[dm-devel] [PATCH v2] dm-integrity: if we have discard support, use it when recalculating

* [dm-devel] [PATCH v2] dm-integrity: if we have discard support, use it when recalculating
@ 2021-04-28 21:00 Mikulas Patocka
  2021-04-30 19:39 ` Melvin Vermeeren
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Mikulas Patocka @ 2021-04-28 21:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mike Snitzer, Milan Broz; +Cc: dm-devel, Melvin Vermeeren

Hi

Here I'm sending version 2 of the patch - it increases version number of 
the target, so that userspace can test if this feature is present.

Mikulas



From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>

If we have discard support, we don't have to recalculate hash - we can
just fill the metadata with the discard pattern.

Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>

Index: linux-2.6/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c
===================================================================

--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c
@@ -2690,26 +2690,30 @@ next_chunk:
 	if (unlikely(dm_integrity_failed(ic)))
 		goto err;
 
-	io_req.bi_op = REQ_OP_READ;
-	io_req.bi_op_flags = 0;
-	io_req.mem.type = DM_IO_VMA;
-	io_req.mem.ptr.addr = ic->recalc_buffer;
-	io_req.notify.fn = NULL;
-	io_req.client = ic->io;
-	io_loc.bdev = ic->dev->bdev;
-	io_loc.sector = get_data_sector(ic, area, offset);
-	io_loc.count = n_sectors;
+	if (!ic->discard) {
+		io_req.bi_op = REQ_OP_READ;
+		io_req.bi_op_flags = 0;
+		io_req.mem.type = DM_IO_VMA;
+		io_req.mem.ptr.addr = ic->recalc_buffer;
+		io_req.notify.fn = NULL;
+		io_req.client = ic->io;
+		io_loc.bdev = ic->dev->bdev;
+		io_loc.sector = get_data_sector(ic, area, offset);
+		io_loc.count = n_sectors;
 
-	r = dm_io(&io_req, 1, &io_loc, NULL);
-	if (unlikely(r)) {
-		dm_integrity_io_error(ic, "reading data", r);
-		goto err;
-	}
+		r = dm_io(&io_req, 1, &io_loc, NULL);
+		if (unlikely(r)) {
+			dm_integrity_io_error(ic, "reading data", r);
+			goto err;
+		}
 
-	t = ic->recalc_tags;
-	for (i = 0; i < n_sectors; i += ic->sectors_per_block) {
-		integrity_sector_checksum(ic, logical_sector + i, ic->recalc_buffer + (i << SECTOR_SHIFT), t);
-		t += ic->tag_size;
+		t = ic->recalc_tags;
+		for (i = 0; i < n_sectors; i += ic->sectors_per_block) {
+			integrity_sector_checksum(ic, logical_sector + i, ic->recalc_buffer + (i << SECTOR_SHIFT), t);
+			t += ic->tag_size;
+		}
+	} else {
+		t = ic->recalc_tags + (n_sectors >> ic->sb->log2_sectors_per_block) * ic->tag_size;
 	}
 
 	metadata_block = get_metadata_sector_and_offset(ic, area, offset, &metadata_offset);
@@ -4364,11 +4368,13 @@ try_smaller_buffer:
 			goto bad;
 		}
 		INIT_WORK(&ic->recalc_work, integrity_recalc);
-		ic->recalc_buffer = vmalloc(RECALC_SECTORS << SECTOR_SHIFT);
-		if (!ic->recalc_buffer) {
-			ti->error = "Cannot allocate buffer for recalculating";
-			r = -ENOMEM;
-			goto bad;
+		if (!ic->discard) {
+			ic->recalc_buffer = vmalloc(RECALC_SECTORS << SECTOR_SHIFT);
+			if (!ic->recalc_buffer) {
+				ti->error = "Cannot allocate buffer for recalculating";
+				r = -ENOMEM;
+				goto bad;
+			}
 		}
 		ic->recalc_tags = kvmalloc_array(RECALC_SECTORS >> ic->sb->log2_sectors_per_block,
 						 ic->tag_size, GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -4377,6 +4383,8 @@ try_smaller_buffer:
 			r = -ENOMEM;
 			goto bad;
 		}
+		if (ic->discard)
+			memset(ic->recalc_tags, DISCARD_FILLER, (RECALC_SECTORS >> ic->sb->log2_sectors_per_block) * ic->tag_size);
 	} else {
 		if (ic->sb->flags & cpu_to_le32(SB_FLAG_RECALCULATING)) {
 			ti->error = "Recalculate can only be specified with internal_hash";
@@ -4570,7 +4578,7 @@ static void dm_integrity_dtr(struct dm_t
 
 static struct target_type integrity_target = {
 	.name			= "integrity",
-	.version		= {1, 8, 0},
+	.version		= {1, 9, 0},
 	.module			= THIS_MODULE,
 	.features		= DM_TARGET_SINGLETON | DM_TARGET_INTEGRITY,
 	.ctr			= dm_integrity_ctr,

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread