Re: [PATCH v10 00/18] drm: Add Samsung MIPI DSIM bridge

[Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>]

On 1/20/23 19:54, Jagan Teki wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 8:36 PM Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
>>
>> On 1/20/23 15:41, Jagan Teki wrote:
>>> Hi Fabio,
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 5:36 PM Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Jagan,
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 2:59 PM Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> There are two patch series prior to this need to apply.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/dri-devel/patch/20221212145745.15387-1-jagan@amarulasolutions.com/
>>>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/dri-devel/cover/20221212182923.29155-1-jagan@amarulasolutions.com/
>>>>
>>>> Would it make sense to re-submit these two patches as part of your series?
>>>
>>> The previous version's comment was to separate them from the DSIM series.
>>
>> Hmmmmm, seems like those first two patches got stuck. I fixed up the
>> malformed Fixes: line (it was split across two lines and had angular
>> brackets around it) and picked the first series via drm-misc-next .
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> We have another series for Exynos, prior to DSIM
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/dri-devel/cover/20221212182923.29155-1-jagan@amarulasolutions.com/
> 
>>
>> Can you send a subsequent patch to convert the DSIM_* macros to BIT()
>> macro , since checkpatch --strict complains about it ?
> 
> Okay.
> 
>>
>> For the second series, you likely want a RB from Maxime Ripard and Dave
>> Stevenson first about the probe order handling.
> 
> Do you mean for 01/18 and 02/18 patches?

I mean

https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/dri-devel/cover/20221212182923.29155-1-jagan@amarulasolutions.com/