All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <Alex_Gagniuc@Dellteam.com>
To: helgaas@kernel.org, mr.nuke.me@gmail.com
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com,
	keith.busch@intel.com, Austin.Bolen@dell.com,
	Shyam.Iyer@dell.com, ariel.elior@cavium.com,
	everest-linux-l2@cavium.com, davem@davemloft.net,
	michael.chan@broadcom.com, ganeshgr@chelsio.com,
	jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, tariqt@mellanox.com,
	saeedm@mellanox.com, leon@kernel.org,
	jakub.kicinski@netronome.com, dirk.vandermerwe@netronome.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
	oss-drivers@netronome.com, stephen@networkplumber.org, mj@ucw.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] PCI: sysfs: Export available PCIe bandwidth
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2018 22:00:19 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f9fbc8babbb344eca593a3f8b0d096d9@ausx13mps321.AMER.DELL.COM> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20181003213054.GH120535@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com

On 10/03/2018 04:31 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> 
> [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
> Please report any suspicious attachments, links, or requests for sensitive information.
> 
> 
> [+cc Stephen, Martin (for possible lspci changes)]
> 
> Hi Alexandru,
> 
> On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 01:02:28PM -0500, Alexandru Gagniuc wrote:
>> For certain bandwidth-critical devices (e.g. multi-port network cards)
>> it is useful to know the available bandwidth to the root complex. This
>> information is only available via the system log, which doesn't
>> account for link degradation after probing.
>>
>> With a sysfs attribute, we can computes the bandwidth on-demand, and
>> will detect degraded links.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c | 13 +++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
>> index 9ecfe13157c0..6658e927b1f5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
>> @@ -218,6 +218,18 @@ static ssize_t current_link_width_show(struct device *dev,
>>   }
>>   static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(current_link_width);
>>   
>> +static ssize_t available_bandwidth_show(struct device *dev,
>> +				       struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
>> +{
>> +	struct pci_dev *pci_dev = to_pci_dev(dev);
>> +	u32 bw_avail;
>> +
>> +	bw_avail = pcie_bandwidth_available(pci_dev, NULL, NULL, NULL);
>> +
>> +	return sprintf(buf, "%u.%03u Gb/s\n", bw_avail / 1000, bw_avail % 1000);
>> +}
>> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(available_bandwidth);
> 
> Help me understand this.  We already have these sysfs attributes:
> 
>    max_link_speed          # eg, 16 GT/s
>    max_link_width          # eg, 8
>    current_link_speed      # eg, 16 GT/s
>    current_link_width      # eg, 8
> 
> so I think the raw materials are already exposed.
> > The benefits I see for this new file are that
> 
>    - pcie_bandwidth_available() does the work of traversing up the
>      tree, doing the computations (link width * speed, reduced by
>      encoding overhead), and finding the minimum, and
> 
>    - it re-traverses the path every time we look at it, while the
>      boot-time check is a one-time event.
> 
> In principle this could all be done in user space with the attributes
> that are already exported.  There's some precedent for things like
> this in lspci, e.g., "NUMA node" [1], and lspci might even be a more
> user-friendly place for users to look for this, as opposed to
> searching through sysfs.

Parsing the endpoint to root port bandwidth is, in principle, possible 
from userspace. It's just that in practice it's very clumsy to do, and, 
as you pointed out, not that reliable.

I understand it's not information that all users would jump in the air 
to know. However, it was important enough for certain use cases, that 
the kernel already has a very reliable way to calculate it.

It seems to me that the most elegant way is to let the kernel tell us, 
since the kernel already has this facility. To quote one of the texts 
under Documentation/, it is an elegant way to "avoid reinventing kernel 
wheels in userspace".

Alex

> [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/utils/pciutils/pciutils.git/commit/?id=90ec4a6d0ae8
> 
>>   static ssize_t secondary_bus_number_show(struct device *dev,
>>   					 struct device_attribute *attr,
>>   					 char *buf)
>> @@ -786,6 +798,7 @@ static struct attribute *pcie_dev_attrs[] = {
>>   	&dev_attr_current_link_width.attr,
>>   	&dev_attr_max_link_width.attr,
>>   	&dev_attr_max_link_speed.attr,
>> +	&dev_attr_available_bandwidth.attr,
>>   	NULL,
>>   };
>>   
>> -- 
>> 2.17.1
>>
> 


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: <Alex_Gagniuc@Dellteam.com>
To: <helgaas@kernel.org>, <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Cc: <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>, <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	<keith.busch@intel.com>, <Austin.Bolen@dell.com>,
	<Shyam.Iyer@dell.com>, <ariel.elior@cavium.com>,
	<everest-linux-l2@cavium.com>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
	<michael.chan@broadcom.com>, <ganeshgr@chelsio.com>,
	<jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>, <tariqt@mellanox.com>,
	<saeedm@mellanox.com>, <leon@kernel.org>,
	<jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>, <dirk.vandermerwe@netronome.com>,
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>, <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
	<oss-drivers@netronome.com>, <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	<mj@ucw.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] PCI: sysfs: Export available PCIe bandwidth
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2018 22:00:19 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f9fbc8babbb344eca593a3f8b0d096d9@ausx13mps321.AMER.DELL.COM> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20181003213054.GH120535@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com

