All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Julien Grall <julien@xen.org>
To: Oleksii <oleksii.kurochko@gmail.com>, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
	Bertrand Marquis <bertrand.marquis@arm.com>,
	Volodymyr Babchuk <Volodymyr_Babchuk@epam.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] xen/arm: align *(.proc.info) in the linker script
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2023 20:38:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f2f6544a-a59e-2e10-0b8f-080f91708459@xen.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cf15b113-ac6f-e115-6c38-38b25a265934@xen.org>

Hi,

On 01/03/2023 17:50, Julien Grall wrote:
> 
> 
> On 01/03/2023 16:38, Oleksii wrote:
>> Hi Julien,
> 
> Hi,
> 
>> On Wed, 2023-03-01 at 16:21 +0000, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> Hi Oleksii,
>>>
>>> On 01/03/2023 16:14, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
>>>> During testing of bug.h's macros generic implementation yocto-
>>>> qemuarm
>>>> job crashed with data abort:
>>>
>>> The commit message is lacking some information. You are telling us
>>> that
>>> there is an error when building with your series, but this doesn't
>>> tell
>>> me why this is the correct fix.
>>>
>>> This is also why I asked to have the xen binary because I want to
>>> check
>>> whether this was a latent bug in Xen or your series effectively
>>> introduce a bug.
>>>
>>> Note that regardless what I just wrote this is a good idea to align
>>> __proc_info_start. I will try to have a closer look later and propose
>>> a
>>> commit message and/or any action for your other series.
>> Regarding binaries please take a look here:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel/aa2862eacccfb0574859bf4cda8f4992baa5d2e1.camel@gmail.com/
>>
>> I am not sure if you get my answer as I had the message from delivery
>> server that it was blocked for some reason.
> 
> I got the answer. The problem now is gitlab only keep the artifact for 
> the latest build and it only provide a zImage (having the ELF would be 
> easier).
> 
> I will try to reproduce the error on my end.

I managed to reproduce it. It looks like that after your bug patch, 
*(.rodata.*) will not be end on a 4-byte boundary. Before your patch, 
all the messages will be in .rodata.str. Now they are in .bug_frames.*, 
so there some difference in .rodata.*.

That said, it is not entirely clear why we never seen the issue before 
because my guessing there are no guarantee that .rodata.* will be 
suitably aligned.

Anyway, here a proposal for the commit message:

"
xen/arm: Ensure the start *(.proc.info) of is 4-byte aligned

The entries in *(.proc.info) are expected to be 4-byte aligned and the 
compiler will access them using 4-byte load instructions. On Arm32, the 
alignment is strictly enforced by the processor and will result to a 
data abort if it is not correct.

However, the linker script doesn't encode this requirement. So we are at 
the mercy of the compiler/linker to have aligned the previous sections 
suitably.

This was spotted when trying to use the upcoming generic bug 
infrastructure with the compiler provided by Yocto.

Link: 
https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel/6735859208c6dcb7320f89664ae298005f70827b.camel@gmail.com/
"

If you are happy with the proposed commit message, then I can update it 
while committing.

Cheers,

-- 
Julien Grall


  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-01 20:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-01 16:14 [PATCH v1] xen/arm: align *(.proc.info) in the linker script Oleksii Kurochko
2023-03-01 16:21 ` Julien Grall
2023-03-01 16:38   ` Oleksii
2023-03-01 17:50     ` Julien Grall
2023-03-01 20:38       ` Julien Grall [this message]
2023-03-02  7:34         ` Oleksii
2023-03-02 14:50           ` Julien Grall
2023-03-02 17:24             ` Oleksii
2023-03-02  9:45         ` Jan Beulich
2023-03-02 11:01           ` Julien Grall
2023-03-02 11:21             ` Jan Beulich
2023-03-02 12:51               ` Julien Grall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f2f6544a-a59e-2e10-0b8f-080f91708459@xen.org \
    --to=julien@xen.org \
    --cc=Volodymyr_Babchuk@epam.com \
    --cc=bertrand.marquis@arm.com \
    --cc=oleksii.kurochko@gmail.com \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.