All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info>
To: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@redhat.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.com>,
	regressions@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: vchiq: Performance regression since 5.18-rc1
Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 11:28:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bc69ee03-1a74-c15d-ec94-da3b987ab8b1@leemhuis.info> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <77d6d498-7dd9-03eb-60f2-d7e682bb1b20@i2se.com>

[TLDR: I'm adding this regression report to the list of tracked
regressions; all text from me you find below is based on a few templates
paragraphs you might have encountered already already in similar form.]

Hi, this is your Linux kernel regression tracker.

On 22.05.22 01:22, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> 
> while testing the staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm driver with
> my Raspberry Pi 3 B+ (multi_v7_defconfig) i noticed a huge performance
> regression since [ff042f4a9b050895a42cae893cc01fa2ca81b95c] mm:
> lru_cache_disable: replace work queue synchronization with synchronize_rcu
> 
> Usually i run "vchiq_test -f 1" to see the driver is still working [1].
> 
> Before commit:
> 
> real    0m1,500s
> user    0m0,068s
> sys    0m0,846s
> 
> After commit:
> 
> real    7m11,449s
> user    0m2,049s
> sys    0m0,023s

Thanks for the report.

To be sure below issue doesn't fall through the cracks unnoticed, I'm
adding it to regzbot, my Linux kernel regression tracking bot:

#regzbot ^introduced ff042f4a9b050895a42cae893cc01fa2ca81b95
#regzbot title mm: chiq_test runs 7 minutes instead of ~ 1 second.
#regzbot ignore-activity

This isn't a regression? This issue or a fix for it are already
discussed somewhere else? It was fixed already? You want to clarify when
the regression started to happen? Or point out I got the title or
something else totally wrong? Then just reply -- ideally with also
telling regzbot about it, as explained here:
https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/tracked-regression/

Reminder for developers: When fixing the issue, add 'Link:' tags
pointing to the report (the mail this one replied to), as the kernel's
documentation call for; above page explains why this is important for
tracked regressions.

Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)

P.S.: As the Linux kernel's regression tracker I deal with a lot of
reports and sometimes miss something important when writing mails like
this. If that's the case here, don't hesitate to tell me in a public
reply, it's in everyone's interest to set the public record straight.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info>
To: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@redhat.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.com>,
	regressions@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: vchiq: Performance regression since 5.18-rc1
Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 11:28:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bc69ee03-1a74-c15d-ec94-da3b987ab8b1@leemhuis.info> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <77d6d498-7dd9-03eb-60f2-d7e682bb1b20@i2se.com>

[TLDR: I'm adding this regression report to the list of tracked
regressions; all text from me you find below is based on a few templates
paragraphs you might have encountered already already in similar form.]

Hi, this is your Linux kernel regression tracker.

On 22.05.22 01:22, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> 
> while testing the staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm driver with
> my Raspberry Pi 3 B+ (multi_v7_defconfig) i noticed a huge performance
> regression since [ff042f4a9b050895a42cae893cc01fa2ca81b95c] mm:
> lru_cache_disable: replace work queue synchronization with synchronize_rcu
> 
> Usually i run "vchiq_test -f 1" to see the driver is still working [1].
> 
> Before commit:
> 
> real    0m1,500s
> user    0m0,068s
> sys    0m0,846s
> 
> After commit:
> 
> real    7m11,449s
> user    0m2,049s
> sys    0m0,023s

Thanks for the report.

To be sure below issue doesn't fall through the cracks unnoticed, I'm
adding it to regzbot, my Linux kernel regression tracking bot:

#regzbot ^introduced ff042f4a9b050895a42cae893cc01fa2ca81b95
#regzbot title mm: chiq_test runs 7 minutes instead of ~ 1 second.
#regzbot ignore-activity

This isn't a regression? This issue or a fix for it are already
discussed somewhere else? It was fixed already? You want to clarify when
the regression started to happen? Or point out I got the title or
something else totally wrong? Then just reply -- ideally with also
telling regzbot about it, as explained here:
https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/tracked-regression/

Reminder for developers: When fixing the issue, add 'Link:' tags
pointing to the report (the mail this one replied to), as the kernel's
documentation call for; above page explains why this is important for
tracked regressions.

Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)

P.S.: As the Linux kernel's regression tracker I deal with a lot of
reports and sometimes miss something important when writing mails like
this. If that's the case here, don't hesitate to tell me in a public
reply, it's in everyone's interest to set the public record straight.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-05-23  9:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-21 23:22 vchiq: Performance regression since 5.18-rc1 Stefan Wahren
2022-05-21 23:22 ` Stefan Wahren
2022-05-21 23:46 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-21 23:46   ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-22 15:11   ` Stefan Wahren
2022-05-22 15:11     ` Stefan Wahren
2022-05-23  4:48     ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-23  4:48       ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-23  6:19       ` Stefan Wahren
2022-05-23  6:19         ` Stefan Wahren
2022-05-23  9:29         ` Phil Elwell
2022-05-23  9:29           ` Phil Elwell
2022-05-23 10:48           ` Stefan Wahren
2022-05-23 10:48             ` Stefan Wahren
2022-05-23 11:01             ` Phil Elwell
2022-05-23 11:01               ` Phil Elwell
2022-05-23 11:15               ` Stefan Wahren
2022-05-23 11:15                 ` Stefan Wahren
2022-05-23 11:22                 ` Phil Elwell
2022-05-23 11:22                   ` Phil Elwell
2022-05-23  7:09 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-05-23  7:09   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-05-25 13:56   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2022-05-25 13:56     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2022-05-25 14:07     ` Stefan Wahren
2022-05-25 14:07       ` Stefan Wahren
2022-05-25 14:26       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-05-25 14:26         ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-05-25 15:02         ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-25 15:02           ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-25 15:37       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2022-05-25 15:37         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2022-05-29 22:47         ` Stefan Wahren
2022-05-29 22:47           ` Stefan Wahren
2022-05-30  9:54     ` Stefan Wahren
2022-05-30  9:54       ` Stefan Wahren
2022-06-01 21:02       ` Stefan Wahren
2022-05-23  9:28 ` Thorsten Leemhuis [this message]
2022-05-23  9:28   ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2022-07-04  9:48   ` Thorsten Leemhuis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bc69ee03-1a74-c15d-ec94-da3b987ab8b1@leemhuis.info \
    --to=regressions@leemhuis.info \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=nsaenzju@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=phil@raspberrypi.com \
    --cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=stefan.wahren@i2se.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.