All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Prateek Sood <prsood@codeaurora.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	avagin@gmail.com, mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, sramana@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup/cpuset: fix circular locking dependency
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 14:24:55 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c282b638-95ef-b688-9249-f23a733c0a43@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171213154041.GP3919388@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com>

On 12/13/2017 09:10 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hi TJ,

> Hello, Prateek.
> 
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 07:58:24PM +0530, Prateek Sood wrote:
>> Did you mean something like below. If not then could you
>> please share a patch for this problem in
>> cgroup_transfer_tasks().
> 
> Oh we surely can add a new iterator but we can just count in
> cgroup_transfer_tasks() too, right?
I did not get what you meant by this. Could you please share a
patch for this.
> 
> Thanks.
> 

Following are two ways to improve cgroup_transfer_tasks(). In
both cases task in PF_EXITING state would be left in source
cgroup. It would be removed from cgroup_exit() in exit path.

diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c b/kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c
index 024085d..e2bdcdb 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c
@@ -123,7 +123,10 @@ int cgroup_transfer_tasks(struct cgroup *to, struct cgroup *from)
         */
        do {
                css_task_iter_start(&from->self, 0, &it);
-               task = css_task_iter_next(&it);
+               do {
+                       task = css_task_iter_next(&it);
+               } while (task && (task & PF_EXITING))
+
                if (task)
                        get_task_struct(task);
                css_task_iter_end(&it);

----------------------------8<---------------------------------

diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c b/kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c
index 024085d..843b8bb 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c
@@ -121,12 +121,11 @@ int cgroup_transfer_tasks(struct cgroup *to, struct cgroup *from)
         * Migrate tasks one-by-one until @from is empty.  This fails iff
         * ->can_attach() fails.
         */
+       css_task_iter_start(&from->self, 0, &it);
        do {
-               css_task_iter_start(&from->self, 0, &it);
                task = css_task_iter_next(&it);
                if (task)
                        get_task_struct(task);
-               css_task_iter_end(&it);

                if (task) {
                        ret = cgroup_migrate(task, false, &mgctx);
@@ -135,6 +134,7 @@ int cgroup_transfer_tasks(struct cgroup *to, struct cgroup *from)
                        put_task_struct(task);
                }
        } while (task && !ret);
+       css_task_iter_end(&it);
 out_err:
        cgroup_migrate_finish(&mgctx);
        percpu_up_write(&cgroup_threadgroup_rwsem);


Thanks


-- 
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation
Center, Inc., is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation
Collaborative Project

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Prateek Sood <prsood-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>,
	avagin-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
	mingo-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	sramana-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup/cpuset: fix circular locking dependency
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 14:24:55 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c282b638-95ef-b688-9249-f23a733c0a43@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171213154041.GP3919388-4dN5La/x3IkLX0oZNxdnEQ2O0Ztt9esIQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>

On 12/13/2017 09:10 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hi TJ,

> Hello, Prateek.
> 
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 07:58:24PM +0530, Prateek Sood wrote:
>> Did you mean something like below. If not then could you
>> please share a patch for this problem in
>> cgroup_transfer_tasks().
> 
> Oh we surely can add a new iterator but we can just count in
> cgroup_transfer_tasks() too, right?
I did not get what you meant by this. Could you please share a
patch for this.
> 
> Thanks.
> 

Following are two ways to improve cgroup_transfer_tasks(). In
both cases task in PF_EXITING state would be left in source
cgroup. It would be removed from cgroup_exit() in exit path.

diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c b/kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c
index 024085d..e2bdcdb 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c
@@ -123,7 +123,10 @@ int cgroup_transfer_tasks(struct cgroup *to, struct cgroup *from)
         */
        do {
                css_task_iter_start(&from->self, 0, &it);
-               task = css_task_iter_next(&it);
+               do {
+                       task = css_task_iter_next(&it);
+               } while (task && (task & PF_EXITING))
+
                if (task)
                        get_task_struct(task);
                css_task_iter_end(&it);

----------------------------8<---------------------------------

diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c b/kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c
index 024085d..843b8bb 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c
@@ -121,12 +121,11 @@ int cgroup_transfer_tasks(struct cgroup *to, struct cgroup *from)
         * Migrate tasks one-by-one until @from is empty.  This fails iff
         * ->can_attach() fails.
         */
+       css_task_iter_start(&from->self, 0, &it);
        do {
-               css_task_iter_start(&from->self, 0, &it);
                task = css_task_iter_next(&it);
                if (task)
                        get_task_struct(task);
-               css_task_iter_end(&it);

                if (task) {
                        ret = cgroup_migrate(task, false, &mgctx);
@@ -135,6 +134,7 @@ int cgroup_transfer_tasks(struct cgroup *to, struct cgroup *from)
                        put_task_struct(task);
                }
        } while (task && !ret);
+       css_task_iter_end(&it);
 out_err:
        cgroup_migrate_finish(&mgctx);
        percpu_up_write(&cgroup_threadgroup_rwsem);


Thanks


-- 
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation
Center, Inc., is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation
Collaborative Project

  reply	other threads:[~2017-12-15  8:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-28  1:22 cgroup/for-next: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected in cpuset_write_resmask Andrei Vagin
2017-11-28 11:35 ` [PATCH] cgroup/cpuset: fix circular locking dependency Prateek Sood
2017-12-04  5:14   ` Prateek Sood
2017-12-04  5:14     ` Prateek Sood
2017-12-04 20:22     ` Tejun Heo
2017-12-04 20:22       ` Tejun Heo
2017-12-04 22:58       ` Tejun Heo
2017-12-04 23:01         ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-04 23:01           ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-08  9:40           ` Prateek Sood
2017-12-08 11:45             ` Prateek Sood
2017-12-08 11:45               ` Prateek Sood
2017-12-11 15:32               ` Tejun Heo
2017-12-11 15:32                 ` Tejun Heo
2017-12-13 14:28                 ` Prateek Sood
2017-12-13 15:40                   ` Tejun Heo
2017-12-15  8:54                     ` Prateek Sood [this message]
2017-12-15  8:54                       ` Prateek Sood
2017-12-15 13:22                       ` Tejun Heo
2017-12-15 19:06                         ` Prateek Sood
2017-12-19  7:26                           ` [PATCH] cgroup: Fix deadlock in cpu hotplug path Prateek Sood
2017-12-19  7:26                             ` Prateek Sood
2017-12-19 13:39                             ` Tejun Heo
2017-12-11 15:20           ` [PATCH] cgroup/cpuset: fix circular locking dependency Tejun Heo
2017-12-11 15:20             ` Tejun Heo
2017-12-13  7:50             ` Prateek Sood
2017-12-13  7:50               ` Prateek Sood
2017-12-13 16:06               ` Tejun Heo
2017-12-15 19:04                 ` Prateek Sood
2017-12-15 19:04                   ` Prateek Sood
2017-12-28 20:37                 ` Prateek Sood
2017-12-28 20:37                   ` Prateek Sood
2018-01-02 16:16                   ` Tejun Heo
2018-01-02 17:44                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-01-02 17:44                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-01-02 18:01                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-01-08 12:28                         ` Tejun Heo
2018-01-08 12:28                           ` Tejun Heo
2018-01-08 13:47                           ` [PATCH wq/for-4.16 1/2] workqueue: separate out init_rescuer() Tejun Heo
2018-01-08 13:47                             ` Tejun Heo
2018-01-08 13:47                             ` [PATCH wq/for-4.16 2/2] workqueue: allow WQ_MEM_RECLAIM on early init workqueues Tejun Heo
2018-01-08 13:47                               ` Tejun Heo
2018-01-08 22:52                           ` [PATCH] cgroup/cpuset: fix circular locking dependency Paul E. McKenney
2018-01-08 22:52                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-01-09  0:31                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-01-09  3:42                               ` Tejun Heo
2018-01-09  3:42                                 ` Tejun Heo
2018-01-09  4:20                                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-01-09 13:44                                   ` Tejun Heo
2018-01-09 15:21                                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-01-09 15:21                                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-01-09 15:37                                       ` Tejun Heo
2018-01-09 16:00                                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-01-09 16:00                                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-01-10 20:08                                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-01-10 21:41                                             ` Tejun Heo
2018-01-10 21:41                                               ` Tejun Heo
2018-01-10 22:10                                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-01-10 22:10                                                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-01-15 12:02                     ` Prateek Sood
2018-01-15 12:02                       ` Prateek Sood
2018-01-16 16:27                       ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c282b638-95ef-b688-9249-f23a733c0a43@codeaurora.org \
    --to=prsood@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=avagin@gmail.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sramana@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.