All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: cocci@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [cocci] mm/slab: prepare for struct patch conversion by spatch
Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2021 13:10:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a02a8c42-011d-0f9c-6a2f-7d45a3f216a5@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17a7a40f-b736-e0ea-02ae-1b03ef4483bf@suse.cz>

> Because a lot of the changes there are mechanistic, I thought it would be a
> good idea to perform them via coccinelle semantic patch. But it's my first
> attempt at large real usage of spatch, and it probably shows.

I guess that your clarification request will trigger further collateral evolution.
Thus I suggest to reconsider also another commit message from your software
development branch accordingly.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vbabka/linux.git/commit/?h=slab-struct_slab-v1r8&id=8a685ebb3b2a10c1d781d5b3e6ad0315ce9323d6

“This patch splits several declarations of multiple variables, or declarations
that include initial assignments, to separate lines, due to my inability to
make a coccinelle semantic patch match on those declarations.”

* How do you think about to specify desirable change preparations by the means of
   the semantic patch language?

* Will any guidance help to find nicer solutions?

Regards,
Markus

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-11-07 12:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-05 16:12 [cocci] Need some help with spatch Vlastimil Babka
2021-11-05 16:20 ` Luis Chamberlain
2021-11-06  6:44   ` Julia Lawall
2021-11-07 23:08   ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-11-08 14:35     ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-11-08 14:45       ` Julia Lawall
2021-11-08 16:53         ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-11-08 17:01           ` Julia Lawall
2021-11-05 20:56 ` Julia Lawall
2021-11-05 21:13 ` Julia Lawall
2021-11-05 21:24   ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-11-05 21:27     ` Julia Lawall
2021-11-05 21:31 ` Julia Lawall
2021-11-05 21:32   ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-11-05 21:43 ` Julia Lawall
2021-11-05 21:59 ` Julia Lawall
2021-11-06 15:36 ` [cocci] mm/slab: mass conversion of struct page to struct slab by spatch Markus Elfring
2021-11-07 12:10 ` Markus Elfring [this message]
2021-11-07 12:22   ` [cocci] mm/slab: prepare for struct patch conversion " Julia Lawall
2021-11-07 12:50     ` [cocci] mm/slab: prepare for struct page " Markus Elfring
2021-11-07 13:18       ` Julia Lawall
2021-11-07 13:40         ` Markus Elfring
2021-11-07 17:50       ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-11-07 18:09         ` Julia Lawall
2021-11-08 17:35           ` Markus Elfring
2021-11-08 17:40             ` Julia Lawall
2021-11-08 23:35             ` Vlastimil Babka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a02a8c42-011d-0f9c-6a2f-7d45a3f216a5@web.de \
    --to=markus.elfring@web.de \
    --cc=cocci@inria.fr \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.