All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>,
	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>
Cc: cocci@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [cocci] mm/slab: prepare for struct page conversion by spatch
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 00:35:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d743be25-66d4-7db9-d978-0d2e73528297@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <96c0476d-beef-ed62-26d3-5f754cec0f45@web.de>

On 11/8/21 18:35, Markus Elfring wrote:
>>> - struct page *page;
>>> + struct slab *slab;
>>
>> If you first rename struct page as strict slab and then do
>>
>> struct slab *
>> - page
>> + slab
>>   ;
>>
>> it might work even for the multiple declaration case.
> 
> Will there are need occur to adjust any more variable names?
> (Would different suffixes matter for corresponding identifiers?)

I was suprised that it works, which means the matching is more complex than
I thought. So I was able for example to achieve this:

-       struct page *page, *discard_page = NULL;
+       struct slab *slab, *slab_to_discard = NULL;

by the following rules (with ok_function per Julia's other e-mail):

@@
position p : script:ocaml() { ok_function p };
@@
- struct page@p
+ struct slab

@@
@@
struct slab *
- page
+ slab
;

@@
expression E;
@@
struct slab *
- discard_page
+ slab_to_discard
= E;

Thanks,
Vlastimil

      parent reply	other threads:[~2021-11-08 23:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-05 16:12 [cocci] Need some help with spatch Vlastimil Babka
2021-11-05 16:20 ` Luis Chamberlain
2021-11-06  6:44   ` Julia Lawall
2021-11-07 23:08   ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-11-08 14:35     ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-11-08 14:45       ` Julia Lawall
2021-11-08 16:53         ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-11-08 17:01           ` Julia Lawall
2021-11-05 20:56 ` Julia Lawall
2021-11-05 21:13 ` Julia Lawall
2021-11-05 21:24   ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-11-05 21:27     ` Julia Lawall
2021-11-05 21:31 ` Julia Lawall
2021-11-05 21:32   ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-11-05 21:43 ` Julia Lawall
2021-11-05 21:59 ` Julia Lawall
2021-11-06 15:36 ` [cocci] mm/slab: mass conversion of struct page to struct slab by spatch Markus Elfring
2021-11-07 12:10 ` [cocci] mm/slab: prepare for struct patch conversion " Markus Elfring
2021-11-07 12:22   ` Julia Lawall
2021-11-07 12:50     ` [cocci] mm/slab: prepare for struct page " Markus Elfring
2021-11-07 13:18       ` Julia Lawall
2021-11-07 13:40         ` Markus Elfring
2021-11-07 17:50       ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-11-07 18:09         ` Julia Lawall
2021-11-08 17:35           ` Markus Elfring
2021-11-08 17:40             ` Julia Lawall
2021-11-08 23:35             ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d743be25-66d4-7db9-d978-0d2e73528297@suse.cz \
    --to=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=Markus.Elfring@web.de \
    --cc=cocci@inria.fr \
    --cc=julia.lawall@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.