All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@dolcini.it>
To: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Cc: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@dolcini.it>,
	Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@toradex.com>,
	Tero Kristo <kristo@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/5] arm64: dts: ti: add verdin am62
Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 19:17:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZHYvnSMSnzoaYvWm@francesco-nb.int.toradex.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230530165351.rqpu7go3kw6j3upc@storable>

On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 11:53:51AM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 18:36-20230530, Francesco Dolcini wrote:
> > On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 07:10:44AM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> > > On 16:36-20230524, Francesco Dolcini wrote:
> > > > +/* Verdin I2C_2_DSI */
> > > > +&main_i2c2 {
> > > > +	status = "okay";
> > > 
> > > Here and few other dtsis:
> > > you should set status along with pinmux.
> > This is already done in the SoM dtsi, same applies to the other comment
> > you have on this pinmux topic.
> > 
> > To rephrase what's hopefully is already written in the commit
> > message/series description, or at least it was in my intention.
> > 
> > The system is modular, with multiple SoM variant and multiple carrier
> > boards. Standard interfaces are defined at the family level, e.g.
> > already in the SoM, in the carrier board DT file peripherals are just
> > enabled, the pinmux is already defined in the common som.dtsi [1][2][3]
> > files and the carrier board just use those unless there is some kind of
> > non-standard deviation.
> > 
> > This prevents duplication and simplify writing device tree file for board
> > that use standard Verdin family interfaces. This should be visible
> > looking at this series in which 3 different boards (Dev, Yavia and
> > Dahlia) are added.
> 
> It helps clarity if the node is marked "okay" when all the necessary
> properties required for operation (in this case pinmux) is enabled. I
> don't see a big change as a result. Just stops people from hunting for
> where pinmux is actually done.

I would disagree here, I would prefer to keep this as it is.
Of course, doing the change you request here is trivial, just some copy
paste.

The pinctrl is not all the necessary properties, you still need go
hunting on the dtsi includes hierarchy to see that everything is there.
And I think this is just fine, we do this just to avoid duplicating
common stuff.

What you get for sure is information duplication, with all the
interfaces that are enabled getting the same pinctrl on
multiple files.

Just on this series you have 3 carrier boards, we have 1 more we should
just send and they all share mostly the same pinmux.
... And the Verdin AM62 is really a very brand new product.

From my point of view I would also lose some clarity, since the current
structure, at least to some extent, helps understanding when a carrier
board is deviating from the family specification.

I hope this explanation gives some more context.

Francesco



WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@dolcini.it>
To: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Cc: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@dolcini.it>,
	Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@toradex.com>,
	Tero Kristo <kristo@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/5] arm64: dts: ti: add verdin am62
Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 19:17:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZHYvnSMSnzoaYvWm@francesco-nb.int.toradex.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230530165351.rqpu7go3kw6j3upc@storable>

On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 11:53:51AM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 18:36-20230530, Francesco Dolcini wrote:
> > On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 07:10:44AM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> > > On 16:36-20230524, Francesco Dolcini wrote:
> > > > +/* Verdin I2C_2_DSI */
> > > > +&main_i2c2 {
> > > > +	status = "okay";
> > > 
> > > Here and few other dtsis:
> > > you should set status along with pinmux.
> > This is already done in the SoM dtsi, same applies to the other comment
> > you have on this pinmux topic.
> > 
> > To rephrase what's hopefully is already written in the commit
> > message/series description, or at least it was in my intention.
> > 
> > The system is modular, with multiple SoM variant and multiple carrier
> > boards. Standard interfaces are defined at the family level, e.g.
> > already in the SoM, in the carrier board DT file peripherals are just
> > enabled, the pinmux is already defined in the common som.dtsi [1][2][3]
> > files and the carrier board just use those unless there is some kind of
> > non-standard deviation.
> > 
> > This prevents duplication and simplify writing device tree file for board
> > that use standard Verdin family interfaces. This should be visible
> > looking at this series in which 3 different boards (Dev, Yavia and
> > Dahlia) are added.
> 
> It helps clarity if the node is marked "okay" when all the necessary
> properties required for operation (in this case pinmux) is enabled. I
> don't see a big change as a result. Just stops people from hunting for
> where pinmux is actually done.

I would disagree here, I would prefer to keep this as it is.
Of course, doing the change you request here is trivial, just some copy
paste.

The pinctrl is not all the necessary properties, you still need go
hunting on the dtsi includes hierarchy to see that everything is there.
And I think this is just fine, we do this just to avoid duplicating
common stuff.

What you get for sure is information duplication, with all the
interfaces that are enabled getting the same pinctrl on
multiple files.

Just on this series you have 3 carrier boards, we have 1 more we should
just send and they all share mostly the same pinmux.
... And the Verdin AM62 is really a very brand new product.

From my point of view I would also lose some clarity, since the current
structure, at least to some extent, helps understanding when a carrier
board is deviating from the family specification.

I hope this explanation gives some more context.

Francesco



_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-30 17:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-24 14:36 [PATCH v1 0/5] Add Toradex Verdin AM62 Francesco Dolcini
2023-05-24 14:36 ` Francesco Dolcini
2023-05-24 14:36 ` [PATCH v1 1/5] dt-bindings: arm: ti: add toradex,verdin-am62 et al Francesco Dolcini
2023-05-24 14:36   ` Francesco Dolcini
2023-05-24 17:48   ` Andrew Davis
2023-05-24 17:48     ` Andrew Davis
2023-05-24 19:10     ` Nishanth Menon
2023-05-24 19:10       ` Nishanth Menon
2023-05-24 19:20     ` Francesco Dolcini
2023-05-24 19:20       ` Francesco Dolcini
2023-05-31  8:29     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-05-31  8:29       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-05-24 19:15   ` Conor Dooley
2023-05-24 19:15     ` Conor Dooley
2023-05-30 12:12   ` Nishanth Menon
2023-05-30 12:12     ` Nishanth Menon
2023-05-30 16:58     ` Francesco Dolcini
2023-05-30 16:58       ` Francesco Dolcini
2023-05-24 14:36 ` [PATCH v1 2/5] arm64: defconfig: enable drivers for Verdin AM62 Francesco Dolcini
2023-05-24 14:36   ` Francesco Dolcini
2023-05-24 14:36 ` [PATCH v1 3/5] arm64: dts: ti: add verdin am62 Francesco Dolcini
2023-05-24 14:36   ` Francesco Dolcini
2023-05-30 10:18   ` Francesco Dolcini
2023-05-30 10:18     ` Francesco Dolcini
2023-05-30 12:10   ` Nishanth Menon
2023-05-30 12:10     ` Nishanth Menon
2023-05-30 13:31     ` Raghavendra, Vignesh
2023-05-30 13:31       ` Raghavendra, Vignesh
2023-05-30 16:36     ` Francesco Dolcini
2023-05-30 16:36       ` Francesco Dolcini
2023-05-30 16:53       ` Nishanth Menon
2023-05-30 16:53         ` Nishanth Menon
2023-05-30 17:17         ` Francesco Dolcini [this message]
2023-05-30 17:17           ` Francesco Dolcini
2023-05-24 14:36 ` [PATCH v1 4/5] arm64: dts: ti: add verdin am62 dahlia Francesco Dolcini
2023-05-24 14:36   ` Francesco Dolcini
2023-05-24 14:36 ` [PATCH v1 5/5] arm64: dts: ti: add verdin am62 yavia Francesco Dolcini
2023-05-24 14:36   ` Francesco Dolcini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZHYvnSMSnzoaYvWm@francesco-nb.int.toradex.com \
    --to=francesco@dolcini.it \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=francesco.dolcini@toradex.com \
    --cc=kristo@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.