Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Add support for r6040 NIC

[malc <av1474@comtv.ru>]

On Wed, 31 Aug 2011, Anthony Liguori wrote:

> On 08/31/2011 08:39 AM, malc wrote:
> > On Wed, 31 Aug 2011, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > 
> > > On 08/31/2011 08:17 AM, malc wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 30 Aug 2011, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > On 08/30/2011 08:30 PM, malc wrote:
> > > > > > On Tue, 30 Aug 2011, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > This won't even come close to passing checkpatch.pl
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Have you actually tried?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Sigh.  I was hoping checkpatch.pl was more useful than it appears to
> > > > > be.
> > > > > 
> > > > > At any rate, the patch doesn't follow CODING_STYLE.
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Where?
> > > 
> > > 3. Naming
> > > 
> > > Variables are lower_case_with_underscores; easy to type and read.
> > > Structured
> > > type names are in CamelCase; harder to type but standing out.  Scalar type
> > > names are lower_case_with_underscores_ending_with_a_t, like the POSIX
> > > uint64_t and family.  Note that this last convention contradicts POSIX
> > > and is therefore likely to be changed.
> > 
> > Where in the patch this was violated, and do note that fields are not
> > variables.
> 
> fields are variables.  And the struct names weren't all CamelCase.

c&v please. The only thing i can agree with is descriptor_t other than
that patch is just fine.

> 
> Regards,
> 
> Anthony Liguori
> 
> > 
> > > 
> > > When wrapping standard library functions, use the prefix qemu_ to alert
> > > readers that they are seeing a wrapped version; otherwise avoid this
> > > prefix.
> > 
> > And what ^^^ has to do with anything?
> > 
> > > 
> > > Regards,
> > > 
> > > Anthony Liguori
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > [..snip..]
> > > > 
> > > 
> > 
> 

-- 
mailto:av1474@comtv.ru