Re: [KJ] Taking the Min and Max macro job

From: "Mehul Jani" <mehul.jani@gmail.com>
To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [KJ] Taking the Min and Max macro job
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 12:30:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cad1dd0a0702080418s5873f801r4eb067e790fa96d6@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070207235145.GZ8991@Ahmed>

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1086 bytes --]

I will do that. And let you know the progress .....

Thanks for pointing out for *reply all*

Mehul

On 2/8/07, Ahmed S. Darwish <darwish.07@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 02:59:41PM +0530, Mehul Jani wrote:
> > On 2/8/07, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 01:51:45AM +0200, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote:
> > >> It seems that no one is assigned the Min and Max macro job. I'll take
> > >> it if no one seems interested.
> > >>
> > >> Well, I hope this to become my last brain-dead patch series :).
> > >
> > >Be very very careful to not add integer overflows.
> > >
> >
> > I had started the activity. changed the handcrafted MAX macro to *max*
> from
> > the kernel.h in the xdr4.c file ( no quite sure of the complete file
> name)
> >
> > the max macro is applied in struct , i changed it and recompile failed.
>
> Hi Mehul,
>
> (Please use reply-to-all, and let the quoted text be on the top not on the
> bottom)
>
> Will you continue the task for the whole tree ?.
>
> --
> Ahmed S. Darwish
> http://darwish-07.blogspot.com
>

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1637 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 168 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org
https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors