Re: cgroup: status-quo and userland efforts

[Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>]

On Wed, 3 Jul 2013, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 1:57 AM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> > Before answering please think about the relevance of your statements
> > "getting this all right isn't easy", "something like a scheduler",
> > "users probably want ..."  and "stable /dev/disk/by-id/* symlinks" in
> > those contexts.
> 
> I don't think anybody needs your money.

Thanks for your well thought out technical argument.
 
> But it's sure an improvement over last time when you wanted to use a
> "Kantholz" to make your statement.

Using an out of context snippet from a private conversation at the bar
to answer a technical argument is definitely proving your point.

Thanks,

	tglx