Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/7] Add dedicated Qcom ICE driver

[Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>]

On 23-03-08 12:03:17, Eric Biggers wrote:
> Hi Abel,
> 
> On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 05:58:31PM +0200, Abel Vesa wrote:
> > As both SDCC and UFS drivers use the ICE with duplicated implementation,
> > while none of the currently supported platforms make use concomitantly
> > of the same ICE IP block instance, the new SM8550 allows both UFS and
> > SDCC to do so. In order to support such scenario, there is a need for
> > a unified implementation and a devicetree node to be shared between
> > both types of storage devices. So lets drop the duplicate implementation
> > of the ICE from both SDCC and UFS and make it a dedicated (soc) driver.
> > Also, switch all UFS and SDCC devicetree nodes to use the new ICE
> > approach.
> > 
> > See each individual patch for changelogs.
> > 
> > The v1 is here:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230214120253.1098426-1-abel.vesa@linaro.org/
> > 
> > Abel Vesa (7):
> >   dt-bindings: soc: qcom: Add schema for Inline Crypto Engine
> >   dt-bindings: ufs: qcom: Add ICE phandle and drop core clock
> >   dt-bindings: mmc: sdhci-msm: Add ICE phandle and drop core clock
> >   soc: qcom: Make the Qualcomm UFS/SDCC ICE a dedicated driver
> >   scsi: ufs: ufs-qcom: Switch to the new ICE API
> >   mmc: sdhci-msm: Switch to the new ICE API
> >   arm64: dts: qcom: Add the Inline Crypto Engine nodes
> 
> Does this address all the comments on v1?  I had also asked some questions on
> v1.  It would be helpful if you would respond.

Sorry about not doing that earlier. Did that now.

> 
> - Eric