All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug 100289] 'flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid argument' error and small frame buffer allocated on turning off and on new monitor
@ 2017-03-20 17:59 bugzilla-daemon
  2017-03-22  9:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
                   ` (19 more replies)
  0 siblings, 20 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2017-03-20 17:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dri-devel


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2862 bytes --]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100289

            Bug ID: 100289
           Summary: 'flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid
                    argument' error and small frame buffer allocated on
                    turning off and on new monitor
           Product: DRI
           Version: unspecified
          Hardware: Other
                OS: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: medium
         Component: DRM/Radeon
          Assignee: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
          Reporter: OmegaPhil@startmail.com

Created attachment 130326
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=130326&action=edit
Xorg log

I have just bought a 3rd monitor, successfully hooked up via Display Port to
the R9 290X (Tahiti XT) card and configured fine as 3 non-mirrored outputs in
XFCE4.

I found that when I turned it off for ~10 seconds or more, after turning it
back on all screens would go black and appear to reinialise. XFCE4 gets
confused and clones the primary monitor output to the new 3rd screen, fiddling
in the XFCE4 Display program fixes this (after the problem happens it seems to
put the primary and new monitor on top of each other...).

Looking into Xorg.0.log, when I turn the monitor off for less than 10 seconds,
I just get the following event:

===============================================================================

[   512.737] (WW) RADEON(0): flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid
argument

===============================================================================

Being off for 10 seconds or more results in:

===============================================================================

[  1891.671] (II) RADEON(0): Allocate new frame buffer 3840x1200 stride 3840
[  1891.677] (WW) RADEON(0): flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Device
or resource busy
[  1891.678] (WW) RADEON(0): flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Device
or resource busy

===============================================================================

It now makes sense why monitor output appears to be mirrored (only 2 unique
outputs) - 3840 is 1920*2. When I fix the configuration with XFCE4, the correct
frame buffer is set up:

===============================================================================

[  2001.120] (II) RADEON(0): Allocate new frame buffer 5760x1200 stride 5760

===============================================================================

I have attached the X log.

I'm currently running Devuan Testing (based off Debian Testing)
uname -a: Linux omega1 4.9.0-2-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.9.13-1 (2017-02-27) x86_64
GNU/Linux
X: 1.19.2-1
radeon: 7.8.0

Thanks for any help.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 4309 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

* [Bug 100289] 'flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid argument' error and small frame buffer allocated on turning off and on new monitor
  2017-03-20 17:59 [Bug 100289] 'flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid argument' error and small frame buffer allocated on turning off and on new monitor bugzilla-daemon
@ 2017-03-22  9:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
  2017-03-22  9:30 ` bugzilla-daemon
                   ` (18 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2017-03-22  9:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dri-devel


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 427 bytes --]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100289

Michel Dänzer <michel@daenzer.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Attachment #130326|text/x-log                  |text/plain
          mime type|                            |

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1178 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

* [Bug 100289] 'flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid argument' error and small frame buffer allocated on turning off and on new monitor
  2017-03-20 17:59 [Bug 100289] 'flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid argument' error and small frame buffer allocated on turning off and on new monitor bugzilla-daemon
  2017-03-22  9:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2017-03-22  9:30 ` bugzilla-daemon
  2017-03-22 19:46 ` bugzilla-daemon
                   ` (17 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2017-03-22  9:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dri-devel


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 996 bytes --]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100289

--- Comment #1 from Michel Dänzer <michel@daenzer.net> ---
Please attach the corresponding dmesg output.

Does this still happen with xf86-video-ati 7.9.0?

(In reply to OmegaPhil from comment #0)
> I found that when I turned it off for ~10 seconds or more, after turning it
> back on all screens would go black and appear to reinialise. XFCE4 gets
> confused and clones the primary monitor output to the new 3rd screen,
> fiddling in the XFCE4 Display program fixes this (after the problem happens
> it seems to put the primary and new monitor on top of each other...).

FWIW, this could be an XFCE issue, unless xrandr reports incorrect information
about the connected monitors after this happens. Xorg only informs clients when
something might have changed about the connected monitors, it doesn't perform
any configuration changes by itself.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2031 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

* [Bug 100289] 'flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid argument' error and small frame buffer allocated on turning off and on new monitor
  2017-03-20 17:59 [Bug 100289] 'flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid argument' error and small frame buffer allocated on turning off and on new monitor bugzilla-daemon
  2017-03-22  9:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
  2017-03-22  9:30 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2017-03-22 19:46 ` bugzilla-daemon
  2017-03-23  9:30 ` bugzilla-daemon
                   ` (16 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2017-03-22 19:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dri-devel


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 775 bytes --]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100289

OmegaPhil@startmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |OmegaPhil@startmail.com

--- Comment #2 from OmegaPhil@startmail.com ---
I have just built and installed from the debian-unstable branch off git
(https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-xorg/driver/xserver-xorg-video-ati.git/)
which is directly tracking upstream - confirmed 7.9 is loaded, the problem is
still present.

Hmm, so XFCE4 Display could be responsible for blacking out the other monitors
momentarily too?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2422 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

* [Bug 100289] 'flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid argument' error and small frame buffer allocated on turning off and on new monitor
  2017-03-20 17:59 [Bug 100289] 'flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid argument' error and small frame buffer allocated on turning off and on new monitor bugzilla-daemon
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2017-03-22 19:46 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2017-03-23  9:30 ` bugzilla-daemon
  2017-03-23 15:49 ` bugzilla-daemon
                   ` (15 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2017-03-23  9:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dri-devel


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 765 bytes --]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100289

--- Comment #3 from Michel Dänzer <michel@daenzer.net> ---
(In reply to OmegaPhil from comment #2)
> confirmed 7.9 is loaded, the problem is still present.

Does radeon_scanout_flip still spit out both "Invalid argument" and "Device or
resource busy" errors?


> Hmm, so XFCE4 Display could be responsible for blacking out the other
> monitors momentarily too?

Yes, that could be a side effect of XFCE changing the virtual desktop
resolution.

All of this could be triggered by the DisplayPort connection appearing
disconnected while the monitor is off, which I understand can happen at least
with some monitors.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1842 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

* [Bug 100289] 'flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid argument' error and small frame buffer allocated on turning off and on new monitor
  2017-03-20 17:59 [Bug 100289] 'flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid argument' error and small frame buffer allocated on turning off and on new monitor bugzilla-daemon
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2017-03-23  9:30 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2017-03-23 15:49 ` bugzilla-daemon
  2017-03-23 19:45 ` bugzilla-daemon
                   ` (14 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2017-03-23 15:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dri-devel


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3116 bytes --]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100289

--- Comment #4 from OmegaPhil@startmail.com ---
Just 'Invalid argument' currently.

I just did 10 tests turning the monitor off for just over 30 seconds, and on
turning it back on, the display layout did not break (but I got the usual flip
queue messages):

==================================================

tail -F /var/log/Xorg.0.log | grep -iE 'flip|allocate'

[181332.656] (WW) RADEON(0): flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid
argument
[181356.321] (WW) RADEON(0): flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid
argument
[181356.742] (WW) RADEON(0): flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid
argument
[181357.947] (II) RADEON(0): Allocate new frame buffer 3840x1200 stride 3840
[181387.340] (II) RADEON(0): Allocate new frame buffer 5760x1200 stride 5760
[201695.702] (WW) RADEON(0): flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid
argument
[201696.734] (II) RADEON(0): Allocate new frame buffer 3840x1200 stride 3840
[201722.513] (II) RADEON(0): Allocate new frame buffer 5760x1200 stride 5760
[220260.080] (WW) RADEON(0): flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid
argument
[253009.764] (WW) RADEON(0): flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid
argument
[253022.375] (WW) RADEON(0): flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid
argument
[253034.800] (WW) RADEON(0): flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid
argument
[253060.151] (WW) RADEON(0): flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid
argument
[253109.552] (WW) RADEON(0): flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid
argument
[253109.561] (WW) RADEON(0): flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid
argument
[253153.533] (WW) RADEON(0): flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid
argument
[253203.721] (WW) RADEON(0): flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid
argument
[253204.176] (WW) RADEON(0): flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid
argument
[253251.989] (WW) RADEON(0): flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid
argument
[253296.426] (WW) RADEON(0): flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid
argument
[253359.934] (WW) RADEON(0): flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid
argument
[253360.370] (WW) RADEON(0): flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid
argument
[253413.594] (WW) RADEON(0): flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid
argument
[253508.625] (WW) RADEON(0): flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid
argument
[253508.630] (WW) RADEON(0): flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid
argument
[253509.047] (WW) RADEON(0): flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid
argument

==================================================

This shows a few 'normal' failures from yesterday earlier on. When I came back
from work and turned it on (so hours off), nothing broke... so it looks like
something has changed or there is an unknown trigger.

I can sit on this until it happens again.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 4055 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

* [Bug 100289] 'flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid argument' error and small frame buffer allocated on turning off and on new monitor
  2017-03-20 17:59 [Bug 100289] 'flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid argument' error and small frame buffer allocated on turning off and on new monitor bugzilla-daemon
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2017-03-23 15:49 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2017-03-23 19:45 ` bugzilla-daemon
  2017-03-23 19:47 ` bugzilla-daemon
                   ` (13 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2017-03-23 19:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dri-devel


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 239 bytes --]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100289

--- Comment #5 from OmegaPhil@startmail.com ---
Ah, happened again after leaving it off for ~2 hours...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1178 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

* [Bug 100289] 'flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid argument' error and small frame buffer allocated on turning off and on new monitor
  2017-03-20 17:59 [Bug 100289] 'flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid argument' error and small frame buffer allocated on turning off and on new monitor bugzilla-daemon
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2017-03-23 19:45 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2017-03-23 19:47 ` bugzilla-daemon
  2017-03-24 18:58 ` bugzilla-daemon
                   ` (12 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2017-03-23 19:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dri-devel


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 276 bytes --]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100289

--- Comment #6 from OmegaPhil@startmail.com ---
Ah sorry I was supposed to xrandr it when it broke - will happen again tomorrow
I'm sure ;)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1215 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

* [Bug 100289] 'flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid argument' error and small frame buffer allocated on turning off and on new monitor
  2017-03-20 17:59 [Bug 100289] 'flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid argument' error and small frame buffer allocated on turning off and on new monitor bugzilla-daemon
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2017-03-23 19:47 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2017-03-24 18:58 ` bugzilla-daemon
  2017-04-19  6:34 ` bugzilla-daemon
                   ` (11 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2017-03-24 18:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dri-devel


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2226 bytes --]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100289

--- Comment #7 from OmegaPhil@startmail.com ---
Just turned the monitors on in sequence left to right after dinner (new monitor
is last), and the problem occurred:

============================================================================

$ xrandr -q

Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 3840 x 1200, maximum 16384 x 16384
DisplayPort-0 connected 1920x1200+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y
axis) 518mm x 324mm
   1920x1200     59.95*+
   1920x1080     60.00    50.00    59.94    30.00    25.00    24.00    29.97   
23.98  
   1920x1080i    60.00    50.00    59.94  
   1600x1200     60.00  
   1280x1024     75.02    60.02  
   1152x864      75.00  
   1280x720      60.00    50.00    59.94  
   1024x768      75.03    60.00  
   800x600       75.00    60.32  
   720x576       50.00  
   720x576i      50.00  
   720x480       60.00    59.94  
   720x480i      60.00    59.94  
   640x480       75.00    60.00    59.94  
   720x400       70.08  
HDMI-0 connected primary 1920x1200+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y
axis) 518mm x 324mm
   1920x1200     59.95*+
   1920x1080     60.00  
   1600x1200     60.00  
   1680x1050     59.88  
   1280x1024     60.02  
   1440x900      59.90  
   1280x960      60.00  
   1024x768      60.00  
   800x600       60.32  
   640x480       59.94  
DVI-0 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
DVI-1 connected 1920x1200+1920+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
518mm x 324mm
   1920x1200     59.95*+
   1920x1080     60.00    50.00    59.94  
   1600x1200     60.00  
   1680x1050     59.88  
   1280x1024     60.02  
   1440x900      59.90  
   1280x960      60.00  
   1280x800      59.91  
   1280x720      60.00    50.00    59.94  
   1024x768      60.00  
   800x600       60.32    56.25  
   720x576       50.00  
   720x480       60.00    59.94  
   640x480       60.00    59.94  

============================================================================

So xrandr agrees that DisplayPort-0 and HDMI-0 are on top of each other at
least.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 3165 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

* [Bug 100289] 'flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid argument' error and small frame buffer allocated on turning off and on new monitor
  2017-03-20 17:59 [Bug 100289] 'flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid argument' error and small frame buffer allocated on turning off and on new monitor bugzilla-daemon
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2017-03-24 18:58 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2017-04-19  6:34 ` bugzilla-daemon
  2017-06-26 19:39 ` bugzilla-daemon
                   ` (10 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2017-04-19  6:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dri-devel


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 603 bytes --]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100289

--- Comment #8 from OmegaPhil@startmail.com ---
For anyone else having this issue, looking through the xrandr output allows you
to make a workaround, for me:

===============================================

xrandr --output DisplayPort-0 --right-of DVI-1

===============================================

is enough to get the correct layout (just one window seems to be consistently
moved to the secondary monitor on top of this, probably as its maximised).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1542 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

* [Bug 100289] 'flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid argument' error and small frame buffer allocated on turning off and on new monitor
  2017-03-20 17:59 [Bug 100289] 'flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid argument' error and small frame buffer allocated on turning off and on new monitor bugzilla-daemon
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2017-04-19  6:34 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2017-06-26 19:39 ` bugzilla-daemon
  2017-06-26 20:13 ` bugzilla-daemon
                   ` (9 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2017-06-26 19:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dri-devel


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 804 bytes --]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100289

--- Comment #9 from OmegaPhil@startmail.com ---
As nothings happened on this ticket for a few months, I've reached the task
again. I can confirm DisplayPort-0 remains connected according to xrandr when
its off, prior to the problem happening.

I'm now running Xorg with '-logverbose 255', but nothing more is logged when
the problem occurs.

A new failure mode has emerged - sometimes the middle Samsung monitor goes off,
and requires disabling and reenabling via the XFCE4 Display program to get it
back on again (haven't tried with xrandr etc).

I'm a bit disappointed nothing more is logged by X, I'm going to see what I can
find out in XFCE4's tooling.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1743 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

* [Bug 100289] 'flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid argument' error and small frame buffer allocated on turning off and on new monitor
  2017-03-20 17:59 [Bug 100289] 'flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid argument' error and small frame buffer allocated on turning off and on new monitor bugzilla-daemon
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  2017-06-26 19:39 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2017-06-26 20:13 ` bugzilla-daemon
  2017-06-27 16:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2017-06-26 20:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dri-devel


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 736 bytes --]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100289

--- Comment #10 from Julien Isorce <julien.isorce@gmail.com> ---
It could be that drm.debug=0x01 will tell you if the error comes from one of
the two "case:" here
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/~agd5f/linux/tree/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane.c?h=amd-staging-4.9#n796
.
If it is the case it should appear in dmesg.

Also worth a try with
https://launchpad.net/~paulo-miguel-dias/+archive/ubuntu/mesa with contains an
up to date version of xf86-video-ati.

The error message is different but I wonder if the patch attached to
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99769 would help here too.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2072 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

* [Bug 100289] 'flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid argument' error and small frame buffer allocated on turning off and on new monitor
  2017-03-20 17:59 [Bug 100289] 'flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid argument' error and small frame buffer allocated on turning off and on new monitor bugzilla-daemon
                   ` (10 preceding siblings ...)
  2017-06-26 20:13 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2017-06-27 16:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
  2017-07-21 19:39 ` bugzilla-daemon
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2017-06-27 16:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dri-devel


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1116 bytes --]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100289

--- Comment #11 from OmegaPhil@startmail.com ---
Wow, thats one hell of a lot of output :) I'll keep running with
'drm.debug=0x01' until I get the problem next, thanks.

I'm on Devuan Testing rather than Ubuntu (RE the Padoka PPA) - looking at
https://packages.qa.debian.org/m/mesa.html , I can see that 17.1.3-2 is coming
to unstable shortly - is that still too old?

If yes, I'll look into building all the stuff myself (I'll look around for some
docs and probably base it off packages I can see on the Padoka PPA I'm
guessing.

Separately, https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99769 is a great link
- I have recently (in recent months) enabled TearFree, so if some related
failure is the culprit that is at least some progress. I really like TearFree
(without it the top of the primary monitor tears with fullscreen videos), but
am perfectly happy to disable it to see if the issue goes away (TearFree is
more than worth the current failure state mind).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2294 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

* [Bug 100289] 'flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid argument' error and small frame buffer allocated on turning off and on new monitor
  2017-03-20 17:59 [Bug 100289] 'flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid argument' error and small frame buffer allocated on turning off and on new monitor bugzilla-daemon
                   ` (11 preceding siblings ...)
  2017-06-27 16:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2017-07-21 19:39 ` bugzilla-daemon
  2017-07-22 14:24 ` bugzilla-daemon
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2017-07-21 19:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dri-devel


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 524 bytes --]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100289

--- Comment #12 from OmegaPhil@startmail.com ---
I have reached this again, and can confirm that even with a kernel boot
parameter of 'drm.debug=0x01', when I get '(WW) RADEON(0): flip queue failed in
radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid argument' in Xorg.log, there is no mention of
'flip target' in the drm output.

