All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
To: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>, <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,
	Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <x86@kernel.org>,
	<hpa@zytor.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
	Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>,
	Daniel Kiss <daniel.kiss@arm.com>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>,
	Delyan Kratunov <delyank@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/6] bpf trampoline for arm64
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2022 11:47:56 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b9667d4b-5246-ee49-22af-c05ffeeaa679@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b9d38c43-a2a7-ae6d-79e1-51507103ef88@huawei.com>

On 4/15/2022 10:37 AM, Hou Tao wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 4/15/2022 12:22 AM, Xu Kuohai wrote:
>> Add bpf trampoline support for arm64. Most of the logic is the same as
>> x86.
>>
>> Tested on qemu, result:
>>  #55 fentry_fexit:OK
>>  #56 fentry_test:OK
>>  #58 fexit_sleep:OK
>>  #59 fexit_stress:OK
>>  #60 fexit_test:OK
>>  #67 get_func_args_test:OK
>>  #68 get_func_ip_test:OK
>>  #101 modify_return:OK
> bpf_struct_ops also depends on bpf trampoline, could you please also add the
> test results for bpf_struct_ops related tests case ?

Yes, more tests is needed. I'm curently testing with bpftrace's kfunc
and bpf selftest, more testing results will be posted.

>>
>> v2:
>> - Add Song's ACK
>> - Change the multi-line comment in is_valid_bpf_tramp_flags() into net
>>   style (patch 3)
>> - Fix a deadloop issue in ftrace selftest (patch 2)
>> - Replace pt_regs->x0 with pt_regs->orig_x0 in patch 1 commit message 
>> - Replace "bpf trampoline" with "custom trampoline" in patch 1, as
>>   ftrace direct call is not only used by bpf trampoline.
>>
>> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220413054959.1053668-1-xukuohai@huawei.com/
>>
>> Xu Kuohai (6):
>>   arm64: ftrace: Add ftrace direct call support
>>   ftrace: Fix deadloop caused by direct call in ftrace selftest
>>   bpf: Move is_valid_bpf_tramp_flags() to the public trampoline code
>>   bpf, arm64: Impelment bpf_arch_text_poke() for arm64
>>   bpf, arm64: bpf trampoline for arm64
>>   selftests/bpf: Fix trivial typo in fentry_fexit.c
>>
>>  arch/arm64/Kconfig                            |   2 +
>>  arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h               |  10 +
>>  arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c               |   1 +
>>  arch/arm64/kernel/entry-ftrace.S              |  28 +-
>>  arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit.h                      |  14 +-
>>  arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c                 | 390 +++++++++++++++++-
>>  arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c                   |  20 -
>>  include/linux/bpf.h                           |   5 +
>>  kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c                   |   4 +-
>>  kernel/bpf/trampoline.c                       |  35 +-
>>  kernel/trace/trace_selftest.c                 |   4 +-
>>  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fentry_fexit.c   |   4 +-
>>  12 files changed, 482 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>>
> 
> .


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
To: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>, <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,
	Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <x86@kernel.org>,
	<hpa@zytor.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
	Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>,
	Daniel Kiss <daniel.kiss@arm.com>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>,
	Delyan Kratunov <delyank@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/6] bpf trampoline for arm64
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2022 11:47:56 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b9667d4b-5246-ee49-22af-c05ffeeaa679@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b9d38c43-a2a7-ae6d-79e1-51507103ef88@huawei.com>

On 4/15/2022 10:37 AM, Hou Tao wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 4/15/2022 12:22 AM, Xu Kuohai wrote:
>> Add bpf trampoline support for arm64. Most of the logic is the same as
>> x86.
>>
>> Tested on qemu, result:
>>  #55 fentry_fexit:OK
>>  #56 fentry_test:OK
>>  #58 fexit_sleep:OK
>>  #59 fexit_stress:OK
>>  #60 fexit_test:OK
>>  #67 get_func_args_test:OK
>>  #68 get_func_ip_test:OK
>>  #101 modify_return:OK
> bpf_struct_ops also depends on bpf trampoline, could you please also add the
> test results for bpf_struct_ops related tests case ?

Yes, more tests is needed. I'm curently testing with bpftrace's kfunc
and bpf selftest, more testing results will be posted.

>>
>> v2:
>> - Add Song's ACK
>> - Change the multi-line comment in is_valid_bpf_tramp_flags() into net
>>   style (patch 3)
>> - Fix a deadloop issue in ftrace selftest (patch 2)
>> - Replace pt_regs->x0 with pt_regs->orig_x0 in patch 1 commit message 
>> - Replace "bpf trampoline" with "custom trampoline" in patch 1, as
>>   ftrace direct call is not only used by bpf trampoline.
>>
>> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220413054959.1053668-1-xukuohai@huawei.com/
>>
>> Xu Kuohai (6):
>>   arm64: ftrace: Add ftrace direct call support
>>   ftrace: Fix deadloop caused by direct call in ftrace selftest
>>   bpf: Move is_valid_bpf_tramp_flags() to the public trampoline code
>>   bpf, arm64: Impelment bpf_arch_text_poke() for arm64
>>   bpf, arm64: bpf trampoline for arm64
>>   selftests/bpf: Fix trivial typo in fentry_fexit.c
>>
>>  arch/arm64/Kconfig                            |   2 +
>>  arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h               |  10 +
>>  arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c               |   1 +
>>  arch/arm64/kernel/entry-ftrace.S              |  28 +-
>>  arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit.h                      |  14 +-
>>  arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c                 | 390 +++++++++++++++++-
>>  arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c                   |  20 -
>>  include/linux/bpf.h                           |   5 +
>>  kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c                   |   4 +-
>>  kernel/bpf/trampoline.c                       |  35 +-
>>  kernel/trace/trace_selftest.c                 |   4 +-
>>  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fentry_fexit.c   |   4 +-
>>  12 files changed, 482 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>>
> 
> .


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-15  3:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-14 16:22 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/6] bpf trampoline for arm64 Xu Kuohai
2022-04-14 16:22 ` Xu Kuohai
2022-04-14 16:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/6] arm64: ftrace: Add ftrace direct call support Xu Kuohai
2022-04-14 16:22   ` Xu Kuohai
2022-04-14 16:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/6] ftrace: Fix deadloop caused by direct call in ftrace selftest Xu Kuohai
2022-04-14 16:22   ` Xu Kuohai
2022-04-20 23:24   ` Steven Rostedt
2022-04-20 23:24     ` Steven Rostedt
2022-04-21  3:01     ` Xu Kuohai
2022-04-21  3:01       ` Xu Kuohai
2022-04-14 16:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/6] bpf: Move is_valid_bpf_tramp_flags() to the public trampoline code Xu Kuohai
2022-04-14 16:22   ` Xu Kuohai
2022-04-14 16:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/6] bpf, arm64: Impelment bpf_arch_text_poke() for arm64 Xu Kuohai
2022-04-14 16:22   ` Xu Kuohai
2022-04-15  2:34   ` Hou Tao
2022-04-15  2:34     ` Hou Tao
2022-04-15  3:39     ` Xu Kuohai
2022-04-15  3:39       ` Xu Kuohai
2022-04-22 10:54   ` Jakub Sitnicki
2022-04-22 10:54     ` Jakub Sitnicki
2022-04-24  5:05     ` Xu Kuohai
2022-04-24  5:05       ` Xu Kuohai
2022-04-25 14:26       ` Jakub Sitnicki
2022-04-25 14:26         ` Jakub Sitnicki
2022-04-26  4:01         ` Xu Kuohai
2022-04-26  4:01           ` Xu Kuohai
2022-04-14 16:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 5/6] bpf, arm64: bpf trampoline " Xu Kuohai
2022-04-14 16:22   ` Xu Kuohai
2022-04-15 17:12   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-04-15 17:12     ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-04-16  1:57     ` Xu Kuohai
2022-04-16  1:57       ` Xu Kuohai
2022-04-20  7:43       ` Xu Kuohai
2022-04-20  7:43         ` Xu Kuohai
2022-04-20 11:42         ` KP Singh
2022-04-20 11:42           ` KP Singh
2022-04-14 16:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 6/6] selftests/bpf: Fix trivial typo in fentry_fexit.c Xu Kuohai
2022-04-14 16:22   ` Xu Kuohai
2022-04-15  2:37 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/6] bpf trampoline for arm64 Hou Tao
2022-04-15  2:37   ` Hou Tao
2022-04-15  3:47   ` Xu Kuohai [this message]
2022-04-15  3:47     ` Xu Kuohai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b9667d4b-5246-ee49-22af-c05ffeeaa679@huawei.com \
    --to=xukuohai@huawei.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=daniel.kiss@arm.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=delyank@fb.com \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --cc=pcc@google.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=steven.price@arm.com \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    --cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
    --cc=zlim.lnx@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.