* [f2fs-dev] [Bug 204043] F2fs kernel BUG at fs/f2fs/data.c:317!
2019-07-01 8:44 [f2fs-dev] [Bug 204043] New: F2fs kernel BUG at fs/f2fs/data.c:317! bugzilla-daemon
@ 2019-07-05 3:55 ` bugzilla-daemon
2019-07-08 6:57 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (9 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2019-07-05 3:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-f2fs-devel
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204043
Chao Yu (chao@kernel.org) changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC| |chao@kernel.org
--- Comment #1 from Chao Yu (chao@kernel.org) ---
Could you help to add below diff to check debug info?
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
index bc5cea27b512..333285cb14c5 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
@@ -241,7 +241,7 @@ static inline void __submit_bio(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
struct bio *bio, enum page_type type)
{
if (!is_read_io(bio_op(bio))) {
- unsigned int start;
+ unsigned int start, ofs;
if (type != DATA && type != NODE)
goto submit_io;
@@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ static inline void __submit_bio(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
goto submit_io;
/* fill dummy pages */
- for (; start < F2FS_IO_SIZE(sbi); start++) {
+ for (ofs = start; ofs < F2FS_IO_SIZE(sbi); ofs++) {
struct page *page =
mempool_alloc(sbi->write_io_dummy,
GFP_NOIO | __GFP_NOFAIL);
@@ -266,8 +266,16 @@ static inline void __submit_bio(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
SetPagePrivate(page);
set_page_private(page, (unsigned
long)DUMMY_WRITTEN_PAGE);
lock_page(page);
- if (bio_add_page(bio, page, PAGE_SIZE, 0) < PAGE_SIZE)
- f2fs_bug_on(sbi, 1);
+ if (bio_add_page(bio, page, PAGE_SIZE, 0) < PAGE_SIZE)
{
+ printk("ofs:%u, start:%u, io_size:%u, "
+ "size:%u, vcnt:%u, max_vecs:%u",
+ ofs, start, F2FS_IO_SIZE(sbi),
+ bio->bi_iter.bi_size,
+ bio->bi_vcnt,
+ bio->bi_max_vecs);
+ WARN_ON(1);
+ break;
+ }
}
/*
* In the NODE case, we lose next block address chain. So, we
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [f2fs-dev] [Bug 204043] F2fs kernel BUG at fs/f2fs/data.c:317!
2019-07-01 8:44 [f2fs-dev] [Bug 204043] New: F2fs kernel BUG at fs/f2fs/data.c:317! bugzilla-daemon
2019-07-05 3:55 ` [f2fs-dev] [Bug 204043] " bugzilla-daemon
@ 2019-07-08 6:57 ` bugzilla-daemon
2019-07-11 10:41 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (8 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2019-07-08 6:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-f2fs-devel
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204043
--- Comment #2 from midwinter1993@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Chao Yu from comment #1)
> Could you help to add below diff to check debug info?
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> index bc5cea27b512..333285cb14c5 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> @@ -241,7 +241,7 @@ static inline void __submit_bio(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> struct bio *bio, enum page_type type)
> {
> if (!is_read_io(bio_op(bio))) {
> - unsigned int start;
> + unsigned int start, ofs;
>
> if (type != DATA && type != NODE)
> goto submit_io;
> @@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ static inline void __submit_bio(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> goto submit_io;
>
> /* fill dummy pages */
> - for (; start < F2FS_IO_SIZE(sbi); start++) {
> + for (ofs = start; ofs < F2FS_IO_SIZE(sbi); ofs++) {
> struct page *page =
> mempool_alloc(sbi->write_io_dummy,
> GFP_NOIO | __GFP_NOFAIL);
> @@ -266,8 +266,16 @@ static inline void __submit_bio(struct f2fs_sb_info
> *sbi,
> SetPagePrivate(page);
> set_page_private(page, (unsigned long)DUMMY_WRITTEN_PAGE);
> lock_page(page);
> - if (bio_add_page(bio, page, PAGE_SIZE, 0) < PAGE_SIZE)
> - f2fs_bug_on(sbi, 1);
> + if (bio_add_page(bio, page, PAGE_SIZE, 0) < PAGE_SIZE) {
> + printk("ofs:%u, start:%u, io_size:%u, "
> + "size:%u, vcnt:%u, max_vecs:%u",
> + ofs, start, F2FS_IO_SIZE(sbi),
> + bio->bi_iter.bi_size,
> + bio->bi_vcnt,
> + bio->bi_max_vecs);
> + WARN_ON(1);
> + break;
> + }
> }
> /*
> * In the NODE case, we lose next block address chain. So, we
Hi!
I patched the kernel, and after I run the test case about 7 times, a warning
occurred:
[ 78.460040] F2FS-fs (loop0): Test dummy encryption mount option ignored
[ 78.464621] F2FS-fs (loop0): Found nat_bits in checkpoint
[ 78.479864] F2FS-fs (loop0): Mounted with checkpoint version = aaca8fb
[ 78.482474] F2FS-fs (loop0): Test dummy encryption mount option ignored
[ 78.483451] F2FS-fs (loop0): switch extent_cache option is not allowed
[ 78.691092] ofs:1, start:1, io_size:8, size:1085440, vcnt:256, max_vecs:256
[ 78.691161] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1072 at fs/f2fs/data.c:323
__submit_merged_bio.cold+0x74/0x7c
[ 78.693234] Modules linked in:
[ 78.693579] CPU: 1 PID: 1072 Comm: kworker/u4:3 Not tainted 5.1.3 #8
[ 78.694330] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS
Ubuntu-1.8.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014
[ 78.695523] Workqueue: writeback wb_workfn (flush-7:0)
[ 78.696109] RIP: 0010:__submit_merged_bio.cold+0x74/0x7c
[ 78.696762] Code: 00 00 00 45 89 e1 41 89 e8 41 8b 8d bc 04 00 00 41 57 48
c7 c7 80 6f dd 8c 8b 54 24 3c 8b 74 24 10 d3 e0 89 c1 e8 50 01 68 ff <0f> 0b 58
e9 15 c3 fe ff e8 9a 4f 73 ff 49 8d 7c 24 5a e8 60 89 89
[ 78.699018] RSP: 0018:ffff888117fa7140 EFLAGS: 00010282
[ 78.699620] RAX: 000000000000003f RBX: ffff88810828bb40 RCX:
0000000000000000
[ 78.700530] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000278 RDI:
ffffed1022ff4e1a
[ 78.701337] RBP: 0000000000109000 R08: 000000000000003f R09:
fffffbfff1c7766c
[ 78.702027] R10: fffffbfff1c7766b R11: ffffffff8e3bb35e R12:
0000000000000100
[ 78.702874] R13: ffff888107a1a200 R14: ffff888108101500 R15:
0000000000000100
[ 78.703735] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88811b500000(0000)
knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 78.704722] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 78.705383] CR2: 00005615108e12d8 CR3: 0000000107c58000 CR4:
00000000000006e0
[ 78.706229] Call Trace:
[ 78.706498] f2fs_submit_page_write+0x3cd/0xdd0
[ 78.707014] do_write_page+0x15d/0x360
[ 78.707453] f2fs_outplace_write_data+0xd7/0x210
[ 78.707985] ? f2fs_do_write_node_page+0x190/0x190
[ 78.708549] ? __enqueue_entity+0xae/0xe0
[ 78.709047] f2fs_do_write_data_page+0x43b/0xf30
[ 78.709590] ? f2fs_should_update_outplace+0x1c0/0x1c0
[ 78.710177] ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70
[ 78.710602] ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
[ 78.711067] ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70
[ 78.711534] ? finish_task_switch+0x145/0x370
[ 78.712048] ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70
[ 78.712497] ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
[ 78.712959] __write_data_page+0xcf6/0x1140
[ 78.713461] ? page_mapped+0xf8/0x1f0
[ 78.713870] ? f2fs_do_write_data_page+0xf30/0xf30
[ 78.714462] ? page_referenced+0x3d0/0x3d0
[ 78.714909] ? _raw_write_unlock_irqrestore+0x20/0x20
[ 78.715533] f2fs_write_cache_pages+0x3ba/0xb40
[ 78.716032] ? __write_data_page+0x1140/0x1140
[ 78.716492] ? f2fs_fsync_node_pages+0xf90/0xf90
[ 78.717021] ? xas_start+0xbf/0x1c0
[ 78.717451] ? __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x10/0x10
[ 78.717995] f2fs_write_data_pages+0x3dd/0x8b0
[ 78.718506] ? f2fs_write_cache_pages+0xb40/0xb40
[ 78.719052] ? f2fs_set_node_page_dirty+0x175/0x3a0
[ 78.719618] ? f2fs_inode_synced+0x1c7/0x200
[ 78.720069] ? memset+0x20/0x40
[ 78.720447] ? f2fs_write_cache_pages+0xb40/0xb40
[ 78.721006] do_writepages+0xbb/0x1e0
[ 78.721444] ? page_writeback_cpu_online+0x10/0x10
[ 78.721964] ? _raw_spin_lock+0x75/0xd0
[ 78.722409] ? _raw_spin_lock_irq+0xd0/0xd0
[ 78.722891] ? __wake_up_bit+0x84/0xe0
[ 78.723331] __writeback_single_inode+0xb6/0x800
[ 78.723861] ? inode_add_lru+0xd9/0x110
[ 78.724273] writeback_sb_inodes+0x441/0x910
[ 78.724756] ? sync_inode_metadata+0x100/0x100
[ 78.725263] ? queue_io+0x16b/0x220
[ 78.725674] wb_writeback+0x261/0x650
[ 78.726129] ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70
[ 78.726641] ? __writeback_inodes_wb+0x170/0x170
[ 78.727361] ? cwt_wakefn+0x60/0x60
[ 78.728104] ? _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x80/0xd0
[ 78.728827] ? _raw_read_unlock_irqrestore+0x20/0x20
[ 78.729542] ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70
[ 78.730121] ? wb_workfn+0xc4/0x7a0
[ 78.730643] wb_workfn+0x1f9/0x7a0
[ 78.731161] ? inode_wait_for_writeback+0x40/0x40
[ 78.731868] ? __schedule+0x481/0xc80
[ 78.732417] ? _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x76/0xd0
[ 78.733046] ? read_word_at_a_time+0xe/0x20
[ 78.733668] ? strscpy+0xb2/0x180
[ 78.734168] process_one_work+0x503/0x970
[ 78.734770] worker_thread+0x7d/0x820
[ 78.735322] kthread+0x1ad/0x210
[ 78.735821] ? process_one_work+0x970/0x970
[ 78.736443] ? kthread_park+0x130/0x130
[ 78.737020] ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
[ 78.737555] ---[ end trace 5a4cea2bd5b6d207 ]---
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [f2fs-dev] [Bug 204043] F2fs kernel BUG at fs/f2fs/data.c:317!
2019-07-01 8:44 [f2fs-dev] [Bug 204043] New: F2fs kernel BUG at fs/f2fs/data.c:317! bugzilla-daemon
2019-07-05 3:55 ` [f2fs-dev] [Bug 204043] " bugzilla-daemon
2019-07-08 6:57 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2019-07-11 10:41 ` bugzilla-daemon
2019-07-16 9:06 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (7 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2019-07-11 10:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-f2fs-devel
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204043
--- Comment #3 from Chao Yu (chao@kernel.org) ---
Could you help to test below two commits?
f2fs: introduce {page,io}_is_mergeable() for readability
f2fs: fix panic of IO alignment feature
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-f2fs-devel/1562841517-77910-1-git-send-email-yuchao0@huawei.com/T/#t
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-f2fs-devel/1562841517-77910-2-git-send-email-yuchao0@huawei.com/T/#u
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [f2fs-dev] [Bug 204043] F2fs kernel BUG at fs/f2fs/data.c:317!
2019-07-01 8:44 [f2fs-dev] [Bug 204043] New: F2fs kernel BUG at fs/f2fs/data.c:317! bugzilla-daemon
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2019-07-11 10:41 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2019-07-16 9:06 ` bugzilla-daemon
2019-07-17 1:36 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (6 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2019-07-16 9:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-f2fs-devel
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204043
--- Comment #4 from Chao Yu (chao@kernel.org) ---
Sorry, previous version is broken... I've updated them.
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-f2fs-devel/20190712085542.4068-1-yuchao0@huawei.com/T/#u
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [f2fs-dev] [Bug 204043] F2fs kernel BUG at fs/f2fs/data.c:317!
2019-07-01 8:44 [f2fs-dev] [Bug 204043] New: F2fs kernel BUG at fs/f2fs/data.c:317! bugzilla-daemon
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2019-07-16 9:06 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2019-07-17 1:36 ` bugzilla-daemon
2019-07-17 2:01 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (5 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2019-07-17 1:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-f2fs-devel
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204043
--- Comment #5 from midwinter1993@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Chao Yu from comment #4)
> Sorry, previous version is broken... I've updated them.
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-f2fs-devel/20190712085542.4068-1-
> yuchao0@huawei.com/T/#u
Sorry! I have not tested these patches yet. :(
I have just tried the updated patch but failed.
It seems inconsistent with kernel-5.1.3?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [f2fs-dev] [Bug 204043] F2fs kernel BUG at fs/f2fs/data.c:317!
2019-07-01 8:44 [f2fs-dev] [Bug 204043] New: F2fs kernel BUG at fs/f2fs/data.c:317! bugzilla-daemon
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2019-07-17 1:36 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2019-07-17 2:01 ` bugzilla-daemon
2019-07-22 3:10 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (4 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2019-07-17 2:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-f2fs-devel
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204043
Chao Yu (chao@kernel.org) changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment #6 is|1 |0
private| |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [f2fs-dev] [Bug 204043] F2fs kernel BUG at fs/f2fs/data.c:317!
2019-07-01 8:44 [f2fs-dev] [Bug 204043] New: F2fs kernel BUG at fs/f2fs/data.c:317! bugzilla-daemon
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2019-07-17 2:01 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2019-07-22 3:10 ` bugzilla-daemon
2019-07-22 3:46 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (3 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2019-07-22 3:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-f2fs-devel
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204043
--- Comment #7 from midwinter1993@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Chao Yu from comment #6)
> You mean it failed when you apply those patches to kernel 5.1.3?
>
> I made patches based on last dev branch below:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jaegeuk/f2fs.git/log/?h=dev
>
> Could you download last code for test? Last code should has issues you
> reported.
Hi! I cloned the repo and patched the latest dev branch.
The aforementioned kernel bug does not manifest again with the provided script.
But my original(complex/long) script triggers another bug; I'm not sure whether
this bug was introduced by the patch.
--- Core dump ---
[ 17.678583] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 17.679405] kernel BUG at fs/f2fs/segment.c:2391!
[ 17.680654] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI
[ 17.681394] CPU: 0 PID: 461 Comm: runner-1 Not tainted 5.2.0+ #5
[ 17.682279] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS
Ubuntu-1.8.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014
[ 17.683674] RIP: 0010:new_curseg+0xbb5/0xf10
[ 17.684309] Code: 14 11 84 d2 74 09 80 fa 03 0f 8e 19 03 00 00 44 0f af ad
00 04 00 00 44 39 e8 0f 83 7f f7 ff ff e9 45 fa ff ff e8 8b 61 80 ff <0f> 0b e8
84 61 80 ff 44 89 e8 31 d2 f7 74 24 08 89 c3 e9 5a f6 ff
[ 17.687001] RSP: 0018:ffff888110c0f360 EFLAGS: 00010293
[ 17.687772] RAX: ffff88811514b400 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX:
ffffffffb93585b5
[ 17.688792] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000048 RDI:
ffff88810f9fe900
[ 17.689771] RBP: ffff888112b2aa80 R08: 0000000000000000 R09:
ffffed1022181e62
[ 17.690804] R10: ffffed1022181e61 R11: 0000000000000003 R12:
ffff888111f4ff30
[ 17.691852] R13: 0000000000000048 R14: ffff88810f9fe900 R15:
0000000000000048
[ 17.692894] FS: 00005555571fe8c0(0000) GS:ffff88811b200000(0000)
knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 17.694066] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 17.694926] CR2: 0000555557302000 CR3: 0000000110406000 CR4:
00000000000006f0
[ 17.695981] Call Trace:
[ 17.696372] ? f2fs_need_SSR+0x4fe/0x670
[ 17.696973] allocate_segment_by_default+0x222/0x440
[ 17.697717] f2fs_allocate_data_block+0x649/0x2720
[ 17.698409] ? f2fs_submit_page_write+0xc25/0x19c0
[ 17.699035] do_write_page+0x1c1/0x590
[ 17.699628] f2fs_outplace_write_data+0x157/0x3d0
[ 17.700439] ? f2fs_do_write_node_page+0x280/0x280
[ 17.701188] ? f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr+0x1f8/0xe70
[ 17.701807] f2fs_do_write_data_page+0xa60/0x13f0
[ 17.702353] ? f2fs_should_update_outplace+0x330/0x330
[ 17.703017] ? _raw_spin_lock+0x75/0xd0
[ 17.703556] ? percpu_counter_add_batch+0xc1/0x110
[ 17.704215] ? f2fs_remove_dirty_inode+0x191/0x520
[ 17.704873] move_data_page+0x5bc/0x990
[ 17.705405] ? get_victim_by_default+0x21d0/0x21d0
[ 17.705986] ? down_read_trylock+0x170/0x170
[ 17.706402] ? __radix_tree_lookup+0x1a9/0x220
[ 17.706834] do_garbage_collect+0x14cd/0x4020
[ 17.707339] ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
[ 17.707797] ? mutex_lock+0x89/0xd0
[ 17.708167] ? mutex_unlock+0x18/0x40
[ 17.708555] ? move_data_block+0x2500/0x2500
[ 17.709004] ? preempt_schedule_common+0x36/0x50
[ 17.709488] ? down_read+0x1f0/0x1f0
[ 17.709869] f2fs_gc+0x69b/0x37e0
[ 17.710224] ? f2fs_start_bidx_of_node+0x40/0x40
[ 17.710709] ? delete_node+0x1ef/0x820
[ 17.711114] ? node_tag_clear+0x8a/0x1b0
[ 17.711530] ? mutex_lock+0x89/0xd0
[ 17.711901] ? __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x10/0x10
[ 17.712368] ? f2fs_balance_fs+0x5ae/0x19c0
[ 17.712809] f2fs_balance_fs+0x5ae/0x19c0
[ 17.713232] ? __d_instantiate+0x320/0x430
[ 17.713664] f2fs_mkdir+0x40a/0x5e0
[ 17.714034] ? security_inode_mkdir+0xca/0x100
[ 17.714501] vfs_mkdir+0x351/0x560
[ 17.714864] do_mkdirat+0x11b/0x210
[ 17.715242] ? __ia32_sys_mknod+0xb0/0xb0
[ 17.715687] ? schedule+0x9c/0x230
[ 17.716051] do_syscall_64+0x9a/0x330
[ 17.716440] ? prepare_exit_to_usermode+0x142/0x1d0
[ 17.716953] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
[ 17.717485] RIP: 0033:0x50eaf7
[ 17.717813] Code: 1f 40 00 b8 89 00 00 00 0f 05 48 3d 01 f0 ff ff 0f 83 2d
f5 f8 ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 66 90 b8 53 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01
f0 ff ff 0f 83 0d f5 f8 ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00
[ 17.719740] RSP: 002b:00007ffff7965da8 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX:
0000000000000053
[ 17.720531] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000400328 RCX:
000000000050eaf7
[ 17.721273] RDX: 0000555557337f90 RSI: 00000000000001fd RDI:
0000555557337f90
[ 17.722015] RBP: 00007ffff7965de0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09:
000000000000003e
[ 17.722963] R10: 0000000000000035 R11: 0000000000000202 R12:
000000000049e490
[ 17.723941] R13: 000000000049e520 R14: 0000000000000000 R15:
0000000000000000
[ 17.724914] Modules linked in:
[ 17.725343] Dumping ftrace buffer:
[ 17.725816] (ftrace buffer empty)
[ 17.726356] ---[ end trace 110112c63ed78316 ]---
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [f2fs-dev] [Bug 204043] F2fs kernel BUG at fs/f2fs/data.c:317!
2019-07-01 8:44 [f2fs-dev] [Bug 204043] New: F2fs kernel BUG at fs/f2fs/data.c:317! bugzilla-daemon
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2019-07-22 3:10 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2019-07-22 3:46 ` bugzilla-daemon
2019-07-22 6:18 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (2 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2019-07-22 3:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-f2fs-devel
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204043
--- Comment #8 from Chao Yu (chao@kernel.org) ---
This bug was reported by you in another track...
So could you confirm the issue in this track again?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [f2fs-dev] [Bug 204043] F2fs kernel BUG at fs/f2fs/data.c:317!
2019-07-01 8:44 [f2fs-dev] [Bug 204043] New: F2fs kernel BUG at fs/f2fs/data.c:317! bugzilla-daemon
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2019-07-22 3:46 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2019-07-22 6:18 ` bugzilla-daemon
2019-07-30 2:11 ` bugzilla-daemon
2019-07-30 2:34 ` bugzilla-daemon
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2019-07-22 6:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-f2fs-devel
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204043
--- Comment #9 from Chao Yu (chao@kernel.org) ---
BTW, to avoid panic in new_curseg(), you'd better to expand image size.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [f2fs-dev] [Bug 204043] F2fs kernel BUG at fs/f2fs/data.c:317!
2019-07-01 8:44 [f2fs-dev] [Bug 204043] New: F2fs kernel BUG at fs/f2fs/data.c:317! bugzilla-daemon
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2019-07-22 6:18 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2019-07-30 2:11 ` bugzilla-daemon
2019-07-30 2:34 ` bugzilla-daemon
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2019-07-30 2:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-f2fs-devel
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204043
--- Comment #10 from midwinter1993@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Chao Yu from comment #8)
> This bug was reported by you in another track...
>
> So could you confirm the issue in this track again?
Sorry! I forgot that bug.
I have tested the patch with the triggering script several times, and the issue
in this track does not happen again (though another bug occurs).
Thank you! :-P
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [f2fs-dev] [Bug 204043] F2fs kernel BUG at fs/f2fs/data.c:317!
2019-07-01 8:44 [f2fs-dev] [Bug 204043] New: F2fs kernel BUG at fs/f2fs/data.c:317! bugzilla-daemon
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2019-07-30 2:11 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2019-07-30 2:34 ` bugzilla-daemon
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2019-07-30 2:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-f2fs-devel
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204043
Chao Yu (chao@kernel.org) changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |CODE_FIX
--- Comment #11 from Chao Yu (chao@kernel.org) ---
Thanks for confirming that! Let me close this track. :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread