From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Anton Starikov <ant.starikov@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org,
bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 15618] New: 2.6.18->2.6.32->2.6.33 huge regression in performance
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:52:44 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1003231242420.18017@i5.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100323112141.7f248f2b.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> You should be able to simply set CONFIG_RWSEM_GENERIC_SPINLOCK=n,
> CONFIG_RWSEM_XCHGADD_ALGORITHM=y by hand, as I mentioned earlier?
No. Doesn't work. The XADD code simply never worked on x86-64, which is
why those three commits I pointed at are required.
Oh, and you need one more commit (at least) in addition to the three I
already mentioned - the one that actually adds the x86-64 wrappers and
Kconfig option:
bafaecd x86-64: support native xadd rwsem implementation
so the minimal list of commits (on top of 2.6.33) is at least
59c33fa x86-32: clean up rwsem inline asm statements
5d0b723 x86: clean up rwsem type system
bafaecd x86-64: support native xadd rwsem implementation
1838ef1 x86-64, rwsem: 64-bit xadd rwsem implementation
and I just verified that they at least cherry-pick cleanly (in that
order). I _think_ it would be good to also do
0d1622d x86-64, rwsem: Avoid store forwarding hazard in __downgrade_write
but that one is a small detail, not anything fundamentally important.
Linus
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Anton Starikov <ant.starikov@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org,
bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 15618] New: 2.6.18->2.6.32->2.6.33 huge regression in performance
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:52:44 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1003231242420.18017@i5.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100323112141.7f248f2b.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> You should be able to simply set CONFIG_RWSEM_GENERIC_SPINLOCK=n,
> CONFIG_RWSEM_XCHGADD_ALGORITHM=y by hand, as I mentioned earlier?
No. Doesn't work. The XADD code simply never worked on x86-64, which is
why those three commits I pointed at are required.
Oh, and you need one more commit (at least) in addition to the three I
already mentioned - the one that actually adds the x86-64 wrappers and
Kconfig option:
bafaecd x86-64: support native xadd rwsem implementation
so the minimal list of commits (on top of 2.6.33) is at least
59c33fa x86-32: clean up rwsem inline asm statements
5d0b723 x86: clean up rwsem type system
bafaecd x86-64: support native xadd rwsem implementation
1838ef1 x86-64, rwsem: 64-bit xadd rwsem implementation
and I just verified that they at least cherry-pick cleanly (in that
order). I _think_ it would be good to also do
0d1622d x86-64, rwsem: Avoid store forwarding hazard in __downgrade_write
but that one is a small detail, not anything fundamentally important.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-23 19:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-15618-10286@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2010-03-23 14:22 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 15618] New: 2.6.18->2.6.32->2.6.33 huge regression in performance Andrew Morton
2010-03-23 14:22 ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-23 17:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-23 17:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-23 17:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-03-23 17:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-03-23 17:57 ` Anton Starikov
2010-03-23 17:57 ` Anton Starikov
2010-03-23 18:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-23 18:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-23 18:03 ` Anton Starikov
2010-03-23 18:03 ` Anton Starikov
2010-03-23 18:21 ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-23 18:21 ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-23 18:25 ` Anton Starikov
2010-03-23 18:25 ` Anton Starikov
2010-03-23 19:22 ` Robin Holt
2010-03-23 19:22 ` Robin Holt
2010-03-23 19:30 ` Anton Starikov
2010-03-23 19:30 ` Anton Starikov
2010-03-23 19:49 ` Robin Holt
2010-03-23 19:49 ` Robin Holt
2010-03-23 19:57 ` Robin Holt
2010-03-23 19:57 ` Robin Holt
2010-03-23 19:50 ` Anton Starikov
2010-03-23 19:50 ` Anton Starikov
2010-03-23 19:52 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2010-03-23 19:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-03-24 16:40 ` Roland Dreier
2010-03-24 16:40 ` Roland Dreier
2010-03-26 3:24 ` Anton Starikov
2010-03-26 3:24 ` Anton Starikov
2010-03-23 19:14 ` Anton Starikov
2010-03-23 19:14 ` Anton Starikov
2010-03-23 19:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-23 19:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-23 19:42 ` Anton Starikov
2010-03-23 19:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-03-23 19:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-03-23 20:43 ` Anton Starikov
2010-03-23 20:43 ` Anton Starikov
2010-03-23 23:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-03-23 23:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-03-23 23:19 ` Anton Starikov
2010-03-23 23:19 ` Anton Starikov
2010-03-23 23:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-23 23:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-23 23:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-03-23 23:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-03-24 0:03 ` Anton Starikov
2010-03-24 0:03 ` Anton Starikov
2010-03-24 2:15 ` Andi Kleen
2010-03-24 2:15 ` Andi Kleen
2010-03-24 3:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-03-24 3:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-04-19 18:19 ` Greg KH
2010-04-19 18:19 ` Greg KH
2010-03-23 18:13 ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-23 18:13 ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-23 18:19 ` Anton Starikov
2010-03-23 18:19 ` Anton Starikov
2010-03-23 18:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-23 18:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-23 21:19 ` Anton Starikov
2010-03-23 21:19 ` Anton Starikov
2010-04-02 18:57 ` Lee Schermerhorn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.1003231242420.18017@i5.linux-foundation.org \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ant.starikov@gmail.com \
--cc=bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.