[PATCH v4 0/4] Allow rmdir(2) to delete a subvolume

[PATCH v4 0/4] Allow rmdir(2) to delete a subvolume

[Misono Tomohiro]

changelog:
  v3 -> v4 ... Reorganize patches and updates commit log.
               No code change in total
  v2 -> v3 ... Use if-else block instead of two if blocks and 
               add Tested-by tag in 2nd patch
  v1 -> v2 ... Split the patch to hopefully make review easier

Note: I will send a xfstest if this series is merged.

This series changes the behavior of rmdir(2) and allow it to delete an
empty subvolume.

1st to 3rd patches refactor btrfs_ioctl_snap_destroy() and no functional
change happens.

btrfs_ioctl_snap_destroy() is roughly comprised of two parts.
The first part is permission check of the (parent) subvolume. The second
part is additional check (1. send is not in progress. 2. the subvolume
is not a default subvolume. 3. the subvolume does not contain other
subvoume) and actual deletion process.

The aim of 1st to 3rd patches is to  extract the second part as
btrfs_delete_subvolume().

4th patch is just one line but this changes the behavior of rmdir(2)
by calling btrfs_delete_subvolume(). For rmdir(2), permission check is
already done in vfs layer.

Tomohiro Misono (4):
  btrfs: move may_destroy_subvol() from ioctl.c to inode.c
  btrfs: Add definition of btrfs_delete_subvolume()
  btrfs: Refactor btrfs_ioctl_snap_destroy() by using
    btrfs_delete_subvolume()
  btrfs: Allow rmdir(2) to delete an empty subvolume

 fs/btrfs/ctree.h |   5 +-
 fs/btrfs/inode.c | 197 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 185 +--------------------------------------------------
 3 files changed, 198 insertions(+), 189 deletions(-)

-- 
2.14.3

[PATCH v4 1/4] btrfs: move may_destroy_subvol() from ioctl.c to inode.c

[Misono Tomohiro]

This is a preparation work to refactor btrfs_ioctl_snap_destroy()
and to allow rmdir(2) to delete an empty subvolume.

Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Misono <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/ctree.h |  1 +
 fs/btrfs/inode.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 54 ------------------------------------------------------
 3 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
index da308774b8a4..2dbead106aab 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
@@ -3166,6 +3166,7 @@ int btrfs_unlink_subvol(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 			struct btrfs_root *root,
 			struct inode *dir, u64 objectid,
 			const char *name, int name_len);
+noinline int may_destroy_subvol(struct btrfs_root *root);
 int btrfs_truncate_block(struct inode *inode, loff_t from, loff_t len,
 			int front);
 int btrfs_truncate_inode_items(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index f53470112670..db66fa4fede6 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -4333,6 +4333,60 @@ int btrfs_unlink_subvol(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 	return ret;
 }
 
+/*
+ * helper to check if the subvolume references other subvolumes
+ */
+noinline int may_destroy_subvol(struct btrfs_root *root)
+{
+	struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = root->fs_info;
+	struct btrfs_path *path;
+	struct btrfs_dir_item *di;
+	struct btrfs_key key;
+	u64 dir_id;
+	int ret;
+
+	path = btrfs_alloc_path();
+	if (!path)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	/* Make sure this root isn't set as the default subvol */
+	dir_id = btrfs_super_root_dir(fs_info->super_copy);
+	di = btrfs_lookup_dir_item(NULL, fs_info->tree_root, path,
+				   dir_id, "default", 7, 0);
+	if (di && !IS_ERR(di)) {
+		btrfs_dir_item_key_to_cpu(path->nodes[0], di, &key);
+		if (key.objectid == root->root_key.objectid) {
+			ret = -EPERM;
+			btrfs_err(fs_info,
+				  "deleting default subvolume %llu is not allowed",
+				  key.objectid);
+			goto out;
+		}
+		btrfs_release_path(path);
+	}
+
+	key.objectid = root->root_key.objectid;
+	key.type = BTRFS_ROOT_REF_KEY;
+	key.offset = (u64)-1;
+
+	ret = btrfs_search_slot(NULL, fs_info->tree_root, &key, path, 0, 0);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		goto out;
+	BUG_ON(ret == 0);
+
+	ret = 0;
+	if (path->slots[0] > 0) {
+		path->slots[0]--;
+		btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(path->nodes[0], &key, path->slots[0]);
+		if (key.objectid == root->root_key.objectid &&
+		    key.type == BTRFS_ROOT_REF_KEY)
+			ret = -ENOTEMPTY;
+	}
+out:
+	btrfs_free_path(path);
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static int btrfs_rmdir(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry)
 {
 	struct inode *inode = d_inode(dentry);
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
index 111ee282b777..11af9eb449ef 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
@@ -1843,60 +1843,6 @@ static noinline int btrfs_ioctl_subvol_setflags(struct file *file,
 	return ret;
 }
 
-/*
- * helper to check if the subvolume references other subvolumes
- */
-static noinline int may_destroy_subvol(struct btrfs_root *root)
-{
-	struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = root->fs_info;
-	struct btrfs_path *path;
-	struct btrfs_dir_item *di;
-	struct btrfs_key key;
-	u64 dir_id;
-	int ret;
-
-	path = btrfs_alloc_path();
-	if (!path)
-		return -ENOMEM;
-
-	/* Make sure this root isn't set as the default subvol */
-	dir_id = btrfs_super_root_dir(fs_info->super_copy);
-	di = btrfs_lookup_dir_item(NULL, fs_info->tree_root, path,
-				   dir_id, "default", 7, 0);
-	if (di && !IS_ERR(di)) {
-		btrfs_dir_item_key_to_cpu(path->nodes[0], di, &key);
-		if (key.objectid == root->root_key.objectid) {
-			ret = -EPERM;
-			btrfs_err(fs_info,
-				  "deleting default subvolume %llu is not allowed",
-				  key.objectid);
-			goto out;
-		}
-		btrfs_release_path(path);
-	}
-
-	key.objectid = root->root_key.objectid;
-	key.type = BTRFS_ROOT_REF_KEY;
-	key.offset = (u64)-1;
-
-	ret = btrfs_search_slot(NULL, fs_info->tree_root, &key, path, 0, 0);
-	if (ret < 0)
-		goto out;
-	BUG_ON(ret == 0);
-
-	ret = 0;
-	if (path->slots[0] > 0) {
-		path->slots[0]--;
-		btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(path->nodes[0], &key, path->slots[0]);
-		if (key.objectid == root->root_key.objectid &&
-		    key.type == BTRFS_ROOT_REF_KEY)
-			ret = -ENOTEMPTY;
-	}
-out:
-	btrfs_free_path(path);
-	return ret;
-}
-
 static noinline int key_in_sk(struct btrfs_key *key,
 			      struct btrfs_ioctl_search_key *sk)
 {
-- 
2.14.3

[PATCH v4 2/4] btrfs: Add definition of btrfs_delete_subvolume()

[Misono Tomohiro]

Add new function btrfs_delete_subvolume() which is almost identical
to the secand half of btrfs_ioctl_snap_destroy(). This function requires
inode_lock for both @dir and inode of @dentry.

This performes additional check (1. send is not in progress. 2. the
subvolume is not a default subvolume. 3. the subvolume does not contain
other subvoume) and actual deletion process.

The code path is not changed yet and this function will be used to
refactor btrfs_ioctl_snap_destroy() and to allow rmdir(2) to delete an
empty subvolume.

Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Misono <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/ctree.h |   1 +
 fs/btrfs/inode.c | 139 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 140 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
index 2dbead106aab..618365eb9d84 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
@@ -3167,6 +3167,7 @@ int btrfs_unlink_subvol(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 			struct inode *dir, u64 objectid,
 			const char *name, int name_len);
 noinline int may_destroy_subvol(struct btrfs_root *root);
+int btrfs_delete_subvolume(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry);
 int btrfs_truncate_block(struct inode *inode, loff_t from, loff_t len,
 			int front);
 int btrfs_truncate_inode_items(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index db66fa4fede6..54c50a9fa2ee 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -4387,6 +4387,145 @@ noinline int may_destroy_subvol(struct btrfs_root *root)
 	return ret;
 }
 