On 10/03/2018 04:31 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> 
> [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
> Please report any suspicious attachments, links, or requests for sensitive information.
> 
> 
> [+cc Stephen, Martin (for possible lspci changes)]
> 
> Hi Alexandru,
> 
> On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 01:02:28PM -0500, Alexandru Gagniuc wrote:
>> For certain bandwidth-critical devices (e.g. multi-port network cards)
>> it is useful to know the available bandwidth to the root complex. This
>> information is only available via the system log, which doesn't
>> account for link degradation after probing.
>>
>> With a sysfs attribute, we can computes the bandwidth on-demand, and
>> will detect degraded links.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c | 13 +++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
>> index 9ecfe13157c0..6658e927b1f5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
>> @@ -218,6 +218,18 @@ static ssize_t current_link_width_show(struct device *dev,
>>   }
>>   static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(current_link_width);
>>   
>> +static ssize_t available_bandwidth_show(struct device *dev,
>> +				       struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
>> +{
>> +	struct pci_dev *pci_dev = to_pci_dev(dev);
>> +	u32 bw_avail;
>> +
>> +	bw_avail = pcie_bandwidth_available(pci_dev, NULL, NULL, NULL);
>> +
>> +	return sprintf(buf, "%u.%03u Gb/s\n", bw_avail / 1000, bw_avail % 1000);
>> +}
>> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(available_bandwidth);
> 
> Help me understand this.  We already have these sysfs attributes:
> 
>    max_link_speed          # eg, 16 GT/s
>    max_link_width          # eg, 8
>    current_link_speed      # eg, 16 GT/s
>    current_link_width      # eg, 8
> 
> so I think the raw materials are already exposed.
> > The benefits I see for this new file are that
> 
>    - pcie_bandwidth_available() does the work of traversing up the
>      tree, doing the computations (link width * speed, reduced by
>      encoding overhead), and finding the minimum, and
> 
>    - it re-traverses the path every time we look at it, while the
>      boot-time check is a one-time event.
> 
> In principle this could all be done in user space with the attributes
> that are already exported.  There's some precedent for things like
> this in lspci, e.g., "NUMA node" [1], and lspci might even be a more
> user-friendly place for users to look for this, as opposed to
> searching through sysfs.

Parsing the endpoint to root port bandwidth is, in principle, possible 
from userspace. It's just that in practice it's very clumsy to do, and, 
as you pointed out, not that reliable.

I understand it's not information that all users would jump in the air 
to know. However, it was important enough for certain use cases, that 
the kernel already has a very reliable way to calculate it.

It seems to me that the most elegant way is to let the kernel tell us, 
since the kernel already has this facility. To quote one of the texts 
under Documentation/, it is an elegant way to "avoid reinventing kernel 
wheels in userspace".

Alex

> [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/utils/pciutils/pciutils.git/commit/?id=90ec4a6d0ae8
> 
>>   static ssize_t secondary_bus_number_show(struct device *dev,
>>   					 struct device_attribute *attr,
>>   					 char *buf)
>> @@ -786,6 +798,7 @@ static struct attribute *pcie_dev_attrs[] = {
>>   	&dev_attr_current_link_width.attr,
>>   	&dev_attr_max_link_width.attr,
>>   	&dev_attr_max_link_speed.attr,
>> +	&dev_attr_available_bandwidth.attr,
>>   	NULL,
>>   };
>>   
>> -- 
>> 2.17.1
>>
> 


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alex_Gagniuc@Dellteam.com <Alex_Gagniuc@Dellteam.com>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 1/9] PCI: sysfs: Export available PCIe bandwidth
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2018 22:00:19 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f9fbc8babbb344eca593a3f8b0d096d9@ausx13mps321.AMER.DELL.COM> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20181003213054.GH120535@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com

On 10/03/2018 04:31 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> 
> [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
> Please report any suspicious attachments, links, or requests for sensitive information.
> 
> 
> [+cc Stephen, Martin (for possible lspci changes)]
> 
> Hi Alexandru,
> 
> On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 01:02:28PM -0500, Alexandru Gagniuc wrote:
>> For certain bandwidth-critical devices (e.g. multi-port network cards)
>> it is useful to know the available bandwidth to the root complex. This
>> information is only available via the system log, which doesn't
>> account for link degradation after probing.
>>
>> With a sysfs attribute, we can computes the bandwidth on-demand, and
>> will detect degraded links.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c | 13 +++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
>> index 9ecfe13157c0..6658e927b1f5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
>> @@ -218,6 +218,18 @@ static ssize_t current_link_width_show(struct device *dev,
>>   }
>>   static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(current_link_width);
>>   
>> +static ssize_t available_bandwidth_show(struct device *dev,
>> +				       struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
>> +{
>> +	struct pci_dev *pci_dev = to_pci_dev(dev);
>> +	u32 bw_avail;
>> +
>> +	bw_avail = pcie_bandwidth_available(pci_dev, NULL, NULL, NULL);
>> +
>> +	return sprintf(buf, "%u.%03u Gb/s\n", bw_avail / 1000, bw_avail % 1000);
>> +}
>> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(available_bandwidth);
> 
> Help me understand this.  We already have these sysfs attributes:
> 
>    max_link_speed          # eg, 16 GT/s
>    max_link_width          # eg, 8
>    current_link_speed      # eg, 16 GT/s
>    current_link_width      # eg, 8
> 
> so I think the raw materials are already exposed.
> > The benefits I see for this new file are that
> 
>    - pcie_bandwidth_available() does the work of traversing up the
>      tree, doing the computations (link width * speed, reduced by
>      encoding overhead), and finding the minimum, and
> 
>    - it re-traverses the path every time we look at it, while the
>      boot-time check is a one-time event.
> 
> In principle this could all be done in user space with the attributes
> that are already exported.  There's some precedent for things like
> this in lspci, e.g., "NUMA node" [1], and lspci might even be a more
> user-friendly place for users to look for this, as opposed to
> searching through sysfs.

Parsing the endpoint to root port bandwidth is, in principle, possible 
from userspace. It's just that in practice it's very clumsy to do, and, 
as you pointed out, not that reliable.

I understand it's not information that all users would jump in the air 
to know. However, it was important enough for certain use cases, that 
the kernel already has a very reliable way to calculate it.

It seems to me that the most elegant way is to let the kernel tell us, 
since the kernel already has this facility. To quote one of the texts 
under Documentation/, it is an elegant way to "avoid reinventing kernel 
wheels in userspace".

Alex

> [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/utils/pciutils/pciutils.git/commit/?id=90ec4a6d0ae8
> 
>>   static ssize_t secondary_bus_number_show(struct device *dev,
>>   					 struct device_attribute *attr,
>>   					 char *buf)
>> @@ -786,6 +798,7 @@ static struct attribute *pcie_dev_attrs[] = {
>>   	&dev_attr_current_link_width.attr,
>>   	&dev_attr_max_link_width.attr,
>>   	&dev_attr_max_link_speed.attr,
>> +	&dev_attr_available_bandwidth.attr,
>>   	NULL,
>>   };
>>   
>> -- 
>> 2.17.1
>>
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-03 22:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-03 18:02 [PATCH 0/9] Export PCIe bandwidth via sysfs Alexandru Gagniuc
2018-09-03 18:02 ` Alexandru Gagniuc
2018-09-03 18:02 ` [PATCH 1/9] PCI: sysfs: Export available PCIe bandwidth Alexandru Gagniuc
2018-09-05  7:26   ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-09-05  7:26     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Stephen Hemminger
2018-09-05 13:52     ` Alex G.
2018-10-03 21:30   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-10-03 21:30     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Bjorn Helgaas
2018-10-03 21:30     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-10-03 21:30     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-10-03 22:00     ` Alex_Gagniuc [this message]
2018-10-03 22:00       ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alex_Gagniuc
2018-10-03 22:00       ` Alex_Gagniuc
2018-10-04 20:45       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-10-04 20:45         ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Bjorn Helgaas
2018-10-08 21:09         ` Alex_Gagniuc
2018-10-08 21:09           ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alex_Gagniuc
2018-10-08 21:09           ` Alex_Gagniuc
2018-09-03 18:02 ` [PATCH 2/9] bnx2x: Do not call pcie_print_link_status() Alexandru Gagniuc
2018-09-03 18:02 ` [PATCH 3/9] bnxt_en: " Alexandru Gagniuc
2018-09-03 18:02 ` [PATCH 4/9] cxgb4: " Alexandru Gagniuc
2018-09-03 18:02 ` [PATCH 5/9] fm10k: " Alexandru Gagniuc
2018-09-03 18:02 ` [PATCH 6/9] ixgbe: " Alexandru Gagniuc
2018-09-03 18:02 ` [PATCH 7/9] net/mlx4: " Alexandru Gagniuc
2018-09-04 12:51   ` Leon Romanovsky
2018-09-04 12:51     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Leon Romanovsky
2018-09-03 18:02 ` [PATCH 8/9] net/mlx5: " Alexandru Gagniuc
2018-09-04 12:51   ` Leon Romanovsky
2018-09-04 12:51     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Leon Romanovsky
2018-09-03 18:02 ` [PATCH 9/9] nfp: " Alexandru Gagniuc

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f9fbc8babbb344eca593a3f8b0d096d9@ausx13mps321.AMER.DELL.COM \
    --to=alex_gagniuc@dellteam.com \
    --cc=Austin.Bolen@dell.com \
    --cc=Shyam.Iyer@dell.com \
    --cc=ariel.elior@cavium.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dirk.vandermerwe@netronome.com \
    --cc=everest-linux-l2@cavium.com \
    --cc=ganeshgr@chelsio.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
    --cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
    --cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michael.chan@broadcom.com \
    --cc=mj@ucw.cz \
    --cc=mr.nuke.me@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oss-drivers@netronome.com \
    --cc=saeedm@mellanox.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=tariqt@mellanox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.