All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kgunda@codeaurora.org
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
	Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>,
	Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 4/5] backlight: qcom-wled: Add support for OVP interrupt handling
Date: Wed, 09 May 2018 11:46:30 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c6119cb6accc8e75aa8d333abb455da4@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9757b8fbcdd55cb72a42451270b3cb33@codeaurora.org>

On 2018-05-09 10:36, kgunda@codeaurora.org wrote:
> On 2018-05-08 22:49, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>> On Tue 08 May 05:26 PDT 2018, kgunda@codeaurora.org wrote:
>> 
>>> On 2018-05-07 22:51, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>>> > On Thu 03 May 02:57 PDT 2018, Kiran Gunda wrote:
>> [..]
>>> > > @@ -220,7 +255,12 @@ static int wled_module_enable(struct wled
>>> > > *wled, int val)
>>> > >  				WLED3_CTRL_REG_MOD_EN,
>>> > >  				WLED3_CTRL_REG_MOD_EN_MASK,
>>> > >  				WLED3_CTRL_REG_MOD_EN_MASK);
>>> > > -	return rc;
>>> > > +	if (rc < 0)
>>> > > +		return rc;
>>> > > +
>>> > > +	schedule_delayed_work(&wled->ovp_work, WLED_SOFT_START_DLY_US);
>>> >
>>> > Do you really want to delay the work on disable?
>>> >
>>> > Wouldn't it be better to use a delay worker for the enablement and in
>>> > the disable case you cancel the work and just disable_irq() directly
>>> > here.
>>> >
>>> Sure. Will do it in the next series.
>>> > But more importantly, if this is only related to auto detection, do you
>>> > really want to enable/disable the ovp_irq after you have detected the
>>> > string configuration?
>>> >
>>> Ok. This is used for the genuine OVP detection and for the auto 
>>> detection as
>>> well.
>> 
>> What is the expected outcome of detecting an OVP condition, outside 
>> auto
>> detection?
>> 
> Ok... Out side auto detection, it is used for information purpose. I 
> think it is
> okay to ignore enable/disable the ovp_irq after auto detection is done.

I am taking back the above comment. The OVP irq is needed even after the 
auto detection is done.
Because there are also cases where one/more of the connected LED string 
of the display-backlight
is malfunctioning (due to damage) and requires the damaged string to be 
turned off to prevent the
complete panel and/or board from being damaged by running the auto 
detection again.

currently we are not resetting "auto_detection_done" flag once it set to 
true. I will fix it in
the next series to run the auto detection again (If the OVP condition is 
met) because of the
above mentioned reason.

We are going to discuss the HW systems to check if the OVP keep on 
occurring due to some other
reason, other then the string issue, what needs to do (disable the 
module ?).

>> Regards,
>> Bjorn
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe 
> linux-arm-msm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kgunda@codeaurora.org
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
	Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>,
	Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 4/5] backlight: qcom-wled: Add support for OVP interrupt handling
Date: Wed, 09 May 2018 06:28:30 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c6119cb6accc8e75aa8d333abb455da4@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9757b8fbcdd55cb72a42451270b3cb33@codeaurora.org>

On 2018-05-09 10:36, kgunda@codeaurora.org wrote:
> On 2018-05-08 22:49, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>> On Tue 08 May 05:26 PDT 2018, kgunda@codeaurora.org wrote:
>> 
>>> On 2018-05-07 22:51, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>>> > On Thu 03 May 02:57 PDT 2018, Kiran Gunda wrote:
>> [..]
>>> > > @@ -220,7 +255,12 @@ static int wled_module_enable(struct wled
>>> > > *wled, int val)
>>> > >  				WLED3_CTRL_REG_MOD_EN,
>>> > >  				WLED3_CTRL_REG_MOD_EN_MASK,
>>> > >  				WLED3_CTRL_REG_MOD_EN_MASK);
>>> > > -	return rc;
>>> > > +	if (rc < 0)
>>> > > +		return rc;
>>> > > +
>>> > > +	schedule_delayed_work(&wled->ovp_work, WLED_SOFT_START_DLY_US);
>>> >
>>> > Do you really want to delay the work on disable?
>>> >
>>> > Wouldn't it be better to use a delay worker for the enablement and in
>>> > the disable case you cancel the work and just disable_irq() directly
>>> > here.
>>> >
>>> Sure. Will do it in the next series.
>>> > But more importantly, if this is only related to auto detection, do you
>>> > really want to enable/disable the ovp_irq after you have detected the
>>> > string configuration?
>>> >
>>> Ok. This is used for the genuine OVP detection and for the auto 
>>> detection as
>>> well.
>> 
>> What is the expected outcome of detecting an OVP condition, outside 
>> auto
>> detection?
>> 
> Ok... Out side auto detection, it is used for information purpose. I 
> think it is
> okay to ignore enable/disable the ovp_irq after auto detection is done.

