* [PATCH 1/2] vhost-vdpa: don't initialize backend_features
@ 2021-06-02 3:31 Jason Wang
2021-06-02 3:31 ` [PATCH 2/2] vhost-vdpa: remove the unused vhost_vdpa_get_acked_features() Jason Wang
2021-06-02 7:38 ` [PATCH 1/2] vhost-vdpa: don't initialize backend_features Gautam Dawar
0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jason Wang @ 2021-06-02 3:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mst, qemu-devel; +Cc: Jason Wang, lulu, gdawar, qemu-stable
We used to initialize backend_features during vhost_vdpa_init()
regardless whether or not it was supported by vhost. This will lead
the unsupported features like VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER to be included and set
to the vhost-vdpa during vhost_dev_start. Because the
VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER is not supported by vhost-vdpa so it won't be
advertised to guest which will break the datapath.
Fix this by not initializing the backend_features, so the
acked_features could be built only from guest features via
vhost_net_ack_features().
Fixes: 108a64818e69b ("vhost-vdpa: introduce vhost-vdpa backend")
Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Cc: Gautam Dawar <gdawar@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
---
hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c b/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c
index 01d2101d09..5fe43a4eb5 100644
--- a/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c
+++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c
@@ -275,15 +275,12 @@ static void vhost_vdpa_add_status(struct vhost_dev *dev, uint8_t status)
static int vhost_vdpa_init(struct vhost_dev *dev, void *opaque)
{
struct vhost_vdpa *v;
- uint64_t features;
assert(dev->vhost_ops->backend_type == VHOST_BACKEND_TYPE_VDPA);
trace_vhost_vdpa_init(dev, opaque);
v = opaque;
v->dev = dev;
dev->opaque = opaque ;
- vhost_vdpa_call(dev, VHOST_GET_FEATURES, &features);
- dev->backend_features = features;
v->listener = vhost_vdpa_memory_listener;
v->msg_type = VHOST_IOTLB_MSG_V2;
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [PATCH 2/2] vhost-vdpa: remove the unused vhost_vdpa_get_acked_features()
2021-06-02 3:31 [PATCH 1/2] vhost-vdpa: don't initialize backend_features Jason Wang
@ 2021-06-02 3:31 ` Jason Wang
2021-06-05 17:19 ` Gautam Dawar
2021-06-02 7:38 ` [PATCH 1/2] vhost-vdpa: don't initialize backend_features Gautam Dawar
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jason Wang @ 2021-06-02 3:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mst, qemu-devel; +Cc: Jason Wang, lulu, gdawar
No user for this helper, let's remove it.
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
---
include/net/vhost-vdpa.h | 1 -
net/vhost-vdpa.c | 9 ---------
2 files changed, 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/vhost-vdpa.h b/include/net/vhost-vdpa.h
index 45e34b7cfc..b81f9a6f2a 100644
--- a/include/net/vhost-vdpa.h
+++ b/include/net/vhost-vdpa.h
@@ -15,7 +15,6 @@
#define TYPE_VHOST_VDPA "vhost-vdpa"
struct vhost_net *vhost_vdpa_get_vhost_net(NetClientState *nc);
-uint64_t vhost_vdpa_get_acked_features(NetClientState *nc);
extern const int vdpa_feature_bits[];
diff --git a/net/vhost-vdpa.c b/net/vhost-vdpa.c
index fe659ec9e2..8dc86332a6 100644
--- a/net/vhost-vdpa.c
+++ b/net/vhost-vdpa.c
@@ -66,15 +66,6 @@ VHostNetState *vhost_vdpa_get_vhost_net(NetClientState *nc)
return s->vhost_net;
}
-uint64_t vhost_vdpa_get_acked_features(NetClientState *nc)
-{
- VhostVDPAState *s = DO_UPCAST(VhostVDPAState, nc, nc);
- assert(nc->info->type == NET_CLIENT_DRIVER_VHOST_VDPA);
- s->acked_features = vhost_net_get_acked_features(s->vhost_net);
-
- return s->acked_features;
-}
-
static int vhost_vdpa_net_check_device_id(struct vhost_net *net)
{
uint32_t device_id;
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* RE: [PATCH 2/2] vhost-vdpa: remove the unused vhost_vdpa_get_acked_features()
2021-06-02 3:31 ` [PATCH 2/2] vhost-vdpa: remove the unused vhost_vdpa_get_acked_features() Jason Wang
@ 2021-06-05 17:19 ` Gautam Dawar
2021-06-08 2:36 ` Jason Wang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Gautam Dawar @ 2021-06-05 17:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason Wang, mst, qemu-devel; +Cc: lulu
No user for this helper, let's remove it.
[GD>>] These patches seem unrelated to me. Do you think they should be part of one patch series?
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
---
include/net/vhost-vdpa.h | 1 -
net/vhost-vdpa.c | 9 ---------
2 files changed, 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/vhost-vdpa.h b/include/net/vhost-vdpa.h index 45e34b7cfc..b81f9a6f2a 100644
--- a/include/net/vhost-vdpa.h
+++ b/include/net/vhost-vdpa.h
@@ -15,7 +15,6 @@
#define TYPE_VHOST_VDPA "vhost-vdpa"
struct vhost_net *vhost_vdpa_get_vhost_net(NetClientState *nc); -uint64_t vhost_vdpa_get_acked_features(NetClientState *nc);
extern const int vdpa_feature_bits[];
diff --git a/net/vhost-vdpa.c b/net/vhost-vdpa.c index fe659ec9e2..8dc86332a6 100644
--- a/net/vhost-vdpa.c
+++ b/net/vhost-vdpa.c
@@ -66,15 +66,6 @@ VHostNetState *vhost_vdpa_get_vhost_net(NetClientState *nc)
return s->vhost_net;
}
-uint64_t vhost_vdpa_get_acked_features(NetClientState *nc) -{
- VhostVDPAState *s = DO_UPCAST(VhostVDPAState, nc, nc);
- assert(nc->info->type == NET_CLIENT_DRIVER_VHOST_VDPA);
- s->acked_features = vhost_net_get_acked_features(s->vhost_net);
-
- return s->acked_features;
-}
-
static int vhost_vdpa_net_check_device_id(struct vhost_net *net) {
uint32_t device_id;
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 2/2] vhost-vdpa: remove the unused vhost_vdpa_get_acked_features()
2021-06-05 17:19 ` Gautam Dawar
@ 2021-06-08 2:36 ` Jason Wang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jason Wang @ 2021-06-08 2:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gautam Dawar, mst, qemu-devel; +Cc: lulu
在 2021/6/6 上午1:19, Gautam Dawar 写道:
> No user for this helper, let's remove it.
>
> [GD>>] These patches seem unrelated to me. Do you think they should be part of one patch series?
It doesn't harm.
I've queued this patch.
Thanks
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> ---
> include/net/vhost-vdpa.h | 1 -
> net/vhost-vdpa.c | 9 ---------
> 2 files changed, 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/vhost-vdpa.h b/include/net/vhost-vdpa.h index 45e34b7cfc..b81f9a6f2a 100644
> --- a/include/net/vhost-vdpa.h
> +++ b/include/net/vhost-vdpa.h
> @@ -15,7 +15,6 @@
> #define TYPE_VHOST_VDPA "vhost-vdpa"
>
> struct vhost_net *vhost_vdpa_get_vhost_net(NetClientState *nc); -uint64_t vhost_vdpa_get_acked_features(NetClientState *nc);
>
> extern const int vdpa_feature_bits[];
>
> diff --git a/net/vhost-vdpa.c b/net/vhost-vdpa.c index fe659ec9e2..8dc86332a6 100644
> --- a/net/vhost-vdpa.c
> +++ b/net/vhost-vdpa.c
> @@ -66,15 +66,6 @@ VHostNetState *vhost_vdpa_get_vhost_net(NetClientState *nc)
> return s->vhost_net;
> }
>
> -uint64_t vhost_vdpa_get_acked_features(NetClientState *nc) -{
> - VhostVDPAState *s = DO_UPCAST(VhostVDPAState, nc, nc);
> - assert(nc->info->type == NET_CLIENT_DRIVER_VHOST_VDPA);
> - s->acked_features = vhost_net_get_acked_features(s->vhost_net);
> -
> - return s->acked_features;
> -}
> -
> static int vhost_vdpa_net_check_device_id(struct vhost_net *net) {
> uint32_t device_id;
> --
> 2.25.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH 1/2] vhost-vdpa: don't initialize backend_features
2021-06-02 3:31 [PATCH 1/2] vhost-vdpa: don't initialize backend_features Jason Wang
2021-06-02 3:31 ` [PATCH 2/2] vhost-vdpa: remove the unused vhost_vdpa_get_acked_features() Jason Wang
@ 2021-06-02 7:38 ` Gautam Dawar
2021-06-02 8:48 ` Jason Wang
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Gautam Dawar @ 2021-06-02 7:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason Wang, mst, qemu-devel; +Cc: qemu-stable, lulu
Hi Jason,
Pls see my comments inline marked by GD>>
Regards,
Gautam
-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 2, 2021 9:01 AM
To: mst@redhat.com; qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Gautam Dawar <gdawar@xilinx.com>; lulu@redhat.com; Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>; qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] vhost-vdpa: don't initialize backend_features
We used to initialize backend_features during vhost_vdpa_init() regardless whether or not it was supported by vhost. This will lead the unsupported features like VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER to be included and set to the vhost-vdpa during vhost_dev_start. Because the VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER is not supported by vhost-vdpa so it won't be advertised to guest which will break the datapath.
Fix this by not initializing the backend_features, so the acked_features could be built only from guest features via vhost_net_ack_features().
Fixes: 108a64818e69b ("vhost-vdpa: introduce vhost-vdpa backend")
Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Cc: Gautam Dawar <gdawar@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
---
hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c b/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c index 01d2101d09..5fe43a4eb5 100644
--- a/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c
+++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c
@@ -275,15 +275,12 @@ static void vhost_vdpa_add_status(struct vhost_dev *dev, uint8_t status) static int vhost_vdpa_init(struct vhost_dev *dev, void *opaque) {
struct vhost_vdpa *v;
- uint64_t features;
assert(dev->vhost_ops->backend_type == VHOST_BACKEND_TYPE_VDPA);
trace_vhost_vdpa_init(dev, opaque);
v = opaque;
v->dev = dev;
dev->opaque = opaque ;
- vhost_vdpa_call(dev, VHOST_GET_FEATURES, &features);
- dev->backend_features = features;
[GD>>] Should this be initialized with 0 here? I am not sure if memory allocated for struct vhost_dev is initialized with 0.
v->listener = vhost_vdpa_memory_listener;
v->msg_type = VHOST_IOTLB_MSG_V2;
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 1/2] vhost-vdpa: don't initialize backend_features
2021-06-02 7:38 ` [PATCH 1/2] vhost-vdpa: don't initialize backend_features Gautam Dawar
@ 2021-06-02 8:48 ` Jason Wang
2021-06-04 9:10 ` Gautam Dawar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jason Wang @ 2021-06-02 8:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gautam Dawar, mst, qemu-devel; +Cc: qemu-stable, lulu
Hi Gautam:
在 2021/6/2 下午3:38, Gautam Dawar 写道:
> Hi Jason,
>
> Pls see my comments inline marked by GD>>
>
> Regards,
> Gautam
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 2, 2021 9:01 AM
> To: mst@redhat.com; qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> Cc: Gautam Dawar <gdawar@xilinx.com>; lulu@redhat.com; Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>; qemu-stable@nongnu.org
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] vhost-vdpa: don't initialize backend_features
>
> We used to initialize backend_features during vhost_vdpa_init() regardless whether or not it was supported by vhost. This will lead the unsupported features like VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER to be included and set to the vhost-vdpa during vhost_dev_start. Because the VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER is not supported by vhost-vdpa so it won't be advertised to guest which will break the datapath.
>
> Fix this by not initializing the backend_features, so the acked_features could be built only from guest features via vhost_net_ack_features().
>
> Fixes: 108a64818e69b ("vhost-vdpa: introduce vhost-vdpa backend")
> Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
> Cc: Gautam Dawar <gdawar@xilinx.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> ---
> hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c b/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c index 01d2101d09..5fe43a4eb5 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c
> +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c
> @@ -275,15 +275,12 @@ static void vhost_vdpa_add_status(struct vhost_dev *dev, uint8_t status) static int vhost_vdpa_init(struct vhost_dev *dev, void *opaque) {
> struct vhost_vdpa *v;
> - uint64_t features;
> assert(dev->vhost_ops->backend_type == VHOST_BACKEND_TYPE_VDPA);
> trace_vhost_vdpa_init(dev, opaque);
>
> v = opaque;
> v->dev = dev;
> dev->opaque = opaque ;
> - vhost_vdpa_call(dev, VHOST_GET_FEATURES, &features);
> - dev->backend_features = features;
> [GD>>] Should this be initialized with 0 here? I am not sure if memory allocated for struct vhost_dev is initialized with 0.
See vhost_net_init:
struct vhost_net *net = g_new0(struct vhost_net, 1);
vhost_dev is embedded in the vhost_net structure. So I think it should
be zero.
Thanks
> v->listener = vhost_vdpa_memory_listener;
> v->msg_type = VHOST_IOTLB_MSG_V2;
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* RE: [PATCH 1/2] vhost-vdpa: don't initialize backend_features
2021-06-02 8:48 ` Jason Wang
@ 2021-06-04 9:10 ` Gautam Dawar
2021-06-08 2:34 ` Jason Wang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Gautam Dawar @ 2021-06-04 9:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason Wang, mst, qemu-devel; +Cc: qemu-stable, lulu
Hi Jason,
-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 2, 2021 2:18 PM
To: Gautam Dawar <gdawar@xilinx.com>; mst@redhat.com; qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: lulu@redhat.com; qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] vhost-vdpa: don't initialize backend_features
Hi Gautam:
在 2021/6/2 下午3:38, Gautam Dawar 写道:
> Hi Jason,
>
> Pls see my comments inline marked by GD>>
>
> Regards,
> Gautam
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 2, 2021 9:01 AM
> To: mst@redhat.com; qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> Cc: Gautam Dawar <gdawar@xilinx.com>; lulu@redhat.com; Jason Wang
> <jasowang@redhat.com>; qemu-stable@nongnu.org
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] vhost-vdpa: don't initialize backend_features
>
> We used to initialize backend_features during vhost_vdpa_init() regardless whether or not it was supported by vhost. This will lead the unsupported features like VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER to be included and set to the vhost-vdpa during vhost_dev_start. Because the VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER is not supported by vhost-vdpa so it won't be advertised to guest which will break the datapath.
>
> Fix this by not initializing the backend_features, so the acked_features could be built only from guest features via vhost_net_ack_features().
>
> Fixes: 108a64818e69b ("vhost-vdpa: introduce vhost-vdpa backend")
> Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
> Cc: Gautam Dawar <gdawar@xilinx.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> ---
> hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c b/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c index
> 01d2101d09..5fe43a4eb5 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c
> +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c
> @@ -275,15 +275,12 @@ static void vhost_vdpa_add_status(struct vhost_dev *dev, uint8_t status) static int vhost_vdpa_init(struct vhost_dev *dev, void *opaque) {
> struct vhost_vdpa *v;
> - uint64_t features;
> assert(dev->vhost_ops->backend_type == VHOST_BACKEND_TYPE_VDPA);
> trace_vhost_vdpa_init(dev, opaque);
>
> v = opaque;
> v->dev = dev;
> dev->opaque = opaque ;
> - vhost_vdpa_call(dev, VHOST_GET_FEATURES, &features);
> - dev->backend_features = features;
> [GD>>] Should this be initialized with 0 here? I am not sure if memory allocated for struct vhost_dev is initialized with 0.
See vhost_net_init:
struct vhost_net *net = g_new0(struct vhost_net, 1);
vhost_dev is embedded in the vhost_net structure. So I think it should be zero.
[GD>>] That's correct. The embedded vhost_dev structure is indeed getting cleared to 0 in vhost_net_init().
Thanks
> v->listener = vhost_vdpa_memory_listener;
> v->msg_type = VHOST_IOTLB_MSG_V2;
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
[GD>>]
Signed-off-by: Gautam Dawar <gdawar@xilinx.com>
Acked-by: Gautam Dawar <gdawar@xilinx.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 1/2] vhost-vdpa: don't initialize backend_features
2021-06-04 9:10 ` Gautam Dawar
@ 2021-06-08 2:34 ` Jason Wang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jason Wang @ 2021-06-08 2:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gautam Dawar, mst, qemu-devel; +Cc: qemu-stable, lulu
在 2021/6/4 下午5:10, Gautam Dawar 写道:
> Hi Jason,
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 2, 2021 2:18 PM
> To: Gautam Dawar <gdawar@xilinx.com>; mst@redhat.com; qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> Cc: lulu@redhat.com; qemu-stable@nongnu.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] vhost-vdpa: don't initialize backend_features
>
> Hi Gautam:
>
> 在 2021/6/2 下午3:38, Gautam Dawar 写道:
>> Hi Jason,
>>
>> Pls see my comments inline marked by GD>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Gautam
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 2, 2021 9:01 AM
>> To: mst@redhat.com; qemu-devel@nongnu.org
>> Cc: Gautam Dawar <gdawar@xilinx.com>; lulu@redhat.com; Jason Wang
>> <jasowang@redhat.com>; qemu-stable@nongnu.org
>> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] vhost-vdpa: don't initialize backend_features
>>
>> We used to initialize backend_features during vhost_vdpa_init() regardless whether or not it was supported by vhost. This will lead the unsupported features like VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER to be included and set to the vhost-vdpa during vhost_dev_start. Because the VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER is not supported by vhost-vdpa so it won't be advertised to guest which will break the datapath.
>>
>> Fix this by not initializing the backend_features, so the acked_features could be built only from guest features via vhost_net_ack_features().
>>
>> Fixes: 108a64818e69b ("vhost-vdpa: introduce vhost-vdpa backend")
>> Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
>> Cc: Gautam Dawar <gdawar@xilinx.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c | 3 ---
>> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c b/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c index
>> 01d2101d09..5fe43a4eb5 100644
>> --- a/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c
>> +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c
>> @@ -275,15 +275,12 @@ static void vhost_vdpa_add_status(struct vhost_dev *dev, uint8_t status) static int vhost_vdpa_init(struct vhost_dev *dev, void *opaque) {
>> struct vhost_vdpa *v;
>> - uint64_t features;
>> assert(dev->vhost_ops->backend_type == VHOST_BACKEND_TYPE_VDPA);
>> trace_vhost_vdpa_init(dev, opaque);
>>
>> v = opaque;
>> v->dev = dev;
>> dev->opaque = opaque ;
>> - vhost_vdpa_call(dev, VHOST_GET_FEATURES, &features);
>> - dev->backend_features = features;
>> [GD>>] Should this be initialized with 0 here? I am not sure if memory allocated for struct vhost_dev is initialized with 0.
>
> See vhost_net_init:
>
> struct vhost_net *net = g_new0(struct vhost_net, 1);
>
> vhost_dev is embedded in the vhost_net structure. So I think it should be zero.
>
> [GD>>] That's correct. The embedded vhost_dev structure is indeed getting cleared to 0 in vhost_net_init().
> Thanks
Ok, I've queued this patch.
Thanks
>
>
>> v->listener = vhost_vdpa_memory_listener;
>> v->msg_type = VHOST_IOTLB_MSG_V2;
>>
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
> [GD>>]
> Signed-off-by: Gautam Dawar <gdawar@xilinx.com>
> Acked-by: Gautam Dawar <gdawar@xilinx.com>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-06-08 2:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-06-02 3:31 [PATCH 1/2] vhost-vdpa: don't initialize backend_features Jason Wang
2021-06-02 3:31 ` [PATCH 2/2] vhost-vdpa: remove the unused vhost_vdpa_get_acked_features() Jason Wang
2021-06-05 17:19 ` Gautam Dawar
2021-06-08 2:36 ` Jason Wang
2021-06-02 7:38 ` [PATCH 1/2] vhost-vdpa: don't initialize backend_features Gautam Dawar
2021-06-02 8:48 ` Jason Wang
2021-06-04 9:10 ` Gautam Dawar
2021-06-08 2:34 ` Jason Wang
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.