+int btrfs_delete_subvolume(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry)
+{
+	struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = btrfs_sb(dentry->d_sb);
+	struct btrfs_root *root = BTRFS_I(dir)->root;
+	struct inode *inode = d_inode(dentry);
+	struct btrfs_root *dest = BTRFS_I(inode)->root;
+	struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans;
+	struct btrfs_block_rsv block_rsv;
+	u64 root_flags;
+	u64 qgroup_reserved;
+	int ret;
+	int err;
+
+	/*
+	 * Don't allow to delete a subvolume with send in progress. This is
+	 * inside the i_mutex so the error handling that has to drop the bit
+	 * again is not run concurrently.
+	 */
+	spin_lock(&dest->root_item_lock);
+	root_flags = btrfs_root_flags(&dest->root_item);
+	if (dest->send_in_progress == 0) {
+		btrfs_set_root_flags(&dest->root_item,
+				root_flags | BTRFS_ROOT_SUBVOL_DEAD);
+		spin_unlock(&dest->root_item_lock);
+	} else {
+		spin_unlock(&dest->root_item_lock);
+		btrfs_warn(fs_info,
+			   "Attempt to delete subvolume %llu during send",
+			   dest->root_key.objectid);
+		err = -EPERM;
+		return err;
+	}
+
+	down_write(&fs_info->subvol_sem);
+
+	err = may_destroy_subvol(dest);
+	if (err)
+		goto out_up_write;
+
+	btrfs_init_block_rsv(&block_rsv, BTRFS_BLOCK_RSV_TEMP);
+	/*
+	 * One for dir inode, two for dir entries, two for root
+	 * ref/backref.
+	 */
+	err = btrfs_subvolume_reserve_metadata(root, &block_rsv,
+					       5, &qgroup_reserved, true);
+	if (err)
+		goto out_up_write;
+
+	trans = btrfs_start_transaction(root, 0);
+	if (IS_ERR(trans)) {
+		err = PTR_ERR(trans);
+		goto out_release;
+	}
+	trans->block_rsv = &block_rsv;
+	trans->bytes_reserved = block_rsv.size;
+
+	btrfs_record_snapshot_destroy(trans, BTRFS_I(dir));
+
+	ret = btrfs_unlink_subvol(trans, root, dir,
+				dest->root_key.objectid,
+				dentry->d_name.name,
+				dentry->d_name.len);
+	if (ret) {
+		err = ret;
+		btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret);
+		goto out_end_trans;
+	}
+
+	btrfs_record_root_in_trans(trans, dest);
+
+	memset(&dest->root_item.drop_progress, 0,
+		sizeof(dest->root_item.drop_progress));
+	dest->root_item.drop_level = 0;
+	btrfs_set_root_refs(&dest->root_item, 0);
+
+	if (!test_and_set_bit(BTRFS_ROOT_ORPHAN_ITEM_INSERTED, &dest->state)) {
+		ret = btrfs_insert_orphan_item(trans,
+					fs_info->tree_root,
+					dest->root_key.objectid);
+		if (ret) {
+			btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret);
+			err = ret;
+			goto out_end_trans;
+		}
+	}
+
+	ret = btrfs_uuid_tree_rem(trans, fs_info, dest->root_item.uuid,
+				  BTRFS_UUID_KEY_SUBVOL,
+				  dest->root_key.objectid);
+	if (ret && ret != -ENOENT) {
+		btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret);
+		err = ret;
+		goto out_end_trans;
+	}
+	if (!btrfs_is_empty_uuid(dest->root_item.received_uuid)) {
+		ret = btrfs_uuid_tree_rem(trans, fs_info,
+					  dest->root_item.received_uuid,
+					  BTRFS_UUID_KEY_RECEIVED_SUBVOL,
+					  dest->root_key.objectid);
+		if (ret && ret != -ENOENT) {
+			btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret);
+			err = ret;
+			goto out_end_trans;
+		}
+	}
+
+out_end_trans:
+	trans->block_rsv = NULL;
+	trans->bytes_reserved = 0;
+	ret = btrfs_end_transaction(trans);
+	if (ret && !err)
+		err = ret;
+	inode->i_flags |= S_DEAD;
+out_release:
+	btrfs_subvolume_release_metadata(fs_info, &block_rsv);
+out_up_write:
+	up_write(&fs_info->subvol_sem);
+	if (err) {
+		spin_lock(&dest->root_item_lock);
+		root_flags = btrfs_root_flags(&dest->root_item);
+		btrfs_set_root_flags(&dest->root_item,
+				root_flags & ~BTRFS_ROOT_SUBVOL_DEAD);
+		spin_unlock(&dest->root_item_lock);
+	} else {
+		d_invalidate(dentry);
+		btrfs_invalidate_inodes(dest);
+		ASSERT(dest->send_in_progress == 0);
+
+		/* the last ref */
+		if (dest->ino_cache_inode) {
+			iput(dest->ino_cache_inode);
+			dest->ino_cache_inode = NULL;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return err;
+}
+
 static int btrfs_rmdir(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry)
 {
 	struct inode *inode = d_inode(dentry);
-- 
2.14.3

[PATCH v4 3/4] btrfs: Refactor btrfs_ioctl_snap_destroy() by using btrfs_delete_subvolume()

[Misono Tomohiro]

Use btrfs_delete_subvolume() to refactor btrfs_ioctl_snap_destroy().
The permission check is still done in btrfs_ioctl_snap_destroy(). Also,
call of d_delete() is still required since btrfs_delete_subvolume()
does not call it.

As a result, btrfs_unlink_subvol() and may_destroy_subvol()
become static functions. No functional change happens.

Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Misono <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/ctree.h |   5 ---
 fs/btrfs/inode.c |   4 +-
 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 131 +------------------------------------------------------
 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 136 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
index 618365eb9d84..6f23f0694ac3 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
@@ -3162,11 +3162,6 @@ int btrfs_unlink_inode(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 int btrfs_add_link(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 		   struct btrfs_inode *parent_inode, struct btrfs_inode *inode,
 		   const char *name, int name_len, int add_backref, u64 index);
-int btrfs_unlink_subvol(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
-			struct btrfs_root *root,
-			struct inode *dir, u64 objectid,
-			const char *name, int name_len);
-noinline int may_destroy_subvol(struct btrfs_root *root);
 int btrfs_delete_subvolume(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry);
 int btrfs_truncate_block(struct inode *inode, loff_t from, loff_t len,
 			int front);
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index 54c50a9fa2ee..2db2e860ba90 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -4252,7 +4252,7 @@ static int btrfs_unlink(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-int btrfs_unlink_subvol(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
+static int btrfs_unlink_subvol(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 			struct btrfs_root *root,
 			struct inode *dir, u64 objectid,
 			const char *name, int name_len)
@@ -4336,7 +4336,7 @@ int btrfs_unlink_subvol(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 /*
  * helper to check if the subvolume references other subvolumes
  */
-noinline int may_destroy_subvol(struct btrfs_root *root)
+static noinline int may_destroy_subvol(struct btrfs_root *root)
 {
 	struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = root->fs_info;
 	struct btrfs_path *path;
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
index 11af9eb449ef..7559a1a82e6d 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
@@ -2266,12 +2266,7 @@ static noinline int btrfs_ioctl_snap_destroy(struct file *file,
 	struct btrfs_root *root = BTRFS_I(dir)->root;
 	struct btrfs_root *dest = NULL;
 	struct btrfs_ioctl_vol_args *vol_args;
-	struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans;
-	struct btrfs_block_rsv block_rsv;
-	u64 root_flags;
-	u64 qgroup_reserved;
 	int namelen;
-	int ret;
 	int err = 0;
 
 	if (!S_ISDIR(dir->i_mode))
@@ -2355,133 +2350,11 @@ static noinline int btrfs_ioctl_snap_destroy(struct file *file,
 	}
 
