From: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org> To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>, peter.griffin@linaro.org Cc: alim.akhtar@samsung.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, andre.draszik@linaro.org, willmcvicker@google.com, kernel-team@android.com, s.nawrocki@samsung.com, cw00.choi@samsung.com, mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@kernel.org, semen.protsenko@linaro.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, jaewon02.kim@samsung.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] clk: samsung: introduce nMUX to reparent MUX clocks Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 08:13:39 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <f67ca72f-c0ae-4f2f-a435-b00266914053@linaro.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <ab700927-d7b6-44c6-bbe0-8c52e4a0f907@linaro.org> On 4/13/24 09:47, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 28/03/2024 13:34, Tudor Ambarus wrote: >> v3: >> - update first patch: >> - remove __nMUX() as it duplicated __MUX() with an exception on flags. >> - update commit message >> - update comment and say that nMUX() shall be used where MUX reparenting >> on clock rate chage is allowed >> - collect R-b, A-b tags >> > > Sorry for late response, somehow this end up deep in inbox. You no worries! > reference some non existing commits, so I think you do not work on > mainline trees. Ah, the horror, you're right, I messed up the fixes reference in commit 2. It's because I started working on this before that patch got integrated. Would be good to extend checkpatch to catch such situations. > > Also Fixes must come before other patches, so probably first patch > should be squashed with second. Otherwise second patch is not a complete > fix. I don't mind squashing them. I noticed a tag that might help in this situations: "Depends-on:". But I guess we can't use that in the same patch set as when the maintainer applies the dependency and adds its S-o-b tag, it will modify the sha1 of the commit. Will squash them. Cheers, ta
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org> To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>, peter.griffin@linaro.org Cc: alim.akhtar@samsung.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, andre.draszik@linaro.org, willmcvicker@google.com, kernel-team@android.com, s.nawrocki@samsung.com, cw00.choi@samsung.com, mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@kernel.org, semen.protsenko@linaro.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, jaewon02.kim@samsung.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] clk: samsung: introduce nMUX to reparent MUX clocks Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 08:13:39 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <f67ca72f-c0ae-4f2f-a435-b00266914053@linaro.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <ab700927-d7b6-44c6-bbe0-8c52e4a0f907@linaro.org> On 4/13/24 09:47, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 28/03/2024 13:34, Tudor Ambarus wrote: >> v3: >> - update first patch: >> - remove __nMUX() as it duplicated __MUX() with an exception on flags. >> - update commit message >> - update comment and say that nMUX() shall be used where MUX reparenting >> on clock rate chage is allowed >> - collect R-b, A-b tags >> > > Sorry for late response, somehow this end up deep in inbox. You no worries! > reference some non existing commits, so I think you do not work on > mainline trees. Ah, the horror, you're right, I messed up the fixes reference in commit 2. It's because I started working on this before that patch got integrated. Would be good to extend checkpatch to catch such situations. > > Also Fixes must come before other patches, so probably first patch > should be squashed with second. Otherwise second patch is not a complete > fix. I don't mind squashing them. I noticed a tag that might help in this situations: "Depends-on:". But I guess we can't use that in the same patch set as when the maintainer applies the dependency and adds its S-o-b tag, it will modify the sha1 of the commit. Will squash them. Cheers, ta _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-15 7:13 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2024-03-28 12:34 [PATCH v3 0/3] clk: samsung: introduce nMUX to reparent MUX clocks Tudor Ambarus 2024-03-28 12:34 ` Tudor Ambarus 2024-03-28 12:34 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] clk: samsung: introduce nMUX for MUX clks that can reparented Tudor Ambarus 2024-03-28 12:34 ` Tudor Ambarus 2024-03-28 12:44 ` André Draszik 2024-03-28 12:44 ` André Draszik 2024-03-28 12:34 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] clk: samsung: gs101: propagate PERIC1 USI SPI clock rate Tudor Ambarus 2024-03-28 12:34 ` Tudor Ambarus 2024-03-28 12:34 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] clk: samsung: gs101: propagate PERIC0 " Tudor Ambarus 2024-03-28 12:34 ` Tudor Ambarus 2024-04-13 8:47 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] clk: samsung: introduce nMUX to reparent MUX clocks Krzysztof Kozlowski 2024-04-13 8:47 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2024-04-15 7:13 ` Tudor Ambarus [this message] 2024-04-15 7:13 ` Tudor Ambarus
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=f67ca72f-c0ae-4f2f-a435-b00266914053@linaro.org \ --to=tudor.ambarus@linaro.org \ --cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \ --cc=andre.draszik@linaro.org \ --cc=cw00.choi@samsung.com \ --cc=jaewon02.kim@samsung.com \ --cc=kernel-team@android.com \ --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \ --cc=peter.griffin@linaro.org \ --cc=s.nawrocki@samsung.com \ --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \ --cc=semen.protsenko@linaro.org \ --cc=willmcvicker@google.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.