All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
To: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>
Cc: qemu-block@nongnu.org,
	Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
	Anthony Perard <anthony.perard@citrix.com>,
	Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>,
	"open list:X86" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	"open list:All patches CC here" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] xen_disk: split discard input to match internal representation
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 10:46:18 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1611231046090.21858@sstabellini-ThinkPad-X260> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161123103912.26699-1-olaf@aepfle.de>

On Wed, 23 Nov 2016, Olaf Hering wrote:
> The guest sends discard requests as u64 sector/count pairs, but the
> block layer operates internally with s64/s32 pairs. The conversion
> leads to IO errors in the guest, the discard request is not processed.
> 
>   domU.cfg:
>   'vdev=xvda, format=qcow2, backendtype=qdisk, target=/x.qcow2'
>   domU:
>   mkfs.ext4 -F /dev/xvda
>   Discarding device blocks: failed - Input/output error
> 
> Fix this by splitting the request into chunks of BDRV_REQUEST_MAX_SECTORS.
> Add input range checking to avoid overflow.
> 
> Fixes f313520 ("xen_disk: add discard support")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>

Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>


> v3:
>  turn tab into spaces to fix checkpatch warning
> v2:
>  adjust overflow check
>  add Fixes revspec because the initial commit also failed to convert u64 to s32
>  adjust summary
> 
>  hw/block/xen_disk.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/block/xen_disk.c b/hw/block/xen_disk.c
> index 3a7dc19..456a2d5 100644
> --- a/hw/block/xen_disk.c
> +++ b/hw/block/xen_disk.c
> @@ -660,6 +660,38 @@ static void qemu_aio_complete(void *opaque, int ret)
>      qemu_bh_schedule(ioreq->blkdev->bh);
>  }
>  
> +static bool blk_split_discard(struct ioreq *ioreq, blkif_sector_t sector_number,
> +                              uint64_t nr_sectors)
> +{
> +    struct XenBlkDev *blkdev = ioreq->blkdev;
> +    int64_t byte_offset;
> +    int byte_chunk;
> +    uint64_t byte_remaining, limit;
> +    uint64_t sec_start = sector_number;
> +    uint64_t sec_count = nr_sectors;
> +
> +    /* Wrap around, or overflowing byte limit? */
> +    if (sec_start + sec_count < sec_count ||
> +        sec_start + sec_count > INT64_MAX >> BDRV_SECTOR_BITS) {
> +        return false;
> +    }
> +
> +    limit = BDRV_REQUEST_MAX_SECTORS << BDRV_SECTOR_BITS;
> +    byte_offset = sec_start << BDRV_SECTOR_BITS;
> +    byte_remaining = sec_count << BDRV_SECTOR_BITS;
> +
> +    do {
> +        byte_chunk = byte_remaining > limit ? limit : byte_remaining;
> +        ioreq->aio_inflight++;
> +        blk_aio_pdiscard(blkdev->blk, byte_offset, byte_chunk,
> +                         qemu_aio_complete, ioreq);
> +        byte_remaining -= byte_chunk;
> +        byte_offset += byte_chunk;
> +    } while (byte_remaining > 0);
> +
> +    return true;
> +}
> +
>  static int ioreq_runio_qemu_aio(struct ioreq *ioreq)
>  {
>      struct XenBlkDev *blkdev = ioreq->blkdev;
> @@ -708,12 +740,10 @@ static int ioreq_runio_qemu_aio(struct ioreq *ioreq)
>          break;
>      case BLKIF_OP_DISCARD:
>      {
> -        struct blkif_request_discard *discard_req = (void *)&ioreq->req;
> -        ioreq->aio_inflight++;
> -        blk_aio_pdiscard(blkdev->blk,
> -                         discard_req->sector_number << BDRV_SECTOR_BITS,
> -                         discard_req->nr_sectors << BDRV_SECTOR_BITS,
> -                         qemu_aio_complete, ioreq);
> +        struct blkif_request_discard *req = (void *)&ioreq->req;
> +        if (!blk_split_discard(ioreq, req->sector_number, req->nr_sectors)) {
> +            goto err;
> +        }
>          break;
>      }
>      default:
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
To: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
	Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
	qemu-block@nongnu.org,
	"open list:All patches CC here" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>,
	"open list:X86" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	Anthony Perard <anthony.perard@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] xen_disk: split discard input to match internal representation
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 10:46:18 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1611231046090.21858@sstabellini-ThinkPad-X260> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161123103912.26699-1-olaf@aepfle.de>

On Wed, 23 Nov 2016, Olaf Hering wrote:
> The guest sends discard requests as u64 sector/count pairs, but the
> block layer operates internally with s64/s32 pairs. The conversion
> leads to IO errors in the guest, the discard request is not processed.
> 
>   domU.cfg:
>   'vdev=xvda, format=qcow2, backendtype=qdisk, target=/x.qcow2'
>   domU:
>   mkfs.ext4 -F /dev/xvda
>   Discarding device blocks: failed - Input/output error
> 
> Fix this by splitting the request into chunks of BDRV_REQUEST_MAX_SECTORS.
> Add input range checking to avoid overflow.
> 
> Fixes f313520 ("xen_disk: add discard support")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>

Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>


> v3:
>  turn tab into spaces to fix checkpatch warning
> v2:
>  adjust overflow check
>  add Fixes revspec because the initial commit also failed to convert u64 to s32
>  adjust summary
> 
>  hw/block/xen_disk.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/block/xen_disk.c b/hw/block/xen_disk.c
> index 3a7dc19..456a2d5 100644
> --- a/hw/block/xen_disk.c
> +++ b/hw/block/xen_disk.c
> @@ -660,6 +660,38 @@ static void qemu_aio_complete(void *opaque, int ret)
>      qemu_bh_schedule(ioreq->blkdev->bh);
>  }
>  
> +static bool blk_split_discard(struct ioreq *ioreq, blkif_sector_t sector_number,
> +                              uint64_t nr_sectors)
> +{
> +    struct XenBlkDev *blkdev = ioreq->blkdev;
> +    int64_t byte_offset;
> +    int byte_chunk;
> +    uint64_t byte_remaining, limit;
> +    uint64_t sec_start = sector_number;
> +    uint64_t sec_count = nr_sectors;
> +
> +    /* Wrap around, or overflowing byte limit? */
> +    if (sec_start + sec_count < sec_count ||
> +        sec_start + sec_count > INT64_MAX >> BDRV_SECTOR_BITS) {
> +        return false;
> +    }
> +
> +    limit = BDRV_REQUEST_MAX_SECTORS << BDRV_SECTOR_BITS;
> +    byte_offset = sec_start << BDRV_SECTOR_BITS;
> +    byte_remaining = sec_count << BDRV_SECTOR_BITS;
> +
> +    do {
> +        byte_chunk = byte_remaining > limit ? limit : byte_remaining;
> +        ioreq->aio_inflight++;
> +        blk_aio_pdiscard(blkdev->blk, byte_offset, byte_chunk,
> +                         qemu_aio_complete, ioreq);
> +        byte_remaining -= byte_chunk;
> +        byte_offset += byte_chunk;
> +    } while (byte_remaining > 0);
> +
> +    return true;
> +}
> +
>  static int ioreq_runio_qemu_aio(struct ioreq *ioreq)
>  {
>      struct XenBlkDev *blkdev = ioreq->blkdev;
> @@ -708,12 +740,10 @@ static int ioreq_runio_qemu_aio(struct ioreq *ioreq)
>          break;
>      case BLKIF_OP_DISCARD:
>      {
> -        struct blkif_request_discard *discard_req = (void *)&ioreq->req;
> -        ioreq->aio_inflight++;
> -        blk_aio_pdiscard(blkdev->blk,
> -                         discard_req->sector_number << BDRV_SECTOR_BITS,
> -                         discard_req->nr_sectors << BDRV_SECTOR_BITS,
> -                         qemu_aio_complete, ioreq);
> +        struct blkif_request_discard *req = (void *)&ioreq->req;
> +        if (!blk_split_discard(ioreq, req->sector_number, req->nr_sectors)) {
> +            goto err;
> +        }
>          break;
>      }
>      default:
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-11-23 18:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-23 10:39 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] xen_disk: split discard input to match internal representation Olaf Hering
2016-11-23 10:39 ` Olaf Hering
2016-11-23 11:40 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.8 " Eric Blake
2016-11-23 11:40   ` Eric Blake
2016-11-23 12:27   ` Kevin Wolf
2016-11-23 12:27     ` Kevin Wolf
2016-11-23 18:46     ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-11-23 18:46       ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-11-23 20:44     ` Olaf Hering
2016-11-23 20:44       ` Olaf Hering
2016-11-23 22:13       ` Olaf Hering
2016-11-23 22:13         ` Olaf Hering
2016-11-23 15:50 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH " Anthony PERARD
2016-11-23 15:50   ` Anthony PERARD
2016-11-23 18:46 ` Stefano Stabellini [this message]
2016-11-23 18:46   ` Stefano Stabellini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.10.1611231046090.21858@sstabellini-ThinkPad-X260 \
    --to=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=anthony.perard@citrix.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=olaf@aepfle.de \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.