All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@xilinx.com>
Cc: p.yadav@ti.com, miquel.raynal@bootlin.com, richard@nod.at,
	vigneshr@ti.com, git@xilinx.com, michal.simek@xilinx.com,
	linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, michael@walle.cc,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] spi: Add multiple CS support for a single SPI device
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2022 12:54:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YqHfccvhy7e5Bc6m@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220606112607.20800-2-amit.kumar-mahapatra@xilinx.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1298 bytes --]

On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 04:56:06PM +0530, Amit Kumar Mahapatra wrote:

> ---
>  drivers/spi/spi-zynqmp-gqspi.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  drivers/spi/spi.c              | 10 +++++++---
>  include/linux/spi/spi.h        | 10 +++++++++-
>  3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

Please split the core and driver support into separate patches, they are
separate things.

> --- a/drivers/spi/spi.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi.c
> @@ -2082,6 +2082,8 @@ static int of_spi_parse_dt(struct spi_controller *ctlr, struct spi_device *spi,
>  {
>  	u32 value;
>  	int rc;
> +	u32 cs[SPI_CS_CNT_MAX];
> +	u8 idx;
>  
>  	/* Mode (clock phase/polarity/etc.) */
>  	if (of_property_read_bool(nc, "spi-cpha"))

This is changing the DT binding but doesn't have any updates to the
binding document.  The binding code also doesn't validate that we don't
have too many chip selects.

> +	/* Bit mask of the chipselect(s) that the driver
> +	 * need to use form the chipselect array.
> +	 */
> +	u8			cs_index_mask : 2;

Why make this a bitfield?  

I'm also not seeing anything here that checks that the driver supports
multiple chip selects - it seems like something that's going to cause
issues and we should probably have something to handle that situation.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@xilinx.com>
Cc: p.yadav@ti.com, miquel.raynal@bootlin.com, richard@nod.at,
	vigneshr@ti.com, git@xilinx.com, michal.simek@xilinx.com,
	linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, michael@walle.cc,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] spi: Add multiple CS support for a single SPI device
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2022 12:54:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YqHfccvhy7e5Bc6m@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220606112607.20800-2-amit.kumar-mahapatra@xilinx.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1298 bytes --]

On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 04:56:06PM +0530, Amit Kumar Mahapatra wrote:

> ---
>  drivers/spi/spi-zynqmp-gqspi.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  drivers/spi/spi.c              | 10 +++++++---
>  include/linux/spi/spi.h        | 10 +++++++++-
>  3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

Please split the core and driver support into separate patches, they are
separate things.

> --- a/drivers/spi/spi.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi.c
> @@ -2082,6 +2082,8 @@ static int of_spi_parse_dt(struct spi_controller *ctlr, struct spi_device *spi,
>  {
>  	u32 value;
>  	int rc;
> +	u32 cs[SPI_CS_CNT_MAX];
> +	u8 idx;
>  
>  	/* Mode (clock phase/polarity/etc.) */
>  	if (of_property_read_bool(nc, "spi-cpha"))

This is changing the DT binding but doesn't have any updates to the
binding document.  The binding code also doesn't validate that we don't
have too many chip selects.

> +	/* Bit mask of the chipselect(s) that the driver
> +	 * need to use form the chipselect array.
> +	 */
> +	u8			cs_index_mask : 2;

Why make this a bitfield?  

I'm also not seeing anything here that checks that the driver supports
multiple chip selects - it seems like something that's going to cause
issues and we should probably have something to handle that situation.

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@xilinx.com>
Cc: p.yadav@ti.com, miquel.raynal@bootlin.com, richard@nod.at,
	vigneshr@ti.com, git@xilinx.com, michal.simek@xilinx.com,
	linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, michael@walle.cc,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] spi: Add multiple CS support for a single SPI device
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2022 12:54:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YqHfccvhy7e5Bc6m@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220606112607.20800-2-amit.kumar-mahapatra@xilinx.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1298 bytes --]

On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 04:56:06PM +0530, Amit Kumar Mahapatra wrote:

> ---
>  drivers/spi/spi-zynqmp-gqspi.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  drivers/spi/spi.c              | 10 +++++++---
>  include/linux/spi/spi.h        | 10 +++++++++-
>  3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

Please split the core and driver support into separate patches, they are
separate things.

> --- a/drivers/spi/spi.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi.c
> @@ -2082,6 +2082,8 @@ static int of_spi_parse_dt(struct spi_controller *ctlr, struct spi_device *spi,
>  {
>  	u32 value;
>  	int rc;
> +	u32 cs[SPI_CS_CNT_MAX];
> +	u8 idx;
>  
>  	/* Mode (clock phase/polarity/etc.) */
>  	if (of_property_read_bool(nc, "spi-cpha"))

This is changing the DT binding but doesn't have any updates to the
binding document.  The binding code also doesn't validate that we don't
have too many chip selects.

> +	/* Bit mask of the chipselect(s) that the driver
> +	 * need to use form the chipselect array.
> +	 */
> +	u8			cs_index_mask : 2;

Why make this a bitfield?  

I'm also not seeing anything here that checks that the driver supports
multiple chip selects - it seems like something that's going to cause
issues and we should probably have something to handle that situation.

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 144 bytes --]

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/

  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-09 11:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-06 11:26 [RFC PATCH 0/2] spi: Add support for stacked/parallel memories Amit Kumar Mahapatra
2022-06-06 11:26 ` Amit Kumar Mahapatra
2022-06-06 11:26 ` Amit Kumar Mahapatra
2022-06-06 11:26 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] spi: Add multiple CS support for a single SPI device Amit Kumar Mahapatra
2022-06-06 11:26   ` Amit Kumar Mahapatra
2022-06-06 11:26   ` Amit Kumar Mahapatra
2022-06-09 11:54   ` Mark Brown [this message]
2022-06-09 11:54     ` Mark Brown
2022-06-09 11:54     ` Mark Brown
2022-06-23 11:39     ` Mahapatra, Amit Kumar
2022-06-23 11:39       ` Mahapatra, Amit Kumar
2022-06-23 11:39       ` Mahapatra, Amit Kumar
2022-06-23 12:06       ` Mark Brown
2022-06-23 12:06         ` Mark Brown
2022-06-23 12:06         ` Mark Brown
2022-07-15 15:35         ` Mahapatra, Amit Kumar
2022-07-15 15:35           ` Mahapatra, Amit Kumar
2022-07-15 15:35           ` Mahapatra, Amit Kumar
2022-07-15 15:54           ` Mark Brown
2022-07-15 15:54             ` Mark Brown
2022-07-15 15:54             ` Mark Brown
2022-07-19 13:21             ` Mahapatra, Amit Kumar
2022-07-19 13:21               ` Mahapatra, Amit Kumar
2022-07-19 13:21               ` Mahapatra, Amit Kumar
2022-07-19 17:53               ` Mark Brown
2022-07-19 17:53                 ` Mark Brown
2022-07-19 17:53                 ` Mark Brown
2022-07-27 13:02                 ` Mahapatra, Amit Kumar
2022-07-27 13:02                   ` Mahapatra, Amit Kumar
2022-07-27 13:02                   ` Mahapatra, Amit Kumar
2022-07-11 12:47     ` Michal Simek
2022-07-11 12:47       ` Michal Simek
2022-07-11 12:47       ` Michal Simek
2022-07-11 14:52       ` Mark Brown
2022-07-11 14:52         ` Mark Brown
2022-07-11 14:52         ` Mark Brown
2022-07-15 15:36         ` Mahapatra, Amit Kumar
2022-07-15 15:36           ` Mahapatra, Amit Kumar
2022-07-15 15:36           ` Mahapatra, Amit Kumar
2022-07-15 16:03           ` Mark Brown
2022-07-15 16:03             ` Mark Brown
2022-07-15 16:03             ` Mark Brown
2022-06-06 11:26 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] mtd: spi-nor: Add support for stacked/parallel memories Amit Kumar Mahapatra
2022-06-06 11:26   ` Amit Kumar Mahapatra
2022-06-06 11:26   ` Amit Kumar Mahapatra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YqHfccvhy7e5Bc6m@sirena.org.uk \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=amit.kumar-mahapatra@xilinx.com \
    --cc=git@xilinx.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michael@walle.cc \
    --cc=michal.simek@xilinx.com \
    --cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=p.yadav@ti.com \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.