From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: "Mimi Zohar" <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Julia Lawall" <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>,
"Alexander Steffen" <Alexander.Steffen@infineon.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
"Benjamin Herrenschmidt" <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
"Corentin Labbe" <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com>,
"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>,
"Jerry Snitselaar" <jsnitsel@redhat.com>,
"Kenneth Goldman" <kgold@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Michael Ellerman" <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
"Nayna Jain" <nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Paul Mackerras" <paulus@samba.org>,
"Peter Hüwe" <PeterHuewe@gmx.de>,
"Stefan Berger" <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: char/tpm: Improve a size determination in nine functions
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 19:48:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e9638486-7e59-1c5a-87ae-ca0f1fbbd021@users.sourceforge.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171018171858.3lcfr2kcp53fngwv@linux.intel.com>
> For 1/4 and 2/4: explain why the message can be omitted.
Why did you not reply directly with this request for the update steps
with the subject “Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation
in tpm_…()”?
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10009405/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10009415/
I find that there can be difficulty to show an appropriate information
source for the reasonable explanation of this change pattern.
> Remove sentence about Coccinelle.
I got the impression that there is a bit of value in such
a kind of attribution.
> That's all.
I assume that there might be also some communication challenges involved.
> 3/4: definitive NAK, too much noise compared to value.
I tried to reduce deviations from the Linux coding style again.
You do not like such an attempt for this software area so far.
> 4/4: this a good commit message.
Why did you not reply directly with this feedback for the update step
“[PATCH 4/4] char/tpm: Less checks in tpm_ibmvtpm_probe() after error detection”?
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10009429/
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/<09a2c3a1-1b10-507d-a866-258b570f6da1@users.sourceforge.net>
> Requires a Tested-by before can be accepted, which I'm not able to give.
I am curious on how this detail will evolve.
Regards,
Markus
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: "Mimi Zohar" <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Julia Lawall" <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>,
"Alexander Steffen" <Alexander.Steffen@infineon.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
"Benjamin Herrenschmidt" <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
"Corentin Labbe" <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com>,
"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>,
"Jerry Snitselaar" <jsnitsel@redhat.com>,
"Kenneth Goldman" <kgold@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Michael Ellerman" <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
"Nayna Jain" <nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Paul Mackerras" <paulus@samba.org>,
"Peter Hüwe" <PeterHuewe@gmx.de>,
"Stefan Berger" <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: char/tpm: Improve a size determination in nine functions
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 17:48:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e9638486-7e59-1c5a-87ae-ca0f1fbbd021@users.sourceforge.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171018171858.3lcfr2kcp53fngwv@linux.intel.com>
> For 1/4 and 2/4: explain why the message can be omitted.
Why did you not reply directly with this request for the update steps
with the subject “Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation
in tpm_…()”?
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10009405/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10009415/
I find that there can be difficulty to show an appropriate information
source for the reasonable explanation of this change pattern.
> Remove sentence about Coccinelle.
I got the impression that there is a bit of value in such
a kind of attribution.
> That's all.
I assume that there might be also some communication challenges involved.
> 3/4: definitive NAK, too much noise compared to value.
I tried to reduce deviations from the Linux coding style again.
You do not like such an attempt for this software area so far.
> 4/4: this a good commit message.
Why did you not reply directly with this feedback for the update step
“[PATCH 4/4] char/tpm: Less checks in tpm_ibmvtpm_probe() after error detection”?
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10009429/
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/<09a2c3a1-1b10-507d-a866-258b570f6da1@users.sourceforge.net>
> Requires a Tested-by before can be accepted, which I'm not able to give.
I am curious on how this detail will evolve.
Regards,
Markus
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: "Mimi Zohar" <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Julia Lawall" <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>,
"Alexander Steffen" <Alexander.Steffen@infineon.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
"Benjamin Herrenschmidt" <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
"Corentin Labbe" <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com>,
"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>,
"Jerry Snitselaar" <jsnitsel@redhat.com>,
"Kenneth Goldman" <kgold@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Michael Ellerman" <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
"Nayna Jain" <nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Paul Mackerras" <paulus@samba.org>,
"Peter Hüwe" <PeterHuewe@gmx.de>,
"Stefan Berger" <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: char/tpm: Improve a size determination in nine functions
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 19:48:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e9638486-7e59-1c5a-87ae-ca0f1fbbd021@users.sourceforge.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171018171858.3lcfr2kcp53fngwv@linux.intel.com>
> For 1/4 and 2/4: explain why the message can be omitted.
Why did you not reply directly with this request for the update steps
with the subject "Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation
in tpm_...()"?
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10009405/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10009415/
I find that there can be difficulty to show an appropriate information
source for the reasonable explanation of this change pattern.
> Remove sentence about Coccinelle.
I got the impression that there is a bit of value in such
a kind of attribution.
> That's all.
I assume that there might be also some communication challenges involved.
> 3/4: definitive NAK, too much noise compared to value.
I tried to reduce deviations from the Linux coding style again.
You do not like such an attempt for this software area so far.
> 4/4: this a good commit message.
Why did you not reply directly with this feedback for the update step
"[PATCH 4/4] char/tpm: Less checks in tpm_ibmvtpm_probe() after error detection"?
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10009429/
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/<09a2c3a1-1b10-507d-a866-258b570f6da1@users.sourceforge.net>
> Requires a Tested-by before can be accepted, which I'm not able to give.
I am curious on how this detail will evolve.
Regards,
Markus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-18 17:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 221+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-16 17:30 [PATCH 0/4] char-TPM: Adjustments for ten function implementations SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-16 17:30 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-16 17:31 ` [PATCH 1/4] char/tpm: Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in tpm_ascii_bios_measurements_show() SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-16 17:31 ` [PATCH 1/4] char/tpm: Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in tpm_ascii_bios_measu SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-16 17:32 ` [PATCH 2/4] char/tpm: Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in tpm_ibmvtpm_probe() SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-16 17:32 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-16 17:33 ` [PATCH 3/4] char/tpm: Improve a size determination in nine functions SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-16 17:33 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-17 11:03 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-10-17 11:03 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-10-17 11:50 ` Alexander.Steffen
2017-10-17 11:50 ` Alexander.Steffen
2017-10-17 11:50 ` Alexander.Steffen
2017-10-17 12:52 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-10-17 12:52 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-10-17 12:52 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-10-17 12:58 ` Julia Lawall
2017-10-17 12:58 ` Julia Lawall
2017-10-17 12:58 ` Julia Lawall
2017-10-17 15:17 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-10-17 15:17 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-10-17 15:17 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-10-17 15:29 ` Julia Lawall
2017-10-17 15:29 ` Julia Lawall
2017-10-17 15:29 ` Julia Lawall
2017-10-18 9:16 ` Alexander.Steffen
2017-10-18 9:16 ` Alexander.Steffen
2017-10-18 9:16 ` Alexander.Steffen
2017-10-18 9:16 ` Alexander.Steffen
2017-10-17 18:41 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-17 18:41 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-17 18:41 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-17 19:28 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-10-17 19:28 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-10-17 19:28 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-10-17 20:04 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-17 20:04 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-17 20:04 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-17 19:36 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-10-17 19:36 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-10-17 20:24 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-17 20:24 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-18 14:57 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-18 14:57 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-18 14:57 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-18 15:22 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-18 15:22 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-18 15:22 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-18 15:59 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-18 15:59 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-18 15:59 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-18 16:43 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-18 16:43 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-18 16:43 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-18 17:18 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-18 17:18 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-18 17:18 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-18 17:22 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-18 17:22 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-18 17:22 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-18 17:54 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-18 17:54 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-18 17:48 ` SF Markus Elfring [this message]
2017-10-18 17:48 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-18 17:48 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-18 17:54 ` Jerry Snitselaar
2017-10-18 17:54 ` Jerry Snitselaar
2017-10-18 17:54 ` Jerry Snitselaar
2017-10-18 18:11 ` char/tpm: Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in tpm_…() SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-18 18:11 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-18 18:11 ` char/tpm: Delete an error message for a failed memory =?UTF-8?B?IGFsbG9jYXRpb24gaW4g SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-18 18:03 ` char/tpm: Improve a size determination in nine functions Andy Shevchenko
2017-10-18 18:03 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-10-19 12:04 ` Michal Suchánek
2017-10-19 12:04 ` Michal Suchánek
2017-10-19 12:16 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-19 12:16 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-19 12:16 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-17 13:02 ` [PATCH 3/4] " Andy Shevchenko
2017-10-17 13:02 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-10-17 13:02 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-10-18 14:52 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-18 14:52 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-17 15:22 ` Alexander.Steffen
2017-10-17 15:22 ` Alexander.Steffen
2017-10-17 15:22 ` Alexander.Steffen
2017-10-17 15:22 ` Alexander.Steffen
2017-10-18 14:48 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-18 14:48 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-19 16:58 ` Alexander.Steffen
2017-10-19 16:58 ` Alexander.Steffen
2017-10-19 16:58 ` Alexander.Steffen
2017-10-20 9:01 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-20 9:01 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-20 10:23 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-20 10:23 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-20 12:03 ` Alexander.Steffen
2017-10-20 12:03 ` Alexander.Steffen
2017-10-20 12:03 ` Alexander.Steffen
2017-10-23 13:20 ` Dan Carpenter
2017-10-23 13:20 ` Dan Carpenter
2017-10-18 14:40 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-18 14:40 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-16 17:34 ` [PATCH 4/4] char/tpm: Less checks in tpm_ibmvtpm_probe() after error detection SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-16 17:34 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-19 11:56 ` Michal Suchánek
2017-10-19 11:56 ` Michal Suchánek
2017-10-19 12:36 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-19 12:36 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-19 12:46 ` Michal Suchánek
2017-10-19 12:46 ` Michal Suchánek
2017-10-19 14:26 ` Dan Carpenter
2017-10-19 14:26 ` Dan Carpenter
2017-10-19 13:36 ` Dan Carpenter
2017-10-19 13:36 ` Dan Carpenter
2017-10-19 13:36 ` Dan Carpenter
2017-10-19 14:16 ` Michal Suchánek
2017-10-19 14:16 ` Michal Suchánek
2017-10-19 14:16 ` Michal Suchánek
2017-10-19 14:16 ` Michal Suchánek
2017-10-19 14:59 ` Dan Carpenter
2017-10-19 14:59 ` Dan Carpenter
2017-10-19 14:59 ` Dan Carpenter
2017-10-19 20:44 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-19 20:44 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-19 20:44 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-16 18:31 ` [PATCH 0/4] char-TPM: Adjustments for ten function implementations Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-16 18:31 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-16 18:35 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-16 18:35 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-16 20:44 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-16 20:44 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-18 15:04 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-18 15:04 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-18 15:43 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-18 15:43 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-18 15:43 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-16 22:46 ` [PATCH 0/4] " Joe Perches
2017-10-16 22:46 ` Joe Perches
2017-10-17 7:20 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-17 7:20 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-17 8:51 ` Dan Carpenter
2017-10-17 8:51 ` Dan Carpenter
2017-10-17 8:56 ` Julia Lawall
2017-10-17 8:56 ` Julia Lawall
2017-10-17 9:44 ` Dan Carpenter
2017-10-17 9:44 ` Dan Carpenter
2017-10-17 10:11 ` Julia Lawall
2017-10-17 10:11 ` Julia Lawall
2017-10-17 11:52 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-10-17 11:52 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-10-17 11:52 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-10-18 3:18 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-10-18 3:18 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-10-19 13:16 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-10-19 13:16 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-10-19 16:08 ` Circumstances for using the tag “Fixes” (or not) SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-19 16:08 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-17 12:26 ` [PATCH 0/4] char-TPM: Adjustments for ten function implementations Michael Ellerman
2017-10-17 12:26 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-10-18 15:07 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-18 15:07 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-17 9:25 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-17 9:25 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-17 15:57 ` James Bottomley
2017-10-17 15:57 ` James Bottomley
2017-10-17 16:32 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-17 16:32 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-17 16:32 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-17 22:43 ` Joe Perches
2017-10-17 22:43 ` Joe Perches
2017-10-17 22:43 ` Joe Perches
2017-10-17 22:43 ` Joe Perches
2017-10-18 9:00 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-18 9:00 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-18 9:18 ` Joe Perches
2017-10-18 9:18 ` Joe Perches
2017-10-18 9:50 ` Alexander.Steffen
2017-10-18 9:50 ` Alexander.Steffen
2017-10-18 9:50 ` Alexander.Steffen
2017-10-18 10:00 ` Julia Lawall
2017-10-18 10:00 ` Julia Lawall
2017-10-18 10:28 ` Joe Perches
2017-10-18 10:28 ` Joe Perches
2017-10-18 10:28 ` Joe Perches
2017-10-18 11:00 ` Adjusting further size determinations? SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-18 11:00 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-18 11:49 ` Joe Perches
2017-10-18 11:49 ` Joe Perches
2017-10-18 12:07 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-18 12:07 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-18 12:58 ` David Laight
2017-10-18 12:58 ` David Laight
2017-10-18 12:58 ` David Laight
2017-10-18 13:32 ` Julia Lawall
2017-10-18 13:32 ` Julia Lawall
2017-10-18 13:50 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-18 13:50 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-18 13:50 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-18 10:44 ` char-TPM: Adjustments for ten function implementations Alexander.Steffen
2017-10-18 10:44 ` Alexander.Steffen
2017-10-18 10:44 ` Alexander.Steffen
2017-10-18 10:49 ` Joe Perches
2017-10-18 10:49 ` Joe Perches
2017-10-18 10:49 ` Joe Perches
2017-10-18 11:07 ` Alexander.Steffen
2017-10-18 11:07 ` Alexander.Steffen
2017-10-18 11:07 ` Alexander.Steffen
2017-10-18 9:55 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-18 9:55 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-18 18:27 ` Michal Suchánek
2017-10-18 18:27 ` Michal Suchánek
2017-10-18 15:10 ` [PATCH 0/4] " Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-18 15:10 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-18 15:10 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-18 16:09 ` James Bottomley
2017-10-18 16:09 ` James Bottomley
2017-10-18 16:09 ` James Bottomley
2017-10-18 17:13 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-18 17:13 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-18 17:13 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e9638486-7e59-1c5a-87ae-ca0f1fbbd021@users.sourceforge.net \
--to=elfring@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=Alexander.Steffen@infineon.com \
--cc=PeterHuewe@gmx.de \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com \
--cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com \
--cc=jsnitsel@redhat.com \
--cc=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kgold@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.