From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> To: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Axel Haslam <ahaslam@baylibre.com>, Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/5] ARM: DTS: da850: Add cfgchip syscon node Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:53:40 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <m2wpgs5h63.fsf@baylibre.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <8f57109a-a6c6-1559-7195-2a1bc5ad66c3@lechnology.com> (David Lechner's message of "Fri, 28 Oct 2016 12:24:06 -0500") David Lechner <david@lechnology.com> writes: > On 10/28/2016 12:08 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: >> Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> writes: >> >>> On Wednesday 26 October 2016 09:38 PM, David Lechner wrote: >>>> On 10/25/2016 10:06 PM, David Lechner wrote: >>>>> Add a syscon node for the SoC CFGCHIPn registers. This is needed for >>>>> the new usb phy driver. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com> >>>>> --- >>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi | 4 ++++ >>>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi >>>>> index f79e1b9..6bbf20d 100644 >>>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi >>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi >>>>> @@ -188,6 +188,10 @@ >>>>> }; >>>>> >>>>> }; >>>>> + cfgchip: cfgchip@1417c { >>>> >>>> I wonder if there is a more generic name instead of cfgchip@. Is there a >>>> preferred generic name for syscon nodes? >>> >>> I did not find anything in ePAPR, but chip-controller might be more >>> appropriate. >>> >>>> >>>>> + compatible = "ti,da830-cfgchip", "syscon"; >>> >>> Looks like we need "simple-mfd" too in the compatible list? >>> >>> I think we can also fold patch 5/5 into this patch and add the cfgchip >>> along with USB phy child node included. >>> >>> If you respin the patch, I can drop 4/5 and 5/5 that I have queued and >>> included the updated patch instead. >> >> Sekhar, what's your opinion of having this syscon just for CFGCHIP* vs >> a single syscon for the whole SYSCFG0 region. >> >> The drivers/bus driver from Bartosz is also using SYSCFG0 registers, and >> proposing a sysconf ro this region, but it will need to exclude the >> CFGCHIPn registers if we also have this syscon. > > What about the pinmux registers, which are already being used > separately too? I guess I/we need to have a closer look at how these are actually shared and decide if there are really overlapping users. here are several different registers packed into this region, but it may be the case that there really isn't any overlapping usage (e.g. pinmux vs. PHY vs bus priorities, etc.) >> >> I tend to think we should just have one for the whole SYSCFG0 which >> this series could use. >> >> Unfortunately, the PHY driver is already merged and it references the >> syscon by compatible. The PHY driver should probably be fixed to find >> its syscon by phandle, and then maybe we could move to a single syscon >> for SYSCFG0? > > I agree that this should be change, but I was thinking we should use > syscon_node_to_regmap(np->parent) since the phy node should be a child > of the syscon node. Even better. Kevin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: khilman@baylibre.com (Kevin Hilman) To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH v6 4/5] ARM: DTS: da850: Add cfgchip syscon node Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:53:40 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <m2wpgs5h63.fsf@baylibre.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <8f57109a-a6c6-1559-7195-2a1bc5ad66c3@lechnology.com> (David Lechner's message of "Fri, 28 Oct 2016 12:24:06 -0500") David Lechner <david@lechnology.com> writes: > On 10/28/2016 12:08 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: >> Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> writes: >> >>> On Wednesday 26 October 2016 09:38 PM, David Lechner wrote: >>>> On 10/25/2016 10:06 PM, David Lechner wrote: >>>>> Add a syscon node for the SoC CFGCHIPn registers. This is needed for >>>>> the new usb phy driver. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com> >>>>> --- >>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi | 4 ++++ >>>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi >>>>> index f79e1b9..6bbf20d 100644 >>>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi >>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi >>>>> @@ -188,6 +188,10 @@ >>>>> }; >>>>> >>>>> }; >>>>> + cfgchip: cfgchip at 1417c { >>>> >>>> I wonder if there is a more generic name instead of cfgchip at . Is there a >>>> preferred generic name for syscon nodes? >>> >>> I did not find anything in ePAPR, but chip-controller might be more >>> appropriate. >>> >>>> >>>>> + compatible = "ti,da830-cfgchip", "syscon"; >>> >>> Looks like we need "simple-mfd" too in the compatible list? >>> >>> I think we can also fold patch 5/5 into this patch and add the cfgchip >>> along with USB phy child node included. >>> >>> If you respin the patch, I can drop 4/5 and 5/5 that I have queued and >>> included the updated patch instead. >> >> Sekhar, what's your opinion of having this syscon just for CFGCHIP* vs >> a single syscon for the whole SYSCFG0 region. >> >> The drivers/bus driver from Bartosz is also using SYSCFG0 registers, and >> proposing a sysconf ro this region, but it will need to exclude the >> CFGCHIPn registers if we also have this syscon. > > What about the pinmux registers, which are already being used > separately too? I guess I/we need to have a closer look at how these are actually shared and decide if there are really overlapping users. here are several different registers packed into this region, but it may be the case that there really isn't any overlapping usage (e.g. pinmux vs. PHY vs bus priorities, etc.) >> >> I tend to think we should just have one for the whole SYSCFG0 which >> this series could use. >> >> Unfortunately, the PHY driver is already merged and it references the >> syscon by compatible. The PHY driver should probably be fixed to find >> its syscon by phandle, and then maybe we could move to a single syscon >> for SYSCFG0? > > I agree that this should be change, but I was thinking we should use > syscon_node_to_regmap(np->parent) since the phy node should be a child > of the syscon node. Even better. Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-28 20:53 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2016-10-26 3:06 [PATCH v6 0/5] da8xx USB PHY platform devices and clocks David Lechner 2016-10-26 3:06 ` David Lechner 2016-10-26 3:06 ` David Lechner 2016-10-26 3:06 ` [PATCH v6 1/5] ARM: davinci: da8xx: add usb phy clocks David Lechner 2016-10-26 3:06 ` David Lechner 2016-10-26 7:59 ` Sekhar Nori 2016-10-26 7:59 ` Sekhar Nori 2016-10-26 7:59 ` Sekhar Nori 2016-10-26 16:37 ` David Lechner 2016-10-26 16:37 ` David Lechner 2016-10-26 16:37 ` David Lechner 2016-10-26 17:13 ` Sekhar Nori 2016-10-26 17:13 ` Sekhar Nori 2016-10-26 17:13 ` Sekhar Nori 2016-10-26 9:24 ` Sekhar Nori 2016-10-26 9:24 ` Sekhar Nori 2016-10-26 9:24 ` Sekhar Nori 2016-10-26 3:06 ` [PATCH v6 2/5] ARM: davinci: da8xx: Add CFGCHIP syscon platform declaration David Lechner 2016-10-26 3:06 ` David Lechner 2016-10-26 9:58 ` Sekhar Nori 2016-10-26 9:58 ` Sekhar Nori 2016-10-26 9:58 ` Sekhar Nori 2016-10-26 3:06 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] ARM: davinci: da8xx: Add USB PHY " David Lechner 2016-10-26 3:06 ` David Lechner 2016-10-26 3:06 ` [PATCH v6 4/5] ARM: DTS: da850: Add cfgchip syscon node David Lechner 2016-10-26 3:06 ` David Lechner 2016-10-26 3:06 ` David Lechner 2016-10-26 10:19 ` Sekhar Nori 2016-10-26 10:19 ` Sekhar Nori 2016-10-26 10:19 ` Sekhar Nori 2016-10-26 16:08 ` David Lechner 2016-10-26 16:08 ` David Lechner 2016-10-26 16:08 ` David Lechner 2016-10-28 8:21 ` Sekhar Nori 2016-10-28 8:21 ` Sekhar Nori 2016-10-28 8:21 ` Sekhar Nori 2016-10-28 17:08 ` Kevin Hilman 2016-10-28 17:08 ` Kevin Hilman 2016-10-28 17:08 ` Kevin Hilman 2016-10-28 17:24 ` David Lechner 2016-10-28 17:24 ` David Lechner 2016-10-28 17:24 ` David Lechner 2016-10-28 20:53 ` Kevin Hilman [this message] 2016-10-28 20:53 ` Kevin Hilman 2016-10-26 3:06 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] ARM: DTS: da850: Add usb phy node David Lechner 2016-10-26 3:06 ` David Lechner 2016-10-26 10:26 ` Sekhar Nori 2016-10-26 10:26 ` Sekhar Nori 2016-10-26 10:26 ` Sekhar Nori 2016-10-27 15:55 ` David Lechner 2016-10-27 15:55 ` David Lechner
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=m2wpgs5h63.fsf@baylibre.com \ --to=khilman@baylibre.com \ --cc=ahaslam@baylibre.com \ --cc=david@lechnology.com \ --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \ --cc=nsekhar@ti.com \ --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \ --cc=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.