From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> To: ira.weiny@intel.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>, x86@kernel.org, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V3 3/9] x86/pks: Enable Protection Keys Supervisor (PKS) Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 11:23:08 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <cfd8e361-9d5b-5b24-08d4-31ad3d392255@intel.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20201009194258.3207172-4-ira.weiny@intel.com> On 10/9/20 12:42 PM, ira.weiny@intel.com wrote: > +/* > + * PKS is independent of PKU and either or both may be supported on a CPU. > + * Configure PKS if the cpu supports the feature. > + */ Let's at least be consistent about CPU vs. cpu in a single comment. :) > +static void setup_pks(void) > +{ > + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SUPERVISOR_PKEYS)) > + return; > + if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_PKS)) > + return; If you put X86_FEATURE_PKS in disabled-features.h, you can get rid of the explicit CONFIG_ check. > + cr4_set_bits(X86_CR4_PKS); > +} > + > /* > * This does the hard work of actually picking apart the CPU stuff... > */ > @@ -1544,6 +1558,7 @@ static void identify_cpu(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) > > x86_init_rdrand(c); > setup_pku(c); > + setup_pks(); > > /* > * Clear/Set all flags overridden by options, need do it > diff --git a/mm/Kconfig b/mm/Kconfig > index 6c974888f86f..1b9bc004d9bc 100644 > --- a/mm/Kconfig > +++ b/mm/Kconfig > @@ -822,6 +822,8 @@ config ARCH_USES_HIGH_VMA_FLAGS > bool > config ARCH_HAS_PKEYS > bool > +config ARCH_HAS_SUPERVISOR_PKEYS > + bool > > config PERCPU_STATS > bool "Collect percpu memory statistics" > _______________________________________________ Linux-nvdimm mailing list -- linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org To unsubscribe send an email to linux-nvdimm-leave@lists.01.org
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> To: ira.weiny@intel.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>, x86@kernel.org, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V3 3/9] x86/pks: Enable Protection Keys Supervisor (PKS) Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 11:23:08 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <cfd8e361-9d5b-5b24-08d4-31ad3d392255@intel.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20201009194258.3207172-4-ira.weiny@intel.com> On 10/9/20 12:42 PM, ira.weiny@intel.com wrote: > +/* > + * PKS is independent of PKU and either or both may be supported on a CPU. > + * Configure PKS if the cpu supports the feature. > + */ Let's at least be consistent about CPU vs. cpu in a single comment. :) > +static void setup_pks(void) > +{ > + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SUPERVISOR_PKEYS)) > + return; > + if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_PKS)) > + return; If you put X86_FEATURE_PKS in disabled-features.h, you can get rid of the explicit CONFIG_ check. > + cr4_set_bits(X86_CR4_PKS); > +} > + > /* > * This does the hard work of actually picking apart the CPU stuff... > */ > @@ -1544,6 +1558,7 @@ static void identify_cpu(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) > > x86_init_rdrand(c); > setup_pku(c); > + setup_pks(); > > /* > * Clear/Set all flags overridden by options, need do it > diff --git a/mm/Kconfig b/mm/Kconfig > index 6c974888f86f..1b9bc004d9bc 100644 > --- a/mm/Kconfig > +++ b/mm/Kconfig > @@ -822,6 +822,8 @@ config ARCH_USES_HIGH_VMA_FLAGS > bool > config ARCH_HAS_PKEYS > bool > +config ARCH_HAS_SUPERVISOR_PKEYS > + bool > > config PERCPU_STATS > bool "Collect percpu memory statistics" >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-13 18:23 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 94+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-10-09 19:42 [PATCH RFC V3 0/9] PKS: Add Protection Keys Supervisor (PKS) support RFC v3 ira.weiny 2020-10-09 19:42 ` ira.weiny 2020-10-09 19:42 ` [PATCH RFC V3 1/9] x86/pkeys: Create