I'm going to test with TearFree off to show that its definitely to blame.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1464 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

* [Bug 100289] 'flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid argument' error and small frame buffer allocated on turning off and on new monitor
  2017-03-20 17:59 [Bug 100289] 'flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid argument' error and small frame buffer allocated on turning off and on new monitor bugzilla-daemon
                   ` (12 preceding siblings ...)
  2017-07-21 19:39 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2017-07-22 14:24 ` bugzilla-daemon
  2018-02-04 18:24 ` bugzilla-daemon
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2017-07-22 14:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dri-devel


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 493 bytes --]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100289

--- Comment #13 from OmegaPhil@startmail.com ---
Right, have just had my first example of the failure without TearFree and with
no associated warning in Xorg.0.log - I'm going to see if I can poke at the
problem from the XFCE4 side (I want to demonstrate a program being told to
change the monitor layout at the very least, then go backwards from there).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1433 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

* [Bug 100289] 'flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid argument' error and small frame buffer allocated on turning off and on new monitor
  2017-03-20 17:59 [Bug 100289] 'flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid argument' error and small frame buffer allocated on turning off and on new monitor bugzilla-daemon
                   ` (13 preceding siblings ...)
  2017-07-22 14:24 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2018-02-04 18:24 ` bugzilla-daemon
  2018-02-04 18:58 ` bugzilla-daemon
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2018-02-04 18:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dri-devel


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 11499 bytes --]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100289

--- Comment #14 from OmegaPhil@startmail.com ---
After messing around with this on and off for months, I have found that the
radeon_scanout_flip error is irrelevant - when the third monitor is turned off
and on, sometimes DisplayPort-0 is reported as Disconnected and then Connected
- through monitoring the root window (xev -root), I can finally get into a
useful X events stream:

======================================================================

RRScreenChangeNotify event, serial 114, synthetic NO, window 0x4bc,
    root 0x4bc, timestamp 332828415, config_timestamp 386328254
    size_index 65535, subpixel_order SubPixelHorizontalRGB
    rotation RR_Rotate_0
    width 5760, height 1200, mwidth 1526, mheight 318

RRNotify event, serial 114, synthetic NO, window 0x4bc,
    subtype XRROutputChangeNotifyEvent
    output DisplayPort-0, crtc 79, mode 1920x1200 (1920x1200)
    rotation RR_Rotate_0
    connection RR_Disconnected, subpixel_order SubPixelHorizontalRGB

RRScreenChangeNotify event, serial 115, synthetic NO, window 0x4bc,
    root 0x4bc, timestamp 332828415, config_timestamp 386328254
    size_index 65535, subpixel_order SubPixelHorizontalRGB
    rotation RR_Rotate_0
    width 5760, height 1200, mwidth 1526, mheight 318

RRNotify event, serial 115, synthetic NO, window 0x4bc,
    subtype XRRCrtcChangeNotifyEvent
    crtc 79, mode None, rotation RR_Rotate_0
    x 0, y 0, width 0, height 0

RRNotify event, serial 115, synthetic NO, window 0x4bc,
    subtype XRROutputChangeNotifyEvent
    output DisplayPort-0, crtc None, mode None
    rotation RR_Rotate_0
    connection RR_Disconnected, subpixel_order SubPixelHorizontalRGB

ConfigureNotify event, serial 115, synthetic NO, window 0x4bc,
    event 0x4bc, window 0x4bc, (0,0), width 5760, height 1200,
    border_width 0, above 0x0, override NO

RRScreenChangeNotify event, serial 117, synthetic NO, window 0x4bc,
    root 0x4bc, timestamp 386328636, config_timestamp 386328813
    size_index 65535, subpixel_order SubPixelHorizontalRGB
    rotation RR_Rotate_0
    width 5760, height 1200, mwidth 1526, mheight 318

RRNotify event, serial 117, synthetic NO, window 0x4bc,
    subtype XRROutputChangeNotifyEvent
    output DisplayPort-0, crtc None, mode None
    rotation RR_Rotate_0
    connection RR_Connected, subpixel_order SubPixelHorizontalRGB

RRScreenChangeNotify event, serial 117, synthetic NO, window 0x4bc,
    root 0x4bc, timestamp 386328636, config_timestamp 386328813
    size_index 65535, subpixel_order SubPixelHorizontalRGB
    rotation RR_Rotate_0
    width 3840, height 1200, mwidth 1016, mheight 318

ConfigureNotify event, serial 117, synthetic NO, window 0x4bc,
    event 0x4bc, window 0x4bc, (0,0), width 3840, height 1200,
    border_width 0, above 0x0, override NO

...


RRScreenChangeNotify event, serial 125, synthetic NO, window 0x4bc,
    root 0x4bc, timestamp 386328636, config_timestamp 386328813
    size_index 65535, subpixel_order SubPixelHorizontalRGB
    rotation RR_Rotate_0
    width 3840, height 1200, mwidth 1016, mheight 318

RRNotify event, serial 125, synthetic NO, window 0x4bc,
    subtype XRRCrtcChangeNotifyEvent
    crtc 79, mode 1920x1200, rotation RR_Rotate_0
    x 0, y 0, width 1920, height 1200

RRNotify event, serial 125, synthetic NO, window 0x4bc,
    subtype XRROutputChangeNotifyEvent
    output DisplayPort-0, crtc 79, mode 1920x1200 (1920x1200)
    rotation RR_Rotate_0
    connection RR_Connected, subpixel_order SubPixelHorizontalRGB

ConfigureNotify event, serial 125, synthetic NO, window 0x4bc,
    event 0x4bc, window 0x4bc, (0,0), width 3840, height 1200,
    border_width 0, above 0x0, override NO

======================================================================

In the middle of that mess, there is a RRScreenChangeNotify event with width
3840, which signifies the invalid desktop state that I get as the result of the
problem - I've managed to smoke it out to xfsettingsd (part of the
xfce4-settings package) - it responds to the disconnection by disabling the
CRTC, and then when it reappears, it enables it without a clue of what the
monitor is, despite it being described in the xfconf settings - and therefore
not putting it in the right place again.

xfsettingsd's version of the events:

=========================================================

Gtk-Message: GtkDialog mapped without a transient parent. This is discouraged.
xfce4-settings(displays): RRScreenChangeNotify event received.
xfce4-settings(displays): Refreshing RandR cache.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected CRTC 80.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected CRTC 79.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected CRTC 81.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected CRTC 82.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected CRTC 83.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected CRTC 84.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected output 85 DisplayPort-0.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected output 86 HDMI-0.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected output 88 DVI-1.
xfce4-settings(displays): Noutput: before = 3, after = 3.
xfce4-settings(displays): RRScreenChangeNotify event received.
xfce4-settings(displays): Refreshing RandR cache.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected CRTC 80.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected CRTC 79.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected CRTC 81.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected CRTC 82.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected CRTC 83.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected CRTC 84.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected output 85 DisplayPort-0.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected output 86 HDMI-0.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected output 88 DVI-1.
xfce4-settings(displays): Noutput: before = 3, after = 3.
xfce4-settings(displays): RRScreenChangeNotify event received.
xfce4-settings(displays): Refreshing RandR cache.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected CRTC 80.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected CRTC 79.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected CRTC 81.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected CRTC 82.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected CRTC 83.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected CRTC 84.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected output 86 HDMI-0.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected output 88 DVI-1.
xfce4-settings(displays): Noutput: before = 3, after = 2.
xfce4-settings(displays): Output disconnected: DisplayPort-0
xfce4-settings(displays): Disabling CRTC 79.
xfce4-settings(displays): Normalized CRTC 80: size=1920x1200, pos=0x0.
xfce4-settings(displays): Normalized CRTC 81: size=1920x1200, pos=1920x0.
xfce4-settings(displays): min_h = 200, min_w = 320, max_h = 16384, max_w =
16384, prev_h = 1200, prev_w = 5760, prev_hmm = 318, prev_wmm = 1524, h = 1200,
w = 3840, hmm = 318, wmm = 1016.
xfce4-settings(displays): Applying desktop dimensions: 3840x1200 (px), 1016x318
(mm).
xfce4-settings(displays): Configuring CRTC 80.
xfce4-settings(displays): Configuring CRTC 79.
xfce4-settings(displays): Configuring CRTC 81.
xfce4-settings(displays): Configuring CRTC 82.
xfce4-settings(displays): Configuring CRTC 83.
xfce4-settings(displays): Configuring CRTC 84.
xfce4-settings(displays): RRScreenChangeNotify event received.
xfce4-settings(displays): Refreshing RandR cache.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected CRTC 80.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected CRTC 79.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected CRTC 81.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected CRTC 82.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected CRTC 83.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected CRTC 84.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected output 85 DisplayPort-0.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected output 86 HDMI-0.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected output 88 DVI-1.
xfce4-settings(displays): Noutput: before = 2, after = 3.
xfce4-settings(displays): New output connected: DisplayPort-0
xfce4-settings(displays): enabling crtc for DisplayPort-0
xfce4-settings(displays): CRTC 79 assigned to DisplayPort-0.
xfce4-settings(displays): CRTC 79, output list[0] -> 85.
xfce4-settings(displays): Normalized CRTC 80: size=1920x1200, pos=0x0.
xfce4-settings(displays): Normalized CRTC 79: size=1920x1200, pos=0x0.
xfce4-settings(displays): Normalized CRTC 81: size=1920x1200, pos=1920x0.
xfce4-settings(displays): min_h = 200, min_w = 320, max_h = 16384, max_w =
16384, prev_h = 1200, prev_w = 5760, prev_hmm = 318, prev_wmm = 1524, h = 1200,
w = 3840, hmm = 318, wmm = 1016.
xfce4-settings(displays): Applying desktop dimensions: 3840x1200 (px), 1016x318
(mm).
xfce4-settings(displays): Configuring CRTC 80.
xfce4-settings(displays): Configuring CRTC 79.
xfce4-settings(displays): Applying changes to CRTC 79.
xfce4-settings(displays): Configuring CRTC 81.
xfce4-settings(displays): Configuring CRTC 82.
xfce4-settings(displays): Configuring CRTC 83.
xfce4-settings(displays): Configuring CRTC 84.
xfce4-settings(displays): RRScreenChangeNotify event received.
xfce4-settings(displays): Refreshing RandR cache.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected CRTC 80.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected CRTC 79.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected CRTC 81.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected CRTC 82.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected CRTC 83.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected CRTC 84.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected output 85 DisplayPort-0.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected output 86 HDMI-0.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected output 88 DVI-1.
xfce4-settings(displays): Noutput: before = 3, after = 3.
xfce4-settings(displays): RRScreenChangeNotify event received.
xfce4-settings(displays): Refreshing RandR cache.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected CRTC 80.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected CRTC 79.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected CRTC 81.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected CRTC 82.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected CRTC 83.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected CRTC 84.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected output 85 DisplayPort-0.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected output 86 HDMI-0.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected output 88 DVI-1.
xfce4-settings(displays): Noutput: before = 3, after = 3.
xfce4-settings(displays): RRScreenChangeNotify event received.
xfce4-settings(displays): Refreshing RandR cache.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected CRTC 80.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected CRTC 79.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected CRTC 81.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected CRTC 82.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected CRTC 83.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected CRTC 84.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected output 85 DisplayPort-0.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected output 86 HDMI-0.
xfce4-settings(displays): Detected output 88 DVI-1.
xfce4-settings(displays): Noutput: before = 3, after = 3.

=========================================================

I'm assuming the important part from the X perspective is when
xfsettingsd/displays.c:xfce_displays_helper_screen_on_event realises the
display is Disconnected, and runs xfce_displays_helper_disable_crtc which calls
XRRSetCrtcConfig with RRCrtc->mode of None/NULL.

If the daemon is killed, no reconfiguration occurs and the desktop keeps its
correct configuration - presumably at the X level its just treated like a
monitor powering off and on - so I guess the next step is for me to understand
what is causing the Disconnect event to be fired through the stack, since the
monitor is definitely not disconnected in reality.

Kudos to Michel for the guess earlier.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 12445 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

* [Bug 100289] 'flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid argument' error and small frame buffer allocated on turning off and on new monitor
  2017-03-20 17:59 [Bug 100289] 'flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid argument' error and small frame buffer allocated on turning off and on new monitor bugzilla-daemon
                   ` (14 preceding siblings ...)
  2018-02-04 18:24 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2018-02-04 18:58 ` bugzilla-daemon
  2018-03-09 17:26 ` bugzilla-daemon
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2018-02-04 18:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dri-devel


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 813 bytes --]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100289

--- Comment #15 from OmegaPhil@startmail.com ---
After being able to identify xfsettingsd as a potential cause (ignoring whether
or not the monitor was actually Disconnected/Connected), I had a look at its
bug tracker - and https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14096 looks
extremely suspicious - after applying the patch and turning on/off the monitor
10 times in a row (waiting 10 seconds inbetween), I haven't had a single
desktop reconfiguration (the patch makes complete sense too WRT this problem),
so I'm going to sit on this for a week to make sure its actually solved.

There seem to be a number of other people complaining of this issue over there
too...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1815 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

* [Bug 100289] 'flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid argument' error and small frame buffer allocated on turning off and on new monitor
  2017-03-20 17:59 [Bug 100289] 'flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid argument' error and small frame buffer allocated on turning off and on new monitor bugzilla-daemon
                   ` (15 preceding siblings ...)
  2018-02-04 18:58 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2018-03-09 17:26 ` bugzilla-daemon
  2018-03-09 17:35 ` bugzilla-daemon
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2018-03-09 17:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dri-devel


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 357 bytes --]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100289

--- Comment #16 from Michel Dänzer <michel@daenzer.net> ---
(In reply to OmegaPhil from comment #15)
> I'm going to sit on this for a week to make sure its actually solved.

A month has passed, is there a verdict yet?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1382 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

* [Bug 100289] 'flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid argument' error and small frame buffer allocated on turning off and on new monitor
  2017-03-20 17:59 [Bug 100289] 'flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid argument' error and small frame buffer allocated on turning off and on new monitor bugzilla-daemon
                   ` (16 preceding siblings ...)
  2018-03-09 17:26 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2018-03-09 17:35 ` bugzilla-daemon
  2018-03-10 11:43 ` bugzilla-daemon
  2019-11-19  9:26 ` bugzilla-daemon
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2018-03-09 17:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dri-devel


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1099 bytes --]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100289

--- Comment #17 from OmegaPhil@startmail.com ---
The patch was not enough, and my comments on that bug have been ignored - the
key bit is:

========================================================================

I've tracked part of the problem down to
xfsettingsd/displays.c:xfce_displays_helper_screen_on_event, L462
xfce_displays_helper_disable_crtc call - when this call is commented out, the
monitor is always configured fine (and looking at xfsettingsd's debug output,
in both the success and failure case there are plenty of events happening where
all monitors are connected at the end to allow for proper configuration).

========================================================================

Commenting this out and I have had no further issues. The current state is good
enough for me - you could counter and say that there should be no disconnect
event in the first place, but I don't plan to look into anything further
currently.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2039 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

* [Bug 100289] 'flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid argument' error and small frame buffer allocated on turning off and on new monitor
  2017-03-20 17:59 [Bug 100289] 'flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid argument' error and small frame buffer allocated on turning off and on new monitor bugzilla-daemon
                   ` (17 preceding siblings ...)
  2018-03-09 17:35 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2018-03-10 11:43 ` bugzilla-daemon
  2019-11-19  9:26 ` bugzilla-daemon
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2018-03-10 11:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dri-devel


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 477 bytes --]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100289

--- Comment #18 from Michel Dänzer <michel@daenzer.net> ---
(In reply to OmegaPhil from comment #17)
> The current state is good enough for me - you could counter and say that there
> should be no disconnect event in the first place, [...]

AFAIK that's up to the monitor (settings?), or possibly even a general issue
with DisplayPort.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1505 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

* [Bug 100289] 'flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid argument' error and small frame buffer allocated on turning off and on new monitor
  2017-03-20 17:59 [Bug 100289] 'flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid argument' error and small frame buffer allocated on turning off and on new monitor bugzilla-daemon
                   ` (18 preceding siblings ...)
  2018-03-10 11:43 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2019-11-19  9:26 ` bugzilla-daemon
  19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2019-11-19  9:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dri-devel


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 806 bytes --]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100289

Martin Peres <martin.peres@free.fr> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |MOVED

--- Comment #19 from Martin Peres <martin.peres@free.fr> ---
-- GitLab Migration Automatic Message --

This bug has been migrated to freedesktop.org's GitLab instance and has been
closed from further activity.

You can subscribe and participate further through the new bug through this link
to our GitLab instance: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/issues/786.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2625 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-11-19  9:26 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-03-20 17:59 [Bug 100289] 'flip queue failed in radeon_scanout_flip: Invalid argument' error and small frame buffer allocated on turning off and on new monitor bugzilla-daemon
2017-03-22  9:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
2017-03-22  9:30 ` bugzilla-daemon
2017-03-22 19:46 ` bugzilla-daemon
2017-03-23  9:30 ` bugzilla-daemon
2017-03-23 15:49 ` bugzilla-daemon
2017-03-23 19:45 ` bugzilla-daemon
2017-03-23 19:47 ` bugzilla-daemon
2017-03-24 18:58 ` bugzilla-daemon
2017-04-19  6:34 ` bugzilla-daemon
2017-06-26 19:39 ` bugzilla-daemon
2017-06-26 20:13 ` bugzilla-daemon
2017-06-27 16:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
2017-07-21 19:39 ` bugzilla-daemon
2017-07-22 14:24 ` bugzilla-daemon
2018-02-04 18:24 ` bugzilla-daemon
2018-02-04 18:58 ` bugzilla-daemon
2018-03-09 17:26 ` bugzilla-daemon
2018-03-09 17:35 ` bugzilla-daemon
2018-03-10 11:43 ` bugzilla-daemon
2019-11-19  9:26 ` bugzilla-daemon

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.