From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> Cc: kbuild-all@01.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>, David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, slab: rename kmalloc-node cache to kmalloc-<size> Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 10:12:13 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <d3a1f708-efdd-98c3-9c26-dab600501679@suse.cz> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20170207133839.f6b1f1befe4468770991f5e0@linux-foundation.org> On 02/07/2017 10:38 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 8 Feb 2017 01:15:17 +0800 kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote: > >> Hi Vlastimil, >> >> [auto build test WARNING on mmotm/master] >> [also build test WARNING on v4.10-rc7 next-20170207] >> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] >> >> url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Vlastimil-Babka/mm-slab-rename-kmalloc-node-cache-to-kmalloc-size/20170204-021843 >> base: git://git.cmpxchg.org/linux-mmotm.git master >> config: arm-allyesconfig (attached as .config) >> compiler: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (Debian 6.1.1-9) 6.1.1 20160705 >> reproduce: >> wget https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross >> chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross >> # save the attached .config to linux build tree >> make.cross ARCH=arm >> >> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> >> >> WARNING: mm/built-in.o(.text+0x3b49c): Section mismatch in reference from the function get_kmalloc_cache_name() to the (unknown reference) .init.rodata:(unknown) >> The function get_kmalloc_cache_name() references >> the (unknown reference) __initconst (unknown). >> This is often because get_kmalloc_cache_name lacks a __initconst >> annotation or the annotation of (unknown) is wrong. > > yup, thanks. Thanks for the fix. I was going to implement Christoph's suggestion and export the whole structure in mm/slab.h, but gcc was complaining that I'm redefining it, until I created a typedef first. Is it worth the trouble? Below is how it would look like. Vlastimil ----8<---- diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c index ede31b59bb9f..9d66b3d6791e 100644 --- a/mm/slab.c +++ b/mm/slab.c @@ -1294,7 +1294,7 @@ void __init kmem_cache_init(void) * structures first. Without this, further allocations will bug. */ kmalloc_caches[INDEX_NODE] = create_kmalloc_cache( - get_kmalloc_cache_name(INDEX_NODE), + kmalloc_info[INDEX_NODE].name, kmalloc_size(INDEX_NODE), ARCH_KMALLOC_FLAGS); slab_state = PARTIAL_NODE; setup_kmalloc_cache_index_table(); diff --git a/mm/slab.h b/mm/slab.h index 5708c548c6f7..e6b4cf74be86 100644 --- a/mm/slab.h +++ b/mm/slab.h @@ -71,6 +71,13 @@ extern struct list_head slab_caches; /* The slab cache that manages slab cache information */ extern struct kmem_cache *kmem_cache; +/* A table of kmalloc cache names and sizes */ +typedef struct { + const char *name; + unsigned long size; +} kmalloc_info_t; +extern const kmalloc_info_t kmalloc_info[]; + unsigned long calculate_alignment(unsigned long flags, unsigned long align, unsigned long size); @@ -78,7 +85,6 @@ unsigned long calculate_alignment(unsigned long flags, /* Kmalloc array related functions */ void setup_kmalloc_cache_index_table(void); void create_kmalloc_caches(unsigned long); -const char *get_kmalloc_cache_name(int index); /* Find the kmalloc slab corresponding for a certain size */ struct kmem_cache *kmalloc_slab(size_t, gfp_t); diff --git a/mm/slab_common.c b/mm/slab_common.c index 36a8547de699..ab3872ed623e 100644 --- a/mm/slab_common.c +++ b/mm/slab_common.c @@ -917,10 +917,7 @@ struct kmem_cache *kmalloc_slab(size_t size, gfp_t flags) * kmalloc_index() supports up to 2^26=64MB, so the final entry of the table is * kmalloc-67108864. */ -static struct { - const char *name; - unsigned long size; -} const kmalloc_info[] __initconst = { +const kmalloc_info_t kmalloc_info[] __initconst = { {NULL, 0}, {"kmalloc-96", 96}, {"kmalloc-192", 192}, {"kmalloc-8", 8}, {"kmalloc-16", 16}, {"kmalloc-32", 32}, @@ -937,11 +934,6 @@ static struct { {"kmalloc-67108864", 67108864} }; -const char *get_kmalloc_cache_name(int index) -{ - return kmalloc_info[index].name; -} - /* * Patch up the size_index table if we have strange large alignment * requirements for the kmalloc array. This is only the case for
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> Cc: kbuild-all@01.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>, David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, slab: rename kmalloc-node cache to kmalloc-<size> Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 10:12:13 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <d3a1f708-efdd-98c3-9c26-dab600501679@suse.cz> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20170207133839.f6b1f1befe4468770991f5e0@linux-foundation.org> On 02/07/2017 10:38 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 8 Feb 2017 01:15:17 +0800 kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote: > >> Hi Vlastimil, >> >> [auto build test WARNING on mmotm/master] >> [also build test WARNING on v4.10-rc7 next-20170207] >> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] >> >> url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Vlastimil-Babka/mm-slab-rename-kmalloc-node-cache-to-kmalloc-size/20170204-021843 >> base: git://git.cmpxchg.org/linux-mmotm.git master >> config: arm-allyesconfig (attached as .config) >> compiler: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (Debian 6.1.1-9) 6.1.1 20160705 >> reproduce: >> wget https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross >> chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross >> # save the attached .config to linux build tree >> make.cross ARCH=arm >> >> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> >> >> WARNING: mm/built-in.o(.text+0x3b49c): Section mismatch in reference from the function get_kmalloc_cache_name() to the (unknown reference) .init.rodata:(unknown) >> The function get_kmalloc_cache_name() references >> the (unknown reference) __initconst (unknown). >> This is often because get_kmalloc_cache_name lacks a __initconst >> annotation or the annotation of (unknown) is wrong. > > yup, thanks. Thanks for the fix. I was going to implement Christoph's suggestion and export the whole structure in mm/slab.h, but gcc was complaining that I'm redefining it, until I created a typedef first. Is it worth the trouble? Below is how it would look like. Vlastimil ----8<---- diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c index ede31b59bb9f..9d66b3d6791e 100644 --- a/mm/slab.c +++ b/mm/slab.c @@ -1294,7 +1294,7 @@ void __init kmem_cache_init(void) * structures first. Without this, further allocations will bug. */ kmalloc_caches[INDEX_NODE] = create_kmalloc_cache( - get_kmalloc_cache_name(INDEX_NODE), + kmalloc_info[INDEX_NODE].name, kmalloc_size(INDEX_NODE), ARCH_KMALLOC_FLAGS); slab_state = PARTIAL_NODE; setup_kmalloc_cache_index_table(); diff --git a/mm/slab.h b/mm/slab.h index 5708c548c6f7..e6b4cf74be86 100644 --- a/mm/slab.h +++ b/mm/slab.h @@ -71,6 +71,13 @@ extern struct list_head slab_caches; /* The slab cache that manages slab cache information */ extern struct kmem_cache *kmem_cache; +/* A table of kmalloc cache names and sizes */ +typedef struct { + const char *name; + unsigned long size; +} kmalloc_info_t; +extern const kmalloc_info_t kmalloc_info[]; + unsigned long calculate_alignment(unsigned long flags, unsigned long align, unsigned long size); @@ -78,7 +85,6 @@ unsigned long calculate_alignment(unsigned long flags, /* Kmalloc array related functions */ void setup_kmalloc_cache_index_table(void); void create_kmalloc_caches(unsigned long); -const char *get_kmalloc_cache_name(int index); /* Find the kmalloc slab corresponding for a certain size */ struct kmem_cache *kmalloc_slab(size_t, gfp_t); diff --git a/mm/slab_common.c b/mm/slab_common.c index 36a8547de699..ab3872ed623e 100644 --- a/mm/slab_common.c +++ b/mm/slab_common.c @@ -917,10 +917,7 @@ struct kmem_cache *kmalloc_slab(size_t size, gfp_t flags) * kmalloc_index() supports up to 2^26=64MB, so the final entry of the table is * kmalloc-67108864. */ -static struct { - const char *name; - unsigned long size; -} const kmalloc_info[] __initconst = { +const kmalloc_info_t kmalloc_info[] __initconst = { {NULL, 0}, {"kmalloc-96", 96}, {"kmalloc-192", 192}, {"kmalloc-8", 8}, {"kmalloc-16", 16}, {"kmalloc-32", 32}, @@ -937,11 +934,6 @@ static struct { {"kmalloc-67108864", 67108864} }; -const char *get_kmalloc_cache_name(int index) -{ - return kmalloc_info[index].name; -} - /* * Patch up the size_index table if we have strange large alignment * requirements for the kmalloc array. This is only the case for -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-08 9:13 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2017-02-03 18:10 Vlastimil Babka 2017-02-03 18:10 ` Vlastimil Babka 2017-02-04 2:26 ` kbuild test robot 2017-02-04 2:26 ` kbuild test robot 2017-02-04 8:27 ` Vlastimil Babka 2017-02-04 8:27 ` Vlastimil Babka 2017-02-06 14:47 ` Christoph Lameter 2017-02-06 14:47 ` Christoph Lameter 2017-02-06 14:52 ` Matthew Wilcox 2017-02-06 14:52 ` Matthew Wilcox 2017-02-06 14:55 ` Christoph Lameter 2017-02-06 14:55 ` Christoph Lameter 2017-02-07 17:15 ` kbuild test robot 2017-02-07 17:15 ` kbuild test robot 2017-02-07 21:38 ` Andrew Morton 2017-02-07 21:38 ` Andrew Morton 2017-02-08 9:12 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message] 2017-02-08 9:12 ` Vlastimil Babka 2017-02-08 9:26 ` Vlastimil Babka 2017-02-08 9:26 ` Vlastimil Babka 2017-02-08 15:13 ` Christoph Lameter 2017-02-08 15:13 ` Christoph Lameter 2017-02-08 21:54 ` Andrew Morton 2017-02-08 21:54 ` Andrew Morton 2017-02-09 9:12 ` Vlastimil Babka 2017-02-09 9:12 ` Vlastimil Babka
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=d3a1f708-efdd-98c3-9c26-dab600501679@suse.cz \ --to=vbabka@suse.cz \ --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \ --cc=cl@linux.com \ --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \ --cc=kbuild-all@01.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \ --cc=lkp@intel.com \ --cc=penberg@kernel.org \ --cc=rientjes@google.com \ --cc=willy@linux.intel.com \ --subject='Re: [PATCH] mm, slab: rename kmalloc-node cache to kmalloc-<size>' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.