All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Kuldeep Singh <singh.kuldeep87k@gmail.com>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>, SoC Team <soc@kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	DTML <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] ARM: dts: lpc32xx: Update spi clock properties
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2022 14:26:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d3e4e548-47c9-7488-26bc-f42be5e3c62a@mleia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e0da4fbc-b72c-60a0-5a5f-99d18653c294@canonical.com>

On 3/12/22 12:23 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 11/03/2022 22:26, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>> On 3/11/22 4:33 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 11/03/2022 15:07, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>>>> On 3/11/22 3:38 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 2:20 PM Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/11/22 11:38 AM, Kuldeep Singh wrote:
>>>>>>> PL022 binding require two clocks to be defined but lpc platform doesn't
>>>>>>> comply with bindings and define only one clock i.e apb_pclk.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Update spi clocks and clocks-names property by adding appropriate clock
>>>>>>> reference to make it compliant with bindings.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> CC: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Kuldeep Singh <singh.kuldeep87k@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> v2:
>>>>>>> - New patch with similar changeset
>>>>>>> - Send to soc ML
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>      arch/arm/boot/dts/lpc32xx.dtsi | 8 ++++----
>>>>>>>      1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/lpc32xx.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/lpc32xx.dtsi
>>>>>>> index c87066d6c995..30958e02d5e2 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/lpc32xx.dtsi
>>>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/lpc32xx.dtsi
>>>>>>> @@ -178,8 +178,8 @@ ssp0: spi@20084000 {
>>>>>>>                                  compatible = "arm,pl022", "arm,primecell";
>>>>>>>                                  reg = <0x20084000 0x1000>;
>>>>>>>                                  interrupts = <20 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>>>>>>> -                             clocks = <&clk LPC32XX_CLK_SSP0>;
>>>>>>> -                             clock-names = "apb_pclk";
>>>>>>> +                             clocks = <&clk LPC32XX_CLK_SSP0>, <&clk LPC32XX_CLK_SSP0>;
>>>>>>> +                             clock-names = "sspclk", "apb_pclk";
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In fact I'm uncertain if it is the right change, could it happen that the commit
>>>>>> cc0f6e96c4fd ("spi: dt-bindings: Convert Arm pl022 to json-schema") sets a wrong
>>>>>> schema pattern?
>>>>>
>>>>> Good pointm this doesn't quite seem right: it is unlikely that the same clock
>>>>> is used for both the SPI bus and the APB bus.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Apparently just one clock is wanted on all observed platforms and cases, this
>>>>>> is implicitly confirmed by clock handling in the drivers/spi/spi-pl022.c :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>            pl022->clk = devm_clk_get(&adev->dev, NULL);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, I would vote to fix the device tree bindings schema.
>>>
>>> Drivers do not describe the hardware. Bindings should not be modeled on
>>> drivers, but on actual hardware, so the example is not convincing.
>>
>> My concern is that fixing the bindings can break the driver and all its users,
>> is it clear enough how it can happen in assumption that the driver uses just
>> one clock at the moment?
> 
> You meant fixing the DTS? We do not consider here "fixing bindings"

Yes, I meant fixing the DTS, sorry for confusion.

> because they look correct. About DTS, using the same clock twice should
> not cause negative effect.

But it is erroneous to specify the SSP clock as APB clock, so this v2 is
incorrect, and I've mentioned above in the discussion that the APB clock
shall be HCLK on the platform.

To avoid any unpleasant uncertainties I expect to get a change in the
driver firstly, the driver shall work according to the bindings, at
the moment it is obviously broken.

--
Best wishes,
Vladimir

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Kuldeep Singh <singh.kuldeep87k@gmail.com>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>, SoC Team <soc@kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	DTML <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] ARM: dts: lpc32xx: Update spi clock properties
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2022 14:26:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d3e4e548-47c9-7488-26bc-f42be5e3c62a@mleia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e0da4fbc-b72c-60a0-5a5f-99d18653c294@canonical.com>

On 3/12/22 12:23 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 11/03/2022 22:26, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>> On 3/11/22 4:33 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 11/03/2022 15:07, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>>>> On 3/11/22 3:38 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 2:20 PM Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/11/22 11:38 AM, Kuldeep Singh wrote:
>>>>>>> PL022 binding require two clocks to be defined but lpc platform doesn't
>>>>>>> comply with bindings and define only one clock i.e apb_pclk.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Update spi clocks and clocks-names property by adding appropriate clock
>>>>>>> reference to make it compliant with bindings.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> CC: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Kuldeep Singh <singh.kuldeep87k@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> v2:
>>>>>>> - New patch with similar changeset
>>>>>>> - Send to soc ML
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>      arch/arm/boot/dts/lpc32xx.dtsi | 8 ++++----
>>>>>>>      1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/lpc32xx.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/lpc32xx.dtsi
>>>>>>> index c87066d6c995..30958e02d5e2 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/lpc32xx.dtsi
>>>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/lpc32xx.dtsi
>>>>>>> @@ -178,8 +178,8 @@ ssp0: spi@20084000 {
>>>>>>>                                  compatible = "arm,pl022", "arm,primecell";
>>>>>>>                                  reg = <0x20084000 0x1000>;
>>>>>>>                                  interrupts = <20 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>>>>>>> -                             clocks = <&clk LPC32XX_CLK_SSP0>;
>>>>>>> -                             clock-names = "apb_pclk";
>>>>>>> +                             clocks = <&clk LPC32XX_CLK_SSP0>, <&clk LPC32XX_CLK_SSP0>;
>>>>>>> +                             clock-names = "sspclk", "apb_pclk";
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In fact I'm uncertain if it is the right change, could it happen that the commit
>>>>>> cc0f6e96c4fd ("spi: dt-bindings: Convert Arm pl022 to json-schema") sets a wrong
>>>>>> schema pattern?
>>>>>
>>>>> Good pointm this doesn't quite seem right: it is unlikely that the same clock
>>>>> is used for both the SPI bus and the APB bus.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Apparently just one clock is wanted on all observed platforms and cases, this
>>>>>> is implicitly confirmed by clock handling in the drivers/spi/spi-pl022.c :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>            pl022->clk = devm_clk_get(&adev->dev, NULL);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, I would vote to fix the device tree bindings schema.
>>>
>>> Drivers do not describe the hardware. Bindings should not be modeled on
>>> drivers, but on actual hardware, so the example is not convincing.
>>
>> My concern is that fixing the bindings can break the driver and all its users,
>> is it clear enough how it can happen in assumption that the driver uses just
>> one clock at the moment?
> 
> You meant fixing the DTS? We do not consider here "fixing bindings"

Yes, I meant fixing the DTS, sorry for confusion.

> because they look correct. About DTS, using the same clock twice should
> not cause negative effect.

But it is erroneous to specify the SSP clock as APB clock, so this v2 is
incorrect, and I've mentioned above in the discussion that the APB clock
shall be HCLK on the platform.

To avoid any unpleasant uncertainties I expect to get a change in the
driver firstly, the driver shall work according to the bindings, at
the moment it is obviously broken.

--
Best wishes,
Vladimir

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-12 12:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-11  9:37 [PATCH v2 0/3] PL022 DT fixes for seattle, lg and lpc platform Kuldeep Singh
2022-03-11  9:37 ` Kuldeep Singh
2022-03-11  9:37 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] arm64: dts: seattle: Update spi clock properties Kuldeep Singh
2022-03-11  9:37   ` Kuldeep Singh
2022-03-11  9:37 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] arm64: dts: lg131x: " Kuldeep Singh
2022-03-11  9:37   ` Kuldeep Singh
2022-03-11  9:38 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] ARM: dts: lpc32xx: " Kuldeep Singh
2022-03-11  9:38   ` Kuldeep Singh
2022-03-11 13:20   ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2022-03-11 13:20     ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2022-03-11 13:38     ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-03-11 13:38       ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-03-11 14:07       ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2022-03-11 14:07         ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2022-03-11 14:33         ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-03-11 14:33           ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-03-11 21:26           ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2022-03-11 21:26             ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2022-03-12 10:23             ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-03-12 10:23               ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-03-12 12:26               ` Vladimir Zapolskiy [this message]
2022-03-12 12:26                 ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2022-03-14 11:43         ` Robin Murphy
2022-03-14 11:43           ` Robin Murphy
2022-03-14 11:50           ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2022-03-14 11:50             ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2022-03-14 12:20             ` Robin Murphy
2022-03-14 12:20               ` Robin Murphy
2022-03-14 12:32               ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-03-14 12:32                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-03-14 17:55                 ` Robin Murphy
2022-03-14 17:55                   ` Robin Murphy
2022-03-14 12:34               ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2022-03-14 12:34                 ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2022-03-27  2:57                 ` Trevor Woerner
2022-03-27 16:27                   ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2022-03-27 16:27                     ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2022-03-27 18:32                     ` Trevor Woerner
2022-03-27 18:32                       ` Trevor Woerner
2022-03-11 10:50 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] PL022 DT fixes for seattle, lg and lpc platform patchwork-bot+linux-soc

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d3e4e548-47c9-7488-26bc-f42be5e3c62a@mleia.com \
    --to=vz@mleia.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olof@lixom.net \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=singh.kuldeep87k@gmail.com \
    --cc=soc@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.