All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
To: Ajit Pandey <ajitp@codeaurora.org>,
	broonie@kernel.org, plai@codeaurora.org, bgoswami@codeaurora.org
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] ASoC: qcom: Add common array to initialize soc based core clocks
Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 10:11:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aa1ad5a5-94e8-0a6a-1937-e9d2abbb67f7@linaro.org> (raw)


On 14/05/2020 17:38, Ajit Pandey wrote:
> AHB-I/X bus clocks inside LPASS coreis not a mandatory clocks for
> SC7180 soc lpass variants, hence make it an optional one.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ajit Pandey <ajitp@codeaurora.org>
> ---

For some reason patch subject seems messed up!

I see two patches with same subject "[PATCH v2 2/7] ASoC: qcom: Add 
common array to initialize soc based core clocks" and totally different 
content and PATCH v2 3/7 is missing as well!

--srini




>   sound/soc/qcom/lpass-cpu.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/sound/soc/qcom/lpass-cpu.c b/sound/soc/qcom/lpass-cpu.c
> index e00a4af..729ca78 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/qcom/lpass-cpu.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/qcom/lpass-cpu.c
> @@ -594,7 +594,7 @@ int asoc_qcom_lpass_cpu_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   		}
>   	}
>   
> -	drvdata->ahbix_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "ahbix-clk");
> +	drvdata->ahbix_clk = devm_clk_get_optional(dev, "ahbix-clk");
>   	if (IS_ERR(drvdata->ahbix_clk)) {
>   		dev_err(dev, "error getting ahbix-clk: %ld\n",
>   			PTR_ERR(drvdata->ahbix_clk));
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
To: Ajit Pandey <ajitp@codeaurora.org>,
	broonie@kernel.org, plai@codeaurora.org, bgoswami@codeaurora.org
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] ASoC: qcom: Add common array to initialize soc based core clocks
Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 10:11:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aa1ad5a5-94e8-0a6a-1937-e9d2abbb67f7@linaro.org> (raw)


On 14/05/2020 17:38, Ajit Pandey wrote:
> AHB-I/X bus clocks inside LPASS coreis not a mandatory clocks for
> SC7180 soc lpass variants, hence make it an optional one.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ajit Pandey <ajitp@codeaurora.org>
> ---

For some reason patch subject seems messed up!

I see two patches with same subject "[PATCH v2 2/7] ASoC: qcom: Add 
common array to initialize soc based core clocks" and totally different 
content and PATCH v2 3/7 is missing as well!

--srini




>   sound/soc/qcom/lpass-cpu.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/sound/soc/qcom/lpass-cpu.c b/sound/soc/qcom/lpass-cpu.c
> index e00a4af..729ca78 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/qcom/lpass-cpu.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/qcom/lpass-cpu.c
> @@ -594,7 +594,7 @@ int asoc_qcom_lpass_cpu_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   		}
>   	}
>   
> -	drvdata->ahbix_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "ahbix-clk");
> +	drvdata->ahbix_clk = devm_clk_get_optional(dev, "ahbix-clk");
>   	if (IS_ERR(drvdata->ahbix_clk)) {
>   		dev_err(dev, "error getting ahbix-clk: %ld\n",
>   			PTR_ERR(drvdata->ahbix_clk));
> 

             reply	other threads:[~2020-05-18  9:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-18  9:11 Srinivas Kandagatla [this message]
2020-05-18  9:11 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] ASoC: qcom: Add common array to initialize soc based core clocks Srinivas Kandagatla
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-05-16 18:06 Ajit Pandey
2020-05-16 18:06 ` Ajit Pandey
     [not found] <“1586592171-31644-1-git-send-email-ajitp@codeaurora.org”>
2020-05-14 16:38 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] ASoC: QCOM: Add support for SC7180 lpass variant Ajit Pandey
2020-05-14 16:38   ` [PATCH v2 2/7] ASoC: qcom: Add common array to initialize soc based core clocks Ajit Pandey
2020-05-14 16:38   ` Ajit Pandey
2020-05-14 16:45     ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aa1ad5a5-94e8-0a6a-1937-e9d2abbb67f7@linaro.org \
    --to=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
    --cc=ajitp@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=bgoswami@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=plai@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.