From: Pkshih <pkshih@realtek.com> To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org> Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 03/24] rtw89: add core and trx files Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2021 09:32:44 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <a8dd5e59fb8f491fb34e52d495cf4c85@realtek.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a0T4iqtF0wj5+VUT6z3S2yGC4uaOr806NCiQTpYoPawUg@mail.gmail.com> > -----Original Message----- > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > Sent: Tuesday, October 5, 2021 4:42 PM > To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> > Cc: Pkshih <pkshih@realtek.com>; Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>; linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 03/24] rtw89: add core and trx files > > On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 9:46 AM Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> wrote: > > Pkshih <pkshih@realtek.com> writes: > > >> From: kvalo=codeaurora.org@mg.codeaurora.org > > >> > > >> > +static __always_inline void RTW89_SET_TXWD(u8 *txdesc, u32 val, > > >> > u8 offset, u32 mask) > > >> > +{ > > >> > + u32 *txd32 = (u32 *)txdesc; > > >> > + > > >> > + le32p_replace_bits((__le32 *)(txd32 + offset), val, mask); > > >> > +} > > >> > > >> I'm not convinced about this either, please just use inline. > > > > > > This is because 'mask' argument of le32p_replace_bits() must be constant > > > only. If I use inline and build this driver with ccflags-y += -Os, > > > compiler reports errors: > > > > > > In function 'field_multiplier', > > > inlined from 'le32_encode_bits' at ./include/linux/bitfield.h:154:1, > > > inlined from 'le32p_replace_bits' at ./include/linux/bitfield.h:154:1, > > > inlined from 'RTW89_SET_FWCMD_UA32.constprop' at > /work/git-root/rtwlan/rtw89/fw.h:1397:2: > > > ./include/linux/bitfield.h:119:3: error: call to '__bad_mask' declared with attribute error: > bad bitfield mask > > > 119 | __bad_mask(); > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > > > I check the implement of le32p_replace_bits(), it looks like > > > > > > static __always_inline void type##p_replace_bits(__##type *p, \ > > > base val, base field) \ > > > { \ > > > *p = (*p & ~to(field)) | type##_encode_bits(val, field); \ > > > } > > > > > > So, I imitate the function to use __always_inline, and then it works. > > > > > > Do you think I don't need to consider the case of Os? > > > But, -Os seems a standard option of Linux kernel. > > > > > > ifdef CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_PERFORMANCE > > > KBUILD_CFLAGS += -O2 > > > else ifdef CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_PERFORMANCE_O3 > > > KBUILD_CFLAGS += -O3 > > > else ifdef CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE > > > KBUILD_CFLAGS += -Os > > > endif > > > > Yeah, we need to support -Os. > > > > Arnd, what do you suggest? Is __always_inline good solution for this? I > > think we should at least add a comment explaining why it's needed. > > __always_inline can make sense to force the compiler to behave > sanely if it doesn't work it out by itself, and I think that is how this > function was meant to be used: the __compiletime_error in bitfield.h > is intended to find any callers that have a non-constant argument, > because that would result in horrible code. > > I would suggest looking at the object code that you get with -Os after > the added __always_inline, just to make sure that this isn't also > horrible. I check the function rtw89_core_fill_txdesc() which uses these macros. With inline, the object code size is 0x1AF. With __always_inline and -Os, the size is 0x1A4. (x86-64 platform) Compare the object codes side-by-side, they are almost the same except to some instructions. I think this is because the inline function I apply __always_inline contains only a simple statement. > > Looking at the driver code, as in > > +#define RTW89_SET_TXWD_BODY_WP_OFFSET(txdesc, val) \ > + RTW89_SET_TXWD(txdesc, val, 0x00, GENMASK(31, 24)) > +#define RTW89_SET_TXWD_BODY_MORE_DATA(txdesc, val) \ > + RTW89_SET_TXWD(txdesc, val, 0x00, BIT(23)) > +#define RTW89_SET_TXWD_BODY_WD_INFO_EN(txdesc, val) \ > + RTW89_SET_TXWD(txdesc, val, 0x00, BIT(22)) > +#define RTW89_SET_TXWD_BODY_FW_DL(txdesc, val) \ > + RTW89_SET_TXWD(txdesc, val, 0x00, BIT(20)) > > I would personally write this without the wrappers, instead defining the > bitmask macros as the masks and then open-coding the > le32p_replace_bits() calls instead, which I would find more > intuitive while it avoids the problem with the bitmasks. Use these macros can address offset and bit fields quickly. How about I use macro instead of inline function? Like, #define RTW89_SET_TXWD (txdesc, val, offset, mask) \ do { \ u32 *txd32 = (u32 *)txdesc; \ le32p_replace_bits((__le32 *)(txd32 + offset), val, mask); \ } while (0) > Going back one more step, I see that that rtw89_core_fill_txdesc() > manipulates the descriptor fields in-memory, which also seems > like a bad idea: The descriptor is mapped as cache-coherent, > so on machines with no coherent DMA (i.e. most ARM or MIPS > machines), that is uncached memory, and writing the descriptor > using a series of read-modify-write cycles on uncached memory > will be awfully slow. Maybe the answer is to just completely > replace the descriptor access. I'll think if we can use chached memory with single_map/unmap for descriptor. That would improve the performance. -- Ping-Ke
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-05 9:32 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-08-20 4:35 [PATCH v6 00/24] rtw89: add Realtek 802.11ax driver Ping-Ke Shih 2021-08-20 4:35 ` [PATCH v6 01/24] rtw89: add CAM files Ping-Ke Shih 2021-10-01 14:46 ` Kalle Valo 2021-08-20 4:35 ` [PATCH v6 02/24] rtw89: add BT coexistence files Ping-Ke Shih 2021-10-01 15:26 ` Kalle Valo 2021-10-01 17:40 ` Small driver submissions and long feedback cycles Brian Norris 2021-08-20 4:35 ` [PATCH v6 03/24] rtw89: add core and trx files Ping-Ke Shih 2021-10-01 16:26 ` Kalle Valo 2021-10-05 7:16 ` Pkshih 2021-10-05 7:46 ` Kalle Valo 2021-10-05 8:42 ` Arnd Bergmann 2021-10-05 9:32 ` Pkshih [this message] 2021-10-05 9:59 ` Arnd Bergmann 2021-10-06 1:35 ` Pkshih 2021-10-06 7:32 ` Arnd Bergmann 2021-10-06 8:19 ` Pkshih 2021-08-20 4:35 ` [PATCH v6 04/24] rtw89: add debug files Ping-Ke Shih 2021-08-20 4:35 ` [PATCH v6 05/24] rtw89: add efuse files Ping-Ke Shih 2021-08-20 4:35 ` [PATCH v6 06/24] rtw89: add files to download and communicate with firmware Ping-Ke Shih 2021-10-01 15:55 ` Kalle Valo 2021-08-20 4:35 ` [PATCH v6 07/24] rtw89: add MAC files Ping-Ke Shih 2021-10-01 16:13 ` Kalle Valo 2021-08-20 4:35 ` [PATCH v6 08/24] rtw89: implement mac80211 ops Ping-Ke Shih 2021-08-20 4:35 ` [PATCH v6 09/24] rtw89: add pci files Ping-Ke Shih 2021-08-20 4:35 ` [PATCH v6 10/24] rtw89: add phy files Ping-Ke Shih 2021-08-20 4:35 ` [PATCH v6 11/24] rtw89: define register names Ping-Ke Shih 2021-08-20 4:35 ` [PATCH v6 12/24] rtw89: add regulatory support Ping-Ke Shih 2021-08-20 4:35 ` [PATCH v6 13/24] rtw89: 8852a: add 8852a specific files Ping-Ke Shih 2021-10-01 16:20 ` Kalle Valo 2021-08-20 4:35 ` [PATCH v6 14/24] rtw89: 8852a: add 8852a RFK files Ping-Ke Shih 2021-08-20 4:35 ` [PATCH v6 15/24] rtw89: 8852a: add 8852a RFK tables Ping-Ke Shih 2021-08-20 4:35 ` [PATCH v6 16/24] rtw89: 8852a: add 8852a tables (1 of 5) Ping-Ke Shih 2021-08-20 4:35 ` [PATCH v6 17/24] rtw89: 8852a: add 8852a tables (2 " Ping-Ke Shih 2021-08-20 4:35 ` [PATCH v6 18/24] rtw89: 8852a: add 8852a tables (3 " Ping-Ke Shih 2021-08-20 4:35 ` [PATCH v6 19/24] rtw89: 8852a: add 8852a tables (4 " Ping-Ke Shih 2021-08-20 4:35 ` [PATCH v6 20/24] rtw89: 8852a: add 8852a tables (5 " Ping-Ke Shih 2021-08-20 4:35 ` [PATCH v6 21/24] rtw89: add ser to recover error reported by firmware Ping-Ke Shih 2021-08-20 4:35 ` [PATCH v6 22/24] rtw89: add PS files Ping-Ke Shih 2021-08-20 4:35 ` [PATCH v6 23/24] rtw89: add SAR files Ping-Ke Shih 2021-08-20 4:35 ` [PATCH v6 24/24] rtw89: add Kconfig and Makefile Ping-Ke Shih 2021-08-22 3:43 ` kernel test robot 2021-08-23 1:37 ` Pkshih 2021-10-01 15:57 ` Kalle Valo 2021-10-01 16:34 ` [PATCH v6 00/24] rtw89: add Realtek 802.11ax driver Kalle Valo 2021-10-01 16:42 ` Larry Finger 2021-10-01 16:46 ` Kalle Valo 2021-10-01 17:18 ` Larry Finger 2021-10-05 5:46 ` Kalle Valo 2021-10-04 6:46 ` Pkshih 2021-10-05 5:52 ` Kalle Valo 2021-10-06 0:10 ` Brian Norris 2021-10-08 4:14 ` Pkshih 2021-10-08 4:11 ` Pkshih 2021-10-09 8:28 ` Kalle Valo 2021-10-12 1:53 ` Pkshih
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=a8dd5e59fb8f491fb34e52d495cf4c85@realtek.com \ --to=pkshih@realtek.com \ --cc=arnd@arndb.de \ --cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \ --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \ --subject='RE: [PATCH v6 03/24] rtw89: add core and trx files' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.