Dave Hansen
2021-10-09  7:38 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2021-10-09 20:56   ` [PATCH v10 00/11] Add TDX Guest Support (Initial support) Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-10-11 13:03     ` Borislav Petkov
2021-10-11 16:33       ` Dave Hansen
2021-10-11 16:48         ` Dave Hansen
2021-10-11 17:04           ` Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YWFG7+QqVGZ5ZdG9@zn.tnic \
    --to=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=knsathya@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=pv-drivers@vmware.com \
    --cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=sdeep@vmware.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.