 	inode_lock(inode);
-
-	/*
-	 * Don't allow to delete a subvolume with send in progress. This is
-	 * inside the i_mutex so the error handling that has to drop the bit
-	 * again is not run concurrently.
-	 */
-	spin_lock(&dest->root_item_lock);
-	root_flags = btrfs_root_flags(&dest->root_item);
-	if (dest->send_in_progress == 0) {
-		btrfs_set_root_flags(&dest->root_item,
-				root_flags | BTRFS_ROOT_SUBVOL_DEAD);
-		spin_unlock(&dest->root_item_lock);
-	} else {
-		spin_unlock(&dest->root_item_lock);
-		btrfs_warn(fs_info,
-			   "Attempt to delete subvolume %llu during send",
-			   dest->root_key.objectid);
-		err = -EPERM;
-		goto out_unlock_inode;
-	}
-
-	down_write(&fs_info->subvol_sem);
-
-	err = may_destroy_subvol(dest);
-	if (err)
-		goto out_up_write;
-
-	btrfs_init_block_rsv(&block_rsv, BTRFS_BLOCK_RSV_TEMP);
-	/*
-	 * One for dir inode, two for dir entries, two for root
-	 * ref/backref.
-	 */
-	err = btrfs_subvolume_reserve_metadata(root, &block_rsv,
-					       5, &qgroup_reserved, true);
-	if (err)
-		goto out_up_write;
-
-	trans = btrfs_start_transaction(root, 0);
-	if (IS_ERR(trans)) {
-		err = PTR_ERR(trans);
-		goto out_release;
-	}
-	trans->block_rsv = &block_rsv;
-	trans->bytes_reserved = block_rsv.size;
-
-	btrfs_record_snapshot_destroy(trans, BTRFS_I(dir));
-
-	ret = btrfs_unlink_subvol(trans, root, dir,
-				dest->root_key.objectid,
-				dentry->d_name.name,
-				dentry->d_name.len);
-	if (ret) {
-		err = ret;
-		btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret);
-		goto out_end_trans;
-	}
-
-	btrfs_record_root_in_trans(trans, dest);
-
-	memset(&dest->root_item.drop_progress, 0,
-		sizeof(dest->root_item.drop_progress));
-	dest->root_item.drop_level = 0;
-	btrfs_set_root_refs(&dest->root_item, 0);
-
-	if (!test_and_set_bit(BTRFS_ROOT_ORPHAN_ITEM_INSERTED, &dest->state)) {
-		ret = btrfs_insert_orphan_item(trans,
-					fs_info->tree_root,
-					dest->root_key.objectid);
-		if (ret) {
-			btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret);
-			err = ret;
-			goto out_end_trans;
-		}
-	}
-
-	ret = btrfs_uuid_tree_rem(trans, fs_info, dest->root_item.uuid,
-				  BTRFS_UUID_KEY_SUBVOL,
-				  dest->root_key.objectid);
-	if (ret && ret != -ENOENT) {
-		btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret);
-		err = ret;
-		goto out_end_trans;
-	}
-	if (!btrfs_is_empty_uuid(dest->root_item.received_uuid)) {
-		ret = btrfs_uuid_tree_rem(trans, fs_info,
-					  dest->root_item.received_uuid,
-					  BTRFS_UUID_KEY_RECEIVED_SUBVOL,
-					  dest->root_key.objectid);
-		if (ret && ret != -ENOENT) {
-			btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret);
-			err = ret;
-			goto out_end_trans;
-		}
-	}
-
-out_end_trans:
-	trans->block_rsv = NULL;
-	trans->bytes_reserved = 0;
-	ret = btrfs_end_transaction(trans);
-	if (ret && !err)
-		err = ret;
-	inode->i_flags |= S_DEAD;
-out_release:
-	btrfs_subvolume_release_metadata(fs_info, &block_rsv);
-out_up_write:
-	up_write(&fs_info->subvol_sem);
-	if (err) {
-		spin_lock(&dest->root_item_lock);
-		root_flags = btrfs_root_flags(&dest->root_item);
-		btrfs_set_root_flags(&dest->root_item,
-				root_flags & ~BTRFS_ROOT_SUBVOL_DEAD);
-		spin_unlock(&dest->root_item_lock);
-	}
-out_unlock_inode:
+	err = btrfs_delete_subvolume(dir, dentry);
 	inode_unlock(inode);
-	if (!err) {
-		d_invalidate(dentry);
-		btrfs_invalidate_inodes(dest);
+	if (!err)
 		d_delete(dentry);
-		ASSERT(dest->send_in_progress == 0);
 
-		/* the last ref */
-		if (dest->ino_cache_inode) {
-			iput(dest->ino_cache_inode);
-			dest->ino_cache_inode = NULL;
-		}
-	}
 out_dput:
 	dput(dentry);
 out_unlock_dir:
-- 
2.14.3

[PATCH v4 4/4] btrfs: Allow rmdir(2) to delete an empty subvolume

[Misono Tomohiro]

Change the behaior of rmdir(2) and allow it to delete an empty subvolume
by calling btrfs_delete_subvolume() which is used by
btrfs_ioctl_snap_destroy(). The required lock for @dir and inode of
@dentry is already acquired in vfs layer.

We need some check before deleting a subvolume. Permission check is done
in vfs layer, emptiness check is in btrfs_rmdir() and additional check
(i.e. neither send is in progress nor the subvolume is a default subvolume)
is in btrfs_delete_subvolume().

Note that in btrfs_snap_destroy(), d_delete() is called after
btrfs_delete_subvolume(). For rmdir(2), d_delete() is called in vfs
layer later.

Tested-by: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijack@inwind.it>
Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Misono <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/inode.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index 2db2e860ba90..afc631f28088 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -4537,7 +4537,7 @@ static int btrfs_rmdir(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry)
 	if (inode->i_size > BTRFS_EMPTY_DIR_SIZE)
 		return -ENOTEMPTY;
 	if (btrfs_ino(BTRFS_I(inode)) == BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID)
-		return -EPERM;
+		return btrfs_delete_subvolume(dir, dentry);
 
 	trans = __unlink_start_trans(dir);
 	if (IS_ERR(trans))
-- 
2.14.3

Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] btrfs: Refactor btrfs_ioctl_snap_destroy() by using btrfs_delete_subvolume()

[David Sterba]

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 02:20:49PM +0900, Misono Tomohiro wrote:
> Use btrfs_delete_subvolume() to refactor btrfs_ioctl_snap_destroy().
> The permission check is still done in btrfs_ioctl_snap_destroy(). Also,
> call of d_delete() is still required since btrfs_delete_subvolume()
> does not call it.
> 
> As a result, btrfs_unlink_subvol() and may_destroy_subvol()
> become static functions. No functional change happens.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Misono <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>

Why is this still split into two patches? Factoring out a function
should happen in one patch, ie 2 and 3 in one go. Do you have a reason
not to do it like that?

Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] btrfs: Refactor btrfs_ioctl_snap_destroy() by using btrfs_delete_subvolume()

[Misono Tomohiro]

On 2018/04/17 2:53, David Sterba wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 02:20:49PM +0900, Misono Tomohiro wrote:
>> Use btrfs_delete_subvolume() to refactor btrfs_ioctl_snap_destroy().
>> The permission check is still done in btrfs_ioctl_snap_destroy(). Also,
>> call of d_delete() is still required since btrfs_delete_subvolume()
>> does not call it.
>>
>> As a result, btrfs_unlink_subvol() and may_destroy_subvol()
>> become static functions. No functional change happens.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Misono <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> 
> Why is this still split into two patches? Factoring out a function
> should happen in one patch, ie 2 and 3 in one go. Do you have a reason
> not to do it like that?

I thought this reduces code change in one patch and might be good, but
I'm completely fine with merging 2nd and 3rd patches. Should I send v5?

Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] btrfs: Refactor btrfs_ioctl_snap_destroy() by using btrfs_delete_subvolume()

[David Sterba]

On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 09:21:16AM +0900, Misono Tomohiro wrote:
> On 2018/04/17 2:53, David Sterba wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 02:20:49PM +0900, Misono Tomohiro wrote:
> >> Use btrfs_delete_subvolume() to refactor btrfs_ioctl_snap_destroy().
> >> The permission check is still done in btrfs_ioctl_snap_destroy(). Also,
> >> call of d_delete() is still required since btrfs_delete_subvolume()
> >> does not call it.
> >>
> >> As a result, btrfs_unlink_subvol() and may_destroy_subvol()
> >> become static functions. No functional change happens.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Misono <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> > 
> > Why is this still split into two patches? Factoring out a function
> > should happen in one patch, ie 2 and 3 in one go. Do you have a reason
> > not to do it like that?
> 
> I thought this reduces code change in one patch and might be good, but
> I'm completely fine with merging 2nd and 3rd patches.

This makes the rewiew harder, if the code is moved the diff can be long
but we have both pieces to compare. Moving code is considered one
logical change and should not introduce any other changes, besides
renaming or formatting fixups.

> Should I send v5?

Yes please, this is not a trivial change and the changelogs need to be
adjusted. Thanks.