Re: Snapshot target and DAX-capable devices

["Kani, Toshi" <toshi.kani@hpe.com>]

On Wed, 2018-12-12 at 12:50 -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12 2018 at 11:12am -0500,
> Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:
> 
> > Does it really make sense to enhance dm-snapshot?  I thought all serious
> > users of snapshots had moved on to dm-thinp?
> 
> There are cases where dm-snapshot is still useful for people.  But those
> are very niche users.  I'm not opposed to others proposing enhancements
> for dm-snapshot in general but it is definitely not a priority (Google's
> dm-bow is an example of a case where dm-snapshot may get extended to
> fulfill google's needs).
> 
> But for this specific DAX case, I can only assume efforts to prop up
> dm-snapshot like this are born out of legacy use-cases.  The reality is
> getting DAX to work with dm-snapshot is pretty involved (due to mmap,
> etc).  This thread got into a lot of the details:
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2018-August/msg00211.html
> 
> So any new attempt to reintroduce DAX support to dm-snapshot (or any
> more complex DM target) will have a very high bar.  One that requires
> much more extensive mm and block (interlock) prep work to make DAX
> safe.

Just to be clear, "reintroduce DAX support to dm-snapshot" is a bit
misleading because there wasn't such attempt before.  My original
hack/change in dm-snapshot was to support non-DAX use-cases to work with
DAX-capable devices.

Thanks,
-Toshi
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm