From: David Lang <david@lang.hm>
To: Roman Yeryomin <leroi.lists@gmail.com>
Cc: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net,
"Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>,
ath10k <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>,
"codel@lists.bufferbloat.net" <codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"OpenWrt Development List" <openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org>,
"Felix Fietkau" <nbd@nbd.name>
Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] OpenWRT wrong adjustment of fq_codel defaults (Was: fq_codel_drop vs a udp flood)
Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 01:12:59 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1605160110270.1574@nftneq.ynat.uz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACiydbLcYe=2VLb3W9i-i2FGALwxJK=oO8RcZWjmj3YPGObK3Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 16 May 2016, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
> On 6 May 2016 at 22:43, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Roman Yeryomin <leroi.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 6 May 2016 at 21:43, Roman Yeryomin <leroi.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On 6 May 2016 at 15:47, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>
>> That is too low a limit, also, for normal use. And:
>> for the purpose of this particular UDP test, flows 16 is ok, but not
>> ideal.
>
> I played with different combinations, it doesn't make any
> (significant) difference: 20-30Mbps, not more.
> What numbers would you propose?
How many different flows did you have going at once? I believe that the reason
for higher numbers isn't for throughput, but to allow for more flows to be
isolated from each other. If you have too few buckets, different flows will end
up being combined into one bucket so that one will affect the other more.
David Lang
_______________________________________________
Codel mailing list
Codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Lang <david@lang.hm>
To: Roman Yeryomin <leroi.lists@gmail.com>
Cc: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net,
"Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>,
"Dave Taht" <dave.taht@gmail.com>,
ath10k <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>,
"codel@lists.bufferbloat.net" <codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"OpenWrt Development List" <openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org>,
"Felix Fietkau" <nbd@nbd.name>
Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] OpenWRT wrong adjustment of fq_codel defaults (Was: [Codel] fq_codel_drop vs a udp flood)
Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 01:12:59 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1605160110270.1574@nftneq.ynat.uz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACiydbLcYe=2VLb3W9i-i2FGALwxJK=oO8RcZWjmj3YPGObK3Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 16 May 2016, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
> On 6 May 2016 at 22:43, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Roman Yeryomin <leroi.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 6 May 2016 at 21:43, Roman Yeryomin <leroi.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On 6 May 2016 at 15:47, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>
>> That is too low a limit, also, for normal use. And:
>> for the purpose of this particular UDP test, flows 16 is ok, but not
>> ideal.
>
> I played with different combinations, it doesn't make any
> (significant) difference: 20-30Mbps, not more.
> What numbers would you propose?
How many different flows did you have going at once? I believe that the reason
for higher numbers isn't for throughput, but to allow for more flows to be
isolated from each other. If you have too few buckets, different flows will end
up being combined into one bucket so that one will affect the other more.
David Lang
_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-16 8:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 108+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-01 3:41 fq_codel_drop vs a udp flood Dave Taht
2016-05-01 4:46 ` [Make-wifi-fast] " Jonathan Morton
2016-05-01 5:08 ` Ben Greear
2016-05-01 5:23 ` Dave Taht
2016-05-01 14:47 ` [Make-wifi-fast] " dpreed
2016-05-02 14:03 ` Roman Yeryomin
2016-05-02 18:40 ` Dave Taht
2016-05-05 13:55 ` Roman Yeryomin
2016-05-05 14:55 ` Roman Yeryomin
2016-05-02 19:47 ` David Lang
2016-05-01 17:59 ` [Codel] " Eric Dumazet
2016-05-01 18:20 ` Jonathan Morton
2016-05-01 18:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-05-01 19:55 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-05-02 7:47 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-05-01 20:35 ` Jonathan Morton
2016-05-01 20:55 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-05-02 14:18 ` Roman Yeryomin
2016-05-02 15:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-05-02 15:43 ` Roman Yeryomin
2016-05-02 16:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-05-02 17:08 ` Dave Taht
2016-05-02 17:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-05-05 14:32 ` Roman Yeryomin
2016-05-05 14:53 ` Roman Yeryomin
2016-05-05 15:32 ` Dave Taht
2016-05-05 16:07 ` Roman Yeryomin
2016-05-05 16:59 ` Jonathan Morton
2016-05-05 17:39 ` Roman Yeryomin
2016-05-05 18:16 ` Dave Taht
2016-05-05 18:33 ` Dave Taht
2016-05-05 16:12 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-05-05 16:25 ` Roman Yeryomin
2016-05-05 16:42 ` Roman Yeryomin
2016-05-06 10:55 ` Roman Yeryomin
2016-05-05 19:23 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-05-05 19:41 ` Dave Taht
2016-05-06 8:41 ` moeller0
2016-05-06 11:33 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-05-06 11:46 ` moeller0
2016-05-06 13:25 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-05-06 15:25 ` moeller0
2016-05-06 15:58 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-05-06 16:30 ` moeller0
2016-05-06 15:55 ` [PATCH net-next] fq_codel: add memory limitation per queue Eric Dumazet
2016-05-09 3:49 ` David Miller
2016-05-09 4:14 ` Cong Wang
2016-05-09 4:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-05-09 5:07 ` Cong Wang
2016-05-09 14:26 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-05-10 4:34 ` Cong Wang
2016-05-10 4:45 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-05-10 4:57 ` Cong Wang
2016-05-10 5:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-05-16 1:16 ` [PATCH net-next] fq_codel: fix memory limitation drift Eric Dumazet
2016-05-17 1:57 ` David Miller
2016-05-06 9:42 ` OpenWRT wrong adjustment of fq_codel defaults (Was: fq_codel_drop vs a udp flood) Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-05-06 9:42 ` OpenWRT wrong adjustment of fq_codel defaults (Was: [Codel] " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-05-06 12:47 ` OpenWRT wrong adjustment of fq_codel defaults (Was: " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-05-06 12:47 ` OpenWRT wrong adjustment of fq_codel defaults (Was: [Codel] " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-05-06 18:43 ` OpenWRT wrong adjustment of fq_codel defaults (Was: " Roman Yeryomin
2016-05-06 18:43 ` OpenWRT wrong adjustment of fq_codel defaults (Was: [Codel] " Roman Yeryomin
2016-05-06 18:56 ` OpenWRT wrong adjustment of fq_codel defaults (Was: " Roman Yeryomin
2016-05-06 18:56 ` OpenWRT wrong adjustment of fq_codel defaults (Was: [Codel] " Roman Yeryomin
2016-05-06 19:43 ` OpenWRT wrong adjustment of fq_codel defaults (Was: " Dave Taht
2016-05-06 19:43 ` OpenWRT wrong adjustment of fq_codel defaults (Was: [Codel] " Dave Taht
2016-05-15 22:34 ` OpenWRT wrong adjustment of fq_codel defaults (Was: " Roman Yeryomin
2016-05-15 22:34 ` OpenWRT wrong adjustment of fq_codel defaults (Was: [Codel] " Roman Yeryomin
2016-05-15 23:07 ` OpenWRT wrong adjustment of fq_codel defaults (Was: " Eric Dumazet
2016-05-15 23:07 ` OpenWRT wrong adjustment of fq_codel defaults (Was: [Codel] " Eric Dumazet
2016-05-15 23:27 ` OpenWRT wrong adjustment of fq_codel defaults (Was: " Roman Yeryomin
2016-05-15 23:27 ` OpenWRT wrong adjustment of fq_codel defaults (Was: [Codel] " Roman Yeryomin
2016-05-16 8:12 ` David Lang [this message]
2016-05-16 8:12 ` [Make-wifi-fast] " David Lang
2016-05-16 8:26 ` Roman Yeryomin
2016-05-16 8:26 ` Roman Yeryomin
2016-05-16 8:46 ` [Make-wifi-fast] OpenWRT wrong adjustment of fq_codel defaults (Was: " David Lang
2016-05-16 8:46 ` [Make-wifi-fast] OpenWRT wrong adjustment of fq_codel defaults (Was: [Codel] " David Lang
2016-05-16 10:34 ` [OpenWrt-Devel] [Make-wifi-fast] OpenWRT wrong adjustment of fq_codel defaults (Was: " Sebastian Moeller
2016-05-16 10:34 ` [OpenWrt-Devel] [Make-wifi-fast] OpenWRT wrong adjustment of fq_codel defaults (Was: [Codel] " Sebastian Moeller
2016-05-16 8:14 ` OpenWRT wrong adjustment of fq_codel defaults (Was: " Roman Yeryomin
2016-05-16 8:14 ` OpenWRT wrong adjustment of fq_codel defaults (Was: [Codel] " Roman Yeryomin
2016-05-16 14:23 ` [Make-wifi-fast] OpenWRT wrong adjustment of fq_codel defaults (Was: " Eric Dumazet
2016-05-16 14:23 ` [Make-wifi-fast] OpenWRT wrong adjustment of fq_codel defaults (Was: [Codel] " Eric Dumazet
2016-05-16 16:04 ` Dave Taht
2016-05-16 16:04 ` Dave Taht
2016-05-16 19:46 ` OpenWRT wrong adjustment of fq_codel defaults (Was: " Roman Yeryomin
2016-05-16 19:46 ` OpenWRT wrong adjustment of fq_codel defaults (Was: [Codel] " Roman Yeryomin
2016-05-07 9:57 ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2016-05-15 22:47 ` Roman Yeryomin
2016-05-15 22:47 ` Roman Yeryomin
2016-05-03 2:26 ` [Codel] fq_codel_drop vs a udp flood Dave Taht
2016-05-03 5:21 ` Dave Taht
2016-05-03 12:39 ` Agarwal, Anil
2016-05-03 12:50 ` Agarwal, Anil
2016-05-03 13:35 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-05-03 15:37 ` Agarwal, Anil
2016-05-03 17:37 ` Dave Taht
2016-05-03 17:54 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-05-03 18:11 ` Dave Taht
2016-05-03 13:20 ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2016-05-01 18:26 ` Dave Taht
2016-05-01 22:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-05-02 14:09 ` Roman Yeryomin
2016-05-02 15:04 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-05-02 15:42 ` Roman Yeryomin
2016-05-02 13:47 ` [Make-wifi-fast] " Roman Yeryomin
2016-05-02 15:01 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.02.1605160110270.1574@nftneq.ynat.uz \
--to=david@lang.hm \
--cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=codel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=leroi.lists@gmail.com \
--cc=make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=nbd@nbd.name \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org \
--cc=zajec5@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.