[Bug 26193] New: nouveau falls back to NoAccel on 9400M

[Bug 26193] New: nouveau falls back to NoAccel on 9400M

[bugzilla-daemon-CC+yJ3UmIYqDUpFQwHEjaQ]

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26193

           Summary: nouveau falls back to NoAccel on 9400M
           Product: xorg
           Version: git
          Platform: Other
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: medium
         Component: Driver/nouveau
        AssignedTo: nouveau-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org
        ReportedBy: bjt23-HmMyXyqgL2CVc3sceRu5cw@public.gmane.org
         QAContact: xorg-team-go0+a7rfsptAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org


Created an attachment (id=32792)
 --> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=32792)
Xorg.0.log

I'm seeing this in my xorg log:

(EE) NOUVEAU(0): Error creating GPU channel: -16
(EE) NOUVEAU(0): Error initialising acceleration.  Falling back to NoAccel

I assume this means no EXA and no 2D accel, which is sad :( .

I'm on a MacBook Pro 13" with GeForce 9400M (NVac).  Using nouveau-drm from the
kernel tree with git rev eeec3a1ecd703d3a32fe223274d2a77686030d78 (built out of
tree for kernel 2.6.32-gentoo-r2), and xf86-video-nouveau git rev
2630a1553d560ce2c7391bc103d4a543f7d3d0da.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 26193] nouveau falls back to NoAccel on 9400M

[bugzilla-daemon-CC+yJ3UmIYqDUpFQwHEjaQ]

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26193


Brian Tarricone <bjt23-HmMyXyqgL2CVc3sceRu5cw@public.gmane.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         OS/Version|All                         |Linux (All)
           Platform|Other                       |x86-64 (AMD64)




-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 26193] nouveau falls back to NoAccel on 9400M

[bugzilla-daemon-CC+yJ3UmIYqDUpFQwHEjaQ]

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26193





--- Comment #1 from Brian Tarricone <bjt23-HmMyXyqgL2CVc3sceRu5cw@public.gmane.org>  2010-01-24 06:10:51 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=32793)
 --> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=32793)
nouveau-related dmesg output 


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 26193] nouveau falls back to NoAccel on 9400M

[bugzilla-daemon-CC+yJ3UmIYqDUpFQwHEjaQ]

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26193





--- Comment #2 from Brian Tarricone <bjt23-HmMyXyqgL2CVc3sceRu5cw@public.gmane.org>  2010-01-24 06:12:04 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=32794)
 --> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=32794)
pretty minimal xorg.conf


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 26193] nouveau falls back to NoAccel on 9400M

[bugzilla-daemon-CC+yJ3UmIYqDUpFQwHEjaQ]

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26193





--- Comment #3 from Maarten Maathuis <madman2003-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>  2010-01-24 06:17:18 PST ---
It's known, the problem is these cards are all onboard. So that makes it harder
to test. The same problem applies to 8200 and 8300 and g102m (the last one is
iirc). They are either NVAA or NVAC. Ben Skeggs is probably the person with the
biggest chance of getting this running, but he doesn't have one.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 26193] nouveau falls back to NoAccel on 9400M

[bugzilla-daemon-CC+yJ3UmIYqDUpFQwHEjaQ]

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26193


Ted Phelps <phelps-e+AXbWqSrlAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |phelps-e+AXbWqSrlAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org




--- Comment #4 from Ted Phelps <phelps-e+AXbWqSrlAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>  2010-01-24 06:33:02 PST ---
I'm seeing what might be the same problem with an NV4E (a GeForce 6150 which is
built into my ASUS M2NPV-VM motherboard) running in a 64-bit environment.  I
have a work-around, but it doesn't make any sense to me.

I've managed to track my issue down to the TTM interface changes:

    77bce8e  drm/nouveau: fix for ttm interface changes, and
    ad49f50  drm/ttm/radeon: add dma32 support.

If I force the last argument to ttm_bo_device_init to false then the GPU
channel is successfully created and 2D acceleration works.  I'm currently using
the following patch:

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_mem.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_mem.c
index 8f3a12f..10d1663 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_mem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_mem.c
@@ -590,7 +590,7 @@ nouveau_mem_init(struct drm_device *dev)
        ret = ttm_bo_device_init(&dev_priv->ttm.bdev,
                                 dev_priv->ttm.bo_global_ref.ref.object,
                                 &nouveau_bo_driver, DRM_FILE_PAGE_OFFSET,
-                                dma_bits <= 32 ? true : false);
+                                /* dma_bits <= 32 ? true : */ false);
        if (ret) {
                NV_ERROR(dev, "Error initialising bo driver: %d\n", ret);
                return ret;

The bit that I find most confusing is that I can't just force dma_bits to be 40
(or 64, for that matter) -- it apparently must be 32.

To summarize, this only works for me if: dma_bits=32 and TTM_PAGE_FLAG_DMA32 is
not in bdev's flags.

I hope this means something to someone...

Thanks,
-Ted


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 26193] nouveau falls back to NoAccel on 9400M

[bugzilla-daemon-CC+yJ3UmIYqDUpFQwHEjaQ]

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26193





--- Comment #5 from Brian Tarricone <bjt23-HmMyXyqgL2CVc3sceRu5cw@public.gmane.org>  2010-01-24 15:44:05 PST ---
Maarten: Is there any more information or help I can provide?  Or any hardware
I can donate?  Unfortunately donating a $1500 Mac laptop isn't something I'm
comfortable doing, but if someone could find a cheap (<= $450?) laptop with the
same or similar NVAC chipset, I might be able to justify buying one for Ben to
test on.  If he thinks remote testing will do, I'd be happy to hang out in
#nouveau on the weekend and help (unfortunately during the week isn't possible
for me).

Ted: interesting... are you running a 64bit system?  If so, does that mean TTM
is trying to use > 32bit DMA?  Perhaps something in the hardware doesn't
support > 32bit DMA, and that fact isn't being detected properly.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 26193] nouveau falls back to NoAccel on 9400M

[bugzilla-daemon-CC+yJ3UmIYqDUpFQwHEjaQ]

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26193





--- Comment #6 from Ted Phelps <phelps-e+AXbWqSrlAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>  2010-01-24 16:40:33 PST ---
Brian: Yes, I am using a 64-bit system.

TTM_PAGE_FLAG_DMA32 is used only by ttm_tt_alloc_page(), where it causes
alloc_page() to be called with the __GFP_DMA32 flag set.  This is supposed to
cause it to return only pages in the first 4GB of RAM, so I'm baffled as to why
it's breaking anything.

FWIW, I only have 4GB of RAM in the machine, so in theory all of it could be
safe for 32-bit DMA.

I note that you're also using an x86-64 CPU, and I'd be curious to know if the
patch in comment #4 helps you.  If not, I should open a new bug report.

Thanks,
-Ted


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 26193] nouveau falls back to NoAccel on 9400M

[bugzilla-daemon-CC+yJ3UmIYqDUpFQwHEjaQ]

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26193





--- Comment #7 from Brian Tarricone <bjt23-HmMyXyqgL2CVc3sceRu5cw@public.gmane.org>  2010-01-25 00:41:33 PST ---
Nope, unfortunately your patch doesn't help.  Same error in the log.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 26193] nouveau falls back to NoAccel on 9400M

[bugzilla-daemon-CC+yJ3UmIYqDUpFQwHEjaQ]

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26193





--- Comment #8 from Maarten Maathuis <madman2003-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>  2010-01-25 00:48:24 PST ---
4GB of RAM means you go over 32 bits memory space (your gpu and other hardware
also needs memory space). Why it breaks in this strange way i do not know.

Brian Tarricone: I think the cheapest would be to dig up a NVAA/NVAC based
motherboard (they seem to exist in socket AM2+ variety only), combined with an
AMD Athlon II X2, some ram, a case, small harddrive and a dvd writer/player.
But it might be worthwhile to find out what is keeping Ben Skeggs from having
such hardware, i will add him to the CC list.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 26193] nouveau falls back to NoAccel on 9400M

[bugzilla-daemon-CC+yJ3UmIYqDUpFQwHEjaQ]

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26193





--- Comment #9 from Maarten Maathuis <madman2003-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>  2010-01-25 00:49:22 PST ---
Ted Phelps: you should open a seperate bug report


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 26193] nouveau falls back to NoAccel on 9400M

[bugzilla-daemon-CC+yJ3UmIYqDUpFQwHEjaQ]

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26193





--- Comment #10 from Ted Phelps <phelps-e+AXbWqSrlAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>  2010-01-25 01:41:54 PST ---
Brian: Thanks for testing.
Maarten: I've submitted bug #26201 to track this.  Thanks for having a look.

-Ted


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 26193] nouveau falls back to NoAccel on 9400M

[bugzilla-daemon-CC+yJ3UmIYqDUpFQwHEjaQ]

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26193





--- Comment #11 from Brian Tarricone <bjt23-HmMyXyqgL2CVc3sceRu5cw@public.gmane.org>  2010-01-26 00:34:19 PST ---
Ok, I did some printf()ing, and found out at least part of what's failing. 
Hopefully this is useful.  Call stack looks something like this (with some of
the actual args passed:

libdrm.so:drmCommandWrite(fd, DRM_NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_PREP, ...)
libdrm_nouveau.so:nouveau_bo_wait(bo, 0x8, 0, 0)
libdrm_nouveau.so:nouveau_bo_map_range(bo, 0, 65536, 0x0c)
libdrm_nouveau.so:nouveau_bo_map()
libdrm_nouveau.so:nouveau_channel_alloc()
nouveau_drv.so:NVInitDma()
[etc.]

And drmCommandWrite() returns -EBUSY.

I poked around in the drm kernel module, but that's where things get a little
weird.  I found nouveau_gem_ioctl_cpu_prep(), and added a printk() at the top,
but I never see any output in dmesg.  So then I added some in
drm_drv.c:drm_ioctl(), but even *that* doesn't seem to be called.  Not sure
what's going on there.  I'm probably misunderstanding something.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 26193] nouveau falls back to NoAccel on 9400M

[bugzilla-daemon-CC+yJ3UmIYqDUpFQwHEjaQ]

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26193


Anssi Hannula <anssi-4qZELD6Fgxhg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |anssi-4qZELD6Fgxhg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org




--- Comment #12 from Anssi Hannula <anssi-4qZELD6Fgxhg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>  2010-01-26 08:33:06 PST ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Brian Tarricone: I think the cheapest would be to dig up a NVAA/NVAC based
> motherboard (they seem to exist in socket AM2+ variety only), combined with an
> AMD Athlon II X2, some ram, a case, small harddrive and a dvd writer/player.

I have an NVAC on a Socket 755 Gigabyte GA-E7AUM-DS2H, x86_64. After reading
this I made a quick test and confirmed that it is hit by this bug as well.
There is one used one for sell at amazon.com (out of stock for new ones):
http://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B001RUI3P6/ref=dp_olp_used?ie=UTF8&condition=used


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 26193] nouveau falls back to NoAccel on 9400M

[bugzilla-daemon-CC+yJ3UmIYqDUpFQwHEjaQ]

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26193





--- Comment #13 from Ingmar Vanhassel <ingmar-k5O9xmZG+kVAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>  2010-01-26 09:23:56 PST ---
For those not on #nouveau @ freenode: Ben Skeggs got access to this hardware
over ssh, and found the bug, so a patch may appear soon.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 26193] nouveau falls back to NoAccel on 9400M

[bugzilla-daemon-CC+yJ3UmIYqDUpFQwHEjaQ]

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26193





--- Comment #14 from Brian Tarricone <bjt23-HmMyXyqgL2CVc3sceRu5cw@public.gmane.org>  2010-01-27 00:08:53 PST ---
Ok, with today's commits (presumably 1ac45d0f945734fe9dcd6f006b0c626da6d7334f
is the one that matters, since the other two seem unrelated), EXA setup is
"fixed," but X comes up with a mostly black screen with random red, blue, and
green pixels every now and then, and big white bands and partial-bands across
the screen.  Machine appears hard-locked (forgot to ssh-test, though, so might
have just been input-locked).


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 26193] nouveau falls back to NoAccel on 9400M

[bugzilla-daemon-CC+yJ3UmIYqDUpFQwHEjaQ]

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26193





--- Comment #15 from Brian Tarricone <bjt23-HmMyXyqgL2CVc3sceRu5cw@public.gmane.org>  2010-01-27 00:10:04 PST ---
Actually now that I think about it, I doubt it's hard-locked -- otherwise I
doubt Xorg.0.log would have made it to disk after the lockup.  Kernel's
probably still alive, to some extent.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 26193] nouveau falls back to NoAccel on 9400M

[bugzilla-daemon-CC+yJ3UmIYqDUpFQwHEjaQ]

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26193





--- Comment #16 from Brian Tarricone <bjt23-HmMyXyqgL2CVc3sceRu5cw@public.gmane.org>  2010-01-27 03:29:56 PST ---
Verified with a bisect that 1ac45d0f945734fe9dcd6f006b0c626da6d7334f causes the
lockup.

I also tried setting the module param vram_notify=1 and vram_notify=0, but
still the same problem either way.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 26193] nouveau falls back to NoAccel on 9400M

[bugzilla-daemon-CC+yJ3UmIYqDUpFQwHEjaQ]

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26193





--- Comment #17 from Kamil Kaminski <kamilkss-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>  2010-01-29 09:58:08 PST ---
No worry I'm getting the same thing with ION, looks like X dies somewhere
along:

X: nouveau_pushbuf.c:271: nouveau_pushbuf_flush: Assertion
`!nouveau_pushbuf_space(chan, min)' failed.

So it looks like more vram magic is needed. I guess we will need to catch
darktama once again and let him ssh into the machine :P

see ya,
#nouveau irc nick: hax0r1


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 26193] nouveau falls back to NoAccel on 9400M

[bugzilla-daemon-CC+yJ3UmIYqDUpFQwHEjaQ]

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26193





--- Comment #18 from Maarten Maathuis <madman2003-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>  2010-01-29 10:02:02 PST ---
I don't think he has even attempted to fix it yet. He said it wasn't trivial.
He's on vacation for the next week, so be patient.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 26193] nouveau falls back to NoAccel on 9400M

[bugzilla-daemon-CC+yJ3UmIYqDUpFQwHEjaQ]

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26193





--- Comment #19 from Ben Skeggs <skeggsb-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>  2010-02-21 21:16:53 PST ---
NVAC should be fixed in latest nouveau git.  It worked on the macbook I got
access to at least :)


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 26193] nouveau falls back to NoAccel on 9400M

[bugzilla-daemon-CC+yJ3UmIYqDUpFQwHEjaQ]

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26193


Brian Tarricone <bjt23-HmMyXyqgL2CVc3sceRu5cw@public.gmane.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED




--- Comment #20 from Brian Tarricone <bjt23-HmMyXyqgL2CVc3sceRu5cw@public.gmane.org>  2010-02-22 04:36:20 PST ---
Great, works fine here!


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.