* [PATCH 00/34] CPUFreq: Move freq change notifications out of drivers
@ 2013-08-16 2:24 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Another 452 lines gone :)
Total stats upto now for all the 5 patchsets:
Viresh Kumar (186):
...
69 files changed, 700 insertions(+), 2451 deletions(-)
Net: 1751 lines gone..
-----x-------------x----------------
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
There are few special cases though, like exynos5440, which doesn't do everything
on the call to ->target_index() routine and call some kind of bottom halves for
doing this work, work/tasklet/etc..
They may continue doing notification from their own code and so this patch
introduces another flag: CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION, which will be set by such
drivers.
This is Fifth part of my cleanup work for CPUFreq, first three are (And
obviously its rebased over them):
1: cpufreq: Introduce cpufreq_table_validate_and_show()
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/8/263
2: cpufreq: define generic routines for cpufreq drivers
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/10/48
3. CPUFreq: Implement light weight ->target(): for 3.13
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/13/349
4. CPUFreq: set policy->cur in cpufreq core instead of drivers
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/14/288
All these are pushed here:
https://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/vireshk/linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/for-v3.13
--
viresh
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
Cc: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com>
Cc: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>
Cc: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
Cc: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-cris-kernel@axis.com
Cc: Mikael Starvik <starvik@axis.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: spear-devel@list.st.com
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Cc: Steven Miao <realmz6@gmail.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Viresh Kumar (34):
cpufreq: move freq change notifications to cpufreq core
cpufreq: acpi: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: arm_big_little: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: at32ap: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: blackfin: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: cpu0: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: cris: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: davinci: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: dbx500: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: e_powersaver: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: elanfreq: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: exynos: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: exynos5440: set CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION flag
cpufreq: ia64-acpi: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: imx6q: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: kirkwood: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: longhaul: set CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION flag
cpufreq: loongson2: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: maple: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: omap: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: p4-clockmod: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: pasemi: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: pmac: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: powernow: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: ppc: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: pxa: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: s3c: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: s5pv210: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: sa11x0: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: sc520: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: sparc: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: SPEAr: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: speedstep: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: tegra: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 14 ++-------
drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c | 25 ++--------------
drivers/cpufreq/at32ap-cpufreq.c | 22 ++++++--------
drivers/cpufreq/blackfin-cpufreq.c | 22 +++++---------
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c | 33 ++++++++-------------
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/cpufreq/cris-artpec3-cpufreq.c | 8 -----
drivers/cpufreq/cris-etraxfs-cpufreq.c | 8 -----
drivers/cpufreq/davinci-cpufreq.c | 30 +++++++------------
drivers/cpufreq/dbx500-cpufreq.c | 22 +-------------
drivers/cpufreq/e_powersaver.c | 23 ++-------------
drivers/cpufreq/elanfreq.c | 13 --------
drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c | 28 +++++-------------
drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c | 2 +-
drivers/cpufreq/ia64-acpi-cpufreq.c | 19 ------------
drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c | 39 ++++++++++--------------
drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c | 54 +++++++++++++---------------------
drivers/cpufreq/longhaul.c | 1 +
drivers/cpufreq/loongson2_cpufreq.c | 16 ----------
drivers/cpufreq/maple-cpufreq.c | 18 +-----------
drivers/cpufreq/omap-cpufreq.c | 39 +++++++++---------------
drivers/cpufreq/p4-clockmod.c | 10 -------
drivers/cpufreq/pasemi-cpufreq.c | 14 +--------
drivers/cpufreq/pmac32-cpufreq.c | 20 +++----------
drivers/cpufreq/pmac64-cpufreq.c | 18 +-----------
drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k6.c | 8 -----
drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k7.c | 11 +------
drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c | 15 +---------
drivers/cpufreq/ppc-corenet-cpufreq.c | 19 +-----------
drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq.c | 19 +-----------
drivers/cpufreq/pxa2xx-cpufreq.c | 27 ++++-------------
drivers/cpufreq/pxa3xx-cpufreq.c | 12 --------
drivers/cpufreq/s3c2416-cpufreq.c | 21 +++----------
drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c | 48 ++++++++++--------------------
drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c | 16 ++++------
drivers/cpufreq/sa1100-cpufreq.c | 17 ++++-------
drivers/cpufreq/sa1110-cpufreq.c | 12 ++------
drivers/cpufreq/sc520_freq.c | 11 -------
drivers/cpufreq/sparc-us2e-cpufreq.c | 7 -----
drivers/cpufreq/sparc-us3-cpufreq.c | 7 -----
drivers/cpufreq/spear-cpufreq.c | 13 +-------
drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-centrino.c | 20 +------------
drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-ich.c | 9 ------
drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-smi.c | 7 -----
drivers/cpufreq/tegra-cpufreq.c | 25 ++++------------
include/linux/cpufreq.h | 6 ++++
46 files changed, 205 insertions(+), 657 deletions(-)
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 00/34] CPUFreq: Move freq change notifications out of drivers
@ 2013-08-16 2:24 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Another 452 lines gone :)
Total stats upto now for all the 5 patchsets:
Viresh Kumar (186):
...
69 files changed, 700 insertions(+), 2451 deletions(-)
Net: 1751 lines gone..
-----x-------------x----------------
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
There are few special cases though, like exynos5440, which doesn't do everything
on the call to ->target_index() routine and call some kind of bottom halves for
doing this work, work/tasklet/etc..
They may continue doing notification from their own code and so this patch
introduces another flag: CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION, which will be set by such
drivers.
This is Fifth part of my cleanup work for CPUFreq, first three are (And
obviously its rebased over them):
1: cpufreq: Introduce cpufreq_table_validate_and_show()
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/8/263
2: cpufreq: define generic routines for cpufreq drivers
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/10/48
3. CPUFreq: Implement light weight ->target(): for 3.13
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/13/349
4. CPUFreq: set policy->cur in cpufreq core instead of drivers
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/14/288
All these are pushed here:
https://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/vireshk/linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/for-v3.13
--
viresh
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
Cc: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com>
Cc: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>
Cc: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
Cc: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-cris-kernel at axis.com
Cc: Mikael Starvik <starvik@axis.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Cc: sparclinux at vger.kernel.org
Cc: spear-devel at list.st.com
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Cc: Steven Miao <realmz6@gmail.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Viresh Kumar (34):
cpufreq: move freq change notifications to cpufreq core
cpufreq: acpi: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: arm_big_little: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: at32ap: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: blackfin: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: cpu0: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: cris: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: davinci: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: dbx500: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: e_powersaver: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: elanfreq: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: exynos: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: exynos5440: set CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION flag
cpufreq: ia64-acpi: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: imx6q: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: kirkwood: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: longhaul: set CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION flag
cpufreq: loongson2: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: maple: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: omap: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: p4-clockmod: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: pasemi: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: pmac: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: powernow: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: ppc: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: pxa: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: s3c: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: s5pv210: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: sa11x0: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: sc520: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: sparc: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: SPEAr: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: speedstep: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: tegra: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 14 ++-------
drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c | 25 ++--------------
drivers/cpufreq/at32ap-cpufreq.c | 22 ++++++--------
drivers/cpufreq/blackfin-cpufreq.c | 22 +++++---------
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c | 33 ++++++++-------------
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/cpufreq/cris-artpec3-cpufreq.c | 8 -----
drivers/cpufreq/cris-etraxfs-cpufreq.c | 8 -----
drivers/cpufreq/davinci-cpufreq.c | 30 +++++++------------
drivers/cpufreq/dbx500-cpufreq.c | 22 +-------------
drivers/cpufreq/e_powersaver.c | 23 ++-------------
drivers/cpufreq/elanfreq.c | 13 --------
drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c | 28 +++++-------------
drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c | 2 +-
drivers/cpufreq/ia64-acpi-cpufreq.c | 19 ------------
drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c | 39 ++++++++++--------------
drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c | 54 +++++++++++++---------------------
drivers/cpufreq/longhaul.c | 1 +
drivers/cpufreq/loongson2_cpufreq.c | 16 ----------
drivers/cpufreq/maple-cpufreq.c | 18 +-----------
drivers/cpufreq/omap-cpufreq.c | 39 +++++++++---------------
drivers/cpufreq/p4-clockmod.c | 10 -------
drivers/cpufreq/pasemi-cpufreq.c | 14 +--------
drivers/cpufreq/pmac32-cpufreq.c | 20 +++----------
drivers/cpufreq/pmac64-cpufreq.c | 18 +-----------
drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k6.c | 8 -----
drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k7.c | 11 +------
drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c | 15 +---------
drivers/cpufreq/ppc-corenet-cpufreq.c | 19 +-----------
drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq.c | 19 +-----------
drivers/cpufreq/pxa2xx-cpufreq.c | 27 ++++-------------
drivers/cpufreq/pxa3xx-cpufreq.c | 12 --------
drivers/cpufreq/s3c2416-cpufreq.c | 21 +++----------
drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c | 48 ++++++++++--------------------
drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c | 16 ++++------
drivers/cpufreq/sa1100-cpufreq.c | 17 ++++-------
drivers/cpufreq/sa1110-cpufreq.c | 12 ++------
drivers/cpufreq/sc520_freq.c | 11 -------
drivers/cpufreq/sparc-us2e-cpufreq.c | 7 -----
drivers/cpufreq/sparc-us3-cpufreq.c | 7 -----
drivers/cpufreq/spear-cpufreq.c | 13 +-------
drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-centrino.c | 20 +------------
drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-ich.c | 9 ------
drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-smi.c | 7 -----
drivers/cpufreq/tegra-cpufreq.c | 25 ++++------------
include/linux/cpufreq.h | 6 ++++
46 files changed, 205 insertions(+), 657 deletions(-)
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 00/34] CPUFreq: Move freq change notifications out of drivers
@ 2013-08-16 2:24 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rjw
Cc: linaro-kernel, patches, cpufreq, linux-pm, linux-kernel,
linux-arm-kernel, Viresh Kumar, Andrew Lunn, David S. Miller,
Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov, Eric Miao, Hans-Christian Egtvedt,
Jesper Nilsson, John Crispin, Kukjin Kim, Linus Walleij,
linux-cris-kernel, Mikael Starvik, Russell King,
Santosh Shilimkar, Sekhar Nori, Shawn Guo, sparclinux,
spear-devel, Stephen Warren, Steven
Another 452 lines gone :)
Total stats upto now for all the 5 patchsets:
Viresh Kumar (186):
...
69 files changed, 700 insertions(+), 2451 deletions(-)
Net: 1751 lines gone..
-----x-------------x----------------
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
There are few special cases though, like exynos5440, which doesn't do everything
on the call to ->target_index() routine and call some kind of bottom halves for
doing this work, work/tasklet/etc..
They may continue doing notification from their own code and so this patch
introduces another flag: CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION, which will be set by such
drivers.
This is Fifth part of my cleanup work for CPUFreq, first three are (And
obviously its rebased over them):
1: cpufreq: Introduce cpufreq_table_validate_and_show()
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/8/263
2: cpufreq: define generic routines for cpufreq drivers
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/10/48
3. CPUFreq: Implement light weight ->target(): for 3.13
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/13/349
4. CPUFreq: set policy->cur in cpufreq core instead of drivers
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/14/288
All these are pushed here:
https://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/vireshk/linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/for-v3.13
--
viresh
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
Cc: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com>
Cc: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>
Cc: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
Cc: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-cris-kernel@axis.com
Cc: Mikael Starvik <starvik@axis.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: spear-devel@list.st.com
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Cc: Steven Miao <realmz6@gmail.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Viresh Kumar (34):
cpufreq: move freq change notifications to cpufreq core
cpufreq: acpi: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: arm_big_little: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: at32ap: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: blackfin: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: cpu0: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: cris: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: davinci: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: dbx500: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: e_powersaver: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: elanfreq: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: exynos: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: exynos5440: set CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION flag
cpufreq: ia64-acpi: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: imx6q: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: kirkwood: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: longhaul: set CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION flag
cpufreq: loongson2: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: maple: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: omap: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: p4-clockmod: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: pasemi: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: pmac: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: powernow: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: ppc: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: pxa: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: s3c: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: s5pv210: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: sa11x0: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: sc520: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: sparc: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: SPEAr: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: speedstep: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
cpufreq: tegra: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 14 ++-------
drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c | 25 ++--------------
drivers/cpufreq/at32ap-cpufreq.c | 22 ++++++--------
drivers/cpufreq/blackfin-cpufreq.c | 22 +++++---------
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c | 33 ++++++++-------------
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/cpufreq/cris-artpec3-cpufreq.c | 8 -----
drivers/cpufreq/cris-etraxfs-cpufreq.c | 8 -----
drivers/cpufreq/davinci-cpufreq.c | 30 +++++++------------
drivers/cpufreq/dbx500-cpufreq.c | 22 +-------------
drivers/cpufreq/e_powersaver.c | 23 ++-------------
drivers/cpufreq/elanfreq.c | 13 --------
drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c | 28 +++++-------------
drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c | 2 +-
drivers/cpufreq/ia64-acpi-cpufreq.c | 19 ------------
drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c | 39 ++++++++++--------------
drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c | 54 +++++++++++++---------------------
drivers/cpufreq/longhaul.c | 1 +
drivers/cpufreq/loongson2_cpufreq.c | 16 ----------
drivers/cpufreq/maple-cpufreq.c | 18 +-----------
drivers/cpufreq/omap-cpufreq.c | 39 +++++++++---------------
drivers/cpufreq/p4-clockmod.c | 10 -------
drivers/cpufreq/pasemi-cpufreq.c | 14 +--------
drivers/cpufreq/pmac32-cpufreq.c | 20 +++----------
drivers/cpufreq/pmac64-cpufreq.c | 18 +-----------
drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k6.c | 8 -----
drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k7.c | 11 +------
drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c | 15 +---------
drivers/cpufreq/ppc-corenet-cpufreq.c | 19 +-----------
drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq.c | 19 +-----------
drivers/cpufreq/pxa2xx-cpufreq.c | 27 ++++-------------
drivers/cpufreq/pxa3xx-cpufreq.c | 12 --------
drivers/cpufreq/s3c2416-cpufreq.c | 21 +++----------
drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c | 48 ++++++++++--------------------
drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c | 16 ++++------
drivers/cpufreq/sa1100-cpufreq.c | 17 ++++-------
drivers/cpufreq/sa1110-cpufreq.c | 12 ++------
drivers/cpufreq/sc520_freq.c | 11 -------
drivers/cpufreq/sparc-us2e-cpufreq.c | 7 -----
drivers/cpufreq/sparc-us3-cpufreq.c | 7 -----
drivers/cpufreq/spear-cpufreq.c | 13 +-------
drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-centrino.c | 20 +------------
drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-ich.c | 9 ------
drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-smi.c | 7 -----
drivers/cpufreq/tegra-cpufreq.c | 25 ++++------------
include/linux/cpufreq.h | 6 ++++
46 files changed, 205 insertions(+), 657 deletions(-)
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 01/34] cpufreq: move freq change notifications to cpufreq core
2013-08-16 2:24 ` Viresh Kumar
(?)
(?)
@ 2013-08-16 2:24 ` Viresh Kumar
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rjw
Cc: linaro-kernel, patches, cpufreq, linux-pm, linux-kernel,
linux-arm-kernel, Viresh Kumar, Andrew Lunn, David S. Miller,
Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov, Eric Miao, Hans-Christian Egtvedt,
Jesper Nilsson, John Crispin, Kukjin Kim, Linus Walleij,
linux-cris-kernel, Mikael Starvik, Russell King,
Santosh Shilimkar, Sekhar Nori, Shawn Guo, sparclinux,
spear-devel, Stephen Warren, Steven Miao, Tony Luck
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
There are few special cases though, like exynos5440, which doesn't do everything
on the call to ->target_index() routine and call some kind of bottom halves for
doing this work, work/tasklet/etc..
They may continue doing notification from their own code and so this patch
introduces another flag: CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION, which will be set by such
drivers.
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
Cc: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com>
Cc: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>
Cc: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
Cc: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-cris-kernel@axis.com
Cc: Mikael Starvik <starvik@axis.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: spear-devel@list.st.com
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Cc: Steven Miao <realmz6@gmail.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/cpufreq.h | 6 ++++++
2 files changed, 40 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index a7a1d3e..2782949 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -1673,6 +1673,9 @@ int __cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
retval = cpufreq_driver->target(policy, target_freq, relation);
else if (cpufreq_driver->target_index) {
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table;
+ struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
+ unsigned long flags;
+ bool notify;
int index;
freq_table = cpufreq_frequency_get_table(policy->cpu);
@@ -1691,7 +1694,38 @@ int __cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
if (freq_table[index].frequency == policy->cur)
return 0;
+ read_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
+ notify = !(cpufreq_driver->flags | CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION);
+ read_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
+
+ if (notify) {
+ freqs.old = policy->cur;
+ freqs.new = freq_table[index].frequency;
+
+ pr_debug("%s: cpu: %d, oldfreq: %u, new freq: %u\n",
+ __func__, policy->cpu, freqs.old,
+ freqs.new);
+
+ cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs,
+ CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
+ }
+
retval = cpufreq_driver->target_index(policy, index);
+ if (retval)
+ pr_err("%s: Failed to change cpu frequency: %d\n",
+ __func__, retval);
+
+ if (notify) {
+ /*
+ * Notify with old freq in case we failed to change
+ * frequency
+ */
+ if (retval)
+ freqs.new = freqs.old;
+
+ cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs,
+ CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
+ }
}
return retval;
diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
index ff9c8df..62ce478 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
@@ -221,6 +221,12 @@ struct cpufreq_driver {
* frequency transitions */
#define CPUFREQ_PM_NO_WARN 0x04 /* don't warn on suspend/resume speed
* mismatches */
+/*
+ * Driver will call cpufreq_notify_transition() in its target_index() routine
+ * and so cpufreq core must not call it. Only useful for drivers that implement
+ * target_index(), unused otherwise.
+ */
+#define CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION 0x08
int cpufreq_register_driver(struct cpufreq_driver *driver_data);
int cpufreq_unregister_driver(struct cpufreq_driver *driver_data);
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread* [PATCH 01/34] cpufreq: move freq change notifications to cpufreq core
@ 2013-08-16 2:24 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
There are few special cases though, like exynos5440, which doesn't do everything
on the call to ->target_index() routine and call some kind of bottom halves for
doing this work, work/tasklet/etc..
They may continue doing notification from their own code and so this patch
introduces another flag: CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION, which will be set by such
drivers.
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
Cc: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com>
Cc: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>
Cc: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
Cc: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-cris-kernel@axis.com
Cc: Mikael Starvik <starvik@axis.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: spear-devel@list.st.com
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Cc: Steven Miao <realmz6@gmail.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/cpufreq.h | 6 ++++++
2 files changed, 40 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index a7a1d3e..2782949 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -1673,6 +1673,9 @@ int __cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
retval = cpufreq_driver->target(policy, target_freq, relation);
else if (cpufreq_driver->target_index) {
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table;
+ struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
+ unsigned long flags;
+ bool notify;
int index;
freq_table = cpufreq_frequency_get_table(policy->cpu);
@@ -1691,7 +1694,38 @@ int __cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
if (freq_table[index].frequency = policy->cur)
return 0;
+ read_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
+ notify = !(cpufreq_driver->flags | CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION);
+ read_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
+
+ if (notify) {
+ freqs.old = policy->cur;
+ freqs.new = freq_table[index].frequency;
+
+ pr_debug("%s: cpu: %d, oldfreq: %u, new freq: %u\n",
+ __func__, policy->cpu, freqs.old,
+ freqs.new);
+
+ cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs,
+ CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
+ }
+
retval = cpufreq_driver->target_index(policy, index);
+ if (retval)
+ pr_err("%s: Failed to change cpu frequency: %d\n",
+ __func__, retval);
+
+ if (notify) {
+ /*
+ * Notify with old freq in case we failed to change
+ * frequency
+ */
+ if (retval)
+ freqs.new = freqs.old;
+
+ cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs,
+ CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
+ }
}
return retval;
diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
index ff9c8df..62ce478 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
@@ -221,6 +221,12 @@ struct cpufreq_driver {
* frequency transitions */
#define CPUFREQ_PM_NO_WARN 0x04 /* don't warn on suspend/resume speed
* mismatches */
+/*
+ * Driver will call cpufreq_notify_transition() in its target_index() routine
+ * and so cpufreq core must not call it. Only useful for drivers that implement
+ * target_index(), unused otherwise.
+ */
+#define CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION 0x08
int cpufreq_register_driver(struct cpufreq_driver *driver_data);
int cpufreq_unregister_driver(struct cpufreq_driver *driver_data);
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread* [PATCH 01/34] cpufreq: move freq change notifications to cpufreq core
@ 2013-08-16 2:24 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
There are few special cases though, like exynos5440, which doesn't do everything
on the call to ->target_index() routine and call some kind of bottom halves for
doing this work, work/tasklet/etc..
They may continue doing notification from their own code and so this patch
introduces another flag: CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION, which will be set by such
drivers.
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
Cc: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com>
Cc: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>
Cc: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
Cc: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-cris-kernel at axis.com
Cc: Mikael Starvik <starvik@axis.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Cc: sparclinux at vger.kernel.org
Cc: spear-devel at list.st.com
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Cc: Steven Miao <realmz6@gmail.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/cpufreq.h | 6 ++++++
2 files changed, 40 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index a7a1d3e..2782949 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -1673,6 +1673,9 @@ int __cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
retval = cpufreq_driver->target(policy, target_freq, relation);
else if (cpufreq_driver->target_index) {
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table;
+ struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
+ unsigned long flags;
+ bool notify;
int index;
freq_table = cpufreq_frequency_get_table(policy->cpu);
@@ -1691,7 +1694,38 @@ int __cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
if (freq_table[index].frequency == policy->cur)
return 0;
+ read_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
+ notify = !(cpufreq_driver->flags | CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION);
+ read_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
+
+ if (notify) {
+ freqs.old = policy->cur;
+ freqs.new = freq_table[index].frequency;
+
+ pr_debug("%s: cpu: %d, oldfreq: %u, new freq: %u\n",
+ __func__, policy->cpu, freqs.old,
+ freqs.new);
+
+ cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs,
+ CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
+ }
+
retval = cpufreq_driver->target_index(policy, index);
+ if (retval)
+ pr_err("%s: Failed to change cpu frequency: %d\n",
+ __func__, retval);
+
+ if (notify) {
+ /*
+ * Notify with old freq in case we failed to change
+ * frequency
+ */
+ if (retval)
+ freqs.new = freqs.old;
+
+ cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs,
+ CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
+ }
}
return retval;
diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
index ff9c8df..62ce478 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
@@ -221,6 +221,12 @@ struct cpufreq_driver {
* frequency transitions */
#define CPUFREQ_PM_NO_WARN 0x04 /* don't warn on suspend/resume speed
* mismatches */
+/*
+ * Driver will call cpufreq_notify_transition() in its target_index() routine
+ * and so cpufreq core must not call it. Only useful for drivers that implement
+ * target_index(), unused otherwise.
+ */
+#define CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION 0x08
int cpufreq_register_driver(struct cpufreq_driver *driver_data);
int cpufreq_unregister_driver(struct cpufreq_driver *driver_data);
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread* [PATCH 01/34] cpufreq: move freq change notifications to cpufreq core
@ 2013-08-16 2:24 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rjw
Cc: linaro-kernel, patches, cpufreq, linux-pm, linux-kernel,
linux-arm-kernel, Viresh Kumar, Andrew Lunn, David S. Miller,
Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov, Eric Miao, Hans-Christian Egtvedt,
Jesper Nilsson, John Crispin, Kukjin Kim, Linus Walleij,
linux-cris-kernel, Mikael Starvik, Russell King,
Santosh Shilimkar, Sekhar Nori, Shawn Guo, sparclinux,
spear-devel, Stephen Warren, Steven
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
There are few special cases though, like exynos5440, which doesn't do everything
on the call to ->target_index() routine and call some kind of bottom halves for
doing this work, work/tasklet/etc..
They may continue doing notification from their own code and so this patch
introduces another flag: CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION, which will be set by such
drivers.
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
Cc: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com>
Cc: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>
Cc: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
Cc: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-cris-kernel@axis.com
Cc: Mikael Starvik <starvik@axis.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: spear-devel@list.st.com
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Cc: Steven Miao <realmz6@gmail.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/cpufreq.h | 6 ++++++
2 files changed, 40 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index a7a1d3e..2782949 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -1673,6 +1673,9 @@ int __cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
retval = cpufreq_driver->target(policy, target_freq, relation);
else if (cpufreq_driver->target_index) {
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table;
+ struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
+ unsigned long flags;
+ bool notify;
int index;
freq_table = cpufreq_frequency_get_table(policy->cpu);
@@ -1691,7 +1694,38 @@ int __cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
if (freq_table[index].frequency == policy->cur)
return 0;
+ read_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
+ notify = !(cpufreq_driver->flags | CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION);
+ read_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
+
+ if (notify) {
+ freqs.old = policy->cur;
+ freqs.new = freq_table[index].frequency;
+
+ pr_debug("%s: cpu: %d, oldfreq: %u, new freq: %u\n",
+ __func__, policy->cpu, freqs.old,
+ freqs.new);
+
+ cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs,
+ CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
+ }
+
retval = cpufreq_driver->target_index(policy, index);
+ if (retval)
+ pr_err("%s: Failed to change cpu frequency: %d\n",
+ __func__, retval);
+
+ if (notify) {
+ /*
+ * Notify with old freq in case we failed to change
+ * frequency
+ */
+ if (retval)
+ freqs.new = freqs.old;
+
+ cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs,
+ CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
+ }
}
return retval;
diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
index ff9c8df..62ce478 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
@@ -221,6 +221,12 @@ struct cpufreq_driver {
* frequency transitions */
#define CPUFREQ_PM_NO_WARN 0x04 /* don't warn on suspend/resume speed
* mismatches */
+/*
+ * Driver will call cpufreq_notify_transition() in its target_index() routine
+ * and so cpufreq core must not call it. Only useful for drivers that implement
+ * target_index(), unused otherwise.
+ */
+#define CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION 0x08
int cpufreq_register_driver(struct cpufreq_driver *driver_data);
int cpufreq_unregister_driver(struct cpufreq_driver *driver_data);
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 02/34] cpufreq: acpi: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
2013-08-16 2:24 ` Viresh Kumar
@ 2013-08-16 2:24 ` Viresh Kumar
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rjw
Cc: linaro-kernel, patches, cpufreq, linux-pm, linux-kernel,
linux-arm-kernel, Viresh Kumar
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 14 ++------------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
index 7536e7d..6b00cd8 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
@@ -428,14 +428,10 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
{
struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data = per_cpu(acfreq_data, policy->cpu);
struct acpi_processor_performance *perf;
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
struct drv_cmd cmd;
unsigned int next_perf_state = 0; /* Index into perf table */
int result = 0;
- pr_debug("acpi_cpufreq_target %d (%d)\n",
- data->freq_table[index].frequency, policy->cpu);
-
if (unlikely(data == NULL ||
data->acpi_data == NULL || data->freq_table == NULL)) {
return -ENODEV;
@@ -483,23 +479,17 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
else
cmd.mask = cpumask_of(policy->cpu);
- freqs.old = perf->states[perf->state].core_frequency * 1000;
- freqs.new = data->freq_table[index].frequency;
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
drv_write(&cmd);
if (acpi_pstate_strict) {
- if (!check_freqs(cmd.mask, freqs.new, data)) {
+ if (!check_freqs(cmd.mask, data->freq_table[index].frequency,
+ data)) {
pr_debug("acpi_cpufreq_target failed (%d)\n",
policy->cpu);
result = -EAGAIN;
- freqs.new = freqs.old;
}
}
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
if (!result)
perf->state = next_perf_state;
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread* [PATCH 02/34] cpufreq: acpi: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
@ 2013-08-16 2:24 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 14 ++------------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
index 7536e7d..6b00cd8 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
@@ -428,14 +428,10 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
{
struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data = per_cpu(acfreq_data, policy->cpu);
struct acpi_processor_performance *perf;
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
struct drv_cmd cmd;
unsigned int next_perf_state = 0; /* Index into perf table */
int result = 0;
- pr_debug("acpi_cpufreq_target %d (%d)\n",
- data->freq_table[index].frequency, policy->cpu);
-
if (unlikely(data == NULL ||
data->acpi_data == NULL || data->freq_table == NULL)) {
return -ENODEV;
@@ -483,23 +479,17 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
else
cmd.mask = cpumask_of(policy->cpu);
- freqs.old = perf->states[perf->state].core_frequency * 1000;
- freqs.new = data->freq_table[index].frequency;
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
drv_write(&cmd);
if (acpi_pstate_strict) {
- if (!check_freqs(cmd.mask, freqs.new, data)) {
+ if (!check_freqs(cmd.mask, data->freq_table[index].frequency,
+ data)) {
pr_debug("acpi_cpufreq_target failed (%d)\n",
policy->cpu);
result = -EAGAIN;
- freqs.new = freqs.old;
}
}
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
if (!result)
perf->state = next_perf_state;
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread[parent not found: <CAOLK0pz7e8nQVnZY0a-j_Fd_kFOqF8ZS4tRfYw1S+25Lv8GoFQ@mail.gmail.com>]
* [PATCH 03/34] cpufreq: arm_big_little: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
2013-08-16 2:24 ` Viresh Kumar
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rjw
Cc: linaro-kernel, patches, cpufreq, linux-pm, linux-kernel,
linux-arm-kernel, Viresh Kumar
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c | 25 +++----------------------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c b/drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c
index daf4423..e3e8f25 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c
@@ -51,30 +51,11 @@ static unsigned int bL_cpufreq_get(unsigned int cpu)
static int bL_cpufreq_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int index)
{
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
- u32 cpu = policy->cpu, cur_cluster;
- int ret = 0;
+ u32 cur_cluster;
cur_cluster = cpu_to_cluster(policy->cpu);
-
- freqs.old = bL_cpufreq_get(policy->cpu);
- freqs.new = freq_table[cur_cluster][index].frequency;
-
- pr_debug("%s: cpu: %d, cluster: %d, oldfreq: %d, target freq: %d, new freq: %d\n",
- __func__, cpu, cur_cluster, freqs.old, freqs.new,
- freqs.new);
-
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
- ret = clk_set_rate(clk[cur_cluster], freqs.new * 1000);
- if (ret) {
- pr_err("clk_set_rate failed: %d\n", ret);
- freqs.new = freqs.old;
- }
-
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
- return ret;
+ return clk_set_rate(clk[cur_cluster],
+ freq_table[cur_cluster][index].frequency * 1000);
}
static void put_cluster_clk_and_freq_table(struct device *cpu_dev)
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread* [PATCH 03/34] cpufreq: arm_big_little: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c | 25 +++----------------------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c b/drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c
index daf4423..e3e8f25 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c
@@ -51,30 +51,11 @@ static unsigned int bL_cpufreq_get(unsigned int cpu)
static int bL_cpufreq_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int index)
{
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
- u32 cpu = policy->cpu, cur_cluster;
- int ret = 0;
+ u32 cur_cluster;
cur_cluster = cpu_to_cluster(policy->cpu);
-
- freqs.old = bL_cpufreq_get(policy->cpu);
- freqs.new = freq_table[cur_cluster][index].frequency;
-
- pr_debug("%s: cpu: %d, cluster: %d, oldfreq: %d, target freq: %d, new freq: %d\n",
- __func__, cpu, cur_cluster, freqs.old, freqs.new,
- freqs.new);
-
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
- ret = clk_set_rate(clk[cur_cluster], freqs.new * 1000);
- if (ret) {
- pr_err("clk_set_rate failed: %d\n", ret);
- freqs.new = freqs.old;
- }
-
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
- return ret;
+ return clk_set_rate(clk[cur_cluster],
+ freq_table[cur_cluster][index].frequency * 1000);
}
static void put_cluster_clk_and_freq_table(struct device *cpu_dev)
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 04/34] cpufreq: at32ap: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
2013-08-16 2:24 ` Viresh Kumar
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rjw
Cc: linaro-kernel, patches, cpufreq, linux-pm, linux-kernel,
linux-arm-kernel, Viresh Kumar, Hans-Christian Egtvedt
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Cc: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/at32ap-cpufreq.c | 22 +++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/at32ap-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/at32ap-cpufreq.c
index 81d0752..856ad80 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/at32ap-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/at32ap-cpufreq.c
@@ -37,27 +37,23 @@ static unsigned long loops_per_jiffy_ref;
static int at32_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
{
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
+ unsigned int old_freq, new_freq;
- freqs.old = at32_get_speed(0);
- freqs.new = freq_table[index].frequency;
+ old_freq = at32_get_speed(0);
+ new_freq = freq_table[index].frequency;
if (!ref_freq) {
- ref_freq = freqs.old;
+ ref_freq = old_freq;
loops_per_jiffy_ref = boot_cpu_data.loops_per_jiffy;
}
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
- if (freqs.old < freqs.new)
+ if (old_freq < new_freq)
boot_cpu_data.loops_per_jiffy = cpufreq_scale(
- loops_per_jiffy_ref, ref_freq, freqs.new);
- clk_set_rate(cpuclk, freqs.new * 1000);
- if (freqs.new < freqs.old)
+ loops_per_jiffy_ref, ref_freq, new_freq);
+ clk_set_rate(cpuclk, new_freq * 1000);
+ if (new_freq < old_freq)
boot_cpu_data.loops_per_jiffy = cpufreq_scale(
- loops_per_jiffy_ref, ref_freq, freqs.new);
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
- pr_debug("cpufreq: set frequency %u Hz\n", freqs.new * 1000);
+ loops_per_jiffy_ref, ref_freq, new_freq);
return 0;
}
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread* [PATCH 04/34] cpufreq: at32ap: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Cc: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/at32ap-cpufreq.c | 22 +++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/at32ap-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/at32ap-cpufreq.c
index 81d0752..856ad80 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/at32ap-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/at32ap-cpufreq.c
@@ -37,27 +37,23 @@ static unsigned long loops_per_jiffy_ref;
static int at32_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
{
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
+ unsigned int old_freq, new_freq;
- freqs.old = at32_get_speed(0);
- freqs.new = freq_table[index].frequency;
+ old_freq = at32_get_speed(0);
+ new_freq = freq_table[index].frequency;
if (!ref_freq) {
- ref_freq = freqs.old;
+ ref_freq = old_freq;
loops_per_jiffy_ref = boot_cpu_data.loops_per_jiffy;
}
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
- if (freqs.old < freqs.new)
+ if (old_freq < new_freq)
boot_cpu_data.loops_per_jiffy = cpufreq_scale(
- loops_per_jiffy_ref, ref_freq, freqs.new);
- clk_set_rate(cpuclk, freqs.new * 1000);
- if (freqs.new < freqs.old)
+ loops_per_jiffy_ref, ref_freq, new_freq);
+ clk_set_rate(cpuclk, new_freq * 1000);
+ if (new_freq < old_freq)
boot_cpu_data.loops_per_jiffy = cpufreq_scale(
- loops_per_jiffy_ref, ref_freq, freqs.new);
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
- pr_debug("cpufreq: set frequency %u Hz\n", freqs.new * 1000);
+ loops_per_jiffy_ref, ref_freq, new_freq);
return 0;
}
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 04/34] cpufreq: at32ap: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
@ 2013-08-16 5:58 ` Hans-Christian Egtvedt
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Hans-Christian Egtvedt @ 2013-08-16 5:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Viresh Kumar
Cc: rjw, linaro-kernel, patches, cpufreq, linux-pm, linux-kernel,
linux-arm-kernel
Around Fri 16 Aug 2013 07:55:01 +0530 or thereabout, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
>
> struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
> freqs.old = old freq...
> freqs.new = new freq...
>
> cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
>
> /* Change rate here */
>
> cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
>
> This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
> good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
>
> Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
> frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
>
> Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
>
> Cc: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/at32ap-cpufreq.c | 22 +++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/at32ap-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/at32ap-cpufreq.c
<snipp>
--
mvh
Hans-Christian Egtvedt
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 04/34] cpufreq: at32ap: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
@ 2013-08-16 5:58 ` Hans-Christian Egtvedt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Hans-Christian Egtvedt @ 2013-08-16 5:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Around Fri 16 Aug 2013 07:55:01 +0530 or thereabout, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
>
> struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
> freqs.old = old freq...
> freqs.new = new freq...
>
> cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
>
> /* Change rate here */
>
> cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
>
> This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
> good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
>
> Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
> frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
>
> Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
>
> Cc: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/at32ap-cpufreq.c | 22 +++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/at32ap-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/at32ap-cpufreq.c
<snipp>
--
mvh
Hans-Christian Egtvedt
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 05/34] cpufreq: blackfin: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
2013-08-16 2:24 ` Viresh Kumar
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rjw
Cc: linaro-kernel, patches, cpufreq, linux-pm, linux-kernel,
linux-arm-kernel, Viresh Kumar, Steven Miao
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Cc: Steven Miao <realmz6@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/blackfin-cpufreq.c | 22 +++++++---------------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/blackfin-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/blackfin-cpufreq.c
index 12528b2..e9e63fc 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/blackfin-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/blackfin-cpufreq.c
@@ -132,27 +132,23 @@ static int bfin_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
#ifndef CONFIG_BF60x
unsigned int plldiv;
#endif
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
static unsigned long lpj_ref;
static unsigned int lpj_ref_freq;
+ unsigned int old_freq, new_freq;
int ret = 0;
#if defined(CONFIG_CYCLES_CLOCKSOURCE)
cycles_t cycles;
#endif
- freqs.old = bfin_getfreq_khz(0);
- freqs.new = bfin_freq_table[index].frequency;
+ old_freq = bfin_getfreq_khz(0);
+ new_freq = bfin_freq_table[index].frequency;
- pr_debug("cpufreq: changing cclk to %lu; target = %u, oldfreq = %u\n",
- freqs.new, freqs.new, freqs.old);
-
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
#ifndef CONFIG_BF60x
plldiv = (bfin_read_PLL_DIV() & SSEL) | dpm_state_table[index].csel;
bfin_write_PLL_DIV(plldiv);
#else
- ret = cpu_set_cclk(policy->cpu, freqs.new * 1000);
+ ret = cpu_set_cclk(policy->cpu, new_freq * 1000);
if (ret != 0) {
WARN_ONCE(ret, "cpufreq set freq failed %d\n", ret);
return ret;
@@ -168,17 +164,13 @@ static int bfin_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
#endif
if (!lpj_ref_freq) {
lpj_ref = loops_per_jiffy;
- lpj_ref_freq = freqs.old;
+ lpj_ref_freq = old_freq;
}
- if (freqs.new != freqs.old) {
+ if (new_freq != old_freq) {
loops_per_jiffy = cpufreq_scale(lpj_ref,
- lpj_ref_freq, freqs.new);
+ lpj_ref_freq, new_freq);
}
- /* TODO: just test case for cycles clock source, remove later */
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
- pr_debug("cpufreq: done\n");
return ret;
}
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread* [PATCH 05/34] cpufreq: blackfin: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Cc: Steven Miao <realmz6@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/blackfin-cpufreq.c | 22 +++++++---------------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/blackfin-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/blackfin-cpufreq.c
index 12528b2..e9e63fc 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/blackfin-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/blackfin-cpufreq.c
@@ -132,27 +132,23 @@ static int bfin_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
#ifndef CONFIG_BF60x
unsigned int plldiv;
#endif
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
static unsigned long lpj_ref;
static unsigned int lpj_ref_freq;
+ unsigned int old_freq, new_freq;
int ret = 0;
#if defined(CONFIG_CYCLES_CLOCKSOURCE)
cycles_t cycles;
#endif
- freqs.old = bfin_getfreq_khz(0);
- freqs.new = bfin_freq_table[index].frequency;
+ old_freq = bfin_getfreq_khz(0);
+ new_freq = bfin_freq_table[index].frequency;
- pr_debug("cpufreq: changing cclk to %lu; target = %u, oldfreq = %u\n",
- freqs.new, freqs.new, freqs.old);
-
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
#ifndef CONFIG_BF60x
plldiv = (bfin_read_PLL_DIV() & SSEL) | dpm_state_table[index].csel;
bfin_write_PLL_DIV(plldiv);
#else
- ret = cpu_set_cclk(policy->cpu, freqs.new * 1000);
+ ret = cpu_set_cclk(policy->cpu, new_freq * 1000);
if (ret != 0) {
WARN_ONCE(ret, "cpufreq set freq failed %d\n", ret);
return ret;
@@ -168,17 +164,13 @@ static int bfin_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
#endif
if (!lpj_ref_freq) {
lpj_ref = loops_per_jiffy;
- lpj_ref_freq = freqs.old;
+ lpj_ref_freq = old_freq;
}
- if (freqs.new != freqs.old) {
+ if (new_freq != old_freq) {
loops_per_jiffy = cpufreq_scale(lpj_ref,
- lpj_ref_freq, freqs.new);
+ lpj_ref_freq, new_freq);
}
- /* TODO: just test case for cycles clock source, remove later */
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
- pr_debug("cpufreq: done\n");
return ret;
}
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 06/34] cpufreq: cpu0: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
2013-08-16 2:24 ` Viresh Kumar
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rjw
Cc: linaro-kernel, patches, cpufreq, linux-pm, linux-kernel,
linux-arm-kernel, Viresh Kumar, Shawn Guo
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c | 33 ++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c
index 4014925..ddd9010 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c
@@ -36,20 +36,19 @@ static unsigned int cpu0_get_speed(unsigned int cpu)
static int cpu0_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
{
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
struct opp *opp;
unsigned long volt = 0, volt_old = 0, tol = 0;
+ unsigned int old_freq, new_freq;
long freq_Hz, freq_exact;
int ret;
freq_Hz = clk_round_rate(cpu_clk, freq_table[index].frequency * 1000);
if (freq_Hz < 0)
freq_Hz = freq_table[index].frequency * 1000;
- freq_exact = freq_Hz;
- freqs.new = freq_Hz / 1000;
- freqs.old = clk_get_rate(cpu_clk) / 1000;
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
+ freq_exact = freq_Hz;
+ new_freq = freq_Hz / 1000;
+ old_freq = clk_get_rate(cpu_clk) / 1000;
if (!IS_ERR(cpu_reg)) {
rcu_read_lock();
@@ -57,9 +56,7 @@ static int cpu0_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
if (IS_ERR(opp)) {
rcu_read_unlock();
pr_err("failed to find OPP for %ld\n", freq_Hz);
- freqs.new = freqs.old;
- ret = PTR_ERR(opp);
- goto post_notify;
+ return PTR_ERR(opp);
}
volt = opp_get_voltage(opp);
rcu_read_unlock();
@@ -68,16 +65,15 @@ static int cpu0_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
}
pr_debug("%u MHz, %ld mV --> %u MHz, %ld mV\n",
- freqs.old / 1000, volt_old ? volt_old / 1000 : -1,
- freqs.new / 1000, volt ? volt / 1000 : -1);
+ old_freq / 1000, volt_old ? volt_old / 1000 : -1,
+ new_freq / 1000, volt ? volt / 1000 : -1);
/* scaling up? scale voltage before frequency */
- if (!IS_ERR(cpu_reg) && freqs.new > freqs.old) {
+ if (!IS_ERR(cpu_reg) && new_freq > old_freq) {
ret = regulator_set_voltage_tol(cpu_reg, volt, tol);
if (ret) {
pr_err("failed to scale voltage up: %d\n", ret);
- freqs.new = freqs.old;
- goto post_notify;
+ return ret;
}
}
@@ -86,23 +82,18 @@ static int cpu0_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
pr_err("failed to set clock rate: %d\n", ret);
if (!IS_ERR(cpu_reg))
regulator_set_voltage_tol(cpu_reg, volt_old, tol);
- freqs.new = freqs.old;
- goto post_notify;
+ return ret;
}
/* scaling down? scale voltage after frequency */
- if (!IS_ERR(cpu_reg) && freqs.new < freqs.old) {
+ if (!IS_ERR(cpu_reg) && new_freq < old_freq) {
ret = regulator_set_voltage_tol(cpu_reg, volt, tol);
if (ret) {
pr_err("failed to scale voltage down: %d\n", ret);
- clk_set_rate(cpu_clk, freqs.old * 1000);
- freqs.new = freqs.old;
+ clk_set_rate(cpu_clk, old_freq * 1000);
}
}
-post_notify:
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
return ret;
}
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread* [PATCH 06/34] cpufreq: cpu0: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c | 33 ++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c
index 4014925..ddd9010 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c
@@ -36,20 +36,19 @@ static unsigned int cpu0_get_speed(unsigned int cpu)
static int cpu0_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
{
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
struct opp *opp;
unsigned long volt = 0, volt_old = 0, tol = 0;
+ unsigned int old_freq, new_freq;
long freq_Hz, freq_exact;
int ret;
freq_Hz = clk_round_rate(cpu_clk, freq_table[index].frequency * 1000);
if (freq_Hz < 0)
freq_Hz = freq_table[index].frequency * 1000;
- freq_exact = freq_Hz;
- freqs.new = freq_Hz / 1000;
- freqs.old = clk_get_rate(cpu_clk) / 1000;
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
+ freq_exact = freq_Hz;
+ new_freq = freq_Hz / 1000;
+ old_freq = clk_get_rate(cpu_clk) / 1000;
if (!IS_ERR(cpu_reg)) {
rcu_read_lock();
@@ -57,9 +56,7 @@ static int cpu0_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
if (IS_ERR(opp)) {
rcu_read_unlock();
pr_err("failed to find OPP for %ld\n", freq_Hz);
- freqs.new = freqs.old;
- ret = PTR_ERR(opp);
- goto post_notify;
+ return PTR_ERR(opp);
}
volt = opp_get_voltage(opp);
rcu_read_unlock();
@@ -68,16 +65,15 @@ static int cpu0_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
}
pr_debug("%u MHz, %ld mV --> %u MHz, %ld mV\n",
- freqs.old / 1000, volt_old ? volt_old / 1000 : -1,
- freqs.new / 1000, volt ? volt / 1000 : -1);
+ old_freq / 1000, volt_old ? volt_old / 1000 : -1,
+ new_freq / 1000, volt ? volt / 1000 : -1);
/* scaling up? scale voltage before frequency */
- if (!IS_ERR(cpu_reg) && freqs.new > freqs.old) {
+ if (!IS_ERR(cpu_reg) && new_freq > old_freq) {
ret = regulator_set_voltage_tol(cpu_reg, volt, tol);
if (ret) {
pr_err("failed to scale voltage up: %d\n", ret);
- freqs.new = freqs.old;
- goto post_notify;
+ return ret;
}
}
@@ -86,23 +82,18 @@ static int cpu0_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
pr_err("failed to set clock rate: %d\n", ret);
if (!IS_ERR(cpu_reg))
regulator_set_voltage_tol(cpu_reg, volt_old, tol);
- freqs.new = freqs.old;
- goto post_notify;
+ return ret;
}
/* scaling down? scale voltage after frequency */
- if (!IS_ERR(cpu_reg) && freqs.new < freqs.old) {
+ if (!IS_ERR(cpu_reg) && new_freq < old_freq) {
ret = regulator_set_voltage_tol(cpu_reg, volt, tol);
if (ret) {
pr_err("failed to scale voltage down: %d\n", ret);
- clk_set_rate(cpu_clk, freqs.old * 1000);
- freqs.new = freqs.old;
+ clk_set_rate(cpu_clk, old_freq * 1000);
}
}
-post_notify:
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
return ret;
}
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 07/34] cpufreq: cris: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
2013-08-16 2:24 ` Viresh Kumar
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rjw
Cc: linaro-kernel, patches, cpufreq, linux-pm, linux-kernel,
linux-arm-kernel, Viresh Kumar, Jesper Nilsson, Mikael Starvik,
linux-cris-kernel
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Cc: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
Cc: Mikael Starvik <starvik@axis.com>
Cc: linux-cris-kernel@axis.com
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cris-artpec3-cpufreq.c | 8 --------
drivers/cpufreq/cris-etraxfs-cpufreq.c | 8 --------
2 files changed, 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cris-artpec3-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cris-artpec3-cpufreq.c
index dace19d..e31e1e5 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cris-artpec3-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cris-artpec3-cpufreq.c
@@ -29,15 +29,9 @@ static unsigned int cris_freq_get_cpu_frequency(unsigned int cpu)
static int cris_freq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int state)
{
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
reg_clkgen_rw_clk_ctrl clk_ctrl;
clk_ctrl = REG_RD(clkgen, regi_clkgen, rw_clk_ctrl);
- freqs.old = cris_freq_get_cpu_frequency(policy->cpu);
- freqs.new = cris_freq_table[state].frequency;
-
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
local_irq_disable();
/* Even though we may be SMP they will share the same clock
@@ -50,8 +44,6 @@ static int cris_freq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int state)
local_irq_enable();
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
return 0;
}
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cris-etraxfs-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cris-etraxfs-cpufreq.c
index 4d40d9df..9d577d0 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cris-etraxfs-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cris-etraxfs-cpufreq.c
@@ -29,15 +29,9 @@ static unsigned int cris_freq_get_cpu_frequency(unsigned int cpu)
static int cris_freq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int state)
{
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
reg_config_rw_clk_ctrl clk_ctrl;
clk_ctrl = REG_RD(config, regi_config, rw_clk_ctrl);
- freqs.old = cris_freq_get_cpu_frequency(policy->cpu);
- freqs.new = cris_freq_table[state].frequency;
-
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
local_irq_disable();
/* Even though we may be SMP they will share the same clock
@@ -50,8 +44,6 @@ static int cris_freq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int state)
local_irq_enable();
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
return 0;
}
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread* [PATCH 07/34] cpufreq: cris: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Cc: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
Cc: Mikael Starvik <starvik@axis.com>
Cc: linux-cris-kernel at axis.com
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cris-artpec3-cpufreq.c | 8 --------
drivers/cpufreq/cris-etraxfs-cpufreq.c | 8 --------
2 files changed, 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cris-artpec3-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cris-artpec3-cpufreq.c
index dace19d..e31e1e5 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cris-artpec3-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cris-artpec3-cpufreq.c
@@ -29,15 +29,9 @@ static unsigned int cris_freq_get_cpu_frequency(unsigned int cpu)
static int cris_freq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int state)
{
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
reg_clkgen_rw_clk_ctrl clk_ctrl;
clk_ctrl = REG_RD(clkgen, regi_clkgen, rw_clk_ctrl);
- freqs.old = cris_freq_get_cpu_frequency(policy->cpu);
- freqs.new = cris_freq_table[state].frequency;
-
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
local_irq_disable();
/* Even though we may be SMP they will share the same clock
@@ -50,8 +44,6 @@ static int cris_freq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int state)
local_irq_enable();
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
return 0;
}
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cris-etraxfs-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cris-etraxfs-cpufreq.c
index 4d40d9df..9d577d0 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cris-etraxfs-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cris-etraxfs-cpufreq.c
@@ -29,15 +29,9 @@ static unsigned int cris_freq_get_cpu_frequency(unsigned int cpu)
static int cris_freq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int state)
{
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
reg_config_rw_clk_ctrl clk_ctrl;
clk_ctrl = REG_RD(config, regi_config, rw_clk_ctrl);
- freqs.old = cris_freq_get_cpu_frequency(policy->cpu);
- freqs.new = cris_freq_table[state].frequency;
-
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
local_irq_disable();
/* Even though we may be SMP they will share the same clock
@@ -50,8 +44,6 @@ static int cris_freq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int state)
local_irq_enable();
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
return 0;
}
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 07/34] cpufreq: cris: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
(?)
@ 2017-10-10 7:57 ` Jesper Nilsson
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Jesper Nilsson @ 2017-10-10 7:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Viresh Kumar
Cc: rjw, linaro-kernel, patches, cpufreq, linux-pm, linux-kernel,
linux-arm-kernel, Jesper Nilsson, Mikael Starvik,
linux-cris-kernel
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 04:25:04AM +0200, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
>
> struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
> freqs.old = old freq...
> freqs.new = new freq...
>
> cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
>
> /* Change rate here */
>
> cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
>
> This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
> good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
>
> Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
> frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
>
> Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
>
Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
> Cc: Mikael Starvik <starvik@axis.com>
> Cc: linux-cris-kernel@axis.com
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cris-artpec3-cpufreq.c | 8 --------
> drivers/cpufreq/cris-etraxfs-cpufreq.c | 8 --------
> 2 files changed, 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cris-artpec3-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cris-artpec3-cpufreq.c
> index dace19d..e31e1e5 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cris-artpec3-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cris-artpec3-cpufreq.c
> @@ -29,15 +29,9 @@ static unsigned int cris_freq_get_cpu_frequency(unsigned int cpu)
>
> static int cris_freq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int state)
> {
> - struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
> reg_clkgen_rw_clk_ctrl clk_ctrl;
> clk_ctrl = REG_RD(clkgen, regi_clkgen, rw_clk_ctrl);
>
> - freqs.old = cris_freq_get_cpu_frequency(policy->cpu);
> - freqs.new = cris_freq_table[state].frequency;
> -
> - cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
> -
> local_irq_disable();
>
> /* Even though we may be SMP they will share the same clock
> @@ -50,8 +44,6 @@ static int cris_freq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int state)
>
> local_irq_enable();
>
> - cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
> -
> return 0;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cris-etraxfs-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cris-etraxfs-cpufreq.c
> index 4d40d9df..9d577d0 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cris-etraxfs-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cris-etraxfs-cpufreq.c
> @@ -29,15 +29,9 @@ static unsigned int cris_freq_get_cpu_frequency(unsigned int cpu)
>
> static int cris_freq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int state)
> {
> - struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
> reg_config_rw_clk_ctrl clk_ctrl;
> clk_ctrl = REG_RD(config, regi_config, rw_clk_ctrl);
>
> - freqs.old = cris_freq_get_cpu_frequency(policy->cpu);
> - freqs.new = cris_freq_table[state].frequency;
> -
> - cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
> -
> local_irq_disable();
>
> /* Even though we may be SMP they will share the same clock
> @@ -50,8 +44,6 @@ static int cris_freq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int state)
>
> local_irq_enable();
>
> - cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
> -
> return 0;
> }
>
> --
> 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
/^JN - Jesper Nilsson
--
Jesper Nilsson -- jesper.nilsson@axis.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread* [PATCH 07/34] cpufreq: cris: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
@ 2017-10-10 7:57 ` Jesper Nilsson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Jesper Nilsson @ 2017-10-10 7:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 04:25:04AM +0200, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
>
> struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
> freqs.old = old freq...
> freqs.new = new freq...
>
> cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
>
> /* Change rate here */
>
> cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
>
> This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
> good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
>
> Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
> frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
>
> Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
>
Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
> Cc: Mikael Starvik <starvik@axis.com>
> Cc: linux-cris-kernel at axis.com
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cris-artpec3-cpufreq.c | 8 --------
> drivers/cpufreq/cris-etraxfs-cpufreq.c | 8 --------
> 2 files changed, 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cris-artpec3-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cris-artpec3-cpufreq.c
> index dace19d..e31e1e5 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cris-artpec3-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cris-artpec3-cpufreq.c
> @@ -29,15 +29,9 @@ static unsigned int cris_freq_get_cpu_frequency(unsigned int cpu)
>
> static int cris_freq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int state)
> {
> - struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
> reg_clkgen_rw_clk_ctrl clk_ctrl;
> clk_ctrl = REG_RD(clkgen, regi_clkgen, rw_clk_ctrl);
>
> - freqs.old = cris_freq_get_cpu_frequency(policy->cpu);
> - freqs.new = cris_freq_table[state].frequency;
> -
> - cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
> -
> local_irq_disable();
>
> /* Even though we may be SMP they will share the same clock
> @@ -50,8 +44,6 @@ static int cris_freq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int state)
>
> local_irq_enable();
>
> - cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
> -
> return 0;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cris-etraxfs-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cris-etraxfs-cpufreq.c
> index 4d40d9df..9d577d0 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cris-etraxfs-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cris-etraxfs-cpufreq.c
> @@ -29,15 +29,9 @@ static unsigned int cris_freq_get_cpu_frequency(unsigned int cpu)
>
> static int cris_freq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int state)
> {
> - struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
> reg_config_rw_clk_ctrl clk_ctrl;
> clk_ctrl = REG_RD(config, regi_config, rw_clk_ctrl);
>
> - freqs.old = cris_freq_get_cpu_frequency(policy->cpu);
> - freqs.new = cris_freq_table[state].frequency;
> -
> - cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
> -
> local_irq_disable();
>
> /* Even though we may be SMP they will share the same clock
> @@ -50,8 +44,6 @@ static int cris_freq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int state)
>
> local_irq_enable();
>
> - cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
> -
> return 0;
> }
>
> --
> 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
/^JN - Jesper Nilsson
--
Jesper Nilsson -- jesper.nilsson at axis.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 07/34] cpufreq: cris: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
@ 2017-10-10 7:57 ` Jesper Nilsson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Jesper Nilsson @ 2017-10-10 7:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Viresh Kumar
Cc: rjw, linaro-kernel, patches, cpufreq, linux-pm, linux-kernel,
linux-arm-kernel, Jesper Nilsson, Mikael Starvik,
linux-cris-kernel
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 04:25:04AM +0200, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
>
> struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
> freqs.old = old freq...
> freqs.new = new freq...
>
> cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
>
> /* Change rate here */
>
> cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
>
> This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
> good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
>
> Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
> frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
>
> Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
>
Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
> Cc: Mikael Starvik <starvik@axis.com>
> Cc: linux-cris-kernel@axis.com
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cris-artpec3-cpufreq.c | 8 --------
> drivers/cpufreq/cris-etraxfs-cpufreq.c | 8 --------
> 2 files changed, 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cris-artpec3-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cris-artpec3-cpufreq.c
> index dace19d..e31e1e5 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cris-artpec3-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cris-artpec3-cpufreq.c
> @@ -29,15 +29,9 @@ static unsigned int cris_freq_get_cpu_frequency(unsigned int cpu)
>
> static int cris_freq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int state)
> {
> - struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
> reg_clkgen_rw_clk_ctrl clk_ctrl;
> clk_ctrl = REG_RD(clkgen, regi_clkgen, rw_clk_ctrl);
>
> - freqs.old = cris_freq_get_cpu_frequency(policy->cpu);
> - freqs.new = cris_freq_table[state].frequency;
> -
> - cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
> -
> local_irq_disable();
>
> /* Even though we may be SMP they will share the same clock
> @@ -50,8 +44,6 @@ static int cris_freq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int state)
>
> local_irq_enable();
>
> - cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
> -
> return 0;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cris-etraxfs-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cris-etraxfs-cpufreq.c
> index 4d40d9df..9d577d0 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cris-etraxfs-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cris-etraxfs-cpufreq.c
> @@ -29,15 +29,9 @@ static unsigned int cris_freq_get_cpu_frequency(unsigned int cpu)
>
> static int cris_freq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int state)
> {
> - struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
> reg_config_rw_clk_ctrl clk_ctrl;
> clk_ctrl = REG_RD(config, regi_config, rw_clk_ctrl);
>
> - freqs.old = cris_freq_get_cpu_frequency(policy->cpu);
> - freqs.new = cris_freq_table[state].frequency;
> -
> - cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
> -
> local_irq_disable();
>
> /* Even though we may be SMP they will share the same clock
> @@ -50,8 +44,6 @@ static int cris_freq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int state)
>
> local_irq_enable();
>
> - cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
> -
> return 0;
> }
>
> --
> 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
/^JN - Jesper Nilsson
--
Jesper Nilsson -- jesper.nilsson@axis.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 07/34] cpufreq: cris: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
2017-10-10 7:57 ` Jesper Nilsson
(?)
@ 2017-10-10 9:13 ` Viresh Kumar
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2017-10-10 9:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jesper Nilsson
Cc: rjw, linaro-kernel, patches, cpufreq, linux-pm, linux-kernel,
linux-arm-kernel, Jesper Nilsson, Mikael Starvik,
linux-cris-kernel
On 10-10-17, 09:57, Jesper Nilsson wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 04:25:04AM +0200, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
> >
> > struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
> > freqs.old = old freq...
> > freqs.new = new freq...
> >
> > cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
> >
> > /* Change rate here */
> >
> > cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
> >
> > This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
> > good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
> >
> > Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
> > frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
> >
> > Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
> >
>
> Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
Wow..
You just Acked a 4 years old patch :)
--
viresh
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 07/34] cpufreq: cris: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
@ 2017-10-10 9:13 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2017-10-10 9:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 10-10-17, 09:57, Jesper Nilsson wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 04:25:04AM +0200, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
> >
> > struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
> > freqs.old = old freq...
> > freqs.new = new freq...
> >
> > cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
> >
> > /* Change rate here */
> >
> > cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
> >
> > This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
> > good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
> >
> > Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
> > frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
> >
> > Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
> >
>
> Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
Wow..
You just Acked a 4 years old patch :)
--
viresh
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 07/34] cpufreq: cris: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
@ 2017-10-10 9:13 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2017-10-10 9:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jesper Nilsson
Cc: rjw, linaro-kernel, patches, cpufreq, linux-pm, linux-kernel,
linux-arm-kernel, Jesper Nilsson, Mikael Starvik,
linux-cris-kernel
On 10-10-17, 09:57, Jesper Nilsson wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 04:25:04AM +0200, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
> >
> > struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
> > freqs.old = old freq...
> > freqs.new = new freq...
> >
> > cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
> >
> > /* Change rate here */
> >
> > cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
> >
> > This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
> > good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
> >
> > Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
> > frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
> >
> > Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
> >
>
> Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
Wow..
You just Acked a 4 years old patch :)
--
viresh
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 08/34] cpufreq: davinci: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
2013-08-16 2:24 ` Viresh Kumar
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rjw
Cc: linaro-kernel, patches, cpufreq, linux-pm, linux-kernel,
linux-arm-kernel, Viresh Kumar, Sekhar Nori
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/davinci-cpufreq.c | 30 ++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/davinci-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/davinci-cpufreq.c
index 07ea6c0..7fcae0c 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/davinci-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/davinci-cpufreq.c
@@ -70,46 +70,36 @@ static unsigned int davinci_getspeed(unsigned int cpu)
static int davinci_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int idx)
{
- int ret = 0;
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
struct davinci_cpufreq_config *pdata = cpufreq.dev->platform_data;
struct clk *armclk = cpufreq.armclk;
+ unsigned int old_freq, new_freq;
+ int ret = 0;
- freqs.old = davinci_getspeed(0);
- freqs.new = pdata->freq_table[idx].frequency;
-
- dev_dbg(cpufreq.dev, "transition: %u --> %u\n", freqs.old, freqs.new);
-
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
+ old_freq = davinci_getspeed(0);
+ new_freq = pdata->freq_table[idx].frequency;
/* if moving to higher frequency, up the voltage beforehand */
- if (pdata->set_voltage && freqs.new > freqs.old) {
+ if (pdata->set_voltage && new_freq > old_freq) {
ret = pdata->set_voltage(idx);
if (ret)
- goto out;
+ return ret;
}
ret = clk_set_rate(armclk, idx);
if (ret)
- goto out;
+ return ret;
if (cpufreq.asyncclk) {
ret = clk_set_rate(cpufreq.asyncclk, cpufreq.asyncrate);
if (ret)
- goto out;
+ return ret;
}
/* if moving to lower freq, lower the voltage after lowering freq */
- if (pdata->set_voltage && freqs.new < freqs.old)
+ if (pdata->set_voltage && new_freq < old_freq)
pdata->set_voltage(idx);
-out:
- if (ret)
- freqs.new = freqs.old;
-
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
- return ret;
+ return 0;
}
static int davinci_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread* [PATCH 08/34] cpufreq: davinci: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/davinci-cpufreq.c | 30 ++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/davinci-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/davinci-cpufreq.c
index 07ea6c0..7fcae0c 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/davinci-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/davinci-cpufreq.c
@@ -70,46 +70,36 @@ static unsigned int davinci_getspeed(unsigned int cpu)
static int davinci_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int idx)
{
- int ret = 0;
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
struct davinci_cpufreq_config *pdata = cpufreq.dev->platform_data;
struct clk *armclk = cpufreq.armclk;
+ unsigned int old_freq, new_freq;
+ int ret = 0;
- freqs.old = davinci_getspeed(0);
- freqs.new = pdata->freq_table[idx].frequency;
-
- dev_dbg(cpufreq.dev, "transition: %u --> %u\n", freqs.old, freqs.new);
-
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
+ old_freq = davinci_getspeed(0);
+ new_freq = pdata->freq_table[idx].frequency;
/* if moving to higher frequency, up the voltage beforehand */
- if (pdata->set_voltage && freqs.new > freqs.old) {
+ if (pdata->set_voltage && new_freq > old_freq) {
ret = pdata->set_voltage(idx);
if (ret)
- goto out;
+ return ret;
}
ret = clk_set_rate(armclk, idx);
if (ret)
- goto out;
+ return ret;
if (cpufreq.asyncclk) {
ret = clk_set_rate(cpufreq.asyncclk, cpufreq.asyncrate);
if (ret)
- goto out;
+ return ret;
}
/* if moving to lower freq, lower the voltage after lowering freq */
- if (pdata->set_voltage && freqs.new < freqs.old)
+ if (pdata->set_voltage && new_freq < old_freq)
pdata->set_voltage(idx);
-out:
- if (ret)
- freqs.new = freqs.old;
-
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
- return ret;
+ return 0;
}
static int davinci_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 09/34] cpufreq: dbx500: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
2013-08-16 2:24 ` Viresh Kumar
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rjw
Cc: linaro-kernel, patches, cpufreq, linux-pm, linux-kernel,
linux-arm-kernel, Viresh Kumar, Linus Walleij
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/dbx500-cpufreq.c | 22 +---------------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/dbx500-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/dbx500-cpufreq.c
index d6d6b8c..060430c 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/dbx500-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/dbx500-cpufreq.c
@@ -22,28 +22,8 @@ static struct clk *armss_clk;
static int dbx500_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int index)
{
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
- int ret;
-
- freqs.old = policy->cur;
- freqs.new = freq_table[index].frequency;
-
- /* pre-change notification */
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
/* update armss clk frequency */
- ret = clk_set_rate(armss_clk, freqs.new * 1000);
-
- if (ret) {
- pr_err("dbx500-cpufreq: Failed to set armss_clk to %d Hz: error %d\n",
- freqs.new * 1000, ret);
- freqs.new = freqs.old;
- }
-
- /* post change notification */
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
- return ret;
+ return clk_set_rate(armss_clk, freq_table[index].frequency * 1000);
}
static unsigned int dbx500_cpufreq_getspeed(unsigned int cpu)
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread* [PATCH 09/34] cpufreq: dbx500: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/dbx500-cpufreq.c | 22 +---------------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/dbx500-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/dbx500-cpufreq.c
index d6d6b8c..060430c 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/dbx500-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/dbx500-cpufreq.c
@@ -22,28 +22,8 @@ static struct clk *armss_clk;
static int dbx500_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int index)
{
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
- int ret;
-
- freqs.old = policy->cur;
- freqs.new = freq_table[index].frequency;
-
- /* pre-change notification */
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
/* update armss clk frequency */
- ret = clk_set_rate(armss_clk, freqs.new * 1000);
-
- if (ret) {
- pr_err("dbx500-cpufreq: Failed to set armss_clk to %d Hz: error %d\n",
- freqs.new * 1000, ret);
- freqs.new = freqs.old;
- }
-
- /* post change notification */
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
- return ret;
+ return clk_set_rate(armss_clk, freq_table[index].frequency * 1000);
}
static unsigned int dbx500_cpufreq_getspeed(unsigned int cpu)
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 10/34] cpufreq: e_powersaver: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
2013-08-16 2:24 ` Viresh Kumar
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rjw
Cc: linaro-kernel, patches, cpufreq, linux-pm, linux-kernel,
linux-arm-kernel, Viresh Kumar
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/e_powersaver.c | 23 +++--------------------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/e_powersaver.c b/drivers/cpufreq/e_powersaver.c
index b39c4ef..9012b8b 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/e_powersaver.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/e_powersaver.c
@@ -107,15 +107,9 @@ static int eps_set_state(struct eps_cpu_data *centaur,
struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
u32 dest_state)
{
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
u32 lo, hi;
- int err = 0;
int i;
- freqs.old = eps_get(policy->cpu);
- freqs.new = centaur->fsb * ((dest_state >> 8) & 0xff);
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
/* Wait while CPU is busy */
rdmsr(MSR_IA32_PERF_STATUS, lo, hi);
i = 0;
@@ -124,8 +118,7 @@ static int eps_set_state(struct eps_cpu_data *centaur,
rdmsr(MSR_IA32_PERF_STATUS, lo, hi);
i++;
if (unlikely(i > 64)) {
- err = -ENODEV;
- goto postchange;
+ return -ENODEV;
}
}
/* Set new multiplier and voltage */
@@ -137,16 +130,10 @@ static int eps_set_state(struct eps_cpu_data *centaur,
rdmsr(MSR_IA32_PERF_STATUS, lo, hi);
i++;
if (unlikely(i > 64)) {
- err = -ENODEV;
- goto postchange;
+ return -ENODEV;
}
} while (lo & ((1 << 16) | (1 << 17)));
- /* Return current frequency */
-postchange:
- rdmsr(MSR_IA32_PERF_STATUS, lo, hi);
- freqs.new = centaur->fsb * ((lo >> 8) & 0xff);
-
#ifdef DEBUG
{
u8 current_multiplier, current_voltage;
@@ -161,11 +148,7 @@ postchange:
current_multiplier);
}
#endif
- if (err)
- freqs.new = freqs.old;
-
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
- return err;
+ return 0;
}
static int eps_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread* [PATCH 10/34] cpufreq: e_powersaver: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/e_powersaver.c | 23 +++--------------------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/e_powersaver.c b/drivers/cpufreq/e_powersaver.c
index b39c4ef..9012b8b 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/e_powersaver.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/e_powersaver.c
@@ -107,15 +107,9 @@ static int eps_set_state(struct eps_cpu_data *centaur,
struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
u32 dest_state)
{
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
u32 lo, hi;
- int err = 0;
int i;
- freqs.old = eps_get(policy->cpu);
- freqs.new = centaur->fsb * ((dest_state >> 8) & 0xff);
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
/* Wait while CPU is busy */
rdmsr(MSR_IA32_PERF_STATUS, lo, hi);
i = 0;
@@ -124,8 +118,7 @@ static int eps_set_state(struct eps_cpu_data *centaur,
rdmsr(MSR_IA32_PERF_STATUS, lo, hi);
i++;
if (unlikely(i > 64)) {
- err = -ENODEV;
- goto postchange;
+ return -ENODEV;
}
}
/* Set new multiplier and voltage */
@@ -137,16 +130,10 @@ static int eps_set_state(struct eps_cpu_data *centaur,
rdmsr(MSR_IA32_PERF_STATUS, lo, hi);
i++;
if (unlikely(i > 64)) {
- err = -ENODEV;
- goto postchange;
+ return -ENODEV;
}
} while (lo & ((1 << 16) | (1 << 17)));
- /* Return current frequency */
-postchange:
- rdmsr(MSR_IA32_PERF_STATUS, lo, hi);
- freqs.new = centaur->fsb * ((lo >> 8) & 0xff);
-
#ifdef DEBUG
{
u8 current_multiplier, current_voltage;
@@ -161,11 +148,7 @@ postchange:
current_multiplier);
}
#endif
- if (err)
- freqs.new = freqs.old;
-
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
- return err;
+ return 0;
}
static int eps_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 11/34] cpufreq: elanfreq: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
2013-08-16 2:24 ` Viresh Kumar
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rjw
Cc: linaro-kernel, patches, cpufreq, linux-pm, linux-kernel,
linux-arm-kernel, Viresh Kumar
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/elanfreq.c | 13 -------------
1 file changed, 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/elanfreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/elanfreq.c
index 4ab4153..de08acf 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/elanfreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/elanfreq.c
@@ -108,17 +108,6 @@ static unsigned int elanfreq_get_cpu_frequency(unsigned int cpu)
static int elanfreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int state)
{
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
-
- freqs.old = elanfreq_get_cpu_frequency(0);
- freqs.new = elan_multiplier[state].clock;
-
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
- printk(KERN_INFO "elanfreq: attempting to set frequency to %i kHz\n",
- elan_multiplier[state].clock);
-
-
/*
* Access to the Elan's internal registers is indexed via
* 0x22: Chip Setup & Control Register Index Register (CSCI)
@@ -149,8 +138,6 @@ static int elanfreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
udelay(10000);
local_irq_enable();
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
return 0;
}
/*
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread* [PATCH 11/34] cpufreq: elanfreq: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/elanfreq.c | 13 -------------
1 file changed, 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/elanfreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/elanfreq.c
index 4ab4153..de08acf 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/elanfreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/elanfreq.c
@@ -108,17 +108,6 @@ static unsigned int elanfreq_get_cpu_frequency(unsigned int cpu)
static int elanfreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int state)
{
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
-
- freqs.old = elanfreq_get_cpu_frequency(0);
- freqs.new = elan_multiplier[state].clock;
-
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
- printk(KERN_INFO "elanfreq: attempting to set frequency to %i kHz\n",
- elan_multiplier[state].clock);
-
-
/*
* Access to the Elan's internal registers is indexed via
* 0x22: Chip Setup & Control Register Index Register (CSCI)
@@ -149,8 +138,6 @@ static int elanfreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
udelay(10000);
local_irq_enable();
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
return 0;
}
/*
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 12/34] cpufreq: exynos: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
2013-08-16 2:24 ` Viresh Kumar
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rjw
Cc: linaro-kernel, patches, cpufreq, linux-pm, linux-kernel,
linux-arm-kernel, Viresh Kumar, Kukjin Kim
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c | 28 ++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
index b1db082..0f87a29 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
@@ -25,7 +25,6 @@
static struct exynos_dvfs_info *exynos_info;
static struct regulator *arm_regulator;
-static struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
static unsigned int locking_frequency;
static bool frequency_locked;
@@ -59,18 +58,18 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_scale(unsigned int target_freq)
struct cpufreq_policy *policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(0);
unsigned int arm_volt, safe_arm_volt = 0;
unsigned int mpll_freq_khz = exynos_info->mpll_freq_khz;
+ unsigned int old_freq;
int index, old_index;
int ret = 0;
- freqs.old = policy->cur;
- freqs.new = target_freq;
+ old_freq = policy->cur;
/*
* The policy max have been changed so that we cannot get proper
* old_index with cpufreq_frequency_table_target(). Thus, ignore
* policy and get the index from the raw freqeuncy table.
*/
- old_index = exynos_cpufreq_get_index(freqs.old);
+ old_index = exynos_cpufreq_get_index(old_freq);
if (old_index < 0) {
ret = old_index;
goto out;
@@ -95,17 +94,14 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_scale(unsigned int target_freq)
}
arm_volt = volt_table[index];
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
/* When the new frequency is higher than current frequency */
- if ((freqs.new > freqs.old) && !safe_arm_volt) {
+ if ((target_freq > old_freq) && !safe_arm_volt) {
/* Firstly, voltage up to increase frequency */
ret = regulator_set_voltage(arm_regulator, arm_volt, arm_volt);
if (ret) {
pr_err("%s: failed to set cpu voltage to %d\n",
__func__, arm_volt);
- freqs.new = freqs.old;
- goto post_notify;
+ return ret;
}
}
@@ -115,22 +111,15 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_scale(unsigned int target_freq)
if (ret) {
pr_err("%s: failed to set cpu voltage to %d\n",
__func__, safe_arm_volt);
- freqs.new = freqs.old;
- goto post_notify;
+ return ret;
}
}
exynos_info->set_freq(old_index, index);
-post_notify:
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
- if (ret)
- goto out;
-
/* When the new frequency is lower than current frequency */
- if ((freqs.new < freqs.old) ||
- ((freqs.new > freqs.old) && safe_arm_volt)) {
+ if ((target_freq < old_freq) ||
+ ((target_freq > old_freq) && safe_arm_volt)) {
/* down the voltage after frequency change */
regulator_set_voltage(arm_regulator, arm_volt,
arm_volt);
@@ -142,7 +131,6 @@ post_notify:
}
out:
-
cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
return ret;
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread* [PATCH 12/34] cpufreq: exynos: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c | 28 ++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
index b1db082..0f87a29 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
@@ -25,7 +25,6 @@
static struct exynos_dvfs_info *exynos_info;
static struct regulator *arm_regulator;
-static struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
static unsigned int locking_frequency;
static bool frequency_locked;
@@ -59,18 +58,18 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_scale(unsigned int target_freq)
struct cpufreq_policy *policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(0);
unsigned int arm_volt, safe_arm_volt = 0;
unsigned int mpll_freq_khz = exynos_info->mpll_freq_khz;
+ unsigned int old_freq;
int index, old_index;
int ret = 0;
- freqs.old = policy->cur;
- freqs.new = target_freq;
+ old_freq = policy->cur;
/*
* The policy max have been changed so that we cannot get proper
* old_index with cpufreq_frequency_table_target(). Thus, ignore
* policy and get the index from the raw freqeuncy table.
*/
- old_index = exynos_cpufreq_get_index(freqs.old);
+ old_index = exynos_cpufreq_get_index(old_freq);
if (old_index < 0) {
ret = old_index;
goto out;
@@ -95,17 +94,14 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_scale(unsigned int target_freq)
}
arm_volt = volt_table[index];
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
/* When the new frequency is higher than current frequency */
- if ((freqs.new > freqs.old) && !safe_arm_volt) {
+ if ((target_freq > old_freq) && !safe_arm_volt) {
/* Firstly, voltage up to increase frequency */
ret = regulator_set_voltage(arm_regulator, arm_volt, arm_volt);
if (ret) {
pr_err("%s: failed to set cpu voltage to %d\n",
__func__, arm_volt);
- freqs.new = freqs.old;
- goto post_notify;
+ return ret;
}
}
@@ -115,22 +111,15 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_scale(unsigned int target_freq)
if (ret) {
pr_err("%s: failed to set cpu voltage to %d\n",
__func__, safe_arm_volt);
- freqs.new = freqs.old;
- goto post_notify;
+ return ret;
}
}
exynos_info->set_freq(old_index, index);
-post_notify:
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
- if (ret)
- goto out;
-
/* When the new frequency is lower than current frequency */
- if ((freqs.new < freqs.old) ||
- ((freqs.new > freqs.old) && safe_arm_volt)) {
+ if ((target_freq < old_freq) ||
+ ((target_freq > old_freq) && safe_arm_volt)) {
/* down the voltage after frequency change */
regulator_set_voltage(arm_regulator, arm_volt,
arm_volt);
@@ -142,7 +131,6 @@ post_notify:
}
out:
-
cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
return ret;
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 13/34] cpufreq: exynos5440: set CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION flag
2013-08-16 2:24 ` Viresh Kumar
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rjw
Cc: linaro-kernel, patches, cpufreq, linux-pm, linux-kernel,
linux-arm-kernel, Viresh Kumar, Kukjin Kim
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, but this drivers needs to do this notification itself and so
it sets its CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION flag.
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c
index 91a64d6..8fb6183 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c
@@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
}
static struct cpufreq_driver exynos_driver = {
- .flags = CPUFREQ_STICKY,
+ .flags = CPUFREQ_STICKY | CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION,
.verify = cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify,
.target_index = exynos_target,
.get = exynos_getspeed,
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread* [PATCH 13/34] cpufreq: exynos5440: set CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION flag
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, but this drivers needs to do this notification itself and so
it sets its CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION flag.
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c
index 91a64d6..8fb6183 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c
@@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
}
static struct cpufreq_driver exynos_driver = {
- .flags = CPUFREQ_STICKY,
+ .flags = CPUFREQ_STICKY | CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION,
.verify = cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify,
.target_index = exynos_target,
.get = exynos_getspeed,
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 13/34] cpufreq: exynos5440: set CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION flag
2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
@ 2013-08-18 10:54 ` amit daniel kachhap
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: amit daniel kachhap @ 2013-08-18 10:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Viresh Kumar
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, linaro-kernel, patches, cpufreq, linux-pm,
linux-kernel, LAK, Kukjin Kim
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 7:55 AM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
> Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
>
> struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
> freqs.old = old freq...
> freqs.new = new freq...
>
> cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
>
> /* Change rate here */
>
> cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
>
> This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
> good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
>
> Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
> frequency change, but this drivers needs to do this notification itself and so
> it sets its CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION flag.
>
> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
The code change looks fine,
Acked-By: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Thanks
Amit Daniel
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c
> index 91a64d6..8fb6183 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c
> @@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> }
>
> static struct cpufreq_driver exynos_driver = {
> - .flags = CPUFREQ_STICKY,
> + .flags = CPUFREQ_STICKY | CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION,
> .verify = cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify,
> .target_index = exynos_target,
> .get = exynos_getspeed,
> --
> 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread* [PATCH 13/34] cpufreq: exynos5440: set CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION flag
@ 2013-08-18 10:54 ` amit daniel kachhap
0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: amit daniel kachhap @ 2013-08-18 10:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 7:55 AM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
> Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
>
> struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
> freqs.old = old freq...
> freqs.new = new freq...
>
> cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
>
> /* Change rate here */
>
> cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
>
> This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
> good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
>
> Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
> frequency change, but this drivers needs to do this notification itself and so
> it sets its CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION flag.
>
> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
The code change looks fine,
Acked-By: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Thanks
Amit Daniel
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c
> index 91a64d6..8fb6183 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c
> @@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> }
>
> static struct cpufreq_driver exynos_driver = {
> - .flags = CPUFREQ_STICKY,
> + .flags = CPUFREQ_STICKY | CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION,
> .verify = cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify,
> .target_index = exynos_target,
> .get = exynos_getspeed,
> --
> 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread* RE: [PATCH 13/34] cpufreq: exynos5440: set CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION flag
2013-08-18 10:54 ` amit daniel kachhap
@ 2013-08-18 21:57 ` Kukjin Kim
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Kukjin Kim @ 2013-08-18 21:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'amit daniel kachhap', 'Viresh Kumar'
Cc: 'Rafael J. Wysocki',
linaro-kernel, patches, cpufreq, linux-pm, linux-kernel,
'LAK'
amit daniel kachhap wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 7:55 AM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> wrote:
> > Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
> >
> > struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
> > freqs.old = old freq...
> > freqs.new = new freq...
> >
> > cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
> >
> > /* Change rate here */
> >
> > cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
> >
> > This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't
> exists a
> > good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
> >
> > Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq
> notification on
> > frequency change, but this drivers needs to do this notification itself
> and so
> > it sets its CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION flag.
> >
> > Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Thanks,
Kukjin
> > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> The code change looks fine,
> Acked-By: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
>
> Thanks
> Amit Daniel
> > ---
> > drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c
> b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c
> > index 91a64d6..8fb6183 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c
> > @@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct
> cpufreq_policy *policy)
> > }
> >
> > static struct cpufreq_driver exynos_driver = {
> > - .flags = CPUFREQ_STICKY,
> > + .flags = CPUFREQ_STICKY | CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION,
> > .verify = cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify,
> > .target_index = exynos_target,
> > .get = exynos_getspeed,
> > --
> > 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread* [PATCH 13/34] cpufreq: exynos5440: set CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION flag
@ 2013-08-18 21:57 ` Kukjin Kim
0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Kukjin Kim @ 2013-08-18 21:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
amit daniel kachhap wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 7:55 AM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> wrote:
> > Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
> >
> > struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
> > freqs.old = old freq...
> > freqs.new = new freq...
> >
> > cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
> >
> > /* Change rate here */
> >
> > cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
> >
> > This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't
> exists a
> > good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
> >
> > Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq
> notification on
> > frequency change, but this drivers needs to do this notification itself
> and so
> > it sets its CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION flag.
> >
> > Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Thanks,
Kukjin
> > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> The code change looks fine,
> Acked-By: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
>
> Thanks
> Amit Daniel
> > ---
> > drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c
> b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c
> > index 91a64d6..8fb6183 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c
> > @@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct
> cpufreq_policy *policy)
> > }
> >
> > static struct cpufreq_driver exynos_driver = {
> > - .flags = CPUFREQ_STICKY,
> > + .flags = CPUFREQ_STICKY | CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION,
> > .verify = cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify,
> > .target_index = exynos_target,
> > .get = exynos_getspeed,
> > --
> > 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 13/34] cpufreq: exynos5440: set CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION flag
2013-08-18 10:54 ` amit daniel kachhap
@ 2013-08-19 3:42 ` amit daniel kachhap
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: amit daniel kachhap @ 2013-08-19 3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Viresh Kumar
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, linaro-kernel, patches, cpufreq, linux-pm,
linux-kernel, LAK, Kukjin Kim
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 4:24 PM, amit daniel kachhap
<amit.daniel@samsung.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 7:55 AM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
>> Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
>>
>> struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
>> freqs.old = old freq...
>> freqs.new = new freq...
>>
>> cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
>>
>> /* Change rate here */
>>
>> cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
>>
>> This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
>> good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
>>
>> Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
>> frequency change, but this drivers needs to do this notification itself and so
>> it sets its CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION flag.
>>
>> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> The code change looks fine,
> Acked-By: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
>
> Thanks
> Amit Daniel
>> ---
>> drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c
>> index 91a64d6..8fb6183 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c
>> @@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>> }
>>
>> static struct cpufreq_driver exynos_driver = {
>> - .flags = CPUFREQ_STICKY,
>> + .flags = CPUFREQ_STICKY | CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION,
How about naming the flag as CPUFREQ_ASYNC_NOTIFICATION? For platforms
not defining this flag, the notifiers can be called synchronously from
the core driver.
Thanks,
Amit Daniel
>> .verify = cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify,
>> .target_index = exynos_target,
>> .get = exynos_getspeed,
>> --
>> 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread* [PATCH 13/34] cpufreq: exynos5440: set CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION flag
@ 2013-08-19 3:42 ` amit daniel kachhap
0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: amit daniel kachhap @ 2013-08-19 3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 4:24 PM, amit daniel kachhap
<amit.daniel@samsung.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 7:55 AM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
>> Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
>>
>> struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
>> freqs.old = old freq...
>> freqs.new = new freq...
>>
>> cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
>>
>> /* Change rate here */
>>
>> cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
>>
>> This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
>> good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
>>
>> Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
>> frequency change, but this drivers needs to do this notification itself and so
>> it sets its CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION flag.
>>
>> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> The code change looks fine,
> Acked-By: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
>
> Thanks
> Amit Daniel
>> ---
>> drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c
>> index 91a64d6..8fb6183 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c
>> @@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>> }
>>
>> static struct cpufreq_driver exynos_driver = {
>> - .flags = CPUFREQ_STICKY,
>> + .flags = CPUFREQ_STICKY | CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION,
How about naming the flag as CPUFREQ_ASYNC_NOTIFICATION? For platforms
not defining this flag, the notifiers can be called synchronously from
the core driver.
Thanks,
Amit Daniel
>> .verify = cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify,
>> .target_index = exynos_target,
>> .get = exynos_getspeed,
>> --
>> 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 13/34] cpufreq: exynos5440: set CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION flag
2013-08-19 3:42 ` amit daniel kachhap
@ 2013-08-19 4:40 ` Viresh Kumar
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-19 4:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: amit daniel kachhap
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, linaro-kernel, patches, cpufreq, linux-pm,
linux-kernel, LAK, Kukjin Kim
On 19 August 2013 09:12, amit daniel kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com> wrote:
>>> + .flags = CPUFREQ_STICKY | CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION,
> How about naming the flag as CPUFREQ_ASYNC_NOTIFICATION? For platforms
> not defining this flag, the notifiers can be called synchronously from
> the core driver.
Nice.. +1
My repo will be updated with this change..
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 13/34] cpufreq: exynos5440: set CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION flag
@ 2013-08-19 4:40 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-19 4:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 19 August 2013 09:12, amit daniel kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com> wrote:
>>> + .flags = CPUFREQ_STICKY | CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION,
> How about naming the flag as CPUFREQ_ASYNC_NOTIFICATION? For platforms
> not defining this flag, the notifiers can be called synchronously from
> the core driver.
Nice.. +1
My repo will be updated with this change..
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 14/34] cpufreq: ia64-acpi: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
2013-08-16 2:24 ` Viresh Kumar
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rjw
Cc: linaro-kernel, patches, cpufreq, linux-pm, linux-kernel,
linux-arm-kernel, Viresh Kumar, Tony Luck
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/ia64-acpi-cpufreq.c | 19 -------------------
1 file changed, 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/ia64-acpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/ia64-acpi-cpufreq.c
index 4695fa2..53c6ac6 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/ia64-acpi-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/ia64-acpi-cpufreq.c
@@ -141,7 +141,6 @@ processor_set_freq (
{
int ret = 0;
u32 value = 0;
- struct cpufreq_freqs cpufreq_freqs;
cpumask_t saved_mask;
int retval;
@@ -168,13 +167,6 @@ processor_set_freq (
pr_debug("Transitioning from P%d to P%d\n",
data->acpi_data.state, state);
- /* cpufreq frequency struct */
- cpufreq_freqs.old = data->freq_table[data->acpi_data.state].frequency;
- cpufreq_freqs.new = data->freq_table[state].frequency;
-
- /* notify cpufreq */
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &cpufreq_freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
/*
* First we write the target state's 'control' value to the
* control_register.
@@ -186,22 +178,11 @@ processor_set_freq (
ret = processor_set_pstate(value);
if (ret) {
- unsigned int tmp = cpufreq_freqs.new;
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &cpufreq_freqs,
- CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
- cpufreq_freqs.new = cpufreq_freqs.old;
- cpufreq_freqs.old = tmp;
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &cpufreq_freqs,
- CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &cpufreq_freqs,
- CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
printk(KERN_WARNING "Transition failed with error %d\n", ret);
retval = -ENODEV;
goto migrate_end;
}
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &cpufreq_freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
data->acpi_data.state = state;
retval = 0;
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread* [PATCH 14/34] cpufreq: ia64-acpi: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/ia64-acpi-cpufreq.c | 19 -------------------
1 file changed, 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/ia64-acpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/ia64-acpi-cpufreq.c
index 4695fa2..53c6ac6 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/ia64-acpi-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/ia64-acpi-cpufreq.c
@@ -141,7 +141,6 @@ processor_set_freq (
{
int ret = 0;
u32 value = 0;
- struct cpufreq_freqs cpufreq_freqs;
cpumask_t saved_mask;
int retval;
@@ -168,13 +167,6 @@ processor_set_freq (
pr_debug("Transitioning from P%d to P%d\n",
data->acpi_data.state, state);
- /* cpufreq frequency struct */
- cpufreq_freqs.old = data->freq_table[data->acpi_data.state].frequency;
- cpufreq_freqs.new = data->freq_table[state].frequency;
-
- /* notify cpufreq */
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &cpufreq_freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
/*
* First we write the target state's 'control' value to the
* control_register.
@@ -186,22 +178,11 @@ processor_set_freq (
ret = processor_set_pstate(value);
if (ret) {
- unsigned int tmp = cpufreq_freqs.new;
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &cpufreq_freqs,
- CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
- cpufreq_freqs.new = cpufreq_freqs.old;
- cpufreq_freqs.old = tmp;
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &cpufreq_freqs,
- CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &cpufreq_freqs,
- CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
printk(KERN_WARNING "Transition failed with error %d\n", ret);
retval = -ENODEV;
goto migrate_end;
}
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &cpufreq_freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
data->acpi_data.state = state;
retval = 0;
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 15/34] cpufreq: imx6q: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
2013-08-16 2:24 ` Viresh Kumar
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rjw
Cc: linaro-kernel, patches, cpufreq, linux-pm, linux-kernel,
linux-arm-kernel, Viresh Kumar, Shawn Guo
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++-----------------------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
index 04a32fb..f35c674 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
@@ -41,14 +41,14 @@ static unsigned int imx6q_get_speed(unsigned int cpu)
static int imx6q_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
{
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
struct opp *opp;
unsigned long freq_hz, volt, volt_old;
+ unsigned int old_freq, new_freq;
int ret;
- freqs.new = freq_table[index].frequency;
- freq_hz = freqs.new * 1000;
- freqs.old = clk_get_rate(arm_clk) / 1000;
+ new_freq = freq_table[index].frequency;
+ freq_hz = new_freq * 1000;
+ old_freq = clk_get_rate(arm_clk) / 1000;
rcu_read_lock();
opp = opp_find_freq_ceil(cpu_dev, &freq_hz);
@@ -63,26 +63,23 @@ static int imx6q_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
volt_old = regulator_get_voltage(arm_reg);
dev_dbg(cpu_dev, "%u MHz, %ld mV --> %u MHz, %ld mV\n",
- freqs.old / 1000, volt_old / 1000,
- freqs.new / 1000, volt / 1000);
-
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
+ old_freq / 1000, volt_old / 1000,
+ new_freq / 1000, volt / 1000);
/* scaling up? scale voltage before frequency */
- if (freqs.new > freqs.old) {
+ if (new_freq > old_freq) {
ret = regulator_set_voltage_tol(arm_reg, volt, 0);
if (ret) {
dev_err(cpu_dev,
"failed to scale vddarm up: %d\n", ret);
- freqs.new = freqs.old;
- goto post_notify;
+ return ret;
}
/*
* Need to increase vddpu and vddsoc for safety
* if we are about to run at 1.2 GHz.
*/
- if (freqs.new == FREQ_1P2_GHZ / 1000) {
+ if (new_freq == FREQ_1P2_GHZ / 1000) {
regulator_set_voltage_tol(pu_reg,
PU_SOC_VOLTAGE_HIGH, 0);
regulator_set_voltage_tol(soc_reg,
@@ -103,13 +100,13 @@ static int imx6q_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
clk_set_parent(step_clk, pll2_pfd2_396m_clk);
clk_set_parent(pll1_sw_clk, step_clk);
if (freq_hz > clk_get_rate(pll2_pfd2_396m_clk)) {
- clk_set_rate(pll1_sys_clk, freqs.new * 1000);
+ clk_set_rate(pll1_sys_clk, new_freq * 1000);
/*
* If we are leaving 396 MHz set-point, we need to enable
* pll1_sys_clk and disable pll2_pfd2_396m_clk to keep
* their use count correct.
*/
- if (freqs.old * 1000 <= clk_get_rate(pll2_pfd2_396m_clk)) {
+ if (old_freq * 1000 <= clk_get_rate(pll2_pfd2_396m_clk)) {
clk_prepare_enable(pll1_sys_clk);
clk_disable_unprepare(pll2_pfd2_396m_clk);
}
@@ -124,16 +121,15 @@ static int imx6q_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
}
/* Ensure the arm clock divider is what we expect */
- ret = clk_set_rate(arm_clk, freqs.new * 1000);
+ ret = clk_set_rate(arm_clk, new_freq * 1000);
if (ret) {
dev_err(cpu_dev, "failed to set clock rate: %d\n", ret);
regulator_set_voltage_tol(arm_reg, volt_old, 0);
- freqs.new = freqs.old;
- goto post_notify;
+ return ret;
}
/* scaling down? scale voltage after frequency */
- if (freqs.new < freqs.old) {
+ if (new_freq < old_freq) {
ret = regulator_set_voltage_tol(arm_reg, volt, 0);
if (ret) {
dev_warn(cpu_dev,
@@ -141,7 +137,7 @@ static int imx6q_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
ret = 0;
}
- if (freqs.old == FREQ_1P2_GHZ / 1000) {
+ if (old_freq == FREQ_1P2_GHZ / 1000) {
regulator_set_voltage_tol(pu_reg,
PU_SOC_VOLTAGE_NORMAL, 0);
regulator_set_voltage_tol(soc_reg,
@@ -149,10 +145,7 @@ static int imx6q_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
}
}
-post_notify:
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
- return ret;
+ return 0;
}
static int imx6q_cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread* [PATCH 15/34] cpufreq: imx6q: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++-----------------------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
index 04a32fb..f35c674 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
@@ -41,14 +41,14 @@ static unsigned int imx6q_get_speed(unsigned int cpu)
static int imx6q_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
{
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
struct opp *opp;
unsigned long freq_hz, volt, volt_old;
+ unsigned int old_freq, new_freq;
int ret;
- freqs.new = freq_table[index].frequency;
- freq_hz = freqs.new * 1000;
- freqs.old = clk_get_rate(arm_clk) / 1000;
+ new_freq = freq_table[index].frequency;
+ freq_hz = new_freq * 1000;
+ old_freq = clk_get_rate(arm_clk) / 1000;
rcu_read_lock();
opp = opp_find_freq_ceil(cpu_dev, &freq_hz);
@@ -63,26 +63,23 @@ static int imx6q_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
volt_old = regulator_get_voltage(arm_reg);
dev_dbg(cpu_dev, "%u MHz, %ld mV --> %u MHz, %ld mV\n",
- freqs.old / 1000, volt_old / 1000,
- freqs.new / 1000, volt / 1000);
-
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
+ old_freq / 1000, volt_old / 1000,
+ new_freq / 1000, volt / 1000);
/* scaling up? scale voltage before frequency */
- if (freqs.new > freqs.old) {
+ if (new_freq > old_freq) {
ret = regulator_set_voltage_tol(arm_reg, volt, 0);
if (ret) {
dev_err(cpu_dev,
"failed to scale vddarm up: %d\n", ret);
- freqs.new = freqs.old;
- goto post_notify;
+ return ret;
}
/*
* Need to increase vddpu and vddsoc for safety
* if we are about to run at 1.2 GHz.
*/
- if (freqs.new == FREQ_1P2_GHZ / 1000) {
+ if (new_freq == FREQ_1P2_GHZ / 1000) {
regulator_set_voltage_tol(pu_reg,
PU_SOC_VOLTAGE_HIGH, 0);
regulator_set_voltage_tol(soc_reg,
@@ -103,13 +100,13 @@ static int imx6q_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
clk_set_parent(step_clk, pll2_pfd2_396m_clk);
clk_set_parent(pll1_sw_clk, step_clk);
if (freq_hz > clk_get_rate(pll2_pfd2_396m_clk)) {
- clk_set_rate(pll1_sys_clk, freqs.new * 1000);
+ clk_set_rate(pll1_sys_clk, new_freq * 1000);
/*
* If we are leaving 396 MHz set-point, we need to enable
* pll1_sys_clk and disable pll2_pfd2_396m_clk to keep
* their use count correct.
*/
- if (freqs.old * 1000 <= clk_get_rate(pll2_pfd2_396m_clk)) {
+ if (old_freq * 1000 <= clk_get_rate(pll2_pfd2_396m_clk)) {
clk_prepare_enable(pll1_sys_clk);
clk_disable_unprepare(pll2_pfd2_396m_clk);
}
@@ -124,16 +121,15 @@ static int imx6q_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
}
/* Ensure the arm clock divider is what we expect */
- ret = clk_set_rate(arm_clk, freqs.new * 1000);
+ ret = clk_set_rate(arm_clk, new_freq * 1000);
if (ret) {
dev_err(cpu_dev, "failed to set clock rate: %d\n", ret);
regulator_set_voltage_tol(arm_reg, volt_old, 0);
- freqs.new = freqs.old;
- goto post_notify;
+ return ret;
}
/* scaling down? scale voltage after frequency */
- if (freqs.new < freqs.old) {
+ if (new_freq < old_freq) {
ret = regulator_set_voltage_tol(arm_reg, volt, 0);
if (ret) {
dev_warn(cpu_dev,
@@ -141,7 +137,7 @@ static int imx6q_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
ret = 0;
}
- if (freqs.old == FREQ_1P2_GHZ / 1000) {
+ if (old_freq == FREQ_1P2_GHZ / 1000) {
regulator_set_voltage_tol(pu_reg,
PU_SOC_VOLTAGE_NORMAL, 0);
regulator_set_voltage_tol(soc_reg,
@@ -149,10 +145,7 @@ static int imx6q_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
}
}
-post_notify:
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
- return ret;
+ return 0;
}
static int imx6q_cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 16/34] cpufreq: kirkwood: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
2013-08-16 2:24 ` Viresh Kumar
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rjw
Cc: linaro-kernel, patches, cpufreq, linux-pm, linux-kernel,
linux-arm-kernel, Viresh Kumar, Andrew Lunn
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c | 54 ++++++++++++++------------------------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c
index c3d6987..fcf461e 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c
@@ -58,48 +58,34 @@ static unsigned int kirkwood_cpufreq_get_cpu_frequency(unsigned int cpu)
static int kirkwood_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int index)
{
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
unsigned int state = kirkwood_freq_table[index].driver_data;
unsigned long reg;
- freqs.old = kirkwood_cpufreq_get_cpu_frequency(0);
- freqs.new = kirkwood_freq_table[index].frequency;
+ local_irq_disable();
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
+ /* Disable interrupts to the CPU */
+ reg = readl_relaxed(priv.base);
+ reg |= CPU_SW_INT_BLK;
+ writel_relaxed(reg, priv.base);
- dev_dbg(priv.dev, "Attempting to set frequency to %i KHz\n",
- kirkwood_freq_table[index].frequency);
- dev_dbg(priv.dev, "old frequency was %i KHz\n",
- kirkwood_cpufreq_get_cpu_frequency(0));
-
- if (freqs.old != freqs.new) {
- local_irq_disable();
-
- /* Disable interrupts to the CPU */
- reg = readl_relaxed(priv.base);
- reg |= CPU_SW_INT_BLK;
- writel_relaxed(reg, priv.base);
-
- switch (state) {
- case STATE_CPU_FREQ:
- clk_disable(priv.powersave_clk);
- break;
- case STATE_DDR_FREQ:
- clk_enable(priv.powersave_clk);
- break;
- }
+ switch (state) {
+ case STATE_CPU_FREQ:
+ clk_disable(priv.powersave_clk);
+ break;
+ case STATE_DDR_FREQ:
+ clk_enable(priv.powersave_clk);
+ break;
+ }
- /* Wait-for-Interrupt, while the hardware changes frequency */
- cpu_do_idle();
+ /* Wait-for-Interrupt, while the hardware changes frequency */
+ cpu_do_idle();
- /* Enable interrupts to the CPU */
- reg = readl_relaxed(priv.base);
- reg &= ~CPU_SW_INT_BLK;
- writel_relaxed(reg, priv.base);
+ /* Enable interrupts to the CPU */
+ reg = readl_relaxed(priv.base);
+ reg &= ~CPU_SW_INT_BLK;
+ writel_relaxed(reg, priv.base);
- local_irq_enable();
- }
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
+ local_irq_enable();
return 0;
}
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread* [PATCH 16/34] cpufreq: kirkwood: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c | 54 ++++++++++++++------------------------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c
index c3d6987..fcf461e 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c
@@ -58,48 +58,34 @@ static unsigned int kirkwood_cpufreq_get_cpu_frequency(unsigned int cpu)
static int kirkwood_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int index)
{
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
unsigned int state = kirkwood_freq_table[index].driver_data;
unsigned long reg;
- freqs.old = kirkwood_cpufreq_get_cpu_frequency(0);
- freqs.new = kirkwood_freq_table[index].frequency;
+ local_irq_disable();
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
+ /* Disable interrupts to the CPU */
+ reg = readl_relaxed(priv.base);
+ reg |= CPU_SW_INT_BLK;
+ writel_relaxed(reg, priv.base);
- dev_dbg(priv.dev, "Attempting to set frequency to %i KHz\n",
- kirkwood_freq_table[index].frequency);
- dev_dbg(priv.dev, "old frequency was %i KHz\n",
- kirkwood_cpufreq_get_cpu_frequency(0));
-
- if (freqs.old != freqs.new) {
- local_irq_disable();
-
- /* Disable interrupts to the CPU */
- reg = readl_relaxed(priv.base);
- reg |= CPU_SW_INT_BLK;
- writel_relaxed(reg, priv.base);
-
- switch (state) {
- case STATE_CPU_FREQ:
- clk_disable(priv.powersave_clk);
- break;
- case STATE_DDR_FREQ:
- clk_enable(priv.powersave_clk);
- break;
- }
+ switch (state) {
+ case STATE_CPU_FREQ:
+ clk_disable(priv.powersave_clk);
+ break;
+ case STATE_DDR_FREQ:
+ clk_enable(priv.powersave_clk);
+ break;
+ }
- /* Wait-for-Interrupt, while the hardware changes frequency */
- cpu_do_idle();
+ /* Wait-for-Interrupt, while the hardware changes frequency */
+ cpu_do_idle();
- /* Enable interrupts to the CPU */
- reg = readl_relaxed(priv.base);
- reg &= ~CPU_SW_INT_BLK;
- writel_relaxed(reg, priv.base);
+ /* Enable interrupts to the CPU */
+ reg = readl_relaxed(priv.base);
+ reg &= ~CPU_SW_INT_BLK;
+ writel_relaxed(reg, priv.base);
- local_irq_enable();
- }
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
+ local_irq_enable();
return 0;
}
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 17/34] cpufreq: longhaul: set CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION flag
2013-08-16 2:24 ` Viresh Kumar
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rjw
Cc: linaro-kernel, patches, cpufreq, linux-pm, linux-kernel,
linux-arm-kernel, Viresh Kumar
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, but this drivers needs to do this notification itself and so
it sets its CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION flag.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/longhaul.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/longhaul.c b/drivers/cpufreq/longhaul.c
index 45bafdd..7359043 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/longhaul.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/longhaul.c
@@ -909,6 +909,7 @@ static int longhaul_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
}
static struct cpufreq_driver longhaul_driver = {
+ .flags = CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION,
.verify = cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify,
.target_index = longhaul_target,
.get = longhaul_get,
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread* [PATCH 17/34] cpufreq: longhaul: set CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION flag
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, but this drivers needs to do this notification itself and so
it sets its CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION flag.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/longhaul.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/longhaul.c b/drivers/cpufreq/longhaul.c
index 45bafdd..7359043 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/longhaul.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/longhaul.c
@@ -909,6 +909,7 @@ static int longhaul_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
}
static struct cpufreq_driver longhaul_driver = {
+ .flags = CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION,
.verify = cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify,
.target_index = longhaul_target,
.get = longhaul_get,
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 18/34] cpufreq: loongson2: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
2013-08-16 2:24 ` Viresh Kumar
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rjw
Cc: linaro-kernel, patches, cpufreq, linux-pm, linux-kernel,
linux-arm-kernel, Viresh Kumar, John Crispin
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Cc: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/loongson2_cpufreq.c | 16 ----------------
1 file changed, 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/loongson2_cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/loongson2_cpufreq.c
index c33347c..6232d29 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/loongson2_cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/loongson2_cpufreq.c
@@ -57,7 +57,6 @@ static int loongson2_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
{
unsigned int cpu = policy->cpu;
cpumask_t cpus_allowed;
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
unsigned int freq;
cpus_allowed = current->cpus_allowed;
@@ -67,26 +66,11 @@ static int loongson2_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
((cpu_clock_freq / 1000) *
loongson2_clockmod_table[index].driver_data) / 8;
- pr_debug("cpufreq: requested frequency %u Hz\n",
- loongson2_clockmod_table[index].frequency * 1000);
-
- freqs.old = loongson2_cpufreq_get(cpu);
- freqs.new = freq;
- freqs.flags = 0;
-
- /* notifiers */
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, &cpus_allowed);
/* setting the cpu frequency */
clk_set_rate(cpuclk, freq);
- /* notifiers */
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
- pr_debug("cpufreq: set frequency %u kHz\n", freq);
-
return 0;
}
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread* [PATCH 18/34] cpufreq: loongson2: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Cc: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/loongson2_cpufreq.c | 16 ----------------
1 file changed, 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/loongson2_cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/loongson2_cpufreq.c
index c33347c..6232d29 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/loongson2_cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/loongson2_cpufreq.c
@@ -57,7 +57,6 @@ static int loongson2_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
{
unsigned int cpu = policy->cpu;
cpumask_t cpus_allowed;
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
unsigned int freq;
cpus_allowed = current->cpus_allowed;
@@ -67,26 +66,11 @@ static int loongson2_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
((cpu_clock_freq / 1000) *
loongson2_clockmod_table[index].driver_data) / 8;
- pr_debug("cpufreq: requested frequency %u Hz\n",
- loongson2_clockmod_table[index].frequency * 1000);
-
- freqs.old = loongson2_cpufreq_get(cpu);
- freqs.new = freq;
- freqs.flags = 0;
-
- /* notifiers */
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, &cpus_allowed);
/* setting the cpu frequency */
clk_set_rate(cpuclk, freq);
- /* notifiers */
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
- pr_debug("cpufreq: set frequency %u kHz\n", freq);
-
return 0;
}
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 19/34] cpufreq: maple: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
2013-08-16 2:24 ` Viresh Kumar
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rjw
Cc: linaro-kernel, patches, cpufreq, linux-pm, linux-kernel,
linux-arm-kernel, Viresh Kumar, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/maple-cpufreq.c | 18 +-----------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/maple-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/maple-cpufreq.c
index b508147..45db7a2 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/maple-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/maple-cpufreq.c
@@ -69,8 +69,6 @@ static struct cpufreq_frequency_table maple_cpu_freqs[] = {
*/
static int maple_pmode_cur;
-static DEFINE_MUTEX(maple_switch_mutex);
-
static const u32 *maple_pmode_data;
static int maple_pmode_max;
@@ -133,21 +131,7 @@ static int maple_scom_query_freq(void)
static int maple_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int index)
{
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
- int rc;
-
- mutex_lock(&maple_switch_mutex);
-
- freqs.old = maple_cpu_freqs[maple_pmode_cur].frequency;
- freqs.new = maple_cpu_freqs[index].frequency;
-
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
- rc = maple_scom_switch_freq(index);
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
- mutex_unlock(&maple_switch_mutex);
-
- return rc;
+ return maple_scom_switch_freq(index);
}
static unsigned int maple_cpufreq_get_speed(unsigned int cpu)
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread* [PATCH 19/34] cpufreq: maple: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/maple-cpufreq.c | 18 +-----------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/maple-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/maple-cpufreq.c
index b508147..45db7a2 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/maple-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/maple-cpufreq.c
@@ -69,8 +69,6 @@ static struct cpufreq_frequency_table maple_cpu_freqs[] = {
*/
static int maple_pmode_cur;
-static DEFINE_MUTEX(maple_switch_mutex);
-
static const u32 *maple_pmode_data;
static int maple_pmode_max;
@@ -133,21 +131,7 @@ static int maple_scom_query_freq(void)
static int maple_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int index)
{
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
- int rc;
-
- mutex_lock(&maple_switch_mutex);
-
- freqs.old = maple_cpu_freqs[maple_pmode_cur].frequency;
- freqs.new = maple_cpu_freqs[index].frequency;
-
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
- rc = maple_scom_switch_freq(index);
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
- mutex_unlock(&maple_switch_mutex);
-
- return rc;
+ return maple_scom_switch_freq(index);
}
static unsigned int maple_cpufreq_get_speed(unsigned int cpu)
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 20/34] cpufreq: omap: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
2013-08-16 2:24 ` Viresh Kumar
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rjw
Cc: linaro-kernel, patches, cpufreq, linux-pm, linux-kernel,
linux-arm-kernel, Viresh Kumar, Santosh Shilimkar
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/omap-cpufreq.c | 39 ++++++++++++++-------------------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/omap-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/omap-cpufreq.c
index 92d45e6..97610a3 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/omap-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/omap-cpufreq.c
@@ -53,15 +53,15 @@ static unsigned int omap_getspeed(unsigned int cpu)
static int omap_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
{
- int r, ret = 0;
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
+ int r, ret;
struct opp *opp;
unsigned long freq, volt = 0, volt_old = 0, tol = 0;
+ unsigned int old_freq, new_freq;
- freqs.old = omap_getspeed(policy->cpu);
- freqs.new = freq_table[index].frequency;
+ old_freq = omap_getspeed(policy->cpu);
+ new_freq = freq_table[index].frequency;
- freq = freqs.new * 1000;
+ freq = new_freq * 1000;
ret = clk_round_rate(mpu_clk, freq);
if (IS_ERR_VALUE(ret)) {
dev_warn(mpu_dev,
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ static int omap_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
if (IS_ERR(opp)) {
rcu_read_unlock();
dev_err(mpu_dev, "%s: unable to find MPU OPP for %d\n",
- __func__, freqs.new);
+ __func__, new_freq);
return -EINVAL;
}
volt = opp_get_voltage(opp);
@@ -87,43 +87,32 @@ static int omap_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
}
dev_dbg(mpu_dev, "cpufreq-omap: %u MHz, %ld mV --> %u MHz, %ld mV\n",
- freqs.old / 1000, volt_old ? volt_old / 1000 : -1,
- freqs.new / 1000, volt ? volt / 1000 : -1);
-
- /* notifiers */
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
+ old_freq / 1000, volt_old ? volt_old / 1000 : -1,
+ new_freq / 1000, volt ? volt / 1000 : -1);
/* scaling up? scale voltage before frequency */
- if (mpu_reg && (freqs.new > freqs.old)) {
+ if (mpu_reg && (new_freq > old_freq)) {
r = regulator_set_voltage(mpu_reg, volt - tol, volt + tol);
if (r < 0) {
dev_warn(mpu_dev, "%s: unable to scale voltage up.\n",
__func__);
- freqs.new = freqs.old;
- goto done;
+ return r;
}
}
- ret = clk_set_rate(mpu_clk, freqs.new * 1000);
+ ret = clk_set_rate(mpu_clk, new_freq * 1000);
/* scaling down? scale voltage after frequency */
- if (mpu_reg && (freqs.new < freqs.old)) {
+ if (mpu_reg && (new_freq < old_freq)) {
r = regulator_set_voltage(mpu_reg, volt - tol, volt + tol);
if (r < 0) {
dev_warn(mpu_dev, "%s: unable to scale voltage down.\n",
__func__);
- ret = clk_set_rate(mpu_clk, freqs.old * 1000);
- freqs.new = freqs.old;
- goto done;
+ clk_set_rate(mpu_clk, old_freq * 1000);
+ return r;
}
}
- freqs.new = omap_getspeed(policy->cpu);
-
-done:
- /* notifiers */
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
return ret;
}
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread* [PATCH 20/34] cpufreq: omap: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/omap-cpufreq.c | 39 ++++++++++++++-------------------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/omap-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/omap-cpufreq.c
index 92d45e6..97610a3 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/omap-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/omap-cpufreq.c
@@ -53,15 +53,15 @@ static unsigned int omap_getspeed(unsigned int cpu)
static int omap_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
{
- int r, ret = 0;
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
+ int r, ret;
struct opp *opp;
unsigned long freq, volt = 0, volt_old = 0, tol = 0;
+ unsigned int old_freq, new_freq;
- freqs.old = omap_getspeed(policy->cpu);
- freqs.new = freq_table[index].frequency;
+ old_freq = omap_getspeed(policy->cpu);
+ new_freq = freq_table[index].frequency;
- freq = freqs.new * 1000;
+ freq = new_freq * 1000;
ret = clk_round_rate(mpu_clk, freq);
if (IS_ERR_VALUE(ret)) {
dev_warn(mpu_dev,
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ static int omap_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
if (IS_ERR(opp)) {
rcu_read_unlock();
dev_err(mpu_dev, "%s: unable to find MPU OPP for %d\n",
- __func__, freqs.new);
+ __func__, new_freq);
return -EINVAL;
}
volt = opp_get_voltage(opp);
@@ -87,43 +87,32 @@ static int omap_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
}
dev_dbg(mpu_dev, "cpufreq-omap: %u MHz, %ld mV --> %u MHz, %ld mV\n",
- freqs.old / 1000, volt_old ? volt_old / 1000 : -1,
- freqs.new / 1000, volt ? volt / 1000 : -1);
-
- /* notifiers */
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
+ old_freq / 1000, volt_old ? volt_old / 1000 : -1,
+ new_freq / 1000, volt ? volt / 1000 : -1);
/* scaling up? scale voltage before frequency */
- if (mpu_reg && (freqs.new > freqs.old)) {
+ if (mpu_reg && (new_freq > old_freq)) {
r = regulator_set_voltage(mpu_reg, volt - tol, volt + tol);
if (r < 0) {
dev_warn(mpu_dev, "%s: unable to scale voltage up.\n",
__func__);
- freqs.new = freqs.old;
- goto done;
+ return r;
}
}
- ret = clk_set_rate(mpu_clk, freqs.new * 1000);
+ ret = clk_set_rate(mpu_clk, new_freq * 1000);
/* scaling down? scale voltage after frequency */
- if (mpu_reg && (freqs.new < freqs.old)) {
+ if (mpu_reg && (new_freq < old_freq)) {
r = regulator_set_voltage(mpu_reg, volt - tol, volt + tol);
if (r < 0) {
dev_warn(mpu_dev, "%s: unable to scale voltage down.\n",
__func__);
- ret = clk_set_rate(mpu_clk, freqs.old * 1000);
- freqs.new = freqs.old;
- goto done;
+ clk_set_rate(mpu_clk, old_freq * 1000);
+ return r;
}
}
- freqs.new = omap_getspeed(policy->cpu);
-
-done:
- /* notifiers */
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
return ret;
}
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 21/34] cpufreq: p4-clockmod: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
2013-08-16 2:24 ` Viresh Kumar
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rjw
Cc: linaro-kernel, patches, cpufreq, linux-pm, linux-kernel,
linux-arm-kernel, Viresh Kumar, David S. Miller
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/p4-clockmod.c | 10 ----------
1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/p4-clockmod.c b/drivers/cpufreq/p4-clockmod.c
index 3c23053..3d1cba9 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/p4-clockmod.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/p4-clockmod.c
@@ -107,15 +107,8 @@ static struct cpufreq_frequency_table p4clockmod_table[] = {
static int cpufreq_p4_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
{
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
int i;
- freqs.old = cpufreq_p4_get(policy->cpu);
- freqs.new = stock_freq * p4clockmod_table[index].driver_data / 8;
-
- /* notifiers */
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
/* run on each logical CPU,
* see section 13.15.3 of IA32 Intel Architecture Software
* Developer's Manual, Volume 3
@@ -123,9 +116,6 @@ static int cpufreq_p4_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
for_each_cpu(i, policy->cpus)
cpufreq_p4_setdc(i, p4clockmod_table[index].driver_data);
- /* notifiers */
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
return 0;
}
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread* [PATCH 21/34] cpufreq: p4-clockmod: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/p4-clockmod.c | 10 ----------
1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/p4-clockmod.c b/drivers/cpufreq/p4-clockmod.c
index 3c23053..3d1cba9 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/p4-clockmod.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/p4-clockmod.c
@@ -107,15 +107,8 @@ static struct cpufreq_frequency_table p4clockmod_table[] = {
static int cpufreq_p4_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
{
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
int i;
- freqs.old = cpufreq_p4_get(policy->cpu);
- freqs.new = stock_freq * p4clockmod_table[index].driver_data / 8;
-
- /* notifiers */
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
/* run on each logical CPU,
* see section 13.15.3 of IA32 Intel Architecture Software
* Developer's Manual, Volume 3
@@ -123,9 +116,6 @@ static int cpufreq_p4_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
for_each_cpu(i, policy->cpus)
cpufreq_p4_setdc(i, p4clockmod_table[index].driver_data);
- /* notifiers */
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
return 0;
}
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 22/34] cpufreq: pasemi: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
2013-08-16 2:24 ` Viresh Kumar
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rjw
Cc: linaro-kernel, patches, cpufreq, linux-pm, linux-kernel,
linux-arm-kernel, Viresh Kumar
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/pasemi-cpufreq.c | 14 +-------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/pasemi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/pasemi-cpufreq.c
index aaee5fa..4d69958 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/pasemi-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/pasemi-cpufreq.c
@@ -51,8 +51,6 @@
static void __iomem *sdcpwr_mapbase;
static void __iomem *sdcasr_mapbase;
-static DEFINE_MUTEX(pas_switch_mutex);
-
/* Current astate, is used when waking up from power savings on
* one core, in case the other core has switched states during
* the idle time.
@@ -249,15 +247,8 @@ static int pas_cpufreq_cpu_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
static int pas_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int pas_astate_new)
{
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
int i;
- freqs.old = policy->cur;
- freqs.new = pas_freqs[pas_astate_new].frequency;
-
- mutex_lock(&pas_switch_mutex);
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
pr_debug("setting frequency for cpu %d to %d kHz, 1/%d of max frequency\n",
policy->cpu,
pas_freqs[pas_astate_new].frequency,
@@ -268,10 +259,7 @@ static int pas_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
for_each_online_cpu(i)
set_astate(i, pas_astate_new);
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
- mutex_unlock(&pas_switch_mutex);
-
- ppc_proc_freq = freqs.new * 1000ul;
+ ppc_proc_freq = pas_freqs[pas_astate_new].frequency * 1000ul;
return 0;
}
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread* [PATCH 22/34] cpufreq: pasemi: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/pasemi-cpufreq.c | 14 +-------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/pasemi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/pasemi-cpufreq.c
index aaee5fa..4d69958 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/pasemi-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/pasemi-cpufreq.c
@@ -51,8 +51,6 @@
static void __iomem *sdcpwr_mapbase;
static void __iomem *sdcasr_mapbase;
-static DEFINE_MUTEX(pas_switch_mutex);
-
/* Current astate, is used when waking up from power savings on
* one core, in case the other core has switched states during
* the idle time.
@@ -249,15 +247,8 @@ static int pas_cpufreq_cpu_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
static int pas_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int pas_astate_new)
{
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
int i;
- freqs.old = policy->cur;
- freqs.new = pas_freqs[pas_astate_new].frequency;
-
- mutex_lock(&pas_switch_mutex);
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
pr_debug("setting frequency for cpu %d to %d kHz, 1/%d of max frequency\n",
policy->cpu,
pas_freqs[pas_astate_new].frequency,
@@ -268,10 +259,7 @@ static int pas_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
for_each_online_cpu(i)
set_astate(i, pas_astate_new);
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
- mutex_unlock(&pas_switch_mutex);
-
- ppc_proc_freq = freqs.new * 1000ul;
+ ppc_proc_freq = pas_freqs[pas_astate_new].frequency * 1000ul;
return 0;
}
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 23/34] cpufreq: pmac: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
2013-08-16 2:24 ` Viresh Kumar
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rjw
Cc: linaro-kernel, patches, cpufreq, linux-pm, linux-kernel,
linux-arm-kernel, Viresh Kumar
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/pmac32-cpufreq.c | 20 ++++----------------
drivers/cpufreq/pmac64-cpufreq.c | 18 +-----------------
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/pmac32-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/pmac32-cpufreq.c
index 47c227c..c8f5d2c 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/pmac32-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/pmac32-cpufreq.c
@@ -330,21 +330,11 @@ static int pmu_set_cpu_speed(int low_speed)
return 0;
}
-static int do_set_cpu_speed(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, int speed_mode,
- int notify)
+static int do_set_cpu_speed(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, int speed_mode)
{
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
unsigned long l3cr;
static unsigned long prev_l3cr;
- freqs.old = cur_freq;
- freqs.new = (speed_mode == CPUFREQ_HIGH) ? hi_freq : low_freq;
-
- if (freqs.old == freqs.new)
- return 0;
-
- if (notify)
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
if (speed_mode == CPUFREQ_LOW &&
cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_L3CR)) {
l3cr = _get_L3CR();
@@ -360,8 +350,6 @@ static int do_set_cpu_speed(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, int speed_mode,
if ((prev_l3cr & L3CR_L3E) && l3cr != prev_l3cr)
_set_L3CR(prev_l3cr);
}
- if (notify)
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
cur_freq = (speed_mode == CPUFREQ_HIGH) ? hi_freq : low_freq;
return 0;
@@ -377,7 +365,7 @@ static int pmac_cpufreq_target( struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
{
int rc;
- rc = do_set_cpu_speed(policy, index, 1);
+ rc = do_set_cpu_speed(policy, index);
ppc_proc_freq = cur_freq * 1000ul;
return rc;
@@ -424,7 +412,7 @@ static int pmac_cpufreq_suspend(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
no_schedule = 1;
sleep_freq = cur_freq;
if (cur_freq == low_freq && !is_pmu_based)
- do_set_cpu_speed(policy, CPUFREQ_HIGH, 0);
+ do_set_cpu_speed(policy, CPUFREQ_HIGH);
return 0;
}
@@ -441,7 +429,7 @@ static int pmac_cpufreq_resume(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
* probably high speed due to our suspend() routine
*/
do_set_cpu_speed(policy, sleep_freq == low_freq ?
- CPUFREQ_LOW : CPUFREQ_HIGH, 0);
+ CPUFREQ_LOW : CPUFREQ_HIGH);
ppc_proc_freq = cur_freq * 1000ul;
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/pmac64-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/pmac64-cpufreq.c
index 63f9642..2557f16 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/pmac64-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/pmac64-cpufreq.c
@@ -78,8 +78,6 @@ static void (*g5_switch_volt)(int speed_mode);
static int (*g5_switch_freq)(int speed_mode);
static int (*g5_query_freq)(void);
-static DEFINE_MUTEX(g5_switch_mutex);
-
static unsigned long transition_latency;
#ifdef CONFIG_PMAC_SMU
@@ -313,21 +311,7 @@ static int g5_pfunc_query_freq(void)
static int g5_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
{
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
- int rc;
-
- mutex_lock(&g5_switch_mutex);
-
- freqs.old = g5_cpu_freqs[g5_pmode_cur].frequency;
- freqs.new = g5_cpu_freqs[index].frequency;
-
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
- rc = g5_switch_freq(index);
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
- mutex_unlock(&g5_switch_mutex);
-
- return rc;
+ return g5_switch_freq(index);
}
static unsigned int g5_cpufreq_get_speed(unsigned int cpu)
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread* [PATCH 23/34] cpufreq: pmac: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/pmac32-cpufreq.c | 20 ++++----------------
drivers/cpufreq/pmac64-cpufreq.c | 18 +-----------------
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/pmac32-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/pmac32-cpufreq.c
index 47c227c..c8f5d2c 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/pmac32-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/pmac32-cpufreq.c
@@ -330,21 +330,11 @@ static int pmu_set_cpu_speed(int low_speed)
return 0;
}
-static int do_set_cpu_speed(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, int speed_mode,
- int notify)
+static int do_set_cpu_speed(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, int speed_mode)
{
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
unsigned long l3cr;
static unsigned long prev_l3cr;
- freqs.old = cur_freq;
- freqs.new = (speed_mode == CPUFREQ_HIGH) ? hi_freq : low_freq;
-
- if (freqs.old == freqs.new)
- return 0;
-
- if (notify)
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
if (speed_mode == CPUFREQ_LOW &&
cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_L3CR)) {
l3cr = _get_L3CR();
@@ -360,8 +350,6 @@ static int do_set_cpu_speed(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, int speed_mode,
if ((prev_l3cr & L3CR_L3E) && l3cr != prev_l3cr)
_set_L3CR(prev_l3cr);
}
- if (notify)
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
cur_freq = (speed_mode == CPUFREQ_HIGH) ? hi_freq : low_freq;
return 0;
@@ -377,7 +365,7 @@ static int pmac_cpufreq_target( struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
{
int rc;
- rc = do_set_cpu_speed(policy, index, 1);
+ rc = do_set_cpu_speed(policy, index);
ppc_proc_freq = cur_freq * 1000ul;
return rc;
@@ -424,7 +412,7 @@ static int pmac_cpufreq_suspend(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
no_schedule = 1;
sleep_freq = cur_freq;
if (cur_freq == low_freq && !is_pmu_based)
- do_set_cpu_speed(policy, CPUFREQ_HIGH, 0);
+ do_set_cpu_speed(policy, CPUFREQ_HIGH);
return 0;
}
@@ -441,7 +429,7 @@ static int pmac_cpufreq_resume(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
* probably high speed due to our suspend() routine
*/
do_set_cpu_speed(policy, sleep_freq == low_freq ?
- CPUFREQ_LOW : CPUFREQ_HIGH, 0);
+ CPUFREQ_LOW : CPUFREQ_HIGH);
ppc_proc_freq = cur_freq * 1000ul;
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/pmac64-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/pmac64-cpufreq.c
index 63f9642..2557f16 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/pmac64-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/pmac64-cpufreq.c
@@ -78,8 +78,6 @@ static void (*g5_switch_volt)(int speed_mode);
static int (*g5_switch_freq)(int speed_mode);
static int (*g5_query_freq)(void);
-static DEFINE_MUTEX(g5_switch_mutex);
-
static unsigned long transition_latency;
#ifdef CONFIG_PMAC_SMU
@@ -313,21 +311,7 @@ static int g5_pfunc_query_freq(void)
static int g5_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
{
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
- int rc;
-
- mutex_lock(&g5_switch_mutex);
-
- freqs.old = g5_cpu_freqs[g5_pmode_cur].frequency;
- freqs.new = g5_cpu_freqs[index].frequency;
-
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
- rc = g5_switch_freq(index);
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
- mutex_unlock(&g5_switch_mutex);
-
- return rc;
+ return g5_switch_freq(index);
}
static unsigned int g5_cpufreq_get_speed(unsigned int cpu)
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 24/34] cpufreq: powernow: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
2013-08-16 2:24 ` Viresh Kumar
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rjw
Cc: linaro-kernel, patches, cpufreq, linux-pm, linux-kernel,
linux-arm-kernel, Viresh Kumar
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k6.c | 8 --------
drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k7.c | 11 +----------
drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c | 15 +--------------
3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k6.c b/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k6.c
index 643e795..fedbe87 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k6.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k6.c
@@ -73,18 +73,12 @@ static int powernow_k6_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
{
unsigned long outvalue = 0, invalue = 0;
unsigned long msrval;
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
if (clock_ratio[best_i].driver_data > max_multiplier) {
printk(KERN_ERR PFX "invalid target frequency\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
- freqs.old = busfreq * powernow_k6_get_cpu_multiplier();
- freqs.new = busfreq * clock_ratio[best_i].driver_data;
-
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
/* we now need to transform best_i to the BVC format, see AMD#23446 */
outvalue = (1<<12) | (1<<10) | (1<<9) | (best_i<<5);
@@ -98,8 +92,6 @@ static int powernow_k6_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
msrval = POWERNOW_IOPORT + 0x0;
wrmsr(MSR_K6_EPMR, msrval, 0); /* disable it again */
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
return 0;
}
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k7.c b/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k7.c
index 946708a..8e52463 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k7.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k7.c
@@ -251,7 +251,6 @@ static void change_VID(int vid)
static int powernow_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
{
u8 fid, vid;
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
union msr_fidvidstatus fidvidstatus;
int cfid;
@@ -265,18 +264,13 @@ static int powernow_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
rdmsrl(MSR_K7_FID_VID_STATUS, fidvidstatus.val);
cfid = fidvidstatus.bits.CFID;
- freqs.old = fsb * fid_codes[cfid] / 10;
-
- freqs.new = powernow_table[index].frequency;
-
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Now do the magic poking into the MSRs. */
if (have_a0 == 1) /* A0 errata 5 */
local_irq_disable();
- if (freqs.old > freqs.new) {
+ if (fsb * fid_codes[cfid] / 10 > powernow_table[index].frequency) {
/* Going down, so change FID first */
change_FID(fid);
change_VID(vid);
@@ -286,12 +280,9 @@ static int powernow_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
change_FID(fid);
}
-
if (have_a0 == 1)
local_irq_enable();
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
return 0;
}
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c b/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c
index 62a1ce4..b00eabe 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c
@@ -931,8 +931,6 @@ static int transition_frequency_fidvid(struct powernow_k8_data *data,
struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
u32 fid = 0;
u32 vid = 0;
- int res;
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
pr_debug("cpu %d transition to index %u\n", smp_processor_id(), index);
@@ -957,22 +955,11 @@ static int transition_frequency_fidvid(struct powernow_k8_data *data,
pr_debug("cpu %d, changing to fid 0x%x, vid 0x%x\n",
smp_processor_id(), fid, vid);
- freqs.old = find_khz_freq_from_fid(data->currfid);
- freqs.new = find_khz_freq_from_fid(fid);
policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(smp_processor_id());
cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
- res = transition_fid_vid(data, fid, vid);
- if (res)
- freqs.new = freqs.old;
- else
- freqs.new = find_khz_freq_from_fid(data->currfid);
-
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
- return res;
+ return transition_fid_vid(data, fid, vid);
}
struct powernowk8_target_arg {
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread* [PATCH 24/34] cpufreq: powernow: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k6.c | 8 --------
drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k7.c | 11 +----------
drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c | 15 +--------------
3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k6.c b/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k6.c
index 643e795..fedbe87 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k6.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k6.c
@@ -73,18 +73,12 @@ static int powernow_k6_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
{
unsigned long outvalue = 0, invalue = 0;
unsigned long msrval;
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
if (clock_ratio[best_i].driver_data > max_multiplier) {
printk(KERN_ERR PFX "invalid target frequency\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
- freqs.old = busfreq * powernow_k6_get_cpu_multiplier();
- freqs.new = busfreq * clock_ratio[best_i].driver_data;
-
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
/* we now need to transform best_i to the BVC format, see AMD#23446 */
outvalue = (1<<12) | (1<<10) | (1<<9) | (best_i<<5);
@@ -98,8 +92,6 @@ static int powernow_k6_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
msrval = POWERNOW_IOPORT + 0x0;
wrmsr(MSR_K6_EPMR, msrval, 0); /* disable it again */
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
return 0;
}
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k7.c b/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k7.c
index 946708a..8e52463 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k7.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k7.c
@@ -251,7 +251,6 @@ static void change_VID(int vid)
static int powernow_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
{
u8 fid, vid;
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
union msr_fidvidstatus fidvidstatus;
int cfid;
@@ -265,18 +264,13 @@ static int powernow_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
rdmsrl(MSR_K7_FID_VID_STATUS, fidvidstatus.val);
cfid = fidvidstatus.bits.CFID;
- freqs.old = fsb * fid_codes[cfid] / 10;
-
- freqs.new = powernow_table[index].frequency;
-
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Now do the magic poking into the MSRs. */
if (have_a0 == 1) /* A0 errata 5 */
local_irq_disable();
- if (freqs.old > freqs.new) {
+ if (fsb * fid_codes[cfid] / 10 > powernow_table[index].frequency) {
/* Going down, so change FID first */
change_FID(fid);
change_VID(vid);
@@ -286,12 +280,9 @@ static int powernow_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
change_FID(fid);
}
-
if (have_a0 == 1)
local_irq_enable();
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
return 0;
}
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c b/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c
index 62a1ce4..b00eabe 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c
@@ -931,8 +931,6 @@ static int transition_frequency_fidvid(struct powernow_k8_data *data,
struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
u32 fid = 0;
u32 vid = 0;
- int res;
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
pr_debug("cpu %d transition to index %u\n", smp_processor_id(), index);
@@ -957,22 +955,11 @@ static int transition_frequency_fidvid(struct powernow_k8_data *data,
pr_debug("cpu %d, changing to fid 0x%x, vid 0x%x\n",
smp_processor_id(), fid, vid);
- freqs.old = find_khz_freq_from_fid(data->currfid);
- freqs.new = find_khz_freq_from_fid(fid);
policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(smp_processor_id());
cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
- res = transition_fid_vid(data, fid, vid);
- if (res)
- freqs.new = freqs.old;
- else
- freqs.new = find_khz_freq_from_fid(data->currfid);
-
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
- return res;
+ return transition_fid_vid(data, fid, vid);
}
struct powernowk8_target_arg {
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 25/34] cpufreq: ppc: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
2013-08-16 2:24 ` Viresh Kumar
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rjw
Cc: linaro-kernel, patches, cpufreq, linux-pm, linux-kernel,
linux-arm-kernel, Viresh Kumar
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/ppc-corenet-cpufreq.c | 19 +------------------
drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq.c | 19 +------------------
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/ppc-corenet-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/ppc-corenet-cpufreq.c
index 79d8e9c..3f7be46 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/ppc-corenet-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/ppc-corenet-cpufreq.c
@@ -69,8 +69,6 @@ static const struct soc_data sdata[] = {
static u32 min_cpufreq;
static const u32 *fmask;
-/* serialize frequency changes */
-static DEFINE_MUTEX(cpufreq_lock);
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpu_data *, cpu_data);
/* cpumask in a cluster */
@@ -253,26 +251,11 @@ static int __exit corenet_cpufreq_cpu_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
static int corenet_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int index)
{
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
struct clk *parent;
- int ret;
struct cpu_data *data = per_cpu(cpu_data, policy->cpu);
- freqs.old = policy->cur;
- freqs.new = data->table[index].frequency;
-
- mutex_lock(&cpufreq_lock);
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
parent = of_clk_get(data->parent, data->table[index].driver_data);
- ret = clk_set_parent(data->clk, parent);
- if (ret)
- freqs.new = freqs.old;
-
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
- mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_lock);
-
- return ret;
+ return clk_set_parent(data->clk, parent);
}
static struct cpufreq_driver ppc_corenet_cpufreq_driver = {
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq.c
index 52f707d..e42ca9c 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq.c
@@ -30,9 +30,6 @@
#include "ppc_cbe_cpufreq.h"
-static DEFINE_MUTEX(cbe_switch_mutex);
-
-
/* the CBE supports an 8 step frequency scaling */
static struct cpufreq_frequency_table cbe_freqs[] = {
{1, 0},
@@ -131,27 +128,13 @@ static int cbe_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
static int cbe_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int cbe_pmode_new)
{
- int rc;
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
-
- freqs.old = policy->cur;
- freqs.new = cbe_freqs[cbe_pmode_new].frequency;
-
- mutex_lock(&cbe_switch_mutex);
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
pr_debug("setting frequency for cpu %d to %d kHz, " \
"1/%d of max frequency\n",
policy->cpu,
cbe_freqs[cbe_pmode_new].frequency,
cbe_freqs[cbe_pmode_new].driver_data);
- rc = set_pmode(policy->cpu, cbe_pmode_new);
-
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
- mutex_unlock(&cbe_switch_mutex);
-
- return rc;
+ return set_pmode(policy->cpu, cbe_pmode_new);
}
static struct cpufreq_driver cbe_cpufreq_driver = {
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread* [PATCH 25/34] cpufreq: ppc: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/ppc-corenet-cpufreq.c | 19 +------------------
drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq.c | 19 +------------------
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/ppc-corenet-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/ppc-corenet-cpufreq.c
index 79d8e9c..3f7be46 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/ppc-corenet-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/ppc-corenet-cpufreq.c
@@ -69,8 +69,6 @@ static const struct soc_data sdata[] = {
static u32 min_cpufreq;
static const u32 *fmask;
-/* serialize frequency changes */
-static DEFINE_MUTEX(cpufreq_lock);
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpu_data *, cpu_data);
/* cpumask in a cluster */
@@ -253,26 +251,11 @@ static int __exit corenet_cpufreq_cpu_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
static int corenet_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int index)
{
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
struct clk *parent;
- int ret;
struct cpu_data *data = per_cpu(cpu_data, policy->cpu);
- freqs.old = policy->cur;
- freqs.new = data->table[index].frequency;
-
- mutex_lock(&cpufreq_lock);
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
parent = of_clk_get(data->parent, data->table[index].driver_data);
- ret = clk_set_parent(data->clk, parent);
- if (ret)
- freqs.new = freqs.old;
-
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
- mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_lock);
-
- return ret;
+ return clk_set_parent(data->clk, parent);
}
static struct cpufreq_driver ppc_corenet_cpufreq_driver = {
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq.c
index 52f707d..e42ca9c 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq.c
@@ -30,9 +30,6 @@
#include "ppc_cbe_cpufreq.h"
-static DEFINE_MUTEX(cbe_switch_mutex);
-
-
/* the CBE supports an 8 step frequency scaling */
static struct cpufreq_frequency_table cbe_freqs[] = {
{1, 0},
@@ -131,27 +128,13 @@ static int cbe_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
static int cbe_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int cbe_pmode_new)
{
- int rc;
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
-
- freqs.old = policy->cur;
- freqs.new = cbe_freqs[cbe_pmode_new].frequency;
-
- mutex_lock(&cbe_switch_mutex);
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
pr_debug("setting frequency for cpu %d to %d kHz, " \
"1/%d of max frequency\n",
policy->cpu,
cbe_freqs[cbe_pmode_new].frequency,
cbe_freqs[cbe_pmode_new].driver_data);
- rc = set_pmode(policy->cpu, cbe_pmode_new);
-
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
- mutex_unlock(&cbe_switch_mutex);
-
- return rc;
+ return set_pmode(policy->cpu, cbe_pmode_new);
}
static struct cpufreq_driver cbe_cpufreq_driver = {
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 26/34] cpufreq: pxa: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
2013-08-16 2:24 ` Viresh Kumar
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rjw
Cc: linaro-kernel, patches, cpufreq, linux-pm, linux-kernel,
linux-arm-kernel, Viresh Kumar, Eric Miao
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Cc: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/pxa2xx-cpufreq.c | 27 ++++++---------------------
drivers/cpufreq/pxa3xx-cpufreq.c | 12 ------------
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/pxa2xx-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/pxa2xx-cpufreq.c
index 183bc13..0a0f436 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/pxa2xx-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/pxa2xx-cpufreq.c
@@ -271,7 +271,6 @@ static int pxa_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int idx)
{
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *pxa_freqs_table;
pxa_freqs_t *pxa_freq_settings;
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
unsigned long flags;
unsigned int new_freq_cpu, new_freq_mem;
unsigned int unused, preset_mdrefr, postset_mdrefr, cclkcfg;
@@ -282,24 +281,17 @@ static int pxa_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int idx)
new_freq_cpu = pxa_freq_settings[idx].khz;
new_freq_mem = pxa_freq_settings[idx].membus;
- freqs.old = policy->cur;
- freqs.new = new_freq_cpu;
if (freq_debug)
pr_debug("Changing CPU frequency to %d Mhz, (SDRAM %d Mhz)\n",
- freqs.new / 1000, (pxa_freq_settings[idx].div2) ?
+ new_freq_cpu / 1000, (pxa_freq_settings[idx].div2) ?
(new_freq_mem / 2000) : (new_freq_mem / 1000));
- if (vcc_core && freqs.new > freqs.old)
+ if (vcc_core && new_freq_cpu > policy->cur) {
ret = pxa_cpufreq_change_voltage(&pxa_freq_settings[idx]);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
- /*
- * Tell everyone what we're about to do...
- * you should add a notify client with any platform specific
- * Vcc changing capability
- */
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
/* Calculate the next MDREFR. If we're slowing down the SDRAM clock
* we need to preset the smaller DRI before the change. If we're
@@ -350,13 +342,6 @@ static int pxa_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int idx)
local_irq_restore(flags);
/*
- * Tell everyone what we've just done...
- * you should add a notify client with any platform specific
- * SDRAM refresh timer adjustments
- */
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
- /*
* Even if voltage setting fails, we don't report it, as the frequency
* change succeeded. The voltage reduction is not a critical failure,
* only power savings will suffer from this.
@@ -365,7 +350,7 @@ static int pxa_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int idx)
* bug is triggered (seems a deadlock). Should anybody find out where,
* the "return 0" should become a "return ret".
*/
- if (vcc_core && freqs.new < freqs.old)
+ if (vcc_core && new_freq_cpu < policy->cur)
ret = pxa_cpufreq_change_voltage(&pxa_freq_settings[idx]);
return 0;
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/pxa3xx-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/pxa3xx-cpufreq.c
index 132e37d..9384004 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/pxa3xx-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/pxa3xx-cpufreq.c
@@ -158,7 +158,6 @@ static unsigned int pxa3xx_cpufreq_get(unsigned int cpu)
static int pxa3xx_cpufreq_set(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
{
struct pxa3xx_freq_info *next;
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
unsigned long flags;
if (policy->cpu != 0)
@@ -166,22 +165,11 @@ static int pxa3xx_cpufreq_set(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
next = &pxa3xx_freqs[index];
- freqs.old = policy->cur;
- freqs.new = next->cpufreq_mhz * 1000;
-
- pr_debug("CPU frequency from %d MHz to %d MHz%s\n",
- freqs.old / 1000, freqs.new / 1000,
- (freqs.old == freqs.new) ? " (skipped)" : "");
-
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
local_irq_save(flags);
__update_core_freq(next);
__update_bus_freq(next);
local_irq_restore(flags);
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
return 0;
}
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread* [PATCH 26/34] cpufreq: pxa: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Cc: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/pxa2xx-cpufreq.c | 27 ++++++---------------------
drivers/cpufreq/pxa3xx-cpufreq.c | 12 ------------
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/pxa2xx-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/pxa2xx-cpufreq.c
index 183bc13..0a0f436 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/pxa2xx-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/pxa2xx-cpufreq.c
@@ -271,7 +271,6 @@ static int pxa_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int idx)
{
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *pxa_freqs_table;
pxa_freqs_t *pxa_freq_settings;
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
unsigned long flags;
unsigned int new_freq_cpu, new_freq_mem;
unsigned int unused, preset_mdrefr, postset_mdrefr, cclkcfg;
@@ -282,24 +281,17 @@ static int pxa_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int idx)
new_freq_cpu = pxa_freq_settings[idx].khz;
new_freq_mem = pxa_freq_settings[idx].membus;
- freqs.old = policy->cur;
- freqs.new = new_freq_cpu;
if (freq_debug)
pr_debug("Changing CPU frequency to %d Mhz, (SDRAM %d Mhz)\n",
- freqs.new / 1000, (pxa_freq_settings[idx].div2) ?
+ new_freq_cpu / 1000, (pxa_freq_settings[idx].div2) ?
(new_freq_mem / 2000) : (new_freq_mem / 1000));
- if (vcc_core && freqs.new > freqs.old)
+ if (vcc_core && new_freq_cpu > policy->cur) {
ret = pxa_cpufreq_change_voltage(&pxa_freq_settings[idx]);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
- /*
- * Tell everyone what we're about to do...
- * you should add a notify client with any platform specific
- * Vcc changing capability
- */
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
/* Calculate the next MDREFR. If we're slowing down the SDRAM clock
* we need to preset the smaller DRI before the change. If we're
@@ -350,13 +342,6 @@ static int pxa_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int idx)
local_irq_restore(flags);
/*
- * Tell everyone what we've just done...
- * you should add a notify client with any platform specific
- * SDRAM refresh timer adjustments
- */
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
- /*
* Even if voltage setting fails, we don't report it, as the frequency
* change succeeded. The voltage reduction is not a critical failure,
* only power savings will suffer from this.
@@ -365,7 +350,7 @@ static int pxa_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int idx)
* bug is triggered (seems a deadlock). Should anybody find out where,
* the "return 0" should become a "return ret".
*/
- if (vcc_core && freqs.new < freqs.old)
+ if (vcc_core && new_freq_cpu < policy->cur)
ret = pxa_cpufreq_change_voltage(&pxa_freq_settings[idx]);
return 0;
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/pxa3xx-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/pxa3xx-cpufreq.c
index 132e37d..9384004 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/pxa3xx-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/pxa3xx-cpufreq.c
@@ -158,7 +158,6 @@ static unsigned int pxa3xx_cpufreq_get(unsigned int cpu)
static int pxa3xx_cpufreq_set(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
{
struct pxa3xx_freq_info *next;
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
unsigned long flags;
if (policy->cpu != 0)
@@ -166,22 +165,11 @@ static int pxa3xx_cpufreq_set(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
next = &pxa3xx_freqs[index];
- freqs.old = policy->cur;
- freqs.new = next->cpufreq_mhz * 1000;
-
- pr_debug("CPU frequency from %d MHz to %d MHz%s\n",
- freqs.old / 1000, freqs.new / 1000,
- (freqs.old == freqs.new) ? " (skipped)" : "");
-
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
local_irq_save(flags);
__update_core_freq(next);
__update_bus_freq(next);
local_irq_restore(flags);
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
return 0;
}
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 27/34] cpufreq: s3c: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
2013-08-16 2:24 ` Viresh Kumar
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rjw
Cc: linaro-kernel, patches, cpufreq, linux-pm, linux-kernel,
linux-arm-kernel, Viresh Kumar, Kukjin Kim
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/s3c2416-cpufreq.c | 21 ++++-------------
drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c | 48 +++++++++++++--------------------------
2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/s3c2416-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/s3c2416-cpufreq.c
index 9b22cc4..0e13914 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/s3c2416-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/s3c2416-cpufreq.c
@@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ static int s3c2416_cpufreq_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int index)
{
struct s3c2416_data *s3c_freq = &s3c2416_cpufreq;
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
+ unsigned int new_freq;
int idx, ret, to_dvs = 0;
mutex_lock(&cpufreq_lock);
@@ -237,25 +237,14 @@ static int s3c2416_cpufreq_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
goto out;
}
- freqs.flags = 0;
- freqs.old = s3c_freq->is_dvs ? FREQ_DVS
- : clk_get_rate(s3c_freq->armclk) / 1000;
-
/* When leavin dvs mode, always switch the armdiv to the hclk rate
* The S3C2416 has stability issues when switching directly to
* higher frequencies.
*/
- freqs.new = (s3c_freq->is_dvs && !to_dvs)
+ new_freq = (s3c_freq->is_dvs && !to_dvs)
? clk_get_rate(s3c_freq->hclk) / 1000
: s3c_freq->freq_table[index].frequency;
- pr_debug("cpufreq: Transition %d-%dkHz\n", freqs.old, freqs.new);
-
- if (!to_dvs && freqs.old == freqs.new)
- goto out;
-
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
if (to_dvs) {
pr_debug("cpufreq: enter dvs\n");
ret = s3c2416_cpufreq_enter_dvs(s3c_freq, idx);
@@ -263,12 +252,10 @@ static int s3c2416_cpufreq_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
pr_debug("cpufreq: leave dvs\n");
ret = s3c2416_cpufreq_leave_dvs(s3c_freq, idx);
} else {
- pr_debug("cpufreq: change armdiv to %dkHz\n", freqs.new);
- ret = s3c2416_cpufreq_set_armdiv(s3c_freq, freqs.new);
+ pr_debug("cpufreq: change armdiv to %dkHz\n", new_freq);
+ ret = s3c2416_cpufreq_set_armdiv(s3c_freq, new_freq);
}
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
out:
mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_lock);
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c
index 5357dc4..a983559 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c
@@ -65,54 +65,46 @@ static unsigned int s3c64xx_cpufreq_get_speed(unsigned int cpu)
static int s3c64xx_cpufreq_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int index)
{
- int ret;
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
struct s3c64xx_dvfs *dvfs;
+ unsigned int old_freq, new_freq;
+ int ret;
- freqs.old = clk_get_rate(armclk) / 1000;
- freqs.new = s3c64xx_freq_table[index].frequency;
- freqs.flags = 0;
+ old_freq = clk_get_rate(armclk) / 1000;
+ new_freq = s3c64xx_freq_table[index].frequency;
dvfs = &s3c64xx_dvfs_table[s3c64xx_freq_table[index].driver_data];
- pr_debug("Transition %d-%dkHz\n", freqs.old, freqs.new);
-
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
#ifdef CONFIG_REGULATOR
- if (vddarm && freqs.new > freqs.old) {
+ if (vddarm && new_freq > old_freq) {
ret = regulator_set_voltage(vddarm,
dvfs->vddarm_min,
dvfs->vddarm_max);
if (ret != 0) {
pr_err("Failed to set VDDARM for %dkHz: %d\n",
- freqs.new, ret);
- freqs.new = freqs.old;
- goto post_notify;
+ new_freq, ret);
+ return ret;
}
}
#endif
- ret = clk_set_rate(armclk, freqs.new * 1000);
+ ret = clk_set_rate(armclk, new_freq * 1000);
if (ret < 0) {
pr_err("Failed to set rate %dkHz: %d\n",
- freqs.new, ret);
- freqs.new = freqs.old;
+ new_freq, ret);
+ return ret;
}
-post_notify:
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
- if (ret)
- goto err;
-
#ifdef CONFIG_REGULATOR
- if (vddarm && freqs.new < freqs.old) {
+ if (vddarm && new_freq < old_freq) {
ret = regulator_set_voltage(vddarm,
dvfs->vddarm_min,
dvfs->vddarm_max);
if (ret != 0) {
pr_err("Failed to set VDDARM for %dkHz: %d\n",
- freqs.new, ret);
- goto err_clk;
+ new_freq, ret);
+ if (clk_set_rate(armclk, old_freq * 1000) < 0)
+ pr_err("Failed to restore original clock rate\n");
+
+ return ret;
}
}
#endif
@@ -121,14 +113,6 @@ post_notify:
clk_get_rate(armclk) / 1000);
return 0;
-
-err_clk:
- if (clk_set_rate(armclk, freqs.old * 1000) < 0)
- pr_err("Failed to restore original clock rate\n");
-err:
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
- return ret;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_REGULATOR
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread* [PATCH 27/34] cpufreq: s3c: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/s3c2416-cpufreq.c | 21 ++++-------------
drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c | 48 +++++++++++++--------------------------
2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/s3c2416-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/s3c2416-cpufreq.c
index 9b22cc4..0e13914 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/s3c2416-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/s3c2416-cpufreq.c
@@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ static int s3c2416_cpufreq_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int index)
{
struct s3c2416_data *s3c_freq = &s3c2416_cpufreq;
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
+ unsigned int new_freq;
int idx, ret, to_dvs = 0;
mutex_lock(&cpufreq_lock);
@@ -237,25 +237,14 @@ static int s3c2416_cpufreq_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
goto out;
}
- freqs.flags = 0;
- freqs.old = s3c_freq->is_dvs ? FREQ_DVS
- : clk_get_rate(s3c_freq->armclk) / 1000;
-
/* When leavin dvs mode, always switch the armdiv to the hclk rate
* The S3C2416 has stability issues when switching directly to
* higher frequencies.
*/
- freqs.new = (s3c_freq->is_dvs && !to_dvs)
+ new_freq = (s3c_freq->is_dvs && !to_dvs)
? clk_get_rate(s3c_freq->hclk) / 1000
: s3c_freq->freq_table[index].frequency;
- pr_debug("cpufreq: Transition %d-%dkHz\n", freqs.old, freqs.new);
-
- if (!to_dvs && freqs.old == freqs.new)
- goto out;
-
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
if (to_dvs) {
pr_debug("cpufreq: enter dvs\n");
ret = s3c2416_cpufreq_enter_dvs(s3c_freq, idx);
@@ -263,12 +252,10 @@ static int s3c2416_cpufreq_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
pr_debug("cpufreq: leave dvs\n");
ret = s3c2416_cpufreq_leave_dvs(s3c_freq, idx);
} else {
- pr_debug("cpufreq: change armdiv to %dkHz\n", freqs.new);
- ret = s3c2416_cpufreq_set_armdiv(s3c_freq, freqs.new);
+ pr_debug("cpufreq: change armdiv to %dkHz\n", new_freq);
+ ret = s3c2416_cpufreq_set_armdiv(s3c_freq, new_freq);
}
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
out:
mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_lock);
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c
index 5357dc4..a983559 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c
@@ -65,54 +65,46 @@ static unsigned int s3c64xx_cpufreq_get_speed(unsigned int cpu)
static int s3c64xx_cpufreq_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int index)
{
- int ret;
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
struct s3c64xx_dvfs *dvfs;
+ unsigned int old_freq, new_freq;
+ int ret;
- freqs.old = clk_get_rate(armclk) / 1000;
- freqs.new = s3c64xx_freq_table[index].frequency;
- freqs.flags = 0;
+ old_freq = clk_get_rate(armclk) / 1000;
+ new_freq = s3c64xx_freq_table[index].frequency;
dvfs = &s3c64xx_dvfs_table[s3c64xx_freq_table[index].driver_data];
- pr_debug("Transition %d-%dkHz\n", freqs.old, freqs.new);
-
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
#ifdef CONFIG_REGULATOR
- if (vddarm && freqs.new > freqs.old) {
+ if (vddarm && new_freq > old_freq) {
ret = regulator_set_voltage(vddarm,
dvfs->vddarm_min,
dvfs->vddarm_max);
if (ret != 0) {
pr_err("Failed to set VDDARM for %dkHz: %d\n",
- freqs.new, ret);
- freqs.new = freqs.old;
- goto post_notify;
+ new_freq, ret);
+ return ret;
}
}
#endif
- ret = clk_set_rate(armclk, freqs.new * 1000);
+ ret = clk_set_rate(armclk, new_freq * 1000);
if (ret < 0) {
pr_err("Failed to set rate %dkHz: %d\n",
- freqs.new, ret);
- freqs.new = freqs.old;
+ new_freq, ret);
+ return ret;
}
-post_notify:
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
- if (ret)
- goto err;
-
#ifdef CONFIG_REGULATOR
- if (vddarm && freqs.new < freqs.old) {
+ if (vddarm && new_freq < old_freq) {
ret = regulator_set_voltage(vddarm,
dvfs->vddarm_min,
dvfs->vddarm_max);
if (ret != 0) {
pr_err("Failed to set VDDARM for %dkHz: %d\n",
- freqs.new, ret);
- goto err_clk;
+ new_freq, ret);
+ if (clk_set_rate(armclk, old_freq * 1000) < 0)
+ pr_err("Failed to restore original clock rate\n");
+
+ return ret;
}
}
#endif
@@ -121,14 +113,6 @@ post_notify:
clk_get_rate(armclk) / 1000);
return 0;
-
-err_clk:
- if (clk_set_rate(armclk, freqs.old * 1000) < 0)
- pr_err("Failed to restore original clock rate\n");
-err:
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
- return ret;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_REGULATOR
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 28/34] cpufreq: s5pv210: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
2013-08-16 2:24 ` Viresh Kumar
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rjw
Cc: linaro-kernel, patches, cpufreq, linux-pm, linux-kernel,
linux-arm-kernel, Viresh Kumar, Kukjin Kim
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c | 16 ++++++----------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c
index 76a4177..efa1080 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c
@@ -26,7 +26,6 @@
static struct clk *cpu_clk;
static struct clk *dmc0_clk;
static struct clk *dmc1_clk;
-static struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
static DEFINE_MUTEX(set_freq_lock);
/* APLL M,P,S values for 1G/800Mhz */
@@ -179,6 +178,7 @@ static int s5pv210_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
unsigned int priv_index;
unsigned int pll_changing = 0;
unsigned int bus_speed_changing = 0;
+ unsigned int old_freq, new_freq;
int arm_volt, int_volt;
int ret = 0;
@@ -193,12 +193,12 @@ static int s5pv210_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
goto exit;
}
- freqs.old = s5pv210_getspeed(0);
- freqs.new = s5pv210_freq_table[index].frequency;
+ old_freq = s5pv210_getspeed(0);
+ new_freq = s5pv210_freq_table[index].frequency;
/* Finding current running level index */
if (cpufreq_frequency_table_target(policy, s5pv210_freq_table,
- freqs.old, CPUFREQ_RELATION_H,
+ old_freq, CPUFREQ_RELATION_H,
&priv_index)) {
ret = -EINVAL;
goto exit;
@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ static int s5pv210_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
arm_volt = dvs_conf[index].arm_volt;
int_volt = dvs_conf[index].int_volt;
- if (freqs.new > freqs.old) {
+ if (new_freq > old_freq) {
ret = regulator_set_voltage(arm_regulator,
arm_volt, arm_volt_max);
if (ret)
@@ -219,8 +219,6 @@ static int s5pv210_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
goto exit;
}
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
/* Check if there need to change PLL */
if ((index == L0) || (priv_index == L0))
pll_changing = 1;
@@ -431,9 +429,7 @@ static int s5pv210_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
}
}
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
- if (freqs.new < freqs.old) {
+ if (new_freq < old_freq) {
regulator_set_voltage(int_regulator,
int_volt, int_volt_max);
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread* [PATCH 28/34] cpufreq: s5pv210: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c | 16 ++++++----------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c
index 76a4177..efa1080 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c
@@ -26,7 +26,6 @@
static struct clk *cpu_clk;
static struct clk *dmc0_clk;
static struct clk *dmc1_clk;
-static struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
static DEFINE_MUTEX(set_freq_lock);
/* APLL M,P,S values for 1G/800Mhz */
@@ -179,6 +178,7 @@ static int s5pv210_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
unsigned int priv_index;
unsigned int pll_changing = 0;
unsigned int bus_speed_changing = 0;
+ unsigned int old_freq, new_freq;
int arm_volt, int_volt;
int ret = 0;
@@ -193,12 +193,12 @@ static int s5pv210_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
goto exit;
}
- freqs.old = s5pv210_getspeed(0);
- freqs.new = s5pv210_freq_table[index].frequency;
+ old_freq = s5pv210_getspeed(0);
+ new_freq = s5pv210_freq_table[index].frequency;
/* Finding current running level index */
if (cpufreq_frequency_table_target(policy, s5pv210_freq_table,
- freqs.old, CPUFREQ_RELATION_H,
+ old_freq, CPUFREQ_RELATION_H,
&priv_index)) {
ret = -EINVAL;
goto exit;
@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ static int s5pv210_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
arm_volt = dvs_conf[index].arm_volt;
int_volt = dvs_conf[index].int_volt;
- if (freqs.new > freqs.old) {
+ if (new_freq > old_freq) {
ret = regulator_set_voltage(arm_regulator,
arm_volt, arm_volt_max);
if (ret)
@@ -219,8 +219,6 @@ static int s5pv210_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
goto exit;
}
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
/* Check if there need to change PLL */
if ((index == L0) || (priv_index == L0))
pll_changing = 1;
@@ -431,9 +429,7 @@ static int s5pv210_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
}
}
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
- if (freqs.new < freqs.old) {
+ if (new_freq < old_freq) {
regulator_set_voltage(int_regulator,
int_volt, int_volt_max);
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 29/34] cpufreq: sa11x0: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
2013-08-16 2:24 ` Viresh Kumar
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rjw
Cc: linaro-kernel, patches, cpufreq, linux-pm, linux-kernel,
linux-arm-kernel, Viresh Kumar, Russell King
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/sa1100-cpufreq.c | 17 ++++++-----------
drivers/cpufreq/sa1110-cpufreq.c | 12 ++----------
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/sa1100-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/sa1100-cpufreq.c
index aa49a08..a89c47b 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/sa1100-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/sa1100-cpufreq.c
@@ -180,22 +180,17 @@ static void sa1100_update_dram_timings(int current_speed, int new_speed)
static int sa1100_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int ppcr)
{
unsigned int cur = sa11x0_getspeed(0);
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
+ unsigned int new_freq;
- freqs.old = cur;
- freqs.new = sa11x0_freq_table[ppcr].frequency;
+ new_freq = sa11x0_freq_table[ppcr].frequency;
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
- if (freqs.new > cur)
- sa1100_update_dram_timings(cur, freqs.new);
+ if (new_freq > cur)
+ sa1100_update_dram_timings(cur, new_freq);
PPCR = ppcr;
- if (freqs.new < cur)
- sa1100_update_dram_timings(cur, freqs.new);
-
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
+ if (new_freq < cur)
+ sa1100_update_dram_timings(cur, new_freq);
return 0;
}
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/sa1110-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/sa1110-cpufreq.c
index c00cf2b..0e52e80 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/sa1110-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/sa1110-cpufreq.c
@@ -232,15 +232,11 @@ sdram_update_refresh(u_int cpu_khz, struct sdram_params *sdram)
static int sa1110_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int ppcr)
{
struct sdram_params *sdram = &sdram_params;
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
struct sdram_info sd;
unsigned long flags;
unsigned int unused;
- freqs.old = sa11x0_getspeed(0);
- freqs.new = sa11x0_freq_table[ppcr].frequency;
-
- sdram_calculate_timing(&sd, freqs.new, sdram);
+ sdram_calculate_timing(&sd, sa11x0_freq_table[ppcr].frequency, sdram);
#if 0
/*
@@ -259,8 +255,6 @@ static int sa1110_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int ppcr)
sd.mdcas[2] = 0xaaaaaaaa;
#endif
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
/*
* The clock could be going away for some time. Set the SDRAMs
* to refresh rapidly (every 64 memory clock cycles). To get
@@ -305,9 +299,7 @@ static int sa1110_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int ppcr)
/*
* Now, return the SDRAM refresh back to normal.
*/
- sdram_update_refresh(freqs.new, sdram);
-
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
+ sdram_update_refresh(sa11x0_freq_table[ppcr].frequency, sdram);
return 0;
}
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread* [PATCH 29/34] cpufreq: sa11x0: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/sa1100-cpufreq.c | 17 ++++++-----------
drivers/cpufreq/sa1110-cpufreq.c | 12 ++----------
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/sa1100-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/sa1100-cpufreq.c
index aa49a08..a89c47b 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/sa1100-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/sa1100-cpufreq.c
@@ -180,22 +180,17 @@ static void sa1100_update_dram_timings(int current_speed, int new_speed)
static int sa1100_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int ppcr)
{
unsigned int cur = sa11x0_getspeed(0);
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
+ unsigned int new_freq;
- freqs.old = cur;
- freqs.new = sa11x0_freq_table[ppcr].frequency;
+ new_freq = sa11x0_freq_table[ppcr].frequency;
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
- if (freqs.new > cur)
- sa1100_update_dram_timings(cur, freqs.new);
+ if (new_freq > cur)
+ sa1100_update_dram_timings(cur, new_freq);
PPCR = ppcr;
- if (freqs.new < cur)
- sa1100_update_dram_timings(cur, freqs.new);
-
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
+ if (new_freq < cur)
+ sa1100_update_dram_timings(cur, new_freq);
return 0;
}
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/sa1110-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/sa1110-cpufreq.c
index c00cf2b..0e52e80 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/sa1110-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/sa1110-cpufreq.c
@@ -232,15 +232,11 @@ sdram_update_refresh(u_int cpu_khz, struct sdram_params *sdram)
static int sa1110_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int ppcr)
{
struct sdram_params *sdram = &sdram_params;
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
struct sdram_info sd;
unsigned long flags;
unsigned int unused;
- freqs.old = sa11x0_getspeed(0);
- freqs.new = sa11x0_freq_table[ppcr].frequency;
-
- sdram_calculate_timing(&sd, freqs.new, sdram);
+ sdram_calculate_timing(&sd, sa11x0_freq_table[ppcr].frequency, sdram);
#if 0
/*
@@ -259,8 +255,6 @@ static int sa1110_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int ppcr)
sd.mdcas[2] = 0xaaaaaaaa;
#endif
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
/*
* The clock could be going away for some time. Set the SDRAMs
* to refresh rapidly (every 64 memory clock cycles). To get
@@ -305,9 +299,7 @@ static int sa1110_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int ppcr)
/*
* Now, return the SDRAM refresh back to normal.
*/
- sdram_update_refresh(freqs.new, sdram);
-
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
+ sdram_update_refresh(sa11x0_freq_table[ppcr].frequency, sdram);
return 0;
}
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 30/34] cpufreq: sc520: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
2013-08-16 2:24 ` Viresh Kumar
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rjw
Cc: linaro-kernel, patches, cpufreq, linux-pm, linux-kernel,
linux-arm-kernel, Viresh Kumar
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/sc520_freq.c | 11 -----------
1 file changed, 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/sc520_freq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/sc520_freq.c
index 6c86452..6adb354 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/sc520_freq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/sc520_freq.c
@@ -56,17 +56,8 @@ static unsigned int sc520_freq_get_cpu_frequency(unsigned int cpu)
static int sc520_freq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int state)
{
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
u8 clockspeed_reg;
- freqs.old = sc520_freq_get_cpu_frequency(0);
- freqs.new = sc520_freq_table[state].frequency;
-
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
- pr_debug("attempting to set frequency to %i kHz\n",
- sc520_freq_table[state].frequency);
-
local_irq_disable();
clockspeed_reg = *cpuctl & ~0x03;
@@ -74,8 +65,6 @@ static int sc520_freq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int state)
local_irq_enable();
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
return 0;
}
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread* [PATCH 30/34] cpufreq: sc520: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/sc520_freq.c | 11 -----------
1 file changed, 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/sc520_freq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/sc520_freq.c
index 6c86452..6adb354 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/sc520_freq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/sc520_freq.c
@@ -56,17 +56,8 @@ static unsigned int sc520_freq_get_cpu_frequency(unsigned int cpu)
static int sc520_freq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int state)
{
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
u8 clockspeed_reg;
- freqs.old = sc520_freq_get_cpu_frequency(0);
- freqs.new = sc520_freq_table[state].frequency;
-
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
- pr_debug("attempting to set frequency to %i kHz\n",
- sc520_freq_table[state].frequency);
-
local_irq_disable();
clockspeed_reg = *cpuctl & ~0x03;
@@ -74,8 +65,6 @@ static int sc520_freq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int state)
local_irq_enable();
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
return 0;
}
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 31/34] cpufreq: sparc: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
2013-08-16 2:24 ` Viresh Kumar
(?)
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rjw
Cc: linaro-kernel, patches, cpufreq, linux-pm, linux-kernel,
linux-arm-kernel, Viresh Kumar, David S. Miller, sparclinux
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/sparc-us2e-cpufreq.c | 7 -------
drivers/cpufreq/sparc-us3-cpufreq.c | 7 -------
2 files changed, 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/sparc-us2e-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/sparc-us2e-cpufreq.c
index 3bf5b8f..62aa23e 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/sparc-us2e-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/sparc-us2e-cpufreq.c
@@ -251,7 +251,6 @@ static int us2e_freq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
unsigned long new_bits, new_freq;
unsigned long clock_tick, divisor, old_divisor, estar;
cpumask_t cpus_allowed;
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
cpumask_copy(&cpus_allowed, tsk_cpus_allowed(current));
set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, cpumask_of(cpu));
@@ -265,16 +264,10 @@ static int us2e_freq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
old_divisor = estar_to_divisor(estar);
- freqs.old = clock_tick / old_divisor;
- freqs.new = new_freq;
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
if (old_divisor != divisor)
us2e_transition(estar, new_bits, clock_tick * 1000,
old_divisor, divisor);
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, &cpus_allowed);
return 0;
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/sparc-us3-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/sparc-us3-cpufreq.c
index 2e54d55..724ffbd 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/sparc-us3-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/sparc-us3-cpufreq.c
@@ -98,7 +98,6 @@ static int us3_freq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
unsigned int cpu = policy->cpu;
unsigned long new_bits, new_freq, reg;
cpumask_t cpus_allowed;
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
cpumask_copy(&cpus_allowed, tsk_cpus_allowed(current));
set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, cpumask_of(cpu));
@@ -124,16 +123,10 @@ static int us3_freq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
reg = read_safari_cfg();
- freqs.old = get_current_freq(cpu, reg);
- freqs.new = new_freq;
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
reg &= ~SAFARI_CFG_DIV_MASK;
reg |= new_bits;
write_safari_cfg(reg);
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, &cpus_allowed);
return 0;
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 31/34] cpufreq: sparc: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/sparc-us2e-cpufreq.c | 7 -------
drivers/cpufreq/sparc-us3-cpufreq.c | 7 -------
2 files changed, 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/sparc-us2e-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/sparc-us2e-cpufreq.c
index 3bf5b8f..62aa23e 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/sparc-us2e-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/sparc-us2e-cpufreq.c
@@ -251,7 +251,6 @@ static int us2e_freq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
unsigned long new_bits, new_freq;
unsigned long clock_tick, divisor, old_divisor, estar;
cpumask_t cpus_allowed;
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
cpumask_copy(&cpus_allowed, tsk_cpus_allowed(current));
set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, cpumask_of(cpu));
@@ -265,16 +264,10 @@ static int us2e_freq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
old_divisor = estar_to_divisor(estar);
- freqs.old = clock_tick / old_divisor;
- freqs.new = new_freq;
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
if (old_divisor != divisor)
us2e_transition(estar, new_bits, clock_tick * 1000,
old_divisor, divisor);
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, &cpus_allowed);
return 0;
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/sparc-us3-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/sparc-us3-cpufreq.c
index 2e54d55..724ffbd 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/sparc-us3-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/sparc-us3-cpufreq.c
@@ -98,7 +98,6 @@ static int us3_freq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
unsigned int cpu = policy->cpu;
unsigned long new_bits, new_freq, reg;
cpumask_t cpus_allowed;
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
cpumask_copy(&cpus_allowed, tsk_cpus_allowed(current));
set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, cpumask_of(cpu));
@@ -124,16 +123,10 @@ static int us3_freq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
reg = read_safari_cfg();
- freqs.old = get_current_freq(cpu, reg);
- freqs.new = new_freq;
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
reg &= ~SAFARI_CFG_DIV_MASK;
reg |= new_bits;
write_safari_cfg(reg);
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, &cpus_allowed);
return 0;
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 31/34] cpufreq: sparc: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: sparclinux at vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/sparc-us2e-cpufreq.c | 7 -------
drivers/cpufreq/sparc-us3-cpufreq.c | 7 -------
2 files changed, 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/sparc-us2e-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/sparc-us2e-cpufreq.c
index 3bf5b8f..62aa23e 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/sparc-us2e-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/sparc-us2e-cpufreq.c
@@ -251,7 +251,6 @@ static int us2e_freq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
unsigned long new_bits, new_freq;
unsigned long clock_tick, divisor, old_divisor, estar;
cpumask_t cpus_allowed;
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
cpumask_copy(&cpus_allowed, tsk_cpus_allowed(current));
set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, cpumask_of(cpu));
@@ -265,16 +264,10 @@ static int us2e_freq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
old_divisor = estar_to_divisor(estar);
- freqs.old = clock_tick / old_divisor;
- freqs.new = new_freq;
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
if (old_divisor != divisor)
us2e_transition(estar, new_bits, clock_tick * 1000,
old_divisor, divisor);
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, &cpus_allowed);
return 0;
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/sparc-us3-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/sparc-us3-cpufreq.c
index 2e54d55..724ffbd 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/sparc-us3-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/sparc-us3-cpufreq.c
@@ -98,7 +98,6 @@ static int us3_freq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
unsigned int cpu = policy->cpu;
unsigned long new_bits, new_freq, reg;
cpumask_t cpus_allowed;
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
cpumask_copy(&cpus_allowed, tsk_cpus_allowed(current));
set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, cpumask_of(cpu));
@@ -124,16 +123,10 @@ static int us3_freq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
reg = read_safari_cfg();
- freqs.old = get_current_freq(cpu, reg);
- freqs.new = new_freq;
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
reg &= ~SAFARI_CFG_DIV_MASK;
reg |= new_bits;
write_safari_cfg(reg);
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, &cpus_allowed);
return 0;
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 32/34] cpufreq: SPEAr: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
2013-08-16 2:24 ` Viresh Kumar
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rjw
Cc: linaro-kernel, patches, cpufreq, linux-pm, linux-kernel,
linux-arm-kernel, Viresh Kumar, spear-devel
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Cc: spear-devel@list.st.com
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/spear-cpufreq.c | 13 +------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/spear-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/spear-cpufreq.c
index efacfa1..4ad35a5 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/spear-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/spear-cpufreq.c
@@ -107,12 +107,10 @@ static int spear1340_set_cpu_rate(struct clk *sys_pclk, unsigned long newfreq)
static int spear_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int index)
{
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
unsigned long newfreq;
struct clk *srcclk;
int ret, mult = 1;
- freqs.old = spear_cpufreq_get(0);
newfreq = spear_cpufreq.freq_tbl[index].frequency * 1000;
if (of_machine_is_compatible("st,spear1340")) {
@@ -145,23 +143,14 @@ static int spear_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
return newfreq;
}
- freqs.new = newfreq / 1000;
- freqs.new /= mult;
-
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
if (mult == 2)
ret = spear1340_set_cpu_rate(srcclk, newfreq);
else
ret = clk_set_rate(spear_cpufreq.clk, newfreq);
- /* Get current rate after clk_set_rate, in case of failure */
- if (ret) {
+ if (ret)
pr_err("CPU Freq: cpu clk_set_rate failed: %d\n", ret);
- freqs.new = clk_get_rate(spear_cpufreq.clk) / 1000;
- }
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
return ret;
}
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread* [PATCH 32/34] cpufreq: SPEAr: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Cc: spear-devel at list.st.com
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/spear-cpufreq.c | 13 +------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/spear-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/spear-cpufreq.c
index efacfa1..4ad35a5 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/spear-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/spear-cpufreq.c
@@ -107,12 +107,10 @@ static int spear1340_set_cpu_rate(struct clk *sys_pclk, unsigned long newfreq)
static int spear_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int index)
{
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
unsigned long newfreq;
struct clk *srcclk;
int ret, mult = 1;
- freqs.old = spear_cpufreq_get(0);
newfreq = spear_cpufreq.freq_tbl[index].frequency * 1000;
if (of_machine_is_compatible("st,spear1340")) {
@@ -145,23 +143,14 @@ static int spear_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
return newfreq;
}
- freqs.new = newfreq / 1000;
- freqs.new /= mult;
-
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
if (mult == 2)
ret = spear1340_set_cpu_rate(srcclk, newfreq);
else
ret = clk_set_rate(spear_cpufreq.clk, newfreq);
- /* Get current rate after clk_set_rate, in case of failure */
- if (ret) {
+ if (ret)
pr_err("CPU Freq: cpu clk_set_rate failed: %d\n", ret);
- freqs.new = clk_get_rate(spear_cpufreq.clk) / 1000;
- }
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
return ret;
}
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 33/34] cpufreq: speedstep: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
2013-08-16 2:24 ` Viresh Kumar
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rjw
Cc: linaro-kernel, patches, cpufreq, linux-pm, linux-kernel,
linux-arm-kernel, Viresh Kumar, David S. Miller
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-centrino.c | 20 +-------------------
drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-ich.c | 9 ---------
drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-smi.c | 7 -------
3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 35 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-centrino.c b/drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-centrino.c
index b7a2f8d..90b4581 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-centrino.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-centrino.c
@@ -424,9 +424,8 @@ static int centrino_cpu_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
static int centrino_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
{
unsigned int msr, oldmsr = 0, h = 0, cpu = policy->cpu;
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
int retval = 0;
- unsigned int j, first_cpu, tmp;
+ unsigned int j, first_cpu;
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *op_points;
cpumask_var_t covered_cpus;
@@ -474,15 +473,6 @@ static int centrino_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
goto out;
}
- freqs.old = extract_clock(oldmsr, cpu, 0);
- freqs.new = extract_clock(msr, cpu, 0);
-
- pr_debug("target=%dkHz old=%d new=%d msr=%04x\n",
- op_points->frequency, freqs.old, freqs.new, msr);
-
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs,
- CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
first_cpu = 0;
/* all but 16 LSB are reserved, treat them with care */
oldmsr &= ~0xffff;
@@ -497,8 +487,6 @@ static int centrino_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
cpumask_set_cpu(j, covered_cpus);
}
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
if (unlikely(retval)) {
/*
* We have failed halfway through the frequency change.
@@ -509,12 +497,6 @@ static int centrino_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
for_each_cpu(j, covered_cpus)
wrmsr_on_cpu(j, MSR_IA32_PERF_CTL, oldmsr, h);
-
- tmp = freqs.new;
- freqs.new = freqs.old;
- freqs.old = tmp;
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
}
retval = 0;
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-ich.c b/drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-ich.c
index 707721e..7639b2b 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-ich.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-ich.c
@@ -258,21 +258,12 @@ static unsigned int speedstep_get(unsigned int cpu)
static int speedstep_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
{
unsigned int policy_cpu;
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
policy_cpu = cpumask_any_and(policy->cpus, cpu_online_mask);
- freqs.old = speedstep_get(policy_cpu);
- freqs.new = speedstep_freqs[index].frequency;
-
- pr_debug("transiting from %u to %u kHz\n", freqs.old, freqs.new);
-
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
smp_call_function_single(policy_cpu, _speedstep_set_state, &index,
true);
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
return 0;
}
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-smi.c b/drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-smi.c
index 19446e4..0f5326d 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-smi.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-smi.c
@@ -241,14 +241,7 @@ static void speedstep_set_state(unsigned int state)
*/
static int speedstep_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
{
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
-
- freqs.old = speedstep_freqs[speedstep_get_state()].frequency;
- freqs.new = speedstep_freqs[index].frequency;
-
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
speedstep_set_state(index);
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
return 0;
}
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread* [PATCH 33/34] cpufreq: speedstep: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-centrino.c | 20 +-------------------
drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-ich.c | 9 ---------
drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-smi.c | 7 -------
3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 35 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-centrino.c b/drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-centrino.c
index b7a2f8d..90b4581 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-centrino.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-centrino.c
@@ -424,9 +424,8 @@ static int centrino_cpu_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
static int centrino_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
{
unsigned int msr, oldmsr = 0, h = 0, cpu = policy->cpu;
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
int retval = 0;
- unsigned int j, first_cpu, tmp;
+ unsigned int j, first_cpu;
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *op_points;
cpumask_var_t covered_cpus;
@@ -474,15 +473,6 @@ static int centrino_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
goto out;
}
- freqs.old = extract_clock(oldmsr, cpu, 0);
- freqs.new = extract_clock(msr, cpu, 0);
-
- pr_debug("target=%dkHz old=%d new=%d msr=%04x\n",
- op_points->frequency, freqs.old, freqs.new, msr);
-
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs,
- CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
first_cpu = 0;
/* all but 16 LSB are reserved, treat them with care */
oldmsr &= ~0xffff;
@@ -497,8 +487,6 @@ static int centrino_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
cpumask_set_cpu(j, covered_cpus);
}
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
if (unlikely(retval)) {
/*
* We have failed halfway through the frequency change.
@@ -509,12 +497,6 @@ static int centrino_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
for_each_cpu(j, covered_cpus)
wrmsr_on_cpu(j, MSR_IA32_PERF_CTL, oldmsr, h);
-
- tmp = freqs.new;
- freqs.new = freqs.old;
- freqs.old = tmp;
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
}
retval = 0;
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-ich.c b/drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-ich.c
index 707721e..7639b2b 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-ich.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-ich.c
@@ -258,21 +258,12 @@ static unsigned int speedstep_get(unsigned int cpu)
static int speedstep_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
{
unsigned int policy_cpu;
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
policy_cpu = cpumask_any_and(policy->cpus, cpu_online_mask);
- freqs.old = speedstep_get(policy_cpu);
- freqs.new = speedstep_freqs[index].frequency;
-
- pr_debug("transiting from %u to %u kHz\n", freqs.old, freqs.new);
-
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
smp_call_function_single(policy_cpu, _speedstep_set_state, &index,
true);
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
return 0;
}
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-smi.c b/drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-smi.c
index 19446e4..0f5326d 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-smi.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-smi.c
@@ -241,14 +241,7 @@ static void speedstep_set_state(unsigned int state)
*/
static int speedstep_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
{
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
-
- freqs.old = speedstep_freqs[speedstep_get_state()].frequency;
- freqs.new = speedstep_freqs[index].frequency;
-
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
speedstep_set_state(index);
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
return 0;
}
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 34/34] cpufreq: tegra: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
2013-08-16 2:24 ` Viresh Kumar
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rjw
Cc: linaro-kernel, patches, cpufreq, linux-pm, linux-kernel,
linux-arm-kernel, Viresh Kumar, Stephen Warren
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/tegra-cpufreq.c | 25 +++++--------------------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra-cpufreq.c
index 3c2b12b..b376b67 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra-cpufreq.c
@@ -102,12 +102,8 @@ static int tegra_update_cpu_speed(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned long rate)
{
int ret = 0;
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
- freqs.old = tegra_getspeed(0);
- freqs.new = rate;
-
- if (freqs.old == freqs.new)
+ if (tegra_getspeed(0) == rate)
return ret;
/*
@@ -121,21 +117,10 @@ static int tegra_update_cpu_speed(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
else
clk_set_rate(emc_clk, 100000000); /* emc 50Mhz */
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEBUG
- printk(KERN_DEBUG "cpufreq-tegra: transition: %u --> %u\n",
- freqs.old, freqs.new);
-#endif
-
- ret = tegra_cpu_clk_set_rate(freqs.new * 1000);
- if (ret) {
- pr_err("cpu-tegra: Failed to set cpu frequency to %d kHz\n",
- freqs.new);
- freqs.new = freqs.old;
- }
-
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
+ ret = tegra_cpu_clk_set_rate(rate * 1000);
+ if (ret)
+ pr_err("cpu-tegra: Failed to set cpu frequency to %lu kHz\n",
+ rate);
return ret;
}
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread* [PATCH 34/34] cpufreq: tegra: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
@ 2013-08-16 2:25 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-08-16 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/tegra-cpufreq.c | 25 +++++--------------------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra-cpufreq.c
index 3c2b12b..b376b67 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra-cpufreq.c
@@ -102,12 +102,8 @@ static int tegra_update_cpu_speed(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned long rate)
{
int ret = 0;
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
- freqs.old = tegra_getspeed(0);
- freqs.new = rate;
-
- if (freqs.old == freqs.new)
+ if (tegra_getspeed(0) == rate)
return ret;
/*
@@ -121,21 +117,10 @@ static int tegra_update_cpu_speed(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
else
clk_set_rate(emc_clk, 100000000); /* emc 50Mhz */
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEBUG
- printk(KERN_DEBUG "cpufreq-tegra: transition: %u --> %u\n",
- freqs.old, freqs.new);
-#endif
-
- ret = tegra_cpu_clk_set_rate(freqs.new * 1000);
- if (ret) {
- pr_err("cpu-tegra: Failed to set cpu frequency to %d kHz\n",
- freqs.new);
- freqs.new = freqs.old;
- }
-
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
+ ret = tegra_cpu_clk_set_rate(rate * 1000);
+ if (ret)
+ pr_err("cpu-tegra: Failed to set cpu frequency to %lu kHz\n",
+ rate);
return ret;
}
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 97+ messages in thread