I am taking back the above comment. The OVP irq is needed even after the 
auto detection is done.
Because there are also cases where one/more of the connected LED string 
of the display-backlight
is malfunctioning (due to damage) and requires the damaged string to be 
turned off to prevent the
complete panel and/or board from being damaged by running the auto 
detection again.

currently we are not resetting "auto_detection_done" flag once it set to 
true. I will fix it in
the next series to run the auto detection again (If the OVP condition is 
met) because of the
above mentioned reason.

We are going to discuss the HW systems to check if the OVP keep on 
occurring due to some other
reason, other then the string issue, what needs to do (disable the 
module ?).

>> Regards,
>> Bjorn
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe 
> linux-arm-msm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-09  6:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-03  9:57 [PATCH V1 0/5] backlight: qcom-wled: Support for QCOM wled driver Kiran Gunda
2018-05-03  9:57 ` [PATCH V1 1/5] qcom: wled: Rename pm8941-wled.c to qcom-wled.c Kiran Gunda
2018-05-03  9:58   ` Kiran Gunda
2018-05-07 15:41   ` Bjorn Andersson
2018-05-07 15:41     ` Bjorn Andersson
2018-05-10 11:10   ` Pavel Machek
2018-05-10 11:10     ` Pavel Machek
2018-05-03  9:57 ` [PATCH V1 2/5] backlight: qcom-wled: Add support for WLED4 peripheral Kiran Gunda
2018-05-03  9:59   ` Kiran Gunda
2018-05-07 16:20   ` Bjorn Andersson
2018-05-07 16:20     ` Bjorn Andersson
2018-05-08 10:25     ` kgunda
2018-05-08 10:37       ` kgunda
2018-05-08 17:17       ` Bjorn Andersson
2018-05-08 17:17         ` Bjorn Andersson
2018-05-09  5:15         ` kgunda
2018-05-09  5:27           ` kgunda
2018-05-17  9:47       ` kgunda
2018-05-17  9:59         ` kgunda
2018-05-17 12:31         ` Rob Herring
2018-05-17 12:31           ` Rob Herring
2018-05-17 12:31           ` Rob Herring
2018-05-17 15:10           ` kgunda
2018-05-17 15:22             ` kgunda
2018-05-18 12:20             ` Rob Herring
2018-05-18 12:20               ` Rob Herring
2018-05-18 12:20               ` Rob Herring
2018-05-14 16:57   ` Pavel Machek
2018-05-14 16:57     ` Pavel Machek
2018-05-15  4:55     ` kgunda
2018-05-15  4:56       ` kgunda
2018-05-03  9:57 ` [PATCH V1 3/5] backlight: qcom-wled: Add support for short circuit handling Kiran Gunda
2018-05-03  9:59   ` Kiran Gunda
2018-05-07  8:06   ` Dan Carpenter
2018-05-07  8:06     ` Dan Carpenter
2018-05-07  8:06     ` Dan Carpenter
2018-05-07  9:08     ` kgunda
2018-05-07  9:20       ` kgunda
2018-05-07 17:06   ` Bjorn Andersson
2018-05-07 17:06     ` Bjorn Andersson
2018-05-08 10:35     ` kgunda
2018-05-08 10:47       ` kgunda
2018-05-03  9:57 ` [PATCH V1 4/5] backlight: qcom-wled: Add support for OVP interrupt handling Kiran Gunda
2018-05-03  9:59   ` Kiran Gunda
2018-05-07 17:21   ` Bjorn Andersson
2018-05-07 17:21     ` Bjorn Andersson
2018-05-08 12:26     ` kgunda
2018-05-08 12:38       ` kgunda
2018-05-08 17:19       ` Bjorn Andersson
2018-05-08 17:19         ` Bjorn Andersson
2018-05-09  5:06         ` kgunda
2018-05-09  5:18           ` kgunda
2018-05-09  6:16           ` kgunda [this message]
2018-05-09  6:28             ` kgunda
2018-05-03  9:57 ` [PATCH V1 5/5] backlight: qcom-wled: Add auto string detection logic Kiran Gunda
2018-05-03  9:59   ` Kiran Gunda
2018-05-07 18:10   ` Bjorn Andersson
2018-05-07 18:10     ` Bjorn Andersson
2018-05-09  7:14     ` kgunda
2018-05-09  7:26       ` kgunda
2018-05-14 17:02       ` Bjorn Andersson
2018-05-14 17:02         ` Bjorn Andersson
2018-05-15  4:50         ` kgunda
2018-05-15  4:50           ` kgunda

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c6119cb6accc8e75aa8d333abb455da4@codeaurora.org \
    --to=kgunda@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-leds@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.