All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Cc: lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, robh@kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com,
	michal.simek@xilinx.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: xilinx-nwl: Simplify code and fix a memory leak
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 01:31:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YYhv9vZCw5r+PKzj@rocinante> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5483f10a44b06aad55728576d489adfa16c3be91.1636279388.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>

Hi Christophe,

> Allocate space for 'bitmap' in 'struct nwl_msi' at build time instead of
> dynamically allocating the memory at runtime.
> 
> This simplifies code (especially error handling paths) and avoid some
> open-coded arithmetic in allocator arguments
> 
> This also fixes a potential memory leak. The bitmap was never freed. It is
> now part of a managed resource.

Just to confirm - you mean potentially leaking when the driver would be
unloaded?  Not the error handling path, correct?

> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c
> @@ -146,7 +146,7 @@
>  
>  struct nwl_msi {			/* MSI information */
>  	struct irq_domain *msi_domain;
> -	unsigned long *bitmap;
> +	DECLARE_BITMAP(bitmap, INT_PCI_MSI_NR);
>  	struct irq_domain *dev_domain;
>  	struct mutex lock;		/* protect bitmap variable */
>  	int irq_msi0;
> @@ -335,12 +335,10 @@ static void nwl_pcie_leg_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
>  
>  static void nwl_pcie_handle_msi_irq(struct nwl_pcie *pcie, u32 status_reg)
>  {
> -	struct nwl_msi *msi;
> +	struct nwl_msi *msi = &pcie->msi;
>  	unsigned long status;
>  	u32 bit;
>  
> -	msi = &pcie->msi;
> -
>  	while ((status = nwl_bridge_readl(pcie, status_reg)) != 0) {
>  		for_each_set_bit(bit, &status, 32) {
>  			nwl_bridge_writel(pcie, 1 << bit, status_reg);
> @@ -560,30 +558,21 @@ static int nwl_pcie_enable_msi(struct nwl_pcie *pcie)
>  	struct nwl_msi *msi = &pcie->msi;
>  	unsigned long base;
>  	int ret;
> -	int size = BITS_TO_LONGS(INT_PCI_MSI_NR) * sizeof(long);
>  
>  	mutex_init(&msi->lock);
>  
> -	msi->bitmap = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!msi->bitmap)
> -		return -ENOMEM;
> -
>  	/* Get msi_1 IRQ number */
>  	msi->irq_msi1 = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "msi1");
> -	if (msi->irq_msi1 < 0) {
> -		ret = -EINVAL;
> -		goto err;
> -	}
> +	if (msi->irq_msi1 < 0)
> +		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(msi->irq_msi1,
>  					 nwl_pcie_msi_handler_high, pcie);
>  
>  	/* Get msi_0 IRQ number */
>  	msi->irq_msi0 = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "msi0");
> -	if (msi->irq_msi0 < 0) {
> -		ret = -EINVAL;
> -		goto err;
> -	}
> +	if (msi->irq_msi0 < 0)
> +		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(msi->irq_msi0,
>  					 nwl_pcie_msi_handler_low, pcie);
> @@ -592,8 +581,7 @@ static int nwl_pcie_enable_msi(struct nwl_pcie *pcie)
>  	ret = nwl_bridge_readl(pcie, I_MSII_CAPABILITIES) & MSII_PRESENT;
>  	if (!ret) {
>  		dev_err(dev, "MSI not present\n");
> -		ret = -EIO;
> -		goto err;
> +		return -EIO;
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Enable MSII */
> @@ -632,10 +620,6 @@ static int nwl_pcie_enable_msi(struct nwl_pcie *pcie)
>  	nwl_bridge_writel(pcie, MSGF_MSI_SR_LO_MASK, MSGF_MSI_MASK_LO);
>  
>  	return 0;
> -err:
> -	kfree(msi->bitmap);
> -	msi->bitmap = NULL;
> -	return ret;

Thank you!

Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@linux.com>

	Krzysztof

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Cc: lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, robh@kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com,
	michal.simek@xilinx.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: xilinx-nwl: Simplify code and fix a memory leak
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 01:31:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YYhv9vZCw5r+PKzj@rocinante> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5483f10a44b06aad55728576d489adfa16c3be91.1636279388.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>

Hi Christophe,

> Allocate space for 'bitmap' in 'struct nwl_msi' at build time instead of
> dynamically allocating the memory at runtime.
> 
> This simplifies code (especially error handling paths) and avoid some
> open-coded arithmetic in allocator arguments
> 
> This also fixes a potential memory leak. The bitmap was never freed. It is
> now part of a managed resource.

Just to confirm - you mean potentially leaking when the driver would be
unloaded?  Not the error handling path, correct?

> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c
> @@ -146,7 +146,7 @@
>  
>  struct nwl_msi {			/* MSI information */
>  	struct irq_domain *msi_domain;
> -	unsigned long *bitmap;
> +	DECLARE_BITMAP(bitmap, INT_PCI_MSI_NR);
>  	struct irq_domain *dev_domain;
>  	struct mutex lock;		/* protect bitmap variable */
>  	int irq_msi0;
> @@ -335,12 +335,10 @@ static void nwl_pcie_leg_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
>  
>  static void nwl_pcie_handle_msi_irq(struct nwl_pcie *pcie, u32 status_reg)
>  {
> -	struct nwl_msi *msi;
> +	struct nwl_msi *msi = &pcie->msi;
>  	unsigned long status;
>  	u32 bit;
>  
> -	msi = &pcie->msi;
> -
>  	while ((status = nwl_bridge_readl(pcie, status_reg)) != 0) {
>  		for_each_set_bit(bit, &status, 32) {
>  			nwl_bridge_writel(pcie, 1 << bit, status_reg);
> @@ -560,30 +558,21 @@ static int nwl_pcie_enable_msi(struct nwl_pcie *pcie)
>  	struct nwl_msi *msi = &pcie->msi;
>  	unsigned long base;
>  	int ret;
> -	int size = BITS_TO_LONGS(INT_PCI_MSI_NR) * sizeof(long);
>  
>  	mutex_init(&msi->lock);
>  
> -	msi->bitmap = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!msi->bitmap)
> -		return -ENOMEM;
> -
>  	/* Get msi_1 IRQ number */
>  	msi->irq_msi1 = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "msi1");
> -	if (msi->irq_msi1 < 0) {
> -		ret = -EINVAL;
> -		goto err;
> -	}
> +	if (msi->irq_msi1 < 0)
> +		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(msi->irq_msi1,
>  					 nwl_pcie_msi_handler_high, pcie);
>  
>  	/* Get msi_0 IRQ number */
>  	msi->irq_msi0 = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "msi0");
> -	if (msi->irq_msi0 < 0) {
> -		ret = -EINVAL;
> -		goto err;
> -	}
> +	if (msi->irq_msi0 < 0)
> +		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(msi->irq_msi0,
>  					 nwl_pcie_msi_handler_low, pcie);
> @@ -592,8 +581,7 @@ static int nwl_pcie_enable_msi(struct nwl_pcie *pcie)
>  	ret = nwl_bridge_readl(pcie, I_MSII_CAPABILITIES) & MSII_PRESENT;
>  	if (!ret) {
>  		dev_err(dev, "MSI not present\n");
> -		ret = -EIO;
> -		goto err;
> +		return -EIO;
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Enable MSII */
> @@ -632,10 +620,6 @@ static int nwl_pcie_enable_msi(struct nwl_pcie *pcie)
>  	nwl_bridge_writel(pcie, MSGF_MSI_SR_LO_MASK, MSGF_MSI_MASK_LO);
>  
>  	return 0;
> -err:
> -	kfree(msi->bitmap);
> -	msi->bitmap = NULL;
> -	return ret;

Thank you!

Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@linux.com>

	Krzysztof

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-08  0:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-07 10:04 [PATCH] PCI: xilinx-nwl: Simplify code and fix a memory leak Christophe JAILLET
2021-11-07 10:04 ` Christophe JAILLET
2021-11-08  0:31 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński [this message]
2021-11-08  0:31   ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-11-08  6:37   ` Christophe JAILLET
2021-11-08  6:37     ` Christophe JAILLET
2021-11-29 13:41 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-11-29 13:41   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-11-30 16:55 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-11-30 16:55   ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YYhv9vZCw5r+PKzj@rocinante \
    --to=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=michal.simek@xilinx.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.