From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> To: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, rui.zhang@intel.com, amit.kucheria@verdurent.com, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, orjan.eide@arm.com, robh@kernel.org, alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com, steven.price@arm.com, airlied@linux.ie, daniel@ffwll.ch Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] thermal: devfreq_cooling: add new registration functions with Energy Model Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 11:14:02 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <ef641466-cf86-85aa-925a-3de9e1eed501@arm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20201202102439.GA1639@arm.com> Hi Ionela, On 12/2/20 10:24 AM, Ionela Voinescu wrote: > Hi Lukasz, > > On Wednesday 18 Nov 2020 at 12:03:56 (+0000), Lukasz Luba wrote: [snip] >> + struct device_node *np = NULL; [snip] >> + >> + if (dev->of_node) >> + np = of_node_get(dev->of_node); >> + > > Should np be checked before use? I'm not sure if it's better to do the > assign first and then the check on np before use. It depends on the > consequences of passing a NULL node pointer later on. The np is actually dev->of_node (or left NULL, as set at the begging). The only meaning of the line above is to increment the counter and then decrement if CONFIG_OF_DYNAMIC was used. The devfreq_cooling_register() has np = NULL and the registration can handle it, so we should be OK here as well. > >> + cdev = of_devfreq_cooling_register_power(np, df, dfc_power); >> + >> + if (np) >> + of_node_put(np); >> + [snip] >> > > Otherwise it looks good to me: > > Reviewed-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com> Thank you for the review. Regards, Lukasz > > Ionela. >
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> To: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com> Cc: amit.kucheria@verdurent.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, airlied@linux.ie, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, steven.price@arm.com, alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com, rui.zhang@intel.com, orjan.eide@arm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] thermal: devfreq_cooling: add new registration functions with Energy Model Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 11:14:02 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <ef641466-cf86-85aa-925a-3de9e1eed501@arm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20201202102439.GA1639@arm.com> Hi Ionela, On 12/2/20 10:24 AM, Ionela Voinescu wrote: > Hi Lukasz, > > On Wednesday 18 Nov 2020 at 12:03:56 (+0000), Lukasz Luba wrote: [snip] >> + struct device_node *np = NULL; [snip] >> + >> + if (dev->of_node) >> + np = of_node_get(dev->of_node); >> + > > Should np be checked before use? I'm not sure if it's better to do the > assign first and then the check on np before use. It depends on the > consequences of passing a NULL node pointer later on. The np is actually dev->of_node (or left NULL, as set at the begging). The only meaning of the line above is to increment the counter and then decrement if CONFIG_OF_DYNAMIC was used. The devfreq_cooling_register() has np = NULL and the registration can handle it, so we should be OK here as well. > >> + cdev = of_devfreq_cooling_register_power(np, df, dfc_power); >> + >> + if (np) >> + of_node_put(np); >> + [snip] >> > > Otherwise it looks good to me: > > Reviewed-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com> Thank you for the review. Regards, Lukasz > > Ionela. > _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-02 11:15 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-11-18 12:03 [PATCH v2 0/5] Thermal devfreq cooling improvements with Energy Model Lukasz Luba 2020-11-18 12:03 ` Lukasz Luba 2020-11-18 12:03 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] thermal: devfreq_cooling: change tracing function and arguments Lukasz Luba 2020-11-18 12:03 ` Lukasz Luba 2020-12-02 10:23 ` Ionela Voinescu 2020-12-02 10:23 ` Ionela Voinescu 2020-11-18 12:03 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] thermal: devfreq_cooling: get a copy of device status Lukasz Luba 2020-11-18 12:03 ` Lukasz Luba 2020-12-02 10:23 ` Ionela Voinescu 2020-12-02 10:23 ` Ionela Voinescu 2020-12-03 13:09 ` Daniel Lezcano 2020-12-03 13:09 ` Daniel Lezcano 2020-12-03 15:38 ` Lukasz Luba 2020-12-03 15:38 ` Lukasz Luba 2020-12-03 16:09 ` Daniel Lezcano 2020-12-03 16:09 ` Daniel Lezcano 2020-12-07 12:41 ` Lukasz Luba 2020-12-07 12:41 ` Lukasz Luba 2020-12-08 14:20 ` Lukasz Luba 2020-12-08 14:20 ` Lukasz Luba 2020-11-18 12:03 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] thermal: devfreq_cooling: add new registration functions with Energy Model Lukasz Luba 2020-11-18 12:03 ` Lukasz Luba 2020-12-02 10:24 ` Ionela Voinescu 2020-12-02 10:24 ` Ionela Voinescu 2020-12-02 11:14 ` Lukasz Luba [this message] 2020-12-02 11:14 ` Lukasz Luba 2020-12-02 11:49 ` Ionela Voinescu 2020-12-02 11:49 ` Ionela Voinescu 2020-12-02 11:54 ` Lukasz Luba 2020-12-02 11:54 ` Lukasz Luba 2020-12-03 15:40 ` Daniel Lezcano 2020-12-03 15:40 ` Daniel Lezcano 2020-12-07 9:46 ` Lukasz Luba 2020-12-07 9:46 ` Lukasz Luba 2020-11-18 12:03 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] thermal: devfreq_cooling: remove old power model and use EM Lukasz Luba 2020-11-18 12:03 ` Lukasz Luba 2020-12-02 10:26 ` Ionela Voinescu 2020-12-02 10:26 ` Ionela Voinescu 2020-11-18 12:03 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] drm/panfrost: Register devfreq cooling and attempt to add Energy Model Lukasz Luba 2020-11-18 12:03 ` Lukasz Luba 2020-12-02 15:01 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] Thermal devfreq cooling improvements with " Daniel Lezcano 2020-12-02 15:01 ` Daniel Lezcano
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=ef641466-cf86-85aa-925a-3de9e1eed501@arm.com \ --to=lukasz.luba@arm.com \ --cc=airlied@linux.ie \ --cc=alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com \ --cc=amit.kucheria@verdurent.com \ --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \ --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \ --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \ --cc=ionela.voinescu@arm.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=orjan.eide@arm.com \ --cc=robh@kernel.org \ --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \ --cc=steven.price@arm.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.