From: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>,
ohad@wizery.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
agross@kernel.org, saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Request direct mapping for modem firmware subdevice
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 11:58:30 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ff805c5c647326c5edaddf2efec5cb87@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a50040a9-54fe-f682-dd7e-b2991b48d633@arm.com>
Hi Robin,
On 2020-03-10 22:14, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 10/03/2020 4:23 pm, Joerg Roedel wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 07:30:50PM +0530, Sibi Sankar wrote:
>>> The accesses are initiated by the firmware
>>> and they access modem reserved regions.
>>> However as explained in ^^ any accesses
>>> outside the region will result in a violation
>>> and is controlled through XPUs (protection units).
>>
>> Okay, this sounds like a case for arm_smmu_get_resv_region(). It
>> should
>> return an entry for the reserved memory region the firmware needs to
>> access, so that generic iommu can setup this mapping.
>>
>> Note that it should return that entry only for your device, not for
>> all
>> devices. Maybe there is a property in DT or IORT you can set to
>> transport this information into the arm-smmu driver.
>>
>> This is pretty similar to RMRR mapping on the Intel VT-d IOMMU or
>> Unity-mapped ranges in the AMD-Vi IOMMU.
>
> Yup, a way to describe boot-time memory regions in IORT is in the
> process of being specced out; the first attempt at an equivalent for
> DT is here:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20191209150748.2471814-1-thierry.reding@gmail.com/
>
> If that's not enough and the SMMU still needs to treat certain Stream
> IDs specially because they may be untranslatable (due to having direct
> access to memory as a side-channel), then that should be handled in
> the SoC-specific corner of the SMMU driver, not delegated to
> individual endpoint drivers.
>
Are you talking about this one for SoC specific change -
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1183530/
Thanks,
Sai
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a
member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: ohad@wizery.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>,
agross@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Request direct mapping for modem firmware subdevice
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 11:58:30 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ff805c5c647326c5edaddf2efec5cb87@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a50040a9-54fe-f682-dd7e-b2991b48d633@arm.com>
Hi Robin,
On 2020-03-10 22:14, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 10/03/2020 4:23 pm, Joerg Roedel wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 07:30:50PM +0530, Sibi Sankar wrote:
>>> The accesses are initiated by the firmware
>>> and they access modem reserved regions.
>>> However as explained in ^^ any accesses
>>> outside the region will result in a violation
>>> and is controlled through XPUs (protection units).
>>
>> Okay, this sounds like a case for arm_smmu_get_resv_region(). It
>> should
>> return an entry for the reserved memory region the firmware needs to
>> access, so that generic iommu can setup this mapping.
>>
>> Note that it should return that entry only for your device, not for
>> all
>> devices. Maybe there is a property in DT or IORT you can set to
>> transport this information into the arm-smmu driver.
>>
>> This is pretty similar to RMRR mapping on the Intel VT-d IOMMU or
>> Unity-mapped ranges in the AMD-Vi IOMMU.
>
> Yup, a way to describe boot-time memory regions in IORT is in the
> process of being specced out; the first attempt at an equivalent for
> DT is here:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20191209150748.2471814-1-thierry.reding@gmail.com/
>
> If that's not enough and the SMMU still needs to treat certain Stream
> IDs specially because they may be untranslatable (due to having direct
> access to memory as a side-channel), then that should be handled in
> the SoC-specific corner of the SMMU driver, not delegated to
> individual endpoint drivers.
>
Are you talking about this one for SoC specific change -
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1183530/
Thanks,
Sai
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a
member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-12 6:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-09 18:22 [PATCH 0/3] Request direct mapping for modem firmware subdevice Sibi Sankar
2020-03-09 18:22 ` Sibi Sankar
2020-03-09 18:22 ` [PATCH 1/3] iommu: Export "iommu_request_dm_for_dev" Sibi Sankar
2020-03-09 18:22 ` Sibi Sankar
2020-03-09 18:22 ` [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom: Add modem-firmware bindings Sibi Sankar
2020-03-09 18:22 ` Sibi Sankar
2020-03-09 18:22 ` [PATCH 3/3] remoteproc: qcom_q6v5_mss: Request direct mapping for firmware subdevice Sibi Sankar
2020-03-09 18:22 ` Sibi Sankar
2020-03-10 11:23 ` [PATCH 0/3] Request direct mapping for modem " Joerg Roedel
2020-03-10 11:23 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-03-10 14:00 ` Sibi Sankar
2020-03-10 14:00 ` Sibi Sankar
2020-03-10 16:23 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-03-10 16:23 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-03-10 16:44 ` Robin Murphy
2020-03-10 16:44 ` Robin Murphy
2020-03-12 6:28 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan [this message]
2020-03-12 6:28 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-03-12 12:05 ` Robin Murphy
2020-03-12 12:05 ` Robin Murphy
2020-03-23 9:43 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-03-23 9:43 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-03-16 15:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-16 15:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-16 16:37 ` Sibi Sankar
2020-03-16 16:37 ` Sibi Sankar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ff805c5c647326c5edaddf2efec5cb87@codeaurora.org \
--to=saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ohad@wizery.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=sibis@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.