From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> To: Ilkka Koskinen <ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, patches@amperecomputing.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] perf/arm-cmn: Add more bits to child node address offset field Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 11:05:39 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <f2ccc321-c892-0e35-3760-1d0ed5b5dbf3@arm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20220808195455.79277-1-ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com> On 2022-08-08 20:54, Ilkka Koskinen wrote: > CMN-600 uses bits [27:0] for child node address offset while bits [30:28] > are required to be zero. > > For CMN-650, the child node address offset field has been increased > to include bits [29:0] while leaving only bit 30 set to zero. > > Let's include the missing two bits and assume older implementations > comply with the spec and set bits [29:28] to 0. Ah, I don't think it ever even crossed my mind to look for changes here, but of course if the node regions have grown from 16KB to 64KB then it's only natural that offsets grow to match. I expect the CMN-700 config that we tested on internally would have been small enough for this not to make a difference. Thanks for the catch! Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> > Signed-off-by: Ilkka Koskinen <ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com> > --- > > I have tested this patch on CMN-600 and CMN-650. > > drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c b/drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c > index 80d8309652a4..b80a9b74662b 100644 > --- a/drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c > +++ b/drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c > @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ > #define CMN_CI_CHILD_COUNT GENMASK_ULL(15, 0) > #define CMN_CI_CHILD_PTR_OFFSET GENMASK_ULL(31, 16) > > -#define CMN_CHILD_NODE_ADDR GENMASK(27, 0) > +#define CMN_CHILD_NODE_ADDR GENMASK(29, 0) > #define CMN_CHILD_NODE_EXTERNAL BIT(31) > > #define CMN_MAX_DIMENSION 12
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> To: Ilkka Koskinen <ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, patches@amperecomputing.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] perf/arm-cmn: Add more bits to child node address offset field Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 11:05:39 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <f2ccc321-c892-0e35-3760-1d0ed5b5dbf3@arm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20220808195455.79277-1-ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com> On 2022-08-08 20:54, Ilkka Koskinen wrote: > CMN-600 uses bits [27:0] for child node address offset while bits [30:28] > are required to be zero. > > For CMN-650, the child node address offset field has been increased > to include bits [29:0] while leaving only bit 30 set to zero. > > Let's include the missing two bits and assume older implementations > comply with the spec and set bits [29:28] to 0. Ah, I don't think it ever even crossed my mind to look for changes here, but of course if the node regions have grown from 16KB to 64KB then it's only natural that offsets grow to match. I expect the CMN-700 config that we tested on internally would have been small enough for this not to make a difference. Thanks for the catch! Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> > Signed-off-by: Ilkka Koskinen <ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com> > --- > > I have tested this patch on CMN-600 and CMN-650. > > drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c b/drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c > index 80d8309652a4..b80a9b74662b 100644 > --- a/drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c > +++ b/drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c > @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ > #define CMN_CI_CHILD_COUNT GENMASK_ULL(15, 0) > #define CMN_CI_CHILD_PTR_OFFSET GENMASK_ULL(31, 16) > > -#define CMN_CHILD_NODE_ADDR GENMASK(27, 0) > +#define CMN_CHILD_NODE_ADDR GENMASK(29, 0) > #define CMN_CHILD_NODE_EXTERNAL BIT(31) > > #define CMN_MAX_DIMENSION 12 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-09 10:05 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-08-08 19:54 [PATCH 1/1] perf/arm-cmn: Add more bits to child node address offset field Ilkka Koskinen 2022-08-08 19:54 ` Ilkka Koskinen 2022-08-09 10:05 ` Robin Murphy [this message] 2022-08-09 10:05 ` Robin Murphy 2022-08-31 4:46 ` Ilkka Koskinen 2022-08-31 4:46 ` Ilkka Koskinen 2022-09-21 16:17 ` Robin Murphy 2022-09-21 16:17 ` Robin Murphy 2022-09-21 19:56 ` Ilkka Koskinen 2022-09-21 19:56 ` Ilkka Koskinen 2022-09-22 20:33 ` Will Deacon 2022-09-22 20:33 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=f2ccc321-c892-0e35-3760-1d0ed5b5dbf3@arm.com \ --to=robin.murphy@arm.com \ --cc=ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \ --cc=patches@amperecomputing.com \ --cc=will@kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.