pkeys_common.h ira.weiny 2020-10-09 19:42 ` ira.weiny 2020-10-13 17:46 ` Dave Hansen 2020-10-13 17:46 ` Dave Hansen 2020-10-13 19:44 ` Ira Weiny 2020-10-13 19:44 ` Ira Weiny 2020-10-09 19:42 ` [PATCH RFC V3 2/9] x86/fpu: Refactor arch_set_user_pkey_access() for PKS support ira.weiny 2020-10-09 19:42 ` ira.weiny 2020-10-13 17:50 ` Dave Hansen 2020-10-13 17:50 ` Dave Hansen 2020-10-13 23:56 ` Ira Weiny 2020-10-13 23:56 ` Ira Weiny 2020-10-16 10:57 ` Peter Zijlstra 2020-10-16 10:57 ` Peter Zijlstra 2020-10-17 3:32 ` Ira Weiny 2020-10-17 3:32 ` Ira Weiny 2020-10-19 9:35 ` Peter Zijlstra 2020-10-19 9:35 ` Peter Zijlstra 2020-10-09 19:42 ` [PATCH RFC V3 3/9] x86/pks: Enable Protection Keys Supervisor (PKS) ira.weiny 2020-10-09 19:42 ` ira.weiny 2020-10-13 18:23 ` Dave Hansen [this message] 2020-10-13 18:23 ` Dave Hansen 2020-10-14 2:08 ` Ira Weiny 2020-10-14 2:08 ` Ira Weiny 2020-10-09 19:42 ` [PATCH RFC V3 4/9] x86/pks: Preserve the PKRS MSR on context switch ira.weiny 2020-10-09 19:42 ` ira.weiny 2020-10-13 18:31 ` Dave Hansen 2020-10-13 18:31 ` Dave Hansen 2020-10-14 22:36 ` Ira Weiny 2020-10-14 22:36 ` Ira Weiny 2020-10-16 11:12 ` Peter Zijlstra 2020-10-16 11:12 ` Peter Zijlstra 2020-10-17 5:14 ` Ira Weiny 2020-10-17 5:14 ` Ira Weiny 2020-10-19 9:37 ` Peter Zijlstra 2020-10-19 9:37 ` Peter Zijlstra 2020-10-19 18:48 ` Ira Weiny 2020-10-19 18:48 ` Ira Weiny 2020-10-16 11:06 ` Peter Zijlstra 2020-10-16 11:06 ` Peter Zijlstra 2020-10-17 5:37 ` Ira Weiny 2020-10-17 5:37 ` Ira Weiny 2020-10-09 19:42 ` [PATCH RFC V3 5/9] x86/pks: Add PKS kernel API ira.weiny 2020-10-09 19:42 ` ira.weiny 2020-10-13 18:43 ` Dave Hansen 2020-10-13 18:43 ` Dave Hansen 2020-10-15 1:08 ` Ira Weiny 2020-10-15 1:08 ` Ira Weiny 2020-10-16 11:07 ` Peter Zijlstra 2020-10-16 11:07 ` Peter Zijlstra 2020-10-17 5:42 ` Ira Weiny 2020-10-17 5:42 ` Ira Weiny 2020-10-09 19:42 ` [PATCH RFC V3 6/9] x86/entry: Pass irqentry_state_t by reference ira.weiny 2020-10-09 19:42 ` ira.weiny 2020-10-16 11:45 ` Peter Zijlstra 2020-10-16 11:45 ` Peter Zijlstra 2020-10-16 12:55 ` Thomas Gleixner 2020-10-16 12:55 ` Thomas Gleixner 2020-10-19 5:37 ` Ira Weiny 2020-10-19 5:37 ` Ira Weiny 2020-10-19 9:32 ` Thomas Gleixner 2020-10-19 9:32 ` Thomas Gleixner 2020-10-19 20:26 ` Ira Weiny 2020-10-19 20:26 ` Ira Weiny 2020-10-19 21:12 ` Thomas Gleixner 2020-10-19 21:12 ` Thomas Gleixner 2020-10-20 14:10 ` Ira Weiny 2020-10-20 14:10 ` Ira Weiny 2020-10-09 19:42 ` [PATCH RFC V3 7/9] x86/entry: Preserve PKRS MSR across exceptions ira.weiny 2020-10-09 19:42 ` ira.weiny 2020-10-13 18:52 ` Dave Hansen 2020-10-13 18:52 ` Dave Hansen 2020-10-15 3:46 ` Ira Weiny 2020-10-15 3:46 ` Ira Weiny 2020-10-15 4:06 ` Dave Hansen 2020-10-15 4:06 ` Dave Hansen 2020-10-15 4:18 ` Ira Weiny 2020-10-15 4:18 ` Ira Weiny 2020-10-09 19:42 ` [PATCH RFC V3 8/9] x86/fault: Report the PKRS state on fault ira.weiny 2020-10-09 19:42 ` ira.weiny 2020-10-13 18:56 ` Dave Hansen 2020-10-13 18:56 ` Dave Hansen 2020-10-15 4:13 ` Ira Weiny 2020-10-15 4:13 ` Ira Weiny 2020-10-09 19:42 ` [PATCH RFC V3 9/9] x86/pks: Add PKS test code ira.weiny 2020-10-09 19:42 ` ira.weiny 2020-10-13 19:02 ` Dave Hansen 2020-10-13 19:02 ` Dave Hansen 2020-10-15 4:46 ` Ira Weiny 2020-10-15 4:46 ` Ira Weiny 2020-10-09 20:18 ` [PATCH RFC V3 0/9] PKS: Add Protection Keys Supervisor (PKS) support RFC v3 Ira Weiny 2020-10-09 20:18 ` Ira Weiny
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=cfd8e361-9d5b-5b24-08d4-31ad3d392255@intel.com \ --to=dave.hansen@intel.com \ --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \ --cc=bp@alien8.de \ --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \ --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \ --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \ --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \ --cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \ --cc=luto@kernel.org \ --cc=mingo@redhat.com \ --cc=peterz@infradead.org \ --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \ --cc=x86@kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.