All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	"Sagi Grimberg" <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>, Wen Xiong <wenxiong@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] blk-mq: not deactivate hctx if the device doesn't use managed irq
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 10:25:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <adf34d6d-b209-78d3-8df9-4e3398e34612@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YNu7rs7j5/KtQjAi@T590>

On 30/06/2021 01:32, Ming Lei wrote:
>> Many block drivers don't use managed interrupts - to be proper, why not set
>> this everywhere (which doesn't use managed interrupts)? I know why, but it's
>> odd.
> It is just one small optimization in slow path for other drivers, not sure these
> drivers are interested in such change. It only serves as fix for callers of
> blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx().
> 
> Anyway, we can document the situation.
> 
>> As an alternative, if the default queue mapping was used (in
>> blk_mq_map_queues()), then that's the same thing as
>> BLK_MQ_F_NOT_USE_MANAGED_IRQ in reality, right? If so, could we
>> alternatively check for that somehow?
> This way can't work, for example of NVMe PCI, managed irq is used for
> the default/write queues, but poll queues uses blk_mq_map_queues().
> 
> Also it can't cover all cases, such as MVMe RDMA.
> 
> Using managed irq or not is thing of driver's choice, and not sure if it
> is good for block layer to provide such abstract. I'd suggest to fix the
> issue still by passing one flag, given we needn't it everywhere so far.

Sure, but I am just trying to suggest a more automatic way of passing 
this info. Like, for example, if we use blk_mq_pci_map_queues() on the 
qmap, then you prob want blk-mq managed interrupt support (for that 
qmap), i.e. CPU hotplug handlers.

Thanks,
John

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	"Sagi Grimberg" <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>, Wen Xiong <wenxiong@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] blk-mq: not deactivate hctx if the device doesn't use managed irq
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 10:25:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <adf34d6d-b209-78d3-8df9-4e3398e34612@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YNu7rs7j5/KtQjAi@T590>

On 30/06/2021 01:32, Ming Lei wrote:
>> Many block drivers don't use managed interrupts - to be proper, why not set
>> this everywhere (which doesn't use managed interrupts)? I know why, but it's
>> odd.
> It is just one small optimization in slow path for other drivers, not sure these
> drivers are interested in such change. It only serves as fix for callers of
> blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx().
> 
> Anyway, we can document the situation.
> 
>> As an alternative, if the default queue mapping was used (in
>> blk_mq_map_queues()), then that's the same thing as
>> BLK_MQ_F_NOT_USE_MANAGED_IRQ in reality, right? If so, could we
>> alternatively check for that somehow?
> This way can't work, for example of NVMe PCI, managed irq is used for
> the default/write queues, but poll queues uses blk_mq_map_queues().
> 
> Also it can't cover all cases, such as MVMe RDMA.
> 
> Using managed irq or not is thing of driver's choice, and not sure if it
> is good for block layer to provide such abstract. I'd suggest to fix the
> issue still by passing one flag, given we needn't it everywhere so far.

Sure, but I am just trying to suggest a more automatic way of passing 
this info. Like, for example, if we use blk_mq_pci_map_queues() on the 
qmap, then you prob want blk-mq managed interrupt support (for that 
qmap), i.e. CPU hotplug handlers.

Thanks,
John

_______________________________________________
Linux-nvme mailing list
Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-30  9:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-29  7:49 [PATCH 0/2] blk-mq: fix blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx Ming Lei
2021-06-29  7:49 ` Ming Lei
2021-06-29  7:49 ` [PATCH 1/2] blk-mq: not deactivate hctx if the device doesn't use managed irq Ming Lei
2021-06-29  7:49   ` Ming Lei
2021-06-29 12:39   ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-06-29 12:39     ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-06-29 14:17     ` Ming Lei
2021-06-29 14:17       ` Ming Lei
2021-06-29 15:49   ` John Garry
2021-06-29 15:49     ` John Garry
2021-06-30  0:32     ` Ming Lei
2021-06-30  0:32       ` Ming Lei
2021-06-30  9:25       ` John Garry [this message]
2021-06-30  9:25         ` John Garry
2021-07-01  9:52       ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-01  9:52         ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-29 23:30   ` Damien Le Moal
2021-06-29 23:30     ` Damien Le Moal
2021-06-30 18:58     ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-06-30 18:58       ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-06-30 21:57       ` Damien Le Moal
2021-06-30 21:57         ` Damien Le Moal
2021-07-01 14:20         ` Keith Busch
2021-07-01 14:20           ` Keith Busch
2021-06-29  7:49 ` [PATCH 2/2] nvme: pass BLK_MQ_F_NOT_USE_MANAGED_IRQ for fc/rdma/tcp/loop Ming Lei
2021-06-29  7:49   ` Ming Lei
2021-06-30  8:15   ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-06-30  8:15     ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-06-30  8:47     ` Ming Lei
2021-06-30  8:47       ` Ming Lei
2021-06-30  8:18 ` [PATCH 0/2] blk-mq: fix blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx Hannes Reinecke
2021-06-30  8:18   ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-06-30  8:42   ` Ming Lei
2021-06-30  8:42     ` Ming Lei
2021-06-30  9:43     ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-06-30  9:43       ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-06-30  9:53       ` Ming Lei
2021-06-30  9:53         ` Ming Lei
2021-06-30 18:59         ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-06-30 18:59           ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-06-30 19:46           ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-06-30 19:46             ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-06-30 23:59             ` Ming Lei
2021-06-30 23:59               ` Ming Lei
2021-07-01  8:00               ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-07-01  8:00                 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-07-01  9:13                 ` Ming Lei
2021-07-01  9:13                   ` Ming Lei
2021-07-02  9:47             ` Daniel Wagner
2021-07-02  9:47               ` Daniel Wagner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=adf34d6d-b209-78d3-8df9-4e3398e34612@huawei.com \
    --to=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dwagner@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=wenxiong@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.