From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 04/12] drm/edid: pass a timing pointer to is_detailed_timing_descriptor() Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 20:29:04 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <YkHwYPHZGnIyvUA0@intel.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <0b5213383e14f11c6a505b10a7342fb2ff4f2a11.1648477901.git.jani.nikula@intel.com> On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 05:34:25PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > Use struct member access instead of direct offsets to avoid a cast. > > Use BUILD_BUG_ON() for sanity check. > > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 8 +++++--- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c > index ded1f019180d..10da6b9b14fb 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c > @@ -2342,9 +2342,11 @@ static bool is_display_descriptor(const struct detailed_timing *descriptor, u8 t > descriptor->data.other_data.type == type; > } > > -static bool is_detailed_timing_descriptor(const u8 d[18]) > +static bool is_detailed_timing_descriptor(const struct detailed_timing *descriptor) > { > - return d[0] != 0x00 || d[1] != 0x00; > + BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(typeof(*descriptor), pixel_clock) != 0); > + > + return descriptor->pixel_clock != 0; > } > > typedef void detailed_cb(struct detailed_timing *timing, void *closure); > @@ -3266,7 +3268,7 @@ do_detailed_mode(struct detailed_timing *timing, void *c) > struct detailed_mode_closure *closure = c; > struct drm_display_mode *newmode; > > - if (!is_detailed_timing_descriptor((const u8 *)timing)) > + if (!is_detailed_timing_descriptor(timing)) > return; > > newmode = drm_mode_detailed(closure->connector->dev, > -- > 2.30.2 -- Ville Syrjälä Intel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/12] drm/edid: pass a timing pointer to is_detailed_timing_descriptor() Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 20:29:04 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <YkHwYPHZGnIyvUA0@intel.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <0b5213383e14f11c6a505b10a7342fb2ff4f2a11.1648477901.git.jani.nikula@intel.com> On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 05:34:25PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > Use struct member access instead of direct offsets to avoid a cast. > > Use BUILD_BUG_ON() for sanity check. > > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 8 +++++--- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c > index ded1f019180d..10da6b9b14fb 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c > @@ -2342,9 +2342,11 @@ static bool is_display_descriptor(const struct detailed_timing *descriptor, u8 t > descriptor->data.other_data.type == type; > } > > -static bool is_detailed_timing_descriptor(const u8 d[18]) > +static bool is_detailed_timing_descriptor(const struct detailed_timing *descriptor) > { > - return d[0] != 0x00 || d[1] != 0x00; > + BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(typeof(*descriptor), pixel_clock) != 0); > + > + return descriptor->pixel_clock != 0; > } > > typedef void detailed_cb(struct detailed_timing *timing, void *closure); > @@ -3266,7 +3268,7 @@ do_detailed_mode(struct detailed_timing *timing, void *c) > struct detailed_mode_closure *closure = c; > struct drm_display_mode *newmode; > > - if (!is_detailed_timing_descriptor((const u8 *)timing)) > + if (!is_detailed_timing_descriptor(timing)) > return; > > newmode = drm_mode_detailed(closure->connector->dev, > -- > 2.30.2 -- Ville Syrjälä Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-28 17:29 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-03-28 14:34 [PATCH v3 00/12] drm/edid: constify EDID parsing, with fixes Jani Nikula 2022-03-28 14:34 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula 2022-03-28 14:34 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] drm/edid: don't modify EDID while parsing Jani Nikula 2022-03-28 14:34 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula 2022-03-28 14:34 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] drm/edid: fix reduced blanking support check Jani Nikula 2022-03-28 14:34 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula 2022-03-28 17:27 ` Ville Syrjälä 2022-03-28 17:27 ` Ville Syrjälä 2022-03-28 14:34 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] drm/edid: pass a timing pointer to is_display_descriptor() Jani Nikula 2022-03-28 14:34 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula 2022-03-28 17:28 ` Ville Syrjälä 2022-03-28 17:28 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä 2022-03-28 14:34 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] drm/edid: pass a timing pointer to is_detailed_timing_descriptor() Jani Nikula 2022-03-28 14:34 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula 2022-03-28 17:29 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message] 2022-03-28 17:29 ` Ville Syrjälä 2022-03-28 14:34 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] drm/edid: use struct detailed_timing member access in is_rb() Jani Nikula 2022-03-28 14:34 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula 2022-03-28 17:29 ` Ville Syrjälä 2022-03-28 17:29 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä 2022-03-28 14:34 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] drm/edid: use struct detailed_timing member access in gtf2 functions Jani Nikula 2022-03-28 14:34 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula 2022-03-28 17:34 ` Ville Syrjälä 2022-03-28 17:34 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä 2022-03-28 14:34 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] drm/edid: constify struct detailed_timing in lower level parsing Jani Nikula 2022-03-28 14:34 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula 2022-03-28 17:35 ` Ville Syrjälä 2022-03-28 17:35 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä 2022-03-28 14:34 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] drm/edid: constify struct detailed_timing in parsing callbacks Jani Nikula 2022-03-28 14:34 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula 2022-03-28 17:37 ` Ville Syrjälä 2022-03-28 17:37 ` Ville Syrjälä 2022-03-28 14:34 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] drm/edid: constify struct edid passed to detailed blocks Jani Nikula 2022-03-28 14:34 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula 2022-03-28 17:39 ` Ville Syrjälä 2022-03-28 17:39 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä 2022-03-28 14:34 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] drm/edid: constify struct edid passed around in callbacks and closure Jani Nikula 2022-03-28 14:34 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula 2022-03-28 17:40 ` Ville Syrjälä 2022-03-28 17:40 ` Ville Syrjälä 2022-03-28 14:34 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] drm/edid: add more general struct edid constness in the interfaces Jani Nikula 2022-03-28 14:34 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula 2022-03-28 17:41 ` Ville Syrjälä 2022-03-28 17:41 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä 2022-03-28 14:34 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] drm/edid: split drm_add_edid_modes() to two Jani Nikula 2022-03-28 14:34 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula 2022-03-28 17:48 ` Ville Syrjälä 2022-03-28 17:48 ` Ville Syrjälä 2022-03-28 18:35 ` Jani Nikula 2022-03-28 18:35 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula 2022-03-28 18:00 ` [PATCH v3 00/12] drm/edid: constify EDID parsing, with fixes Emil Velikov 2022-03-28 18:00 ` [Intel-gfx] " Emil Velikov 2022-03-28 18:36 ` Jani Nikula 2022-03-28 18:36 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula 2022-03-29 1:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/edid: constify EDID parsing, with fixes (rev2) Patchwork 2022-03-29 1:30 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork 2022-03-29 1:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork 2022-03-29 1:59 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork 2022-03-29 4:35 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork 2022-03-29 9:21 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/edid: constify EDID parsing, with fixes (rev3) Patchwork 2022-03-29 9:23 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork 2022-03-29 9:27 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork 2022-03-29 9:59 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork 2022-03-29 12:55 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=YkHwYPHZGnIyvUA0@intel.com \ --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \ --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \ --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \ --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.