All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Stephen N Chivers <schivers@csc.com.au>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
	linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 01/13] arm: Fix mutual exclusion in arch_gettimeoffset
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 08:55:37 +1100 (AEDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.21.1811140854280.371@nippy.intranet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181113092012.GI30658@n2100.armlinux.org.uk>

On Tue, 13 Nov 2018, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 02:39:00PM +1100, Finn Thain wrote:
> > 
> > You could remove the old arch_gettimeoffset API without dropping any 
> > platforms.
> > 
> > If no-one converts a given platform to the clocksource API it would mean 
> > that the default 'jiffies' clocksource will get used on that platform.
> > 
> > Clock resolution and timer precision would be degraded, but that might not 
> > matter.
> > 
> > Anyway, if someone who has this hardware is willing to test a clocksource 
> > API conversion, they can let me know and I'll attempt that patch.
> 
> There's reasons why that's not appropriate - such as not having two
> separate timers in order to supply a clocksource and separate clock
> event.
> 
> Not all hardware is suited to the clocksource + clockevent idea.
> 

Sorry, I don't follow.

AFAIK, clocksources and clock event devices are orthogonal concepts. There 
are platforms with !ARCH_USES_GETTIMEOFFSET && !GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS (and 
every other combination).

A clocksource read method just provides a cycle count, and in this sense 
arch_gettimeoffset() is equivalent to a clocksource.

If these two arm platforms have an existing clock event device which 
somehow precludes any new clocksources, why doesn't that also render 
arch_gettimeoffset() impossible?

-- 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: fthain@telegraphics.com.au (Finn Thain)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 01/13] arm: Fix mutual exclusion in arch_gettimeoffset
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 08:55:37 +1100 (AEDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.21.1811140854280.371@nippy.intranet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181113092012.GI30658@n2100.armlinux.org.uk>

On Tue, 13 Nov 2018, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 02:39:00PM +1100, Finn Thain wrote:
> > 
> > You could remove the old arch_gettimeoffset API without dropping any 
> > platforms.
> > 
> > If no-one converts a given platform to the clocksource API it would mean 
> > that the default 'jiffies' clocksource will get used on that platform.
> > 
> > Clock resolution and timer precision would be degraded, but that might not 
> > matter.
> > 
> > Anyway, if someone who has this hardware is willing to test a clocksource 
> > API conversion, they can let me know and I'll attempt that patch.
> 
> There's reasons why that's not appropriate - such as not having two
> separate timers in order to supply a clocksource and separate clock
> event.
> 
> Not all hardware is suited to the clocksource + clockevent idea.
> 

Sorry, I don't follow.

AFAIK, clocksources and clock event devices are orthogonal concepts. There 
are platforms with !ARCH_USES_GETTIMEOFFSET && !GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS (and 
every other combination).

A clocksource read method just provides a cycle count, and in this sense 
arch_gettimeoffset() is equivalent to a clocksource.

If these two arm platforms have an existing clock event device which 
somehow precludes any new clocksources, why doesn't that also render 
arch_gettimeoffset() impossible?

-- 

  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-13 21:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-12  4:12 [RFC PATCH 00/13] m68k: Drop arch_gettimeoffset and adopt clocksource API Finn Thain
2018-11-12  4:12 ` [RFC PATCH 08/13] m68k: atari: Convert to " Finn Thain
2018-11-12  4:12 ` [RFC PATCH 04/13] m68k: mac: Clean up unused timer definitions Finn Thain
2018-11-12  4:12 ` [RFC PATCH 10/13] m68k: hp300: Convert to clocksource API Finn Thain
2018-11-12  4:12 ` [RFC PATCH 11/13] m68k: mac: " Finn Thain
2018-11-12  4:12 ` [RFC PATCH 01/13] arm: Fix mutual exclusion in arch_gettimeoffset Finn Thain
2018-11-12  4:12   ` Finn Thain
2018-11-12  8:34   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-12  8:34     ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-13  3:39     ` Finn Thain
2018-11-13  3:39       ` Finn Thain
2018-11-13  9:20       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-11-13  9:20         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-11-13 21:55         ` Finn Thain [this message]
2018-11-13 21:55           ` Finn Thain
2018-11-13 23:43           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-11-13 23:43             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-11-14  1:35             ` Michael Schmitz
2018-11-14  1:35               ` Michael Schmitz
2018-11-14  7:58               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-11-14  7:58                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-11-15  1:34                 ` Michael Schmitz
2018-11-15  1:34                   ` Michael Schmitz
2018-11-14  3:17             ` Finn Thain
2018-11-14  3:17               ` Finn Thain
2018-11-14 14:16               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-11-14 14:16                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-11-14 14:58                 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-11-14 14:58                   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-11-14 18:11                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-11-14 18:11                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-11-15  4:12                 ` Finn Thain
2018-11-15  4:12                   ` Finn Thain
2018-11-16 17:47                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-11-16 17:47                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-11-16 22:49                     ` Finn Thain
2018-11-16 22:49                       ` Finn Thain
2018-11-17  3:00                       ` Michael Schmitz
2018-11-17  3:00                         ` Michael Schmitz
2018-11-14 12:05   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-11-14 12:05     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-11-12  4:12 ` [RFC PATCH 02/13] m68k: " Finn Thain
2018-11-12  4:12 ` [RFC PATCH 07/13] m68k: amiga: Convert to clocksource API Finn Thain
2018-11-12  9:02   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-11-12  9:21     ` Finn Thain
2018-11-12  4:12 ` [RFC PATCH 09/13] m68k: bvme6000: " Finn Thain
2018-11-12  4:12 ` [RFC PATCH 06/13] m68k: Drop ARCH_USES_GETTIMEOFFSET Finn Thain
2018-11-12  9:00   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-11-12  9:06     ` Finn Thain
2018-11-13  2:29       ` Michael Schmitz
2018-11-13  3:14         ` Finn Thain
2018-11-13  4:50           ` Michael Schmitz
2018-11-13  6:15             ` Finn Thain
2018-11-13  8:24               ` Michael Schmitz
2018-11-13 22:11                 ` Finn Thain
2018-11-14  1:08                   ` Michael Schmitz
2018-11-14  2:58                     ` Michael Schmitz
2018-11-14 23:54                       ` Michael Schmitz
2018-11-15  4:37                         ` Finn Thain
2018-11-15  6:35                         ` Michael Schmitz
2018-11-16  0:04                           ` Finn Thain
2018-11-12  4:12 ` [RFC PATCH 13/13] m68k: mvme16x: Convert to clocksource API Finn Thain
2018-11-12 18:37   ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-11-13  0:11     ` Finn Thain
2018-11-13 22:04       ` Finn Thain
2018-11-13 22:10         ` [RFC PATCH 13/13] m68k: mvme16x: Convert to clocksource APIy Thomas Gleixner
2018-11-13 22:33           ` Finn Thain
2018-11-18 17:12             ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-11-12  4:12 ` [RFC PATCH 03/13] m68k: mac: Fix VIA timer counter accesses Finn Thain
2018-11-12  4:12 ` [RFC PATCH 12/13] m68k: mvme147: Convert to clocksource API Finn Thain
2018-11-12  4:12 ` [RFC PATCH 05/13] m68k: apollo, q40, sun3, sun3x: Remove arch_gettimeoffset implementations Finn Thain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LNX.2.21.1811140854280.371@nippy.intranet \
    --to=fthain@telegraphics.com.au \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=schivers@csc.com.au \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.