All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: "Hans de Goede" <j.w.r.degoede@gmail.com>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
	"Jani Nikula" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
	"Imre Deak" <imre.deak@intel.com>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] x86 / i915 iosf_mbi / PMIC bus access fixes
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 14:11:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a311296a-4594-2c8d-5d6b-11ac89966607@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171019111620.26761-1-hdegoede@redhat.com>

Thomas, Ingo,

Ping? Can we please get an ack for taking this upstream
through the drm subsys tree ?

Regards,

Hans


On 19-10-17 13:16, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> Here is a split-up version of my "drm/i915: Acquire PUNIT->PMIC bus for
> intel_uncore_forcewake_reset()" patch, this time with the
> arch/x86/platform/intel/iosf_mbi.c split out into a separate patch.
> 
> Since the iosf_mbi changes are fairly isolated, ideally this entire
> series would go upstream through the drm tree. X86 maintainers, can
> we have an ack for that from one of you please ?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Hans
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: "Hans de Goede" <j.w.r.degoede@gmail.com>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
	"Jani Nikula" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
	"Imre Deak" <imre.deak@intel.com>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] x86 / i915 iosf_mbi / PMIC bus access fixes
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 14:11:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a311296a-4594-2c8d-5d6b-11ac89966607@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171019111620.26761-1-hdegoede@redhat.com>

Thomas, Ingo,

Ping? Can we please get an ack for taking this upstream
through the drm subsys tree ?

Regards,

Hans


On 19-10-17 13:16, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> Here is a split-up version of my "drm/i915: Acquire PUNIT->PMIC bus for
> intel_uncore_forcewake_reset()" patch, this time with the
> arch/x86/platform/intel/iosf_mbi.c split out into a separate patch.
> 
> Since the iosf_mbi changes are fairly isolated, ideally this entire
> series would go upstream through the drm tree. X86 maintainers, can
> we have an ack for that from one of you please ?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Hans
> 
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-10-30 13:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-19 11:16 [PATCH v5 1/2] x86 / i915 iosf_mbi / PMIC bus access fixes Hans de Goede
2017-10-19 11:16 ` Hans de Goede
2017-10-19 11:16 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] x86/platform/intel/iosf_mbi: Add unlocked PMIC bus access notifier unregister Hans de Goede
2017-10-19 11:16   ` Hans de Goede
2017-10-19 11:16 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] drm/i915: Acquire PUNIT->PMIC bus for intel_uncore_forcewake_reset() Hans de Goede
2017-10-19 11:16   ` Hans de Goede
2017-10-31  9:50   ` Ingo Molnar
2017-10-31  9:50     ` Ingo Molnar
2017-10-31 10:04     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2017-10-31 10:04       ` Daniel Vetter
2017-10-31 11:54       ` Ingo Molnar
2017-10-31 10:10     ` Hans de Goede
2017-10-31 10:10       ` Hans de Goede
2017-10-19 11:50 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [v5,1/2] x86/platform/intel/iosf_mbi: Add unlocked PMIC bus access notifier unregister Patchwork
2017-10-19 13:04   ` Hans de Goede
2017-10-19 13:14     ` Hans de Goede
2017-10-30 13:11 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2017-10-30 13:11   ` [PATCH v5 1/2] x86 / i915 iosf_mbi / PMIC bus access fixes Hans de Goede
2017-11-03 18:03 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [v5,1/2] x86/platform/intel/iosf_mbi: Add unlocked PMIC bus access notifier unregister Patchwork
2017-11-03 19:06 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2017-11-08 12:37 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a311296a-4594-2c8d-5d6b-11ac89966607@redhat.com \
    --to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=j.w.r.degoede@gmail